pith. sign in

arxiv: 1205.4237 · v4 · pith:M6M6Y6NQnew · submitted 2012-05-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

A comparison of the galaxy peculiar velocity field with the PSCz gravity field-- A Bayesian hyper-parameter method

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords bayesiandensityfieldgalaxyhyper-parameterpeculiarvelocityanalysis
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We constructed a Bayesian hyper-parameter statistical method to quantify the difference between predicted velocities derived from the observed galaxy distribution in the \textit{IRAS}-PSC$z$ redshift survey and peculiar velocities measured using different distance indicators. In our analysis we find that the model--data comparison becomes unreliable beyond $70 \hmpc$ because of the inadequate sampling by \textit{IRAS} survey of prominent, distant superclusters, like the Shapley Concentration. On the other hand, the analysis of the velocity residuals show that the PSC$z$ gravity field provides an adequate model to the local, $\le 70 \hmpc$, peculiar velocity field. The hyper-parameter combination of ENEAR, SN, A1SN and SFI++ catalogues in the Bayesian framework constrains the amplitude of the linear flow to be $\beta=0.53 \pm 0.014$. For an rms density fluctuations in the PSC$z$ galaxy number density $\sigma_8^{\rm gal}=0.42\pm0.03$, we obtain an estimate of the growth rate of density fluctuations $f\sigma_{8}(z\sim0) = 0.42 \pm 0.033$, which is in excellent agreement with independent estimates based on different techniques.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.