Kobayashi-Hitchin Correspondence for Saturated Reflexive Parabolic Sheaves on K\"ahler manifolds

Jiayu Li; Tianshu Jiang

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 7 references

Kobayashi-Hitchin Correspondence for Saturated Reflexive Parabolic Sheaves on K\"ahler manifolds

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A saturated reflexive parabolic sheaf is polystable if and only if it admits an admissible Hermitian-Einstein metric compatible with its parabolic structure.

desk verdict A serious extension of the parabolic Kobayashi-Hitchin program to saturated reflexive sheaves, worth a careful referee, but with a few load-bearing steps asserted rather than proved. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03579 v2 pith:M7NAZHA5 submitted 2025-06-04 math.DG math.CV

Tianshu Jiang , Jiayu Li This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DGmath.CV MSC 53C0714J6032L0553C55

keywords Kobayashi-HitchincorrespondenceparabolicsheavesreflexiveHermitian-Yang-MillsflowHermitian-EinsteinmetricsBogomolov-GiesekerinequalityKählermanifoldssimplenormalcrossingdivisor

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish a Kobayashi-Hitchin correspondence for saturated reflexive parabolic sheaves on compact Kähler manifolds with a simple normal crossing divisor. The main theorem, Theorem 6.14, states that such a parabolic sheaf is μω-polystable if and only if it admits an admissible Hermitian-Einstein metric with respect to the original Kähler form ω, compatible with the parabolic structure. The semistable analogue, Theorem 6.15, replaces the single metric by a family of approximate Hermitian-Einstein metrics. From this the paper derives the parabolic Bogomolov-Gieseker inequality and extends it to semistability with respect to a nef and big class. The consequence is that an algebraic stability condition becomes a curvature condition, bringing flow and metric techniques to bear on these sheaves.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the Hermitian-Yang-Mills flow with fixed determinant, starting from a specially constructed metric bH on the regular part of F_*. The paper first resolves the sheaf's singularities by blowing up, embeds F into a locally free sheaf E, and twists by an effective exceptional divisor so that the pullback becomes a locally abelian parabolic bundle E'_* = E ⊗ [-P_0]. A metric H_0 adapted to this parabolic bundle is built from local smooth decompositions compatible with the parabolic filtrations; its curvature reproduces the first and second parabolic Chern characters. Tensoring with a line bundle metric gives bH, adapted to F_* in codimension 2 and with polynomial curvature growth near the divisor. The flow then deforms bH; under polystability it converges to an admissible Hermitian-Einstein metric, and under semistability to approximate Hermitian-Einstein metrics. The transition from parabolic to analytic stability uses Proposition 4.16, which asserts that bH is adapted to every parabolic subsheaf in codimension 1.

What would settle it

On a Kähler surface with D = {xy = 0}, take a rank-2 saturated reflexive parabolic sheaf whose filtration jumps at the crossing, construct bH as in Section 4, and compare the trace of the restricted curvature on a parabolic subsheaf with its first parabolic Chern class as currents: any mismatch away from a codimension-2 set would refute Proposition 4.16 and undermine Theorem 6.14. Independently, a μω-polystable F_* with no admissible Hermitian-Einstein metric compatible with its parabolic structure, or an admissible H-E metric compatible with a non-polystable F_*, would refute the correspondence itself.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 6.14: for a saturated reflexive parabolic sheaf F_* over (X, ω, D), μω-polystability is equivalent to the existence of an admissible Hermitian-Einstein metric with respect to ω on F|_{X^∘∖D} that is compatible with F_*. Compatibility means that the metric's trace curvature represents ch_1(F_*) and that, for every proper parabolic subsheaf S_*, the induced metric's first Chern class is at least ch_1(S_*) in the sense of currents. Admissibility requires the curvature to be in $L^{2}$ and its trace contraction with ω to be bounded. The paper also proves Theorem 6.15, where semistability is equivalent to a family of approximate Hermitian-Einstein metrics all compatible with the parabolic structure, and Corollary 6.16, the parabolic Bogomolov-Gieseker inequality. Theorem 7.1 extends that inequality to semistability with respect to a nef and big class.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the unproved assertion, Proposition 4.16, that the constructed metric bH computes the first Chern class of every parabolic subsheaf S_* away from a set of codimension 2; if this assertion fails, the bridge from parabolic stability to the analytic stability used by the flow argument collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Polystability of F_* is equivalent to the existence of an admissible Hermitian-Einstein metric compatible with the parabolic structure, giving a curvature-theoretic criterion for the algebraic condition.
Semistability is characterized by a family of approximate Hermitian-Einstein metrics all compatible with the parabolic structure, extending the correspondence beyond stable objects.
Every semistable saturated reflexive parabolic sheaf satisfies the Bogomolov-Gieseker inequality Δ(F_*) · [ω]^{n-2} ≥ 0.
The same inequality holds when semistability is taken with respect to a nef and big class [η], not only a Kähler class.
Equality in the inequality occurs exactly when F|_{X\D} is a vector bundle admitting a projectively flat Hermitian-Einstein connection compatible with the parabolic structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step, not taken in the paper, is to feed the same adapted metric and flow into the parabolic Higgs bundle setting; the convergence and extension arguments appear to carry over once the Higgs field has tame singularities along the divisor.
If Proposition 4.16 can be supplied with a direct proof, the correspondence gives a practical criterion: checking parabolic stability could be reduced to finding a single admissible Hermitian-Einstein metric, avoiding a search over all parabolic subsheaves.
The compatibility inequality in Definition 1.1, rather than equality, is likely the correct notion for singular sheaves; it degenerates to the usual equality exactly when the underlying sheaf is locally free.
The nef-and-big Bogomolov-Gieseker inequality suggests that the discriminant bounds the geometry of semistable parabolic sheaves outside the Kähler cone, which may matter for compactness or moduli questions not addressed in the paper.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a serious extension of the parabolic Kobayashi-Hitchin program, and the main theorem is plausible, but the manuscript as written has several load-bearing steps that are asserted rather than proved. It deserves a serious referee, but the referee should demand real derivations, not just 'tautological'.

What's genuinely new: the correspondence for saturated reflexive parabolic sheaves, which does not reduce to the parabolic-bundle case; the upgrade from conical-metric Hermitian-Einstein to approximate Hermitian-Einstein for the original Kähler class; and the nef-and-big Bogomolov-Gieseker inequality. The metric construction in §4 is substantial: conical Kähler metrics, uniform Sobolev via Nash-Yau entropy, heat kernel bounds, and the curvature computations for adaptedness in codimension 2. That is real analytic work, and the paper is clearly organized.

The soft spot is the adaptedness of bH to every parabolic subsheaf. Proposition 4.16 says it is 'tautological' and omits the proof. It is not tautological. bH is constructed to respect the parabolic filtration of F_* itself; for an arbitrary holomorphic subsheaf S_*, the Chern-Weil comparison involves the second fundamental form of S_* and, along D, boundary terms. Equality ch1(S_*)·[η] = (√-1/2π)∫ Tr(F_{bH|S})∧η is exactly what is needed to make analytic stability match parabolic stability (Prop 5.1) and to get compatibility of the limiting metric (Prop 6.10). Both directions of Theorem 6.14 inherit from it. The stress-test note is right on this point.

Two smaller items: Lemma 3.2 is a one-line consequence of the nonstandard Chern character definition and deserves a few more lines; and Prop 6.12's snc-divisor adaptation of Biquard is waved off as 'easily adapted' in a remark, which is an unproved claim. The stable-convergence step is delegated to [Li-Zh-Zh]; that one is less alarming if the cited result is genuinely the same trick, but it is still a black box.

Overall: the central argument is credible and the contributions are real. The paper is not ready as is; the gaps are structural but probably fillable. I would send it to a capable referee and expect at least one revision. It belongs in a reading group.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims a Kobayashi–Hitchin correspondence for saturated reflexive parabolic sheaves over compact Kähler manifolds with a simple normal crossing divisor: a saturated reflexive parabolic sheaf F_* is μ_ω-polystable if and only if there exists an admissible Hermitian–Einstein metric with respect to ω on the regular part F|_{X°\D} that is compatible with the parabolic structure (Theorem 6.14), with an analogous statement for semistability and approximate Hermitian–Einstein metrics (Theorem 6.15). The proof constructs a parabolic metric bH adapted in codimension 2 via resolution of singularities and a smooth decomposition of the pulled-back locally abelian parabolic bundle, then runs the Hermitian–Yang–Mills flow on the regular part, using analytic stability as an intermediate equivalence. The paper also derives a Bogomolov–Gieseker inequality for semistable parabolic sheaves with respect to nef and big classes (Theorem 7.1).

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, it extends the classical Kobayashi–Hitchin correspondence from vector bundles and reflexive sheaves to the parabolic setting, replacing the conical-metric Hermitian–Einstein metrics of [Li] by metrics adapted to the fixed Kähler form ω, and it provides a parabolic Bogomolov–Gieseker inequality even for nef and big classes. The paper contains substantial original constructions: the resolution procedure reducing a saturated reflexive parabolic sheaf to a locally abelian parabolic bundle (Section 3), the explicit adapted metric with Chern–Weil representatives for the first and second parabolic Chern characters (Propositions 4.10, 4.14, 4.15), and uniform Sobolev and heat-kernel estimates for conical Kähler metrics (Section 4.1). The main gap is a missing proof of the load-bearing Proposition 4.16, together with several steps delegated to previous work of the authors; these need to be supplied before the theorems can be considered established.

major comments (4)

[§4.2.3, Proposition 4.16] Proposition 4.16 asserts that the metric bH constructed in §4.2 is adapted in codimension 1 to every parabolic subsheaf S∗ of F∗, with the proof omitted as 'tautological'. This assertion is load-bearing: it is used in Proposition 5.1 to equate analytic stability with parabolic stability, and in Proposition 6.10 to show that the limiting Hermitian–Yang–Mills metrics are compatible with all parabolic subsheaves. The claim is not tautological: bH is built from a C∞ decomposition (Proposition 4.9) adapted only to the parabolic filtration of F∗ itself, whereas for a general subsheaf S∗ the Chern–Weil comparison between ch1(S∗) and (√−1/2π)Tr(F_{bH|S}) involves the second fundamental form of S∗ in F∗ and boundary terms along D. A complete proof, or a precise reference to one, is required.
[§6.2, convergence of the HYM flow] The proof that the HYM flow converges to an approximate (or exact) Hermitian–Einstein metric depends on [Li-Zh-Zh, Proposition 4.1] for the semistable case and on 'the same trick used in [Li-Zh-Zh, Proposition 4.1]' for the stable case. The text does not state the hypotheses of that proposition or verify them in the present setting (noncompact base X∘∖D, reflexive parabolic sheaf with singular locus of codimension at least 3, conical Kähler metrics ω_{ϵδ}). Because this convergence is one half of Theorem 6.14, the authors should either provide the proof or carefully transcribe the relevant estimates with the precise conditions under which the cited result applies.
[§6.2, Proposition 6.12 and Remark 6.13] Proposition 6.12 establishes the L∞ and L^2_1 regularity of sections of an admissible Hermitian–Einstein metric compatible with a saturated reflexive parabolic sheaf on a polydisk with a simple normal crossing divisor. This proposition is needed in the converse direction of Theorem 6.14 to obtain the holomorphic splitting when equality holds in the slope inequality. Its proof appeals to [Ba-Si, Section 1] and to Biquard's extension theorem [Bq2, Theorem 2.1], which is stated for a smooth divisor; the extension to the simple normal crossing case is relegated to Remark 6.13 with a one-sentence assertion about solving a ∂-problem on Δ∗ × Δ∗. This extension is nontrivial and is load-bearing, so the details of the ∂-problem and the slice argument should be supplied.
[§2.3, Definition 2.11] The parabolic Chern character is defined by formula (1), which the authors acknowledge is 'by no means standard' and for which there is no hint for general parabolic sheaves. Since the main theorems concern stability and Bogomolov–Gieseker inequalities with respect to this Chern character, the paper should clarify the scope: the results are for this specific definition. The agreement with the classical formulas (2)–(3) for locally abelian parabolic bundles in codimension 2 (cf. Lemma 2.4) is reassuring, but the proof of Lemma 2.8 and the additivity invoked in Section 7 should be expanded to make clear that they use only properties of the formula (1).

minor comments (4)

[§7, proof of Theorem 7.1] The expressions '∆(F0_∗) · [η^{n−1}_ϵ] ≥ 0' and the following lines should use [η^{n−2}_ϵ] to match the statement of Theorem 7.1; also 'F0_∗' is not defined and appears to denote a graded piece of the Jordan–Hölder filtration, which should be introduced.
[§5, proof of Proposition 5.1] In the proof of Proposition 5.1 the reference 'Lemma 4.16' should be 'Proposition 4.16'.
[§4.1, Proposition 4.6] The heat kernel estimate in Proposition 4.6 writes the exponential factor as 'exp(− d_{ϵδ}(x,y)(4+τ)t)', which should presumably be 'exp(−d_{ϵδ}(x,y)^2/((4+τ)t))' to be dimensionally correct.
[Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors (e.g., 'comtatible', 'respcet', 'adpated', 'Metha' for 'Mehta') and a few notation ambiguities: X∘ is used for X\W while X\D also appears, and the notation D∗ in Section 6 is introduced only implicitly. A careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central existence theorem is a genuine HYM-flow construction; Prop. 4.16's omitted proof is a correctness gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. Parabolic stability is defined via the nonstandard parabolic Chern character (Def. 2.11), but the authors explicitly acknowledge that this formula is not standard and use it as a definition; the metric construction in §4.2 independently realizes ch1 and ch2 as curvature currents (Props. 4.10 and 4.14), so the analytic objects are not simply renamed stability data. The main implication stability ⇒ Hermitian-Einstein metric is carried by the Hermitian-Yang-Mills flow with estimates imported from Bando–Siu, Simpson, and the authors' prior papers [Li] and [Li-Zh-Zh]; these are external published results whose assumptions do not include Theorem 6.14, and they are not fitted to the target conclusion. The converse direction uses the compatibility inequality in Definition 1.1, but that is a genuine metric condition and the H-E equation ΛF_H = λ id is an independent curvature condition; stability does not follow from the definition alone, and the polystable splitting is obtained by a separate analytic argument (Prop. 6.12). The only serious concern is Prop. 4.16, where adaptedness to every parabolic subsheaf in codimension 1 is asserted with the proof omitted as 'tautological'; the equality ch1(S_*) = (√-1/2π) Tr(F_{bH|S}) for arbitrary subsheaves is not a formal consequence of the construction and requires control of second fundamental form and boundary terms. This is a potentially load-bearing correctness gap, but it is not a circular reduction: the assertion is not derived from the target theorem, and no equation is shown to equal itself by construction. The self-citations are load-bearing but are independent published results, not uniqueness theorems imported to forbid alternatives. Hence no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof leans on several external theorems and on an ad hoc definition of parabolic Chern character for general sheaves. The most consequential axioms are the choice of Definition 2.11 and the asserted Chern-character identities after blow-up (Lemma 3.2). No new particles or forces are introduced, and there are no data-fitted parameters.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper Formula (1) defines the parabolic Chern character of any parabolic sheaf and is additive on short exact sequences.
Definition 2.11 is described as non-standard for general sheaves; stability, degrees and the Bogomolov-Gieseker discriminant are all computed with this character.
ad hoc to paper Blow-ups resolve the sheaf and parabolic structure so that the Chern character identities in Lemma 3.2 hold with no exceptional-divisor error terms.
Lemma 3.2 is asserted via suggestive formulas, not derived; it is load-bearing for metric adaptedness and for all later intersection computations.
domain assumption The uniform Sobolev inequality of Guo et al. holds for the conical metrics ω_{ϵδ} with constants independent of ϵ and δ.
Used in Proposition 4.3 to run Moser iteration and to control the Hermitian-Yang-Mills flow.
domain assumption Simpson's HYM flow existence (Prop 6.1) and the L2 decay of Φ under semistability from [Li-Zh-Zh, Prop 4.1] apply in the present noncompact conical setting.
The convergence arguments for Theorems 6.14 and 6.15 delegate the main analytic estimates to these external results.
domain assumption Biquard's extension theorem for admissible Hermitian-Einstein metrics adapts from a smooth divisor to a simple normal crossing divisor.
Proposition 6.12 and Remark 6.13 assert the adaptation is easy without giving the solution of the ∂-problem on Δ* × Δ*.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kobayashi-Hitchin Correspondence for Saturated Reflexive Parabolic Sheaves on K\"ahler manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M7NAZHA5

@misc{pith2026250603579,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kobayashi-Hitchin Correspondence for Saturated Reflexive Parabolic Sheaves on K\"ahler manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M7NAZHA5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03579}
}

read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the Kobayashi-Hitchin correspondence in the setting of parabolic sheaves with a simple normal crossing divisor over a compact K\"ahler manifold using the method of Hermitian-Yang-Mills flow.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

7 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

[1]

Fibr\'es paraboliques et champ des racines

[Ba] S. Bando. “Removable Singularities for Holomorphic Vector Bundles”. In: Tohoku Math. J. 43.1 (1991), pp. 61–67. [Ba-Si] S. Bando and Y.-T. Siu. “Stable Sheaves and Einstein-Hermitian Metrics”. In: Geom. Anal. Complex Manifolds 39 (1994), pp. 39–50. [Bo] N. Borne. “Fibr´ es Paraboliques et Champ des Racines”. In: arXiv Math. (2006), math/0604458. [Bq]...

work page Pith review arXiv 1991
[81]

Asymptotic behaviour of tame harmonic bundles and an application to pure twistor $D$-modules

[Lu] M. L¨ ubke. “Stability of Einstein-Hermitian Vector Bundles”. In: Manuscripta Math. 42 (1983), pp. 245–257. [Ma-Yo] M. Maruyama and K. Yokogawa. “Moduli of Parabolic Stable Sheaves”. In: Math. Ann. 293 (1992), pp. 77–99. [Me-Se] V. Metha and C. S. Seshadri. “Moduli of Vector Bundles on Curves with Parabolic Structures”. In: Math. Ann. 248.3 (1980), p...

work page Pith review arXiv 1983
[1339]

Calculating the Parabolic Chern Character of a Locally Abelian Parabolic Bundle

[Ta] C. H. Taher. “Calculating the Parabolic Chern Character of a Locally Abelian Parabolic Bundle”. In: Manuscr. Math. 132 (2010), pp. 169–198. [Uh-Ya] K. K. Uhlenbeck and S.-T. Yau. “On the Existence of Hermitian-Yang-Mills Con- nections in Stable Vector Bundles”. In: Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 39 (1986), pp. 257–293. 33

work page 2010
[1971]

Constructing Variation of Hodge Structure Using Yang-Mills Theory and Applications to Uniformization

[Si1] C. T. Simpson. “Constructing Variation of Hodge Structure Using Yang-Mills Theory and Applications to Uniformization”. In: J. Amer. Math. Soc. 1.4 (1988), pp. 867–918. [Si2] C. T. Simpson. “Harmonic Bundles on Non-Compact Curves”. In: J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990), pp. 713–770. [St-Wr] B. Steer and A. Wren. “The Donaldson-Hitchin-Kobayashi Correspond...

work page 1988
[2013]

Heat Kernel Estimates and Lower Bound of Eigenvalues

[Ch-Li] S.-Y. Cheng and P. Li. “Heat Kernel Estimates and Lower Bound of Eigenvalues”. In: Comment. Math. Helv. 56.1 (1981), pp. 327–338. [Cl] B. Claudon, P. Graf, and H. Guenancia. “Numerical Characterization of Complex Torus Quotients”. In: Comment. Math. Helv. 97.4 (2022), pp. 769–799. [Do1] S. K. Donaldson. “Anti Self-Dual Yang-Mills Connections over ...

arXiv 1981
[2023]

Gaussian Upper Bounds for the Heat Kernel on Arbitrary Mani- folds

[Gr] A. Grigor’yan. “Gaussian Upper Bounds for the Heat Kernel on Arbitrary Mani- folds”. In: J. Differ. Geom. 45.1 (1997), pp. 33–52. [Hc] N. J. Hitchin. “The Self-Duality Equations on a Riemann Surface”. In: Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 55 (1987), pp. 59–126. [Hr] H. Hironaka. “Resolution of Singularities of an Algebraic Variety over a Field of Characteristic...

work page 1997
[2024]

First Chern Class and Holomorphic Tensor Fields

[Ko1] S. Kobayashi. “First Chern Class and Holomorphic Tensor Fields”. In: Nagoya Math. J. 77 (1980), pp. 5–11. [Ko2] S. Kobayashi. “Curvature and Stability of Vector Bundles”. In: Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A 58 (1982), pp. 158–162. 32 [Li] J.-Y. Li. “Hermitian-Einstein Metrics and Chern Number Inequalities on Parabolic Stable Bundles over K¨ ahler Manifolds...

work page 1980

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Fibr\'es paraboliques et champ des racines

[Ba] S. Bando. “Removable Singularities for Holomorphic Vector Bundles”. In: Tohoku Math. J. 43.1 (1991), pp. 61–67. [Ba-Si] S. Bando and Y.-T. Siu. “Stable Sheaves and Einstein-Hermitian Metrics”. In: Geom. Anal. Complex Manifolds 39 (1994), pp. 39–50. [Bo] N. Borne. “Fibr´ es Paraboliques et Champ des Racines”. In: arXiv Math. (2006), math/0604458. [Bq]...

work page Pith review arXiv 1991

[2] [81]

Asymptotic behaviour of tame harmonic bundles and an application to pure twistor $D$-modules

[Lu] M. L¨ ubke. “Stability of Einstein-Hermitian Vector Bundles”. In: Manuscripta Math. 42 (1983), pp. 245–257. [Ma-Yo] M. Maruyama and K. Yokogawa. “Moduli of Parabolic Stable Sheaves”. In: Math. Ann. 293 (1992), pp. 77–99. [Me-Se] V. Metha and C. S. Seshadri. “Moduli of Vector Bundles on Curves with Parabolic Structures”. In: Math. Ann. 248.3 (1980), p...

work page Pith review arXiv 1983

[3] [1339]

Calculating the Parabolic Chern Character of a Locally Abelian Parabolic Bundle

[Ta] C. H. Taher. “Calculating the Parabolic Chern Character of a Locally Abelian Parabolic Bundle”. In: Manuscr. Math. 132 (2010), pp. 169–198. [Uh-Ya] K. K. Uhlenbeck and S.-T. Yau. “On the Existence of Hermitian-Yang-Mills Con- nections in Stable Vector Bundles”. In: Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 39 (1986), pp. 257–293. 33

work page 2010

[4] [1971]

Constructing Variation of Hodge Structure Using Yang-Mills Theory and Applications to Uniformization

[Si1] C. T. Simpson. “Constructing Variation of Hodge Structure Using Yang-Mills Theory and Applications to Uniformization”. In: J. Amer. Math. Soc. 1.4 (1988), pp. 867–918. [Si2] C. T. Simpson. “Harmonic Bundles on Non-Compact Curves”. In: J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990), pp. 713–770. [St-Wr] B. Steer and A. Wren. “The Donaldson-Hitchin-Kobayashi Correspond...

work page 1988

[5] [2013]

Heat Kernel Estimates and Lower Bound of Eigenvalues

[Ch-Li] S.-Y. Cheng and P. Li. “Heat Kernel Estimates and Lower Bound of Eigenvalues”. In: Comment. Math. Helv. 56.1 (1981), pp. 327–338. [Cl] B. Claudon, P. Graf, and H. Guenancia. “Numerical Characterization of Complex Torus Quotients”. In: Comment. Math. Helv. 97.4 (2022), pp. 769–799. [Do1] S. K. Donaldson. “Anti Self-Dual Yang-Mills Connections over ...

arXiv 1981

[6] [2023]

Gaussian Upper Bounds for the Heat Kernel on Arbitrary Mani- folds

[Gr] A. Grigor’yan. “Gaussian Upper Bounds for the Heat Kernel on Arbitrary Mani- folds”. In: J. Differ. Geom. 45.1 (1997), pp. 33–52. [Hc] N. J. Hitchin. “The Self-Duality Equations on a Riemann Surface”. In: Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 55 (1987), pp. 59–126. [Hr] H. Hironaka. “Resolution of Singularities of an Algebraic Variety over a Field of Characteristic...

work page 1997

[7] [2024]

First Chern Class and Holomorphic Tensor Fields

[Ko1] S. Kobayashi. “First Chern Class and Holomorphic Tensor Fields”. In: Nagoya Math. J. 77 (1980), pp. 5–11. [Ko2] S. Kobayashi. “Curvature and Stability of Vector Bundles”. In: Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A 58 (1982), pp. 158–162. 32 [Li] J.-Y. Li. “Hermitian-Einstein Metrics and Chern Number Inequalities on Parabolic Stable Bundles over K¨ ahler Manifolds...

work page 1980