Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 2 cited by

A sharp isoperimetric inequality and the top order $Q$-curvature

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Q-curvature sign fixes isoperimetric ratio in all dimensions

desk verdict Solid paper with a genuinely new sign-determination theorem; the isoperimetric inequality is a clean consequence. Deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06951 v1 pith:M63OBXAD submitted 2026-07-08 math.DG math.AP

Mingxiang Li , Xingwang Xu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.AP
keywords fracmathbbomegacurvatureorderinequalitypartialsharp
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that for a smooth complete conformally flat metric on R^n (n ≥ 2), the sign of the top-order Q-curvature determines the sign of the sectional curvature. This bridge then yields a sharp isoperimetric inequality: when Q-curvature is non-negative, the isoperimetric ratio equals 1 minus the normalized total Q-curvature, exactly generalizing the classical two-dimensional Fiala-Huber formula to arbitrary dimension. When Q-curvature is non-positive and the Cartan-Hadamard conjecture is assumed, the Euclidean isoperimetric inequality holds with ratio exactly 1.

What carries the argument

The normal metric integral representation (1.6) of the conformal factor as a logarithmic potential against the Q-curvature measure; differentiation of this potential to express sectional curvature integrally; Hölder's inequality applied to that integral to transfer the sign of Q to the sign of sectional curvature; Bishop-Gromov volume comparison and Brendle's isoperimetric inequality to convert the curvature sign into a sharp isoperimetric bound.

What would settle it

A smooth complete conformal metric on R^n with non-negative Q-curvature but somewhere-negative sectional curvature would break the sign-transfer theorem and collapse the isoperimetric inequality. Alternatively, a complete normal metric with non-negative Q-curvature whose isoperimetric ratio is strictly below 1 − α_0 would contradict Theorem 1.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central mechanism is an integral representation of the conformal factor u as a logarithmic potential against the Q-curvature measure. Differentiating this representation twice and inserting the result into the standard conformal-change formula for sectional curvature converts the sign of Q-curvature directly into the sign of sectional curvature via Hölder's inequality. Once non-negative sectional (hence Ricci) curvature is established, Brendle's isoperimetric inequality for manifolds with non-negative Ricci curvature combines with a volume-ratio lower bound tied to the total Q-curvature to pin the isoperimetric ratio to 1 − α_0 from below, while a pre-existing identity of Chang-Qing-Yang

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument rests on the integral representation (1.6) — the so-called normal metric condition — which lets one write the conformal factor as a logarithmic potential of Q-curvature. Without this representation, the sign-transfer from Q-curvature to sectional curvature and the asymptotic identity used to bound the isoperimetric ratio both fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The sharp Sobolev inequality on (R^n, g) follows with constant (1 − α_0)^{(n-1)/n} times the Euclidean sharp constant, extending the isoperimetric result to functional inequalities.
  • The volume ratio at infinity V_g(B^g_r(0)) / (|B^n| r^n) is forced to equal exactly (1 − α_0)^{n-1} when Q-curvature is non-negative, resolving the liminf of Theorem 4.1 to an equality.
  • The conjectured formula I_g = 1 − 2/((n-1)!|S^n|) ∫ (Q_g^{(n)})^+ dμ_g would extend the result to metrics with sign-changing Q-curvature, generalizing Huber's inequality (1.2).
  • The sign-transfer result (Q-sign → sectional-curvature-sign) may constrain the moduli of complete normal conformal metrics on R^n, since non-negative Q-curvature forces non-negative sectional curvature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper establishes a sharp isoperimetric inequality for complete normal conformal metrics $g = e^{2u}|dx|^2$ on $R^n$ ($n >= 2$) with non-negative top-order $Q$-curvature. The main result, Theorem 1.1, states that the isoperimetric ratio $I_g$ equals $1 - alpha_0$, where $alpha_0$ is the normalized total $Q$-curvature. The proof strategy is as follows: (1) Theorem 1.2 shows that the sign of $Q_g^{(n)}$ determines the sign of the sectional curvature, via a direct computation using the integral representation (1.6) and Holder's inequality; (2) Theorem 4.1 establishes a lower bound on the volume ratio $liminf_{r to infty} V_g(B_r^g(0))/(|B^n|r^n) >= (1-alpha_0)^{n-1}$, using strong $A_infty$ weight techniques and comparison with the radially symmetric metric $bar g$; (3) Theorem 1.1 then follows by combining the non-negative Ricci curvature (from Theorem 1.2) with Brendle's isoperimetric inequality (1.4) for the lower bound, and the Chang-Qing-Yang identity (1.8) for the upper bound. A conditional result (Theorem 1.3) for non-positive $Q$-curvature is also given, assuming the Cartan-Hadamard conjecture. The paper also includes a lower bound on sectional curvature in terms of scalar curvature (Theorem 3.3) and a sharp Sobolev inequality (Corollary 5.1).

Significance. The paper addresses a natural question raised by Chang regarding the relationship between isoperimetric inequalities and $Q$-curvature integrals. The main result, Theorem 1.1, provides a clean and sharp answer in the non-negative $Q$-curvature setting, generalizing the classical 2D Fiala-Huber inequality to all dimensions. The key new ingredient is Theorem 1.2, which establishes that the sign of the top-order $Q$-curvature controls the sign of the sectional curvature for complete normal metrics. This is a strong and somewhat surprising geometric rigidity result. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is assembled from independent ingredients: the sign-determination (Theorem 1.2, new), the volume ratio lower bound (Theorem 4.1, new), Brendle's isoperimetric inequality [7], and the Chang-Qing-Yang identity [12, 33]. The argument is not circular: the upper bound on $I_g$ comes from the identity (1.8), and the lower bound comes from Brendle's inequality combined with the new volume ratio estimate. Theorem 3.3 (sectional curvature lower bound in terms of scalar curvature) and Corollary 5.1 (sharp Sobolev inequality) are additional contributions. The conjecture stated at the end (involving only the $Q

major comments (2)
  1. Theorem 3.2 states the hypothesis $alpha_0 <= 2$, but for complete normal metrics, Lemma 3.1 (the Cohn-Vossen inequality) gives $alpha_0 <= 1$. The proof of Theorem 3.2 for the non-negative $Q$-curvature case yields $e^{2u}K_g >= (2-alpha_0) int ... >= 0$, which is valid under the weaker hypothesis $alpha_0 <= 2$. However, since the paper only applies Theorem 3.2 in the context of complete normal metrics (where $alpha_0 <= 1$), the stated hypothesis $alpha_0 <= 2$ is somewhat misleading. The authors should clarify whether Theorem 3.2 is intended to apply to a broader class of metrics where only $alpha_0 <= 2$ is assumed, or whether this is simply a non-optimal bound. This does not affect the validity of the main results but affects the precise scope of Theorem 3.2.
  2. Several technical lemmas in Section 2 (Lemmas 2.1, 2.3, 2.5, 2.7) are stated with proofs that are sketched or referenced to the first author's prior preprints [26, 27]. For instance, Lemma 2.5 is a key ingredient (used in Lemma 2.6, Lemma 4.7, and Lemma 4.8), and its proof involves a delicate Jensen's inequality argument with a parameter $epsilon$ (equations 2.11-2.12). While the argument appears correct, the key estimate $limsup_{epsilon to 0} oint_{partial B_1} (|xi_0|/|xi-xi_0|)^epsilon dsigma <= 1$ should be verified more carefully for $n=2$ (where $partial B_1$ is a circle and the singularity is $1/|xi-xi_0|$). The authors should ensure that the dominated convergence or uniform integrability argument is valid in this borderline case, or restrict the relevant lemmas to $n >= 3$ if needed.
minor comments (8)
  1. The abstract and Theorem 1.1 use $mathbb{B}^n$ and $mathbb{S}^n$ while the body text uses $B^n$ and $S^n$. Notation should be unified.
  2. In the proof of Lemma 2.1, the splitting uses $A_1 = B_1(x)$, $A_2 = B_{log|x|}(0)$, $A_3 = R^n setminus (A_1 cup A_2)$. The condition $|x| >= e^4$ is used to ensure $|x| >= 2 log|x|$, but the interaction between $A_1$ and $A_2$ when $|x|$ is large should be clarified (they may overlap).
  3. Theorem 3.3 uses the notation $Q_g^{(2k)}$ for the $2k$-th order $Q$-curvature, but the main body uses $Q_g^{(n)}$ for the top-order. The relationship between $2k$ and $n$ in Theorem 3.3 should be stated more explicitly (the text says $1 <= k < n/2$).
  4. In equation (3.1), the formula for the sectional curvature under conformal change is standard but the sign convention should be checked against the reference [5] (Besse).
  5. Lemma 5.4 proves $I_g <= 1$ by taking $r to 0$, which is a standard argument. The notation $o(1)$ in the ratio is slightly confusing since it is $r to 0$, not $r to infty$.
  6. The reference to 'Theorem 1.4 in [27]' in Remark 5.3 refers to a preprint; the authors should verify the final published reference if available.
  7. Typo in the proof of Theorem 3.2: 'This if $Q_g^{(n)} <= 0$' should be 'Thus if $Q_g^{(n)} <= 0$'.
  8. In the proof of Lemma 4.7, the variable $y_r$ is defined by $B_{|y_r|}(0) = B_r^{bar g}(0)$, but the relationship between $|y_r|$ and $r$ should be clarified (they are not equal in general).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained with independent external support

full rationale

The central claim I_g = 1 - α_0 is bounded above by the Chang-Qing-Yang identity (1.8) [12, 33] and below by Brendle's isoperimetric inequality (1.4) [7], both independent external results. The new ingredient is Theorem 3.2 (sign of Q-curvature determines sign of sectional curvature), proved directly from the integral representation (1.6) and Hölder's inequality without circular dependency. The volume ratio estimate (Theorem 4.1) uses the strong A∞ weight property from [6, 41] and standard comparison arguments. Self-citations [26, 27, 28, 29] provide technical lemmas about asymptotic behavior of the conformal factor, but these are reproved or sketched in Section 2 for self-containment. Proposition 5.2 uses Theorem 1.1 but is a separate corollary, not part of the proof chain for Theorem 1.1 itself. No step reduces to its own inputs by construction. The only minor concern is that several technical lemmas cite the first author's prior work, but these are independently verifiable estimates, not load-bearing uniqueness claims or fitted parameters renamed as predictions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or postulated objects. All mathematical objects (Q-curvature, sectional curvature, isoperimetric ratio, conformal factor) are standard in conformal geometry. The normal metric condition is a standard definition in the Q-curvature literature. No free parameters are fitted or tuned.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Normal metric assumption: the conformal factor u satisfies the integral representation (1.6) with Green's function for (-Δ)^{n/2}
    This is the central structural assumption of the paper. Without it, the Chang-Qing-Yang identity (1.8) fails and the integral of Q-curvature can be arbitrary (stated explicitly in the introduction). Invoked throughout, especially in Section 2 and the proof of Theorem 3.2.
  • standard math Brendle's isoperimetric inequality (1.4) for manifolds with non-negative Ricci curvature
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.1 to obtain the lower bound I_g ≥ (AVR(g))^{1/(n-1)}. This is a published result [7] from 2023.
  • standard math Chang-Qing-Yang identity (1.8): the asymptotic isoperimetric ratio equals 1 - α_0 for complete normal metrics
    Provides the upper bound I_g ≤ 1 - α_0 in the proof of Theorem 1.1. Published result from [12, 33].
  • domain assumption Cartan-Hadamard conjecture (for Theorem 1.3 only)
    Theorem 1.3 explicitly assumes this conjecture holds. It is verified only for n ≤ 4. This is a conditional result.
  • domain assumption Q_g^{(n)} e^{nu} ∈ L^1(R^n) and the metric is complete
    Finite total Q-curvature and completeness are standing assumptions throughout. Invoked for integrability in all estimates in Section 2.
  • standard math Strong A∞ weight property of e^{nu} when α_0 < 1 (Lemma 4.4)
    Used in Section 4 to compare geodesic distances and volumes between g and its radial symmetrization ḡ. Proven by Bonk-Heinonen-Saksman [6] and extended by Wang [41].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A sharp isoperimetric inequality and the top order $Q$-curvature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M63OBXAD

@misc{pith2026260706951,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A sharp isoperimetric inequality and the top order $Q$-curvature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M63OBXAD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06951}
}
abstract

For a smooth, complete and normal metric $g = e^{2u}|dx|^2$ with finite total $n$-th order $Q$-curvature on $\mathbb{R}^n$ with dimension $n \geq 2$, we first show that everywhere non-negativity (resp. non-positivity) $n$-th order $Q$-curvature $Q_g^{(n)}$ implies everywhere non-negativity (resp. non-positivity) of the sectional curvature. Based on this fact, we secondly show that, once $Q_g^{(n)}$ is non-negative, then for any compact domain $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ with smooth boundary $\partial\Omega$, the following sharp isoperimetric inequality holds: $$|\partial\Omega|_g^{\frac{n}{n-1}} \geq n^{\frac{n}{n-1}} |\mathbb{B}^n|^{\frac{1}{n-1}} \left(1 - \frac{2}{(n-1)!\,|\mathbb{S}^n|} \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} Q_g^{(n)} \, d\mu_g\right) |\Omega|_g.$$ The third claim in this article is that, if the $n$-th order $Q$-curvature, $Q_g^{(n)}$, is non-positive and under the main assumption that Cartan-Hadamard conjecture holds true, then we have the sharp inequality $$|\partial\Omega|_g^{\frac{n}{n-1}} \geq n^{\frac{n}{n-1}} |\mathbb{B}^n|^{\frac{1}{n-1}}|\Omega|_g.$$

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Positivity and non-positivity results for the sixth-order $Q$-curvature of conformal metrics in $\mathbb{R}^n$

    math.DG 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Under nonnegative top-order Q-curvature, Q^(6) is positive for 2m ≤ n ≤ 4m−6, but fails at some point for all n > N_m ≈ 10.55m, refuting the positivity conjecture.

  2. Bonnet-Myers type theorems for $Q$-curvature on four-manifolds

    math.DG 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Complete four-manifolds with R ≥ c>0 and Q ≥ c'>0 are compact; if Q/R ≥ k>0 then diameter ≤ 4π/√(15k).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [7]

    M. Bonk, J. Heinonen, E. Saksman, Logarithmic potentials, quasiconformal flows, and Q-curvature, Duke Math. J. 142 (2008) 197–239

    work page 2008

  2. [1]

    Agostiniani, M

    V. Agostiniani, M. Fogagnolo, L. Mazzieri, Sharp geometric inequalities for closed hy- persurfaces in manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature, Invent. Math. 222 (2020), no. 3, 1033–1101

    work page 2020

  3. [2]

    Balogh, A

    Z. Balogh, A. Krist´ aly, Sharp isoperimetric and Sobolev inequalities in spaces with nonnegative Ricci curvature, Math. Ann. 385 (2023), no. 3-4, 1747–1773

    work page 2023

  4. [3]

    Beckenbach, T

    E. Beckenbach, T. Rad´ o, Subharmonic functions and surfaces of negative curvature, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 35 (1933), no. 3, 662–674

    work page 1933

  5. [4]

    Benjamini, J

    I. Benjamini, J. Cao, A new isoperimetric comparison theorem for surfaces of variable curvature, Duke Math. J. 85 (1996), no. 2, 359–396

    work page 1996

  6. [5]

    Besse, Einstein manifolds, Ergeb

    A. Besse, Einstein manifolds, Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3), 10, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,

    work page

  7. [6]

    ISBN:3-540-15279-2

    xii+510 pp. ISBN:3-540-15279-2

    work page

  8. [8]

    Brendle, Sobolev inequalities in manifolds with nonnegative curvature, Comm

    S. Brendle, Sobolev inequalities in manifolds with nonnegative curvature, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (2023), no. 9, 2192–2218

    work page 2023

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Bol, Isoperimetrische Ungleichungen f¨ ur Bereiche auf Fl¨ achen, Jber

    G. Bol, Isoperimetrische Ungleichungen f¨ ur Bereiche auf Fl¨ achen, Jber. Deutsch. Math.-Verein. 51 (1941), 219–257

    1941

  2. [10]

    Caffarelli, L

    L. Caffarelli, L. Silvestre, An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 32 (2007), no. 7-9, 1245–1260

    2007

  3. [11]

    Cavalletti, A

    F. Cavalletti, A. Mondino, Sharp and rigid isoperimetric inequalities in metric- measure spaces with lower Ricci curvature bounds, Invent. Math. 208 (2017), no. 3, 803–849

    2017

  4. [12]

    Chang, M

    A. Chang, M. Gonz´ alez, Fractional Laplacian in conformal geometry, Adv. Math. 226 (2011), no. 2, 1410–1432. 32 MINGXIANG LI, XINGWANG XU

    2011

  5. [13]

    Chang, J

    A. Chang, J. Qing, P. Yang, On the Chern-Gauss-Bonnet integral for conformal metrics onR 4, Duke Math. J. 103 (2000), no. 3, 523–544

    2000

  6. [14]

    Cohn-Vossen, K¨ urzeste Wege und Totalkr¨ ummung auf Fl¨ achen, Compositio Math

    S. Cohn-Vossen, K¨ urzeste Wege und Totalkr¨ ummung auf Fl¨ achen, Compositio Math. 2 (1935), 69–133

    1935

  7. [15]

    Croke, A sharp four-dimensional isoperimetric inequality, Comment

    C. Croke, A sharp four-dimensional isoperimetric inequality, Comment. Math. Helv. 59 (1984), no. 2, 187–192

    1984

  8. [16]

    David, S

    G. David, S. Semmes, StrongA ∞ weights, Sobolev inequalities and quasiconformal mappings, in Analysis and Partial Differential Equations, Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. 122, Dekker, New York, 1990, 101 – 111

    1990

  9. [17]

    Fang, On a conformal Gauss–Bonnet–Chern inequality for LCF manifolds and related topics, Calc

    H. Fang, On a conformal Gauss–Bonnet–Chern inequality for LCF manifolds and related topics, Calc. Var. PDE 23 (2005), 469–496

    2005

  10. [18]

    Fefferman, C.R

    C. Fefferman, C.R. Graham, The Ambient Metric, Ann. of Math. Stud., vol. 178, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012, x+113

    2012

  11. [19]

    Fiala, Le probl` eme des isop´ erim` etres sur les surfaces ouvertes ` a courbure positive, Comment

    F. Fiala, Le probl` eme des isop´ erim` etres sur les surfaces ouvertes ` a courbure positive, Comment. Math. Helv. 13 (1941), 293–346

    1941

  12. [20]

    Finn, On a class of conformal metrics, with application to differential geometry in the large, Comment

    R. Finn, On a class of conformal metrics, with application to differential geometry in the large, Comment. Math. Helv. 40 (1965), 1–30

    1965

  13. [21]

    Ghomi, J

    M. Ghomi, J. Spruck, Total curvature and the isoperimetric inequality in Cartan- Hadamard manifolds, J. Geom. Anal. 32 (2022), no. 2, Paper No. 50, 54 pp

    2022

  14. [22]

    C. Gui, A. Moradifam, The sphere covering inequality and its applications, Invent. Math. 214 (2018), no. 3, 1169–1204

    2018

  15. [23]

    Hartman, Geodesic parallel coordinates in the large

    P. Hartman, Geodesic parallel coordinates in the large. Amer. J. Math. 86 (1964), 705–727

    1964

  16. [24]

    Huber, On the isoperimetric inequality on surfaces of variable Gaussian curvature, Ann

    A. Huber, On the isoperimetric inequality on surfaces of variable Gaussian curvature, Ann. of Math. (2) 60 (1954), 237–247

    1954

  17. [25]

    Huber, On subharmonic functions and differential geometry in the large, Comment

    A. Huber, On subharmonic functions and differential geometry in the large, Comment. Math. Helv. 32 (1957), 13–72

    1957

  18. [26]

    Kleiner, An isoperimetric comparison theorem, Invent

    B. Kleiner, An isoperimetric comparison theorem, Invent. Math. 108 (1992), no. 1, 37–47

    1992

  19. [27]

    Li, The total Q-curvature, volume entropy and polynomial growth polyharmonic functions, Adv

    M. Li, The total Q-curvature, volume entropy and polynomial growth polyharmonic functions, Adv. Math. 450 (2024), Paper No. 109768, 43 pp

    2024

  20. [28]

    Li, Conformal metrics with finite total Q-curvature revisited, arXiv:2405.09872

    M. Li, Conformal metrics with finite total Q-curvature revisited, arXiv:2405.09872

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    M. Li, J. Wei, X. Xu, On geometry ofQ (2k) g -curvature, arXiv:2506.20165

  22. [30]

    M. Li, X. Xu, On positivity of the Q-curvatures of conformal metrics, J. Funct. Anal. 289 (2025), no. 8, Paper No. 111011

    2025

  23. [31]

    Li, L.-F

    P. Li, L.-F. Tam, Complete surfaces with finite total curvature, J. Differential Geom. 33 (1991), no. 1, 139–168

    1991

  24. [32]

    Ma, Cohn-Vossen theory for locally conformally flat manifolds, arXiv:2606.13979

    S. Ma, Cohn-Vossen theory for locally conformally flat manifolds, arXiv:2606.13979

  25. [33]

    S. Ma, J. Qing, Onn-superharmonic functions and some geometric applications, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 60 (2021), no. 6, Paper No. 234, 42 pp

    2021

  26. [34]

    Ndiaye, J

    C. Ndiaye, J. Xiao, An upper bound of the total Q-curvature and its isoperimetric deficit for higher-dimensional conformal Euclidean metrics, Calc. Var. PDE 38(2010), pages 1–27

    2010

  27. [35]

    Osserman, The isoperimetric inequality, Bull

    R. Osserman, The isoperimetric inequality, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 84 (1978), no. 6, 1182–1238

    1978

  28. [36]

    Peterson, Future directions of research in geometry: A summary of the panel dis- cussion at the 2007 Midwest Geometry Conference, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom

    L.J. Peterson, Future directions of research in geometry: A summary of the panel dis- cussion at the 2007 Midwest Geometry Conference, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 3 (2007), Paper 081, 7 pp

    2007

  29. [37]

    Schulze, Nonlinear evolution by mean curvature and isoperimetric inequalities, J

    F. Schulze, Nonlinear evolution by mean curvature and isoperimetric inequalities, J. Differential Geom. 79 (2008), no. 2, 197–241

    2008

  30. [38]

    Semmes, Bi-Lipschitz mappings and strongA ∞ weights, Ann

    S. Semmes, Bi-Lipschitz mappings and strongA ∞ weights, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I Math. 18 (1993), no. 2, 211–248. ISOPERIMETRIC INEQUALITY ABOUTQ-CURVATURE 33

    1993

  31. [39]

    Shiohama, Total curvatures and minimal areas of complete surfaces

    K. Shiohama, Total curvatures and minimal areas of complete surfaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1985), no. 2, 310–316

    1985

  32. [40]

    Y. Sire, Y. Wang, Fractional Poincar´ e inequality with finite total Q-curvature, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 56 (2017), no. 2, Paper No. 35, 18 pp

    2017

  33. [41]

    Topping, Mean curvature flow and geometric inequalities, J

    P. Topping, Mean curvature flow and geometric inequalities, J. Reine Angew. Math. 503 (1998), 47–61

    1998

  34. [42]

    Wang, The isoperimetric inequality and quasiconformal maps on manifolds with finite total Q-curvature, Int

    Y. Wang, The isoperimetric inequality and quasiconformal maps on manifolds with finite total Q-curvature, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2 (2012), 394–422

    2012

  35. [43]

    Wang, The isoperimetric inequality and Q-curvature, Adv

    Y. Wang, The isoperimetric inequality and Q-curvature, Adv. Math. 281 (2015), 823–844

    2015

  36. [44]

    Weil, Sur les surfaces a courbure negative, C.R

    A. Weil, Sur les surfaces a courbure negative, C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris 182 (1926), 1069-1071

    1926

  37. [45]

    Xiao, Toward best isoperimetric constants for (H 1, BM O)-normal conformal met- rics onR n,n≥3, Adv

    J. Xiao, Toward best isoperimetric constants for (H 1, BM O)-normal conformal met- rics onR n,n≥3, Adv. Math. 220 (2009), no. 2, 540–559. Mingxiang Li, Department of Mathematics & Institute of Mathematical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong Em...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.