Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Regularity and Decay for Navier-Slip Fluid-Structure Interaction in Exterior Domains

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that the linearized Navier-slip fluid–rigid-body system in an exterior domain generates a bounded analytic semigroup, has maximal L^q regularity for every 1<q<∞, and decays with sharp L^r–L^q rates.

desk verdict Real step for Navier-slip FSI in exterior domains, but the decay proof has a wrong interpolation exponent and a few unproved passages. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19736 v3 pith:MBBM4QIM submitted 2026-07-22 math.AP

Buma Jin Jin This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 76D0535Q3576D07
keywords fluid-rigidbodyinteractionNavier-slipboundaryconditionexteriordomainanalyticsemigroupmaximalL^qregularityL^q–L^rdecayestimatesKorn-typeinequalityHelmholtz–Weyldecomposition
topics Navier-Stokes Regularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

What the paper tries to establish: the linearized motion of a rigid body surrounded by a viscous incompressible fluid, with Navier slip-with-friction at the interface, is well-posed and decaying in the strongest linear sense even when the fluid occupies the whole space outside the body. Prior semigroup and decay results for the slip condition were confined to bounded containers; the paper extends them to exterior domains for all integrability exponents $1

What carries the argument

The central object is the fluid–structure operator $A_{\alpha,q} := P_q A$, where $P_q$ is the Helmholtz projection for the decomposition $L^q(\mathbb{R}^3) = X_q \oplus G_1^q \oplus G_2^q$ and $A$ acts as $-\mu \Delta$ in the fluid and as the rigid-body momentum balances inside the body. States $u \in X_q$ are extended velocity fields whose restriction to the body is the rigid motion $u = \ell + \omega \times x$, so the fluid–body coupling becomes boundary conditions on $\partial \Omega$ rather than a separate system. The proof machinery: a coercive bilinear form gives self-adjointness and surjectivity of $I + A_{\alpha,2}$; cutoffs and Bogovski operators localize the general $L^q$ estimates to known whole-space and bounded-domain results; interpolation and duality propagate sectorialit

What would settle it

For $1<q<3/2$, solve $(\lambda I + A_{\alpha,q})u = f$ with $\operatorname{Re} \lambda \ge 0$ and check whether $\|(\lambda I + A_{\alpha,q})^{-1}\| \le C/(1+|\lambda|)$ holds uniformly. If a sequence $\lambda_n \to \infty$ with $\operatorname{Re} \lambda_n \ge 0$ admits approximate eigenfunctions—states $u_n$ with $\|u_n\|=1$ and $\|(\lambda_n - A_{\alpha,q})u_n\| \to 0$—then sectoriality fails and Theorem 2.5 collapses. Equivalently, test whether the finite-$T$ maximal regularity constant really is independent of $T$ for a specific forcing; a counterexample would falsify the paper's central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central claim is Theorem 2.5: for the exterior domain $\Omega = \mathbb{R}^3 \setminus B$ and every $1<q<\infty$, the fluid–structure operator $A_{\alpha,q}$ generates a bounded analytic semigroup on the subspace $X_q$ of states satisfying the no-penetration condition. Together with Theorems 2.3 and 2.6, the paper claims the linearized system (1.7) with Navier-slip boundary conditions (C2)–(C3) has maximal $L^q$ regularity on finite intervals (with constants independent of T for $q<3/2$), and that its semigroup satisfies sharp $L^r$–$L^q$ decay estimates for $1<r\le q<\infty$, including derivative and pressure bounds. The proof route is: self-adjointness and accretivity of the $L^2$ operator via a coercive bilinear form; a localizat

Load-bearing premise

The paper asserts in Section 7.2 that the uniform-in-time maximal $L^q$ regularity for $1<q<3/2$ implies the resolvent estimate on the closed right half-plane, but the limiting passage from finite time intervals to $T=\infty$ is not proved; this unproved step is load-bearing for bounded analyticity and the decay estimates that follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, the linearized slip fluid–structure problem is well-posed in the maximal-regularity sense: for every 1<q<∞, forcing in L^q produces a unique strong solution with the expected W^{2,1}_q regularity.
  • The semigroup is bounded analytic for every 1<q<∞, so solutions become smooth for t>0 and obey the parabolic estimate ||∂_t u(t)|| ≤ c t^{−1} ||u_0||.
  • Solutions decay algebraically: the fluid velocity decays like t^{−(3/2)(1/r−1/q)} in L^q from L^r data, and the body velocities decay at least like (1+t)^{−1/2} up to an arbitrarily large auxiliary exponent.
  • These linear decay rates match the heat-semigroup scaling, indicating that the body's presence and the slip condition do not slow the linear relaxation rate.
  • The regularity and decay theorems provide the linear foundation the paper indicates for constructing strong W^{2,1}_q and Kato-type solutions of the nonlinear system.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not quantify how its constants depend on the friction coefficient α or the body's geometry; tracing the limits α→0 (perfect slip) and α→∞ (approaching no-slip) could show whether the decay rates interpolate between the known no-slip exterior results.
  • The body-velocity decay t^{−1/2} is slower than the fluid-velocity decay for most q, an asymmetry the paper does not highlight but which is a concrete prediction of the linear theory.
  • The q=∞ case is left open; a reader might try real interpolation or Marcinkiewicz arguments to push the L^r–L^q estimates to q=∞, which would give sup-norm decay, but the paper explicitly defers that question.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the linearized motion of a rigid body in an incompressible viscous fluid occupying the exterior of a ball, with Navier-slip boundary conditions. The main object is the fluid–structure operator A_{α,q} on the space X_q. The authors claim: self-adjointness and accretivity in L^2; maximal L^q-regularity on finite time intervals for all 1<q<∞, with a T-independent constant for 1<q<3/2; bounded analyticity of the semigroup for all q; and sharp L^r–L^q decay estimates in the whole range 1<r≤q<∞. The proof strategy is a localization argument that patches known whole-space and bounded-domain estimates, followed by interpolation and duality to obtain sectoriality and decay. The paper also contains an appendix proving the required Stokes resolvent estimates and a uniqueness lemma.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, this would be the first treatment of strong L^q-regularity and decay for the Navier-slip fluid–structure interaction in an exterior domain, a genuinely open problem. The overall architecture—using the spherical geometry through the Helmholtz–Weyl decomposition, localizing the exterior domain into a bounded-domain piece and a whole-space piece, and then interpolating between the q=2 and q<3/2 anchors—is sensible and likely repairable. However, the paper as written contains load-bearing gaps: the passage from finite-interval to infinite-interval maximal regularity is asserted without proof, and the energy-decay proof in Lemma 8.4 uses an invalid interpolation exponent. Since these steps are essential for Theorems 2.5 and 2.6, the manuscript cannot be accepted in its present form. The work does not ship machine-checked proofs or code, so the correctness rests entirely on the mathematical arguments.

major comments (3)
  1. [§7.2, Eq. (7.3)] The paper asserts that the T-independent maximal regularity estimate for 1<q<3/2 from Theorem 2.3 automatically yields maximal regularity on the infinite interval, and hence the uniform resolvent bound |λ|‖(λI+A_{α,q})^{-1}‖≤M for Re λ≥0. This is a nontrivial limiting statement. Finite-interval estimates with constant independent of T alone do not give the resolvent bound without a compactness/limiting argument and an a priori estimate on the whole half-line. No such argument is supplied. This step is load-bearing: Theorem 2.5 (bounded analyticity) and the later decay estimates rely on it.
  2. [§8.2.1, Lemma 8.4, Eq. (8.12)] The interpolation exponent θ=3/2(1/r−1/2) used in the proof of Lemma 8.4 is not the correct Gagliardo–Nirenberg exponent in R^3. For the inequality ‖v‖_{L^2} ≤ C‖∇v‖_{L^2}^α‖v‖_{L^r}^{1−α}, the correct exponent is α=3(2−r)/(6−r), not θ. For example, r=1 gives θ=3/4 while α=3/5; a concentrating family v_λ(x)=λ^{−3/r}φ(x/λ) supported away from ∂Ω yields ‖v_λ‖_{L^2}∼λ^{−3/2} while the claimed right-hand side behaves like λ^{−15/8}, so the asserted inequality fails uniformly. Consequently the differential inequality in (8.12), dE/dt+cE^{1/(2θ)}≤0, has the wrong exponent; for r<6/5 the exponent is below 1 and does not give the claimed algebraic decay. Replacing θ by α would yield dE/dt+cE^{1/α}≤0 and the intended decay, but that is not what is written. This invalidates the proof of the full range 1<r<6/5 in Theorem 2.6.
  3. [Theorem 2.6 vs. §8.2.4–8.2.5] The large-time estimates in Theorem 2.6 contain exponents that do not match the proof. The refined bound for ‖∇v‖ and ‖D^2v‖+‖∇π‖ includes t^{−3/(2r)+2/(2m)}, whereas the proofs in §8.2.4 and §8.2.5 conclude with t^{−3/2(1/r−1/m)}. These differ by t^{1/(2m)}; the theorem is stronger than the proof supports. In addition, the first displayed estimate in Theorem 2.6 for |ℓ(t)|+|ω(t)| has an extra factor (1+t)^{−1/2} compared to Remark 8.6 and the derivation in §8.2.2. The statement should be reconciled with the actual conclusions of the proof.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Corollary 8.2] The proof refers to 'Lemma 8.8' when Lemma 8.1 is evidently meant.
  2. [Theorem 2.6] The phrase 'satisfying the compatibility conditions,' contains an extra comma; also the compatibility condition for L^r initial data is not stated precisely, although the reduced version in Section 2 suggests it.
  3. [§2] There is a duplicated word in the sentence 'ensures a natural transition transition of results between different domain geometries'.
  4. [Lemma 8.4] The energy functional is defined as E(t)=‖v‖_{L^2}^2+m|ℓ|^2+|J_0||ω|^2; the notation |J_0||ω|^2 is inconsistent with the vector/matrix convention used elsewhere, and the quadratic form (J_0ω)·ω would be more precise.
  5. [References] The reference [14] appears garbled ('A. Dhifaoui-theory for the exterior Stokes problem...'). The author should verify the citation data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; self-citation [7] is background only.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The L^2 theory (Lemma 5.1/Theorem 2.2) is obtained from the Lax–Milgram lemma and standard elliptic regularity, not from the desired semigroup conclusion. The L^q maximal regularity (Theorem 2.3) is assembled by localization from whole-space Stokes estimates and the bounded-domain Navier-slip FSI result [3], an independent, author-disjoint source. The sectoriality and bounded analyticity (Section 7) follow from the self-adjoint L^2 case, the uniform-in-time maximal regularity for 1<q<3/2, and standard interpolation/duality [39, 34, 40]; no resolvent bound is assumed from the conclusion. The L^r–L^q decay estimates (Section 8) are derived from the semigroup bounds via external Korn, Gagliardo–Nirenberg, and trace estimates [43, 12, 21, 22]. The only self-citation, [7], is cited alongside [13,19] for the concrete form of the G_q^2 component in the Helmholtz–Weyl decomposition, whose existence is quoted from [50]; it is background and not load-bearing. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' own prior work is used to force a choice. The proof gaps flagged by a reader—the finite-to-infinite T extension asserted in Section 7.2 and the questionable interpolation exponent in Lemma 8.4 (Section 8.2.1)—are correctness concerns, not circularity, because they do not make any main result equivalent to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central proof rests on standard PDE and functional-analytic background plus several cited deep results (Helmholtz-Weyl decomposition, bounded-domain slip FSI maximal regularity, Galdi's structure theorem). No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new physical entities are introduced. The only non-standard assumption is the unproved passage from finite-T to infinite-T maximal regularity in Section 7.2.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Classical functional-analytic tools: Lax-Milgram, Banach-Alaoglu, Aubin-Lions, Rellich-Kondrachov, interpolation, semigroup theory.
    Used throughout Sections 5-8 and the appendices for existence, compactness, and interpolation.
  • standard math Helmholtz-Weyl decomposition for the fluid-structure space: L^q(R^3)=X_q⊕G^q_1⊕G^q_2 with bounded projection (Theorem 2.2 of [50]).
    Foundational for defining the operator A_{α,q}=P_q A in Section 3.
  • standard math Bounded-domain maximal L^q regularity for the slip FSI problem ([3, Theorem 4.9]).
    Used in Lemma 6.1 on the cut-off bounded-domain problem.
  • domain assumption The fluid domain is the complement of a smooth compact body with C^∞ boundary; viscosity μ>0, friction α>0; densities of fluid and body equal to 1.
    Stated in Section 1; positivity and smoothness are used in the Korn-type inequalities, trace theorems, and elliptic regularity.
  • domain assumption Initial data satisfy the compatibility conditions (2.1), or the reduced L^q form.
    These conditions characterize the real interpolation space B^{2-2/q,q}_α and are required in Theorems 2.2, 2.3, and 2.6.
  • standard math Galdi's asymptotic structure theorem for Stokes solutions in exterior domains ([22, Theorem V.3.3]).
    Used in the proof of the uniqueness Theorem A.8 for the homogeneous slip Stokes problem.
  • standard math Classical L^p estimates for the Stokes problem in the whole space and in bounded domains (Propositions A.1-A.3).
    Used in the proof of Lemma 4.5.
  • ad hoc to paper The finite-time maximal regularity estimate for q<3/2 extends to the infinite interval with the same constant.
    Section 7.2 asserts this extension without proof; it is the weakest load-bearing step in deriving bounded analyticity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regularity and Decay for Navier-Slip Fluid-Structure Interaction in Exterior Domains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MBBM4QIM

@misc{pith2026260719736,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regularity and Decay for Navier-Slip Fluid-Structure Interaction in Exterior Domains},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MBBM4QIM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19736}
}
abstract

We study the linearized motion of a spherical rigid body immersed in an incompressible viscous fluid occupying the whole space, under Navier slip boundary conditions with friction. While semigroup regularity and decay estimates are well understood for the no-slip case, such results have been limited to bounded domains in the slip setting. By exploiting the geometric regularity of the sphere, we establish strong $L^q$-regularity, bounded analyticity, and sharp $ L^q-L^r$ estimates for the corresponding fluid-structure operator. These results would provide a foundation for constructing strong $W^{2,1}_q$ solutions and Kato-type solutions to the corresponding nonlinear system.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Acevedo, C

    P. Acevedo, C. Amrouche, C. Conca, and A. Ghosh, Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations with Navier boundary condition,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I, V ol. 357, No. 2, pp. 115–119, 2019

    2019

  2. [2]

    Acevedo Tapia, C

    P. Acevedo Tapia, C. Amrouche, C. Conca and A. Ghosh,Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations with Navier boundary conditions,J. Differential equations 285(2021) 258-320

    2021

  3. [3]

    Al Baba, A

    H. Al Baba, A. Ghosh, B. Muha and S. Ne ˇcasov´a,L p strong solution to fuid-rigid body inter- action system with Navier slip boundary condition, J. Elliptic Parabol. Equ. 7 (2021), 439-489

    2021

  4. [4]

    Amrouche and M

    C. Amrouche and M. Meslameni,Stokes problem with several types of boundary conditions in an exterior domain, Electron. J. Differ. Equ, 2013(196)(2013), 1–28

    2013

  5. [5]

    Amrouche, M

    C. Amrouche, M. Escobedo and A. Ghosh ,Semigroup Theory for the Stokes Operator with Navier Boundary Condition onL p Spaces, Waves in Flows,:The 2018 Prague-Sum Workshop Lectures, Birkh¨ auser (2021)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Amrouche and K.R

    C. Amrouche and K.R. Rajagopal, The Stokes approximations with slip boundary conditions andL p estimates,Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl., V ol. 72, No. 5, pp. 2304–2324, 2010

    2010

  7. [7]

    Bae and B

    H.-O. Bae and B. J. JinAsymptotic profile for the interaction of a rigid ball and an incompress- ible viscous fluid, Journal of Differential Equations 376 (2023),682-713

    2023

  8. [8]

    Bensoussan, G

    A. Bensoussan, G. Da Prato, M.C. Delfour and S.K. Mitter,Representation and control of infinite-dimensional systems,V ol.1, Birk¨ auser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1992

    1992

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Viscous Incompress- ible Fluid + Rigid Body

    Marco Bravin,Energy Equality and Uniqueness of Weak Solutions of a “Viscous Incompress- ible Fluid + Rigid Body” System with Navier Slip-with-Friction Conditions in a 2D Bounded Domain,J. Math. Fluid Mech. 21 (2019),1-31

    2019

  2. [10]

    Bresch, B

    D. Bresch, B. Desjardins and D. G´ erard-Veret,On compressible Navier-Stokes equations with density dependent viscosities in bounded domains, J. Math. Pures Appl. 87(2007), 227-235

    2007

  3. [11]

    Brezis and P

    H. Brezis and P. Mironescu,Gagliardo-Nirenberg, composition and products in fractional Sobolev spaces, J. Evolution Equations 1 2001), 387-404

    2001

  4. [12]

    Crispo and P

    F. Crispo and P. Maremonti,An interpolation inequality in exterior domains, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova, 112(2004),11-39

    2004

  5. [13]

    Dashti and J.C

    M. Dashti and J.C. Robinson,The motion of a fluid-Rigid Disc system at the zero limit of the Rigid Disc Radius, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 200 (2011), 285-312

    2011

  6. [14]

    Dhifaoui-theory for the exterior Stokes problem with Navier’s type slip-without-friction boundary conditions,Math

    A. Dhifaoui-theory for the exterior Stokes problem with Navier’s type slip-without-friction boundary conditions,Math. Z. 73 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    M. P. do Carmo,Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Revised and Updated Second Edition, Dover Publications, 2016

    2016

  8. [16]

    I. A. Djebour,Existence of strong solutions for a compressible fluid-solid interaction system with Navier slip boundary conditions, Evolution Equations and Control Theory,13(2024), 1162–1198

    2024

  9. [17]

    Eiter,On the regularity of weak solutions to time-periodic Navier–Stokes equations in exte- rior domains, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.00429 (2022)

    T. Eiter,On the regularity of weak solutions to time-periodic Navier–Stokes equations in exte- rior domains, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.00429 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Eiter and Y

    T. Eiter and Y . Shibata,Viscous flow past a translating body with oscillating boundary, Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan,77(2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Ervedoza, D

    S. Ervedoza, D. Maity and M. Tucsnak,Large time behavior for the motion of a solid in a viscous incompresible fluid,Math. Ann. 385 (2023), 631–691

    2023

  12. [20]

    Farwig and H

    R. Farwig and H. Sohr, Generalized resolvent estimates for the Stokes system in bounded and unbounded domains,J. Math. Soc. Japan, 48 (1996), 581–601

    1996

  13. [21]

    Gagliardo,Proprieta di alcune classi di funzioni in pia varialili, Richerche Mat

    E. Gagliardo,Proprieta di alcune classi di funzioni in pia varialili, Richerche Mat. 7(1958), 102-137. 44 B. JIN

    1958

  14. [22]

    G. P. Galdi,An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of the Navier–Stokes Equations, Vol. I & II, 2nd edition, Springer, New York, 2011

    2011

  15. [23]

    Gerard-Varet and M

    D. Gerard-Varet and M. Hilliaret,Existence of weak solutions up to collision for viscous fluid- solid systems with slip,Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 67(2014), 2022-2076

    2014

  16. [24]

    Y . Giga. Domains of fractional powers of the Stokes operator inLr spaces.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 89(3):251–265, 1985

    1985

  17. [25]

    Giga,Domains of fractional powers of the Stokes operator inL r spaces,Arch

    Y . Giga,Domains of fractional powers of the Stokes operator inL r spaces,Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 89(1985), 251-265

    1985

  18. [26]

    Giga and H

    Y . Giga and H. Sohr,On the Stokes operator in exterior domains, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 36(1989),103-130

    1989

  19. [27]

    Grisvard, Elliptic Problems in a Nonsmooth Domains, Pitmsan Advanced Publishing Pro- gram(1985)

    P. Grisvard, Elliptic Problems in a Nonsmooth Domains, Pitmsan Advanced Publishing Pro- gram(1985)

    1985

  20. [28]

    Hishida, Stability of time-dependent motions for fluid–rigid ball interaction,J

    T. Hishida, Stability of time-dependent motions for fluid–rigid ball interaction,J. Math. Fluid Mech., 26(1):1–25, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Iwashita,L q −L r estimates for solutions of the nonstationary stokes equations in an exterior domain and the Navier-Stokes initial value problems inLq spaces,Math

    H. Iwashita,L q −L r estimates for solutions of the nonstationary stokes equations in an exterior domain and the Navier-Stokes initial value problems inLq spaces,Math. Ann. 285, (1989) 265- 288

    1989

  22. [30]

    Kajiwara,MaximalL p-Lq regularity for the Stokes equations with various boundary condi- tions in the half space, arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.05306 (2022)

    N. Kajiwara,MaximalL p-Lq regularity for the Stokes equations with various boundary condi- tions in the half space, arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.05306 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kozono and T

    H. Kozono and T. Ogawa,SomeL p estimate for the exterior Stokes flow and an application to the non-stationary Navier-Stokes equations, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 41 (1992),789-808

    1992

  24. [32]

    Kozono and H

    H. Kozono and H. Sohr,New a prior estimate for the Stokes equations in exterior domains, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 40 (1991), 1-27

    1991

  25. [33]

    Ladyzhenskaya,The Mathematical Theory of Visous Incompressible Flow,Gordon and Beach 1963

    O.A. Ladyzhenskaya,The Mathematical Theory of Visous Incompressible Flow,Gordon and Beach 1963

    1963

  26. [34]

    Lunardi, Analytic Semigroups and optimal Regularity in Parabolic Problems, Birkh¨ auser (1999)

    A. Lunardi, Analytic Semigroups and optimal Regularity in Parabolic Problems, Birkh¨ auser (1999)

    1999

  27. [35]

    Maity and M

    D. Maity and M. Tucsnak,L p −L q Maximal Regulairty for some Operators associated with Linearlized Incompressible Fluid-Rigid Body problems,Math. Anal. Fluid Mech.—Sel. Recent Results, Contemp. Math., 710 (2018), 175-201

    2018

  28. [36]

    Maity and M

    D. Maity and M. Tucsnak.L p-Lq maximal regularity for some fluid-structure interaction prob- lems.Analysis and PDE, 12(8):1913–1964, 2019

    1913

  29. [37]

    Maremonti and V .A

    P. Maremonti and V .A. Solonnikov,On nonstationary Stokes problem in exterior domains, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. Ser. 24 (1997), 395-449

    1997

  30. [38]

    Maremonti and V .A

    P. Maremonti and V .A. Solonnikov,An estimate for the solutions of solutions of the Stokes system in exterior domains,Zap. Nauch. Sem. LOMI 180(1990), 105-120

    1990

  31. [39]

    Pr ¨uss,Evolutionary Integral Equations and Applications, Monographs in Mathematics, vol

    J. Pr ¨uss,Evolutionary Integral Equations and Applications, Monographs in Mathematics, vol. 87, Birkh¨auser, Basel, 1993

    1993

  32. [40]

    Rudin, Functional Analysis, McGraw-Hill Science, 1991

    W. Rudin, Functional Analysis, McGraw-Hill Science, 1991

    1991

  33. [41]

    Shibata, On the Stokes equations with slip boundary condition,Math

    R. Shibata, On the Stokes equations with slip boundary condition,Math. Methods Appl. Sci.23 (2000), 203–226

    2000

  34. [42]

    Shibata and R

    Y . Shibata and R. Shimada,On theL p-Lq estimates of the Stokes semigroup in a vector bundle, Differential and Integral Equations,20(11) (2007), 1201-1236

    2007

  35. [43]

    Shibata and H

    Y . Shibata and H. Soga, Scattering theory for the elastic wave equation in an exterior domain, Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan,41(1989), no. 2, 311–327

    1989

  36. [44]

    Sohr,The Navier–Stokes Equations: An Elementary Functional Analytic Approach, Birkh¨auser, Basel, 2001

    H. Sohr,The Navier–Stokes Equations: An Elementary Functional Analytic Approach, Birkh¨auser, Basel, 2001

    2001

  37. [45]

    Solonnikov,Estimates for solutions of nonstationary Navier-Stokes equations,J

    V .A. Solonnikov,Estimates for solutions of nonstationary Navier-Stokes equations,J. Soviet Math. 8(1977), 467-523

    1977

  38. [46]

    Takahashi and M

    T. Takahashi and M. Tucsnak,Gloabal strong solutions for the two-dimensional motion of an- finite cylinder in a viscous fluid, J. Math. fluid mech. 6 (2004), 53-77

    2004

  39. [47]

    Temam, Navier-Stokes Equations, Theory and Numerical Analysis, Studies in Mathematics and Its Applications, V ol 2, Elsevier Science Publications B.V

    R. Temam, Navier-Stokes Equations, Theory and Numerical Analysis, Studies in Mathematics and Its Applications, V ol 2, Elsevier Science Publications B.V . 1984. NA VIER-SLIP FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION 45

    1984

  40. [48]

    Temam,Probl `emes math´ematiques en plasticit´e

    R. Temam,Probl `emes math´ematiques en plasticit´e. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1983

    1983

  41. [49]

    Wang,Strong solutions for the fluid-solid systems in a 2-D domain, Asymptot

    C. Wang,Strong solutions for the fluid-solid systems in a 2-D domain, Asymptot. Anal. 89(2014),263-306

    2014

  42. [50]

    Wang and Z

    Y . Wang and Z. Xin,Analysis of the semigroup associated with the fluid-rigid body problem and local existence of strong solutions, J. Funct. Anal. 261(2011), 2587-2616

    2011

  43. [51]

    Weidmann, Linear operators in Hilbert spaces, Springer-Verlag(1976)

    J. Weidmann, Linear operators in Hilbert spaces, Springer-Verlag(1976). DEPARTMENT OFMATHEMATICSEDUCATION, MOKPONATIONALUNIVERSITY MUAN534-729, SOUTHKOREA Email address:bumjajin@mnu.ac.kr

    1976

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.