Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards Brain Passage Retrieval -- An Investigation of EEG Query Representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.06695 v3 pith:MCDFAZJQ submitted 2024-12-09 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords brainretrievalusersinformationtextcognitiveneedsqueries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Information Retrieval (IR) systems primarily rely on users' ability to translate their internal information needs into (text) queries. However, this translation process is often uncertain and cognitively demanding, leading to queries that incompletely or inaccurately represent users' true needs. This challenge is particularly acute for users with ill-defined information needs or physical impairments that limit traditional text input, where the gap between cognitive intent and query expression becomes even more pronounced. Recent neuroscientific studies have explored Brain-Machine Interfaces (BMIs) as a potential solution, aiming to bridge the gap between users' cognitive semantics and their search intentions. However, current approaches attempting to decode explicit text queries from brain signals have shown limited effectiveness in learning robust brain-to-text representations, often failing to capture the nuanced semantic information present in brain patterns. To address these limitations, we propose BPR (Brain Passage Retrieval), a novel framework that eliminates the need for intermediate query translation by enabling direct retrieval of relevant passages from users' brain signals. Our approach leverages dense retrieval architectures to map EEG signals and text passages into a shared semantic space. Through comprehensive experiments on the ZuCo dataset, we demonstrate that BPR achieves up to 8.81% improvement in precision@5 over existing EEG-to-text baselines, while maintaining effectiveness across 30 participants. Our ablation studies reveal the critical role of hard negative sampling and specialised brain encoders in achieving robust cross-modal alignment. These results establish the viability of direct brain-to-passage retrieval and provide a foundation for developing more natural interfaces between users' cognitive states and IR systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Error Classification from Physiological Signals within Airborne Environment

    cs.HC 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EEG-based error classification from physiological signals maintains roughly 88% accuracy during live flight manoeuvres, comparable to laboratory performance, while ECG fails near chance.

  2. Adaptive Orchestration of Modular Generative Information Access Systems

    cs.IR 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A framework for per-query adaptive orchestration of modular GenIA systems is proposed, and a contextual-bandit instantiation is shown to outperform static GPTSwarm orchestration on question answering.

Pith tools