pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.08498 · v1 · pith:M3OM6FVSnew · submitted 2019-07-19 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · physics.optics

Dynamic multi-focus laser writing with acousto-optofluidics

A. Zunino , S. Surdo , M. Duocastella This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 18:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph physics.optics
keywords laser writingmulti-focusacousto-opticsultrasound diffractionhigh-throughput processingmaterial modificationwettability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ultrasound waves in a liquid diffract a laser beam into multiple tunable foci with sub-microsecond control.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that ultrasound can be used to split a single laser beam into several focused spots whose positions and number can be changed rapidly by adjusting the sound wave. This replaces the usual slow single-beam scanning with parallel processing. The method is demonstrated by changing the shape and water-repelling properties of metals, polymers, and ceramics at high speed when the sample is moved. A sympathetic reader would care because many laser applications are limited by how fast the beam can be moved across the material.

Core claim

Ultrasound waves propagating in a liquid diffract an incoming laser into multiple beamlets whose distribution can be tuned by changing the amplitude, frequency, or phase of the ultrasound, achieving control times below one microsecond; when the sample is translated, this dynamic splitting enables high-throughput laser processing as shown by local modification of morphology and wettability on metals, polymers, and ceramics.

What carries the argument

Acousto-optofluidic diffraction, where ultrasound in a liquid acts as a tunable grating to split the laser light into multiple foci.

If this is right

  • Sequential single-beam scanning can be replaced by parallel multi-focus writing.
  • Multi-focus distributions can be adjusted in sub-microsecond times.
  • High-throughput processing is possible across metals, polymers, and ceramics.
  • Local changes to morphology and wettability can be achieved at higher speeds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar acousto-optofluidic splitting could be applied to imaging systems for faster scanning.
  • Optical trapping setups might benefit from rapid multi-particle manipulation using the same principle.
  • Integration challenges with translation stages may limit applicability to certain high-precision tasks.

Load-bearing premise

The liquid and transducer can be combined with moving the sample without losing enough beam quality or focus stability to still produce the desired material changes.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing that the laser spots lose focus or intensity too much during sample translation to achieve consistent morphological changes on the tested materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.08498 by A. Zunino, M. Duocastella, S. Surdo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Laser multi-focus generation with acousto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temporal characteristics of the AOF multi-focus generator. (a) Images of multi-focus distributions acquired with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Experimental and computational study of the diffraction efficiency as a function of the main driving parameters: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Materials processing with AOF-enabled LDW workstation. (a) Result of multi-focus laser ablation of chromium for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Laser writing of materials is normally performed by the sequential scanning of a single focused beam across a sample. This process is time-consuming and it can severely limit the throughput of laser systems in key applications such as surgery, microelectronics, or manufacturing. Here we report a parallelization strategy based on ultrasound waves in a liquid to diffract light into multiple beamlets. Adjusting amplitude, frequency, or phase of ultrasound allows tunable multi-focus distributions with sub-microsecond control. When combined with sample translation, the dynamic splitting of light leads to high-throughput laser processing, as demonstrated by locally modifying the morphological and wettability properties of metals, polymers, and ceramics. The results illustrate how acousto-optofluidic systems are universal tools for fast multi-focus generation, with potential impact in fields such as imaging or optical trapping.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes an acousto-optofluidic technique in which ultrasound waves in a liquid cell diffract an incident laser beam into multiple tunable foci. Control of ultrasound amplitude, frequency, or phase enables sub-microsecond reconfiguration of the multi-focus pattern. When this dynamic splitting is combined with sample translation, the approach is claimed to enable high-throughput laser processing, demonstrated by morphological and wettability modifications on metals, polymers, and ceramics via SEM, AFM, and contact-angle measurements.

Significance. If validated, the method provides a compact, electronically tunable route to parallel laser writing that avoids fixed diffractive optics or mechanical scanners. The experimental demonstrations across three material classes support versatility, and the sub-microsecond response follows directly from acoustic timescales. The work supplies concrete optical and material data, but the absence of quantitative throughput metrics (processing rate, area coverage, or benchmark comparisons) limits evaluation of the claimed high-throughput advantage.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results] Results section on translated exposures: the central high-throughput claim is supported only by qualitative SEM/AFM images and contact-angle data showing local modifications; no measured processing speeds (e.g., mm²/s), error bars on coverage rates, or direct comparison to single-beam scanning are reported. This quantitative gap is load-bearing for the assertion that dynamic splitting plus translation yields high throughput.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Experimental Setup] Experimental Setup: transducer driving electronics and liquid-cell alignment tolerances are described at a high level; additional parameters (e.g., acoustic power calibration, beam quality after cell traversal) would aid reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: several multi-focus pattern images lack intensity scale bars or quantitative line profiles, making it difficult to assess focus uniformity and contrast.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section on translated exposures: the central high-throughput claim is supported only by qualitative SEM/AFM images and contact-angle data showing local modifications; no measured processing speeds (e.g., mm²/s), error bars on coverage rates, or direct comparison to single-beam scanning are reported. This quantitative gap is load-bearing for the assertion that dynamic splitting plus translation yields high throughput.

    Authors: We agree that the high-throughput assertion would be strengthened by quantitative metrics. The manuscript emphasizes the acousto-optofluidic mechanism and sub-microsecond tunability, with the translated-exposure results serving as proof-of-principle demonstrations across materials. In revision we will add explicit calculations of areal processing rate (using the reported translation speeds and number of foci), error bars on coverage estimates, and a direct comparison to equivalent single-beam scanning under the same laser parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely experimental demonstration

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental report on acousto-optofluidic multi-focus generation and material processing. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or predictive models appear in the abstract or described sections. All claims (tunable beamlets via ultrasound amplitude/frequency/phase, sub-microsecond control, high-throughput processing via translation, and morphological/wettability changes) rest on direct experimental observations (SEM/AFM/contact-angle data across metals/polymers/ceramics) rather than any reduction to self-defined inputs or self-citations. The acoustic response time provides an independent physical basis for the timing claim, with no load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the abstract; the work rests on standard acousto-optic diffraction and fluidic transmission of ultrasound.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5671 in / 1068 out tokens · 23430 ms · 2026-05-24T18:53:13.487352+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Solution of the wave equation in the acoustic cavity Propagation of acoustic waves in a viscous medium, water in our case, is governed by the damped acoustic wave equation [20, 31], which for a single axis can be written as ∂2ρ ∂t2− ∂2 ∂x2 ( ν ∂ρ ∂t + c2 sρ ) = 0, (A1) where ν is the kinematic viscosity of water,cs is the speed of sound in water and ρ is ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    to convert the variations of density into variations of refractive index: n(ρm) = n0 + ∂n ∂ρ ⏐⏐⏐⏐ ρ0 ρm = n0 + n4 0 + n2 0− 2 6n0 ρm ρ0 , (A4) where n0 and ρ0 are, respectively, the static refractive index and density of water. Combining equations A3 and A4 it is possible to obtain an analytic expression for the instantaneous refractive index in the cavit...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Considering visible light, and a typical driving frequency of 1 MHz (with a corresponding wavelength of the acoustic wave of about 8 1.5 mm), in our experiments Q≈ 0.03

    Acousto-optic interaction regime To determine the type of diffraction that occurs when a beam passes through the AOF device, we can use the Klein-Cook parameter defined as [32]: Q = 2πλl n0Λ2 (A6) being λ the wavelength of the laser beam, l the length of the piezoelectric plate (≈ 2 cm in current design), and Λ the wavelength of the acoustic wave. Consideri...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Calculation of the diffraction intensity The equation of a Gaussian beam traveling along the z-axis is given by E(r, z) = E0 w0 w(z) exp [−(r− r0)2 w2(z) ] × × exp [ −i ( κz + κ r2 2R(z)− ψ(z) )] (A7) where w0 is the beam waist, w the beam width, κ is the wave number, R is the radius of curvature, and ψ is the Guoy phase factor. The optical path length tra...

    work page

  5. [5]

    From the temporal character- ization of the AOF device, we obtained the intensity of each diffracted order as a function of time (Figure 2b) in the main text)

    Measurement of the change in refractive index The good agreement between experimental results and model allowed us to calculate the change in refractive in- dex induced in the cavity. From the temporal character- ization of the AOF device, we obtained the intensity of each diffracted order as a function of time (Figure 2b) in the main text). By using equat...

    work page

  6. [6]

    T. C. Chong, M. H. Hong, and L. P. Shi, Laser precision engineering: From microfabrication to nanoprocessing, Laser & Photonics Reviews 4, 123 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Duocastella and C

    M. Duocastella and C. B. Arnold, Bessel and annular beams for materials processing, Laser & Photonics Re- views 6, 607 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Osellame, H

    R. Osellame, H. J. Hoekstra, G. Cerullo, and M. Pollnau, Femtosecond laser microstructuring: An enabling tool for optofluidic lab-on-chips, Laser & Photonics Reviews 5, 442 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Piqu´ e, R

    A. Piqu´ e, R. C. Auyeung, H. Kim, N. A. Charipar, and S. A. Mathews, Laser 3D micro-manufacturing, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 49, 223001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Sahin, E

    R. Sahin, E. Simsek, and S. Akturk, Nanoscale patterning of graphene through femtosecond laser ablation, Applied Physics Letters 104, 053118 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Eggeling, A

    C. Eggeling, A. Chmyrov, S. W. Hell, T. Grotjohann, M. Ratz, S. Jakobs, J. Keller, and E. d’Este, Nanoscopy with more than 100,000 ’doughnuts’, Nature Methods10, 737 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Kuroiwa, N

    Y. Kuroiwa, N. Takeshima, Y. Narita, S. Tanaka, and K. Hirao, Arbitrary micropatterning method in femtosec- ond laser microprocessing using diffractive optical ele- ments, Optics Express 12, 1908 (2004)

    work page 1908

  13. [13]

    Nakata, T

    Y. Nakata, T. Okada, and M. Maeda, Lithographical laser ablation using femtosecond laser, Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing 79, 1481 (2004)

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    Cheng, J

    A. Cheng, J. T. Gon¸ calves, P. Golshani, K. Arisaka, and C. Portera-Cailliau, Simultaneous two-photon calcium imaging at different depths with spatiotemporal multi- plexing, Nature Methods 8, 139 (2011)

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    M. A. Dugan, J. X. Tull, and W. S. Warren, High- resolution acousto-optic shaping of unamplified and am- plified femtosecond laser pulses, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 14, 2348 (1997)

    work page 1997

  16. [16]

    H¨ afner, J

    T. H¨ afner, J. Strauß, C. Roider, J. Heberle, and M. Schmidt, Tailored laser beam shaping for efficient and accurate microstructuring, Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing 124, 10.1007/s00339-017-1530-0 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-017-1530-0 2018

  17. [17]

    Obata, J

    K. Obata, J. Koch, U. Hinze, and B. N. Chichkov, Multi- focus two-photon polymerization technique based on in- dividually controlled phase modulation, Optics Express 18, 17193 (2010)

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    B. Sun, P. S. Salter, C. Roider, A. Jesacher, J. Strauss, J. Heberle, M. Schmidt, and M. J. Booth, Four- dimensional light shaping: Manipulating ultrafast spa- tiotemporal foci in space and time, Light: Science and Applications 7, 17117 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    K. An, S. Hong, S. Han, H. Lee, J. Yeo, and S. H. Ko, Selective sintering of metal nanoparticle ink for maskless fabrication of an electrode micropattern using a spatially modulated laser beam by a digital micromirror device, ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 6, 2786 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Q. Geng, D. Wang, P. Chen, and S. C. Chen, Ultrafast multi-focus 3-D nano-fabrication based on two-photon polymerization, Nature Communications 10, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Piazza, P

    S. Piazza, P. Bianchini, C. Sheppard, A. Diaspro, and M. Duocastella, Enhanced volumetric imaging in 2- photon microscopy via acoustic lens beam shaping, Jour- nal of Biophotonics 11, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    L. Kong, J. Tang, J. P. Little, Y. Yu, T. L¨ ammermann, C. P. Lin, R. N. Germain, and M. Cui, Continuous vol- umetric imaging via an optical phase-locked ultrasound lens, Nature Methods 12, 759 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Duocastella and C

    M. Duocastella and C. B. Arnold, Enhanced depth of field laser processing using an ultra-high-speed axial scanner, Applied Physics Letters 102, 061113 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    T.-H. Chen, R. Fardel, and C. B. Arnold, Ultrafast z- scanning for high-efficiency laser micro-machining, Light: Science & Applications 7, 17181 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Surdo and M

    S. Surdo and M. Duocastella, Fast Acoustic Light Sculpt- ing for On-demand Maskless Lithography, Advanced Sci- ence , 1900304 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Ohtsuka, Y

    Y. Ohtsuka, Y. Arima, and Y. Imai, Acoustooptic 2-D profile shaping of a Gaussian laser beam, Applied Optics 24, 2813 (1985)

    work page 1985

  27. [27]

    Maydan, Acoustooptical pulse modulators, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 6, 15 (1970)

    D. Maydan, Acoustooptical pulse modulators, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 6, 15 (1970)

    work page 1970

  28. [28]

    R. V. Johnson, Temporal response of the acoustooptic modulator in the high scattering efficiency regime, Ap- plied Optics 18, 903 (1979)

    work page 1979

  29. [29]

    R. N. Wenzel, Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 28, 988 (1936)

    work page 1936

  30. [30]

    Eduok, O

    U. Eduok, O. Faye, and J. Szpunar, Recent developments and applications of protective silicone coatings: A review of PDMS functional materials, Progress in Organic Coat- ings 111, 124 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Surdo, A

    S. Surdo, A. Diaspro, and M. Duocastella, Microlens fabrication by replica molding of frozen laser-printed droplets, Applied Surface Science 418, 554 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    S. Hong, J. Yeo, G. Kim, D. Kim, H. Lee, J. Kwon, H. Lee, P. Lee, and S. H. Ko, Nonvacuum , Maskless Fabrication of a Flexible Metal Grid Transparent Con- ductor by Low-Temperature Selective Laser Sintering of Nanoparticle Ink, ACS Nano 7, 5024 (2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Fischer and M

    J. Fischer and M. Wegener, Three-dimensional optical laser lithography beyond the diffraction limit, Laser & Photonics Reviews 7, 22 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Trypogeorgos, T

    D. Trypogeorgos, T. Harte, A. Bonnin, and C. Foot, Pre- cise shaping of laser light by an acousto-optic deflector, Optics Express 21, 8619 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    J. H. Cantrell, L. Adler, and W. T. Yost, Subharmonic generation, chaos, and subharmonic resurrection in an acoustically driven fluid-filled cavity, Chaos 25, 023115 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    McLeod and C

    E. McLeod and C. B. Arnold, Mechanics and refractive power optimization of tunable acoustic gradient lenses, Journal of Applied Physics 102, 1 (2007)

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    W. R. Klein and B. D. Cook, Unified Approach to Ul- trasonic Light Diffraction, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics 14, 123 (1967)

    work page 1967

  38. [38]

    C. V. Raman and N. S. Nagendra Nath, The diffraction of light by high frequency sound waves: Part I, Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Section A 2, 406 (1935)

    work page 1935

  39. [39]

    Svelto, Principles of Lasers , 5th ed

    O. Svelto, Principles of Lasers , 5th ed. (Springer Verlag, 2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Goodman, Introduction To Fourier Optics , 4th ed

    J. Goodman, Introduction To Fourier Optics , 4th ed. (W.H. Freeman, 2017)

    work page 2017