pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15909 · v1 · pith:MCGJRPILnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🧮 math.QA · math.RT

Restricted quantum groups as graded Hopf algebras

Jelena Ani\'c , Giovanni Felder This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 17:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.QA math.RT
keywords graded Hopf algebrasrestricted quantum groupsrigid monoidal categoriesfibre functorfinite groupoidsAndrews-Baxter-Forrester modelsJimbo-Miwa-Okado models
0
0 comments X

The pith

A π²-grading on Hopf algebras turns their finite-dimensional representations into a rigid monoidal category equipped with a fibre functor to π-graded vector spaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines π²-graded Hopf algebras, where the grading is given by the double groupoid of commutative diagrams of a finite groupoid π. It establishes that the finite-dimensional representations of any such algebra assemble into a rigid monoidal category that carries a fibre functor to the category of vector spaces graded by π. The construction is illustrated by the restricted quantum groups that appear in the Andrews-Baxter-Forrester restricted solid-on-solid models and in the Jimbo-Miwa-Okado models associated with classical Lie algebras.

Core claim

The authors introduce the notion of a π²-graded Hopf algebra graded by the double groupoid of commutative diagrams of a finite groupoid π. For these algebras, the finite dimensional representations form a rigid monoidal category equipped with a fibre functor to the category of π-graded vector spaces. Restricted quantum groups serve as the main concrete realization of this structure.

What carries the argument

The π²-grading defined via the double groupoid of commutative diagrams of a finite groupoid π, which ensures compatibility with the Hopf algebra operations and induces the desired monoidal structure on representations.

If this is right

  • The category of finite-dimensional representations is rigid monoidal.
  • A fibre functor exists from this category to the category of π-graded vector spaces.
  • The same construction applies directly to the restricted quantum groups of the Andrews-Baxter-Forrester and Jimbo-Miwa-Okado models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The grading technique may extend to other families of quantum groups that arise in integrable models.
  • The fibre functor could simplify explicit calculations of fusion rules or braiding in these representation categories.
  • Similar double-groupoid gradings might produce new examples of modular tensor categories outside the listed models.

Load-bearing premise

The proposed definition of the π²-grading by the double groupoid is compatible with the Hopf algebra axioms while preserving the rigid monoidal structure on representations.

What would settle it

Finding a concrete finite-dimensional representation of one of the restricted quantum groups that fails to be rigid or to admit the fibre functor under this grading would refute the central claim.

read the original abstract

We introduce the notion of $\pi^2$-graded Hopf algebra, where the grading is by the double groupoid of commutative diagrams of a finite groupoid $\pi$. The finite dimensional representations of a $\pi^2$-graded Hopf algebra form a rigid monoidal category with a fibre functor to the category of $\pi$-graded vector spaces. The main example is given by the restricted quantum groups underlying the Andrews-Baxter-Forrester restricted solid-on-solid models of statistical mechanics and, more generally, the Jimbo-Miwa-Okado models associated to classical Lie algebras.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the notion of π²-graded Hopf algebra, graded by the double groupoid of commutative diagrams of a finite groupoid π. It claims that the finite-dimensional representations of such a Hopf algebra form a rigid monoidal category with a fibre functor to the category of π-graded vector spaces. The primary examples are the restricted quantum groups underlying the Andrews-Baxter-Forrester restricted solid-on-solid models and the Jimbo-Miwa-Okado models associated to classical Lie algebras.

Significance. If the central claims are verified, the work supplies a graded Hopf-algebraic framework that realizes rigid monoidal categories with fibre functors for a class of restricted quantum groups arising in solvable lattice models. This could clarify the categorical structure underlying the representation theory of these algebras and connect directly to the integrability of the associated statistical-mechanics models. The construction appears definitional rather than circular, with no free parameters introduced.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim that finite-dimensional representations form a rigid monoidal category with fibre functor to π-graded vector spaces requires explicit verification that the coproduct Δ and antipode S respect the double-groupoid grading. Without a direct check that the graded components of Δ map into the appropriate summands of the double groupoid (ensuring tensor products of representations remain π²-graded) and that S supplies compatible duals, the fibre functor and rigidity may not be well-defined. This verification is load-bearing for the main theorem and should appear immediately after the definition of the π²-grading.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive suggestion. The point about explicit verification of grading compatibility is well taken, and we have revised the manuscript to include it immediately after the definition.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that finite-dimensional representations form a rigid monoidal category with fibre functor to π-graded vector spaces requires explicit verification that the coproduct Δ and antipode S respect the double-groupoid grading. Without a direct check that the graded components of Δ map into the appropriate summands of the double groupoid (ensuring tensor products of representations remain π²-graded) and that S supplies compatible duals, the fibre functor and rigidity may not be well-defined. This verification is load-bearing for the main theorem and should appear immediately after the definition of the π²-grading.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the exposition of the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a new lemma (Lemma 2.4) immediately after the definition of π²-graded Hopf algebras. The lemma contains a direct computation: for a homogeneous element x of bidegree (g,h) in the double groupoid, the coproduct Δ(x) is shown to lie in the sum of tensor products of components whose bidegrees compose correctly in the groupoid, so that the tensor product of two finite-dimensional π-graded representations remains π²-graded. The same lemma verifies that the antipode S maps the (g,h)-component into the dual component corresponding to the inverse pair, thereby supplying the rigid duals compatible with the fibre functor to π-graded vector spaces. The main theorem is now stated with an explicit reference to this lemma. These additions make the load-bearing step transparent without altering the original construction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

New π²-grading definition yields rigid monoidal representation category as a theorem, not by construction

full rationale

The paper introduces the definition of a π²-graded Hopf algebra graded by the double groupoid of commutative diagrams of a finite groupoid π. It then states that the finite-dimensional representations form a rigid monoidal category with fibre functor to π-graded vector spaces. This is presented as a consequence of the definition together with the Hopf algebra axioms, not as a self-referential reduction where the claimed property is presupposed in the grading or derived solely from self-citation. No fitted parameters, renamed known results, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or description. The main examples (restricted quantum groups) are external to the grading definition itself. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted or verified from the full development.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5612 in / 1174 out tokens · 42079 ms · 2026-05-19T17:47:22.804203+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quantumq-Langlands corre- spondence

    M. Aganagic, E. Frenkel, and A. Okounkov. “Quantumq-Langlands corre- spondence”. In:Trans. Moscow Math. Soc.79 (2018), pp. 1–83.issn: 0077- 1554.doi:10.1090/mosc/278.url:https://doi.org/10.1090/mosc/278

    work page doi:10.1090/mosc/278.url:https://doi.org/10.1090/mosc/278 2018

  2. [2]

    arXiv 1604.00423

    Mina Aganagic and Andrei Okounkov.Elliptic stable envelopes. arXiv 1604.00423. 2016

    work page arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Quasimap counts and Bethe eigen- functions

    Mina Aganagic and Andrei Okounkov. “Quasimap counts and Bethe eigen- functions”. In:Mosc. Math. J.17.4 (2017), pp. 565–600.issn: 1609-3321.doi: 10.17323/1609- 4514- 2016- 16- 4- 565- 600.url:https://doi.org/10. 17323/1609-4514-2016-16-4-565-600

    work page doi:10.17323/1609- 2017

  4. [4]

    Eight-vertex SOS model and generalized Rogers-Ramanujan-type identities

    George E. Andrews, R. J. Baxter, and P. J. Forrester. “Eight-vertex SOS model and generalized Rogers-Ramanujan-type identities”. In:J. Statist. Phys. 35.3-4 (1984), pp. 193–266.issn: 0022-4715.doi:10.1007/BF01014383.url: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014383

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01014383.url: 1984

  5. [5]

    Hidden symmetries of 4DN= 2 gauge theories

    Hanno Bertle et al. “Hidden symmetries of 4DN= 2 gauge theories”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics2025.2 (Feb. 2025), p. 205.issn: 1029-8479. doi:10 . 1007 / JHEP02(2025 ) 205.url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1007 / JHEP02(2025)205

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994, pp

    Vyjayanthi Chari and Andrew Pressley.A guide to quantum groups. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994, pp. xvi+651.isbn: 0-521-43305-3

    work page 1994

  7. [7]

    Gauge theory and integrability, I

    Kevin Costello, Edward Witten, and Masahito Yamazaki. “Gauge theory and integrability, I”. In:ICCM Not.6.1 (2018), pp. 46–119.issn: 2326-4810.doi: 10.4310/ICCM.2018.v6.n1.a6.url:https://doi.org/10.4310/ICCM. 2018.v6.n1.a6

    work page doi:10.4310/iccm.2018.v6.n1.a6.url:https://doi.org/10.4310/iccm 2018

  8. [8]

    Dynamical Yang-Baxter equation and quantum vector bundles

    J. Donin and A. Mudrov. “Dynamical Yang-Baxter equation and quantum vector bundles”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.254.3 (2005), pp. 719–760.issn: 0010-3616,1432-0916.doi:10 . 1007 / s00220 - 004 - 1247 - 8.url:https : //doi.org/10.1007/s00220-004-1247-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1247-8 2005

  9. [9]

    Quantum groupoids and dynamical categories

    J. Donin and A. Mudrov. “Quantum groupoids and dynamical categories”. In:J. Algebra296.2 (2006), pp. 348–384.issn: 0021-8693,1090-266X.doi: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.01.001.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jalgebra.2006.01.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.01.001.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/j 2006

  10. [10]

    A new realization of Yangians and of quantum affine alge- bras

    V. G. Drinfel’d. “A new realization of Yangians and of quantum affine alge- bras”. In:Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR296.1 (1987), pp. 13–17.issn: 0002-3264

    work page 1987

  11. [11]

    Quantum groups

    V. G. Drinfel’d. “Quantum groups”. In:Proceedings of the International Con- gress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Berkeley, Calif., 1986). Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1987, pp. 798–820

    work page 1986

  12. [12]

    Lectures on the dynamical Yang- Baxter equations

    Pavel Etingof and Olivier Schiffmann. “Lectures on the dynamical Yang- Baxter equations”. In:Quantum groups and Lie theory (Durham, 1999). Vol. 290. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cam- bridge, 2001, pp. 89–129. REFERENCES 49

    work page 1999

  13. [13]

    Solutions of the quantum dynami- cal Yang-Baxter equation and dynamical quantum groups

    Pavel Etingof and Alexander Varchenko. “Solutions of the quantum dynami- cal Yang-Baxter equation and dynamical quantum groups”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.196.3 (1998), pp. 591–640.issn: 0010-3616,1432-0916.doi:10.1007/ s002200050437.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200050437

    work page doi:10.1007/s002200050437 1998

  14. [14]

    Monodromy of solutions of the elliptic quantum Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov-Bernard difference equations

    G. Felder, V. Tarasov, and A. Varchenko. “Monodromy of solutions of the elliptic quantum Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov-Bernard difference equations”. In: Internat. J. Math.10.8 (1999), pp. 943–975.issn: 0129-167X.doi:10.1142/ S0129167X99000410.url:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129167X99000410

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129167x99000410 1999

  15. [15]

    Solutions of the elliptic qKZB equations and Bethe ansatz. I

    G. Felder, V. Tarasov, and A. Varchenko. “Solutions of the elliptic qKZB equations and Bethe ansatz. I”. In:Topics in singularity theory. Vol. 180. Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997, pp. 45–75.doi:10.1090/trans2/180/04.url:https://doi.org/10.1090/ trans2/180/04

    work page doi:10.1090/trans2/180/04.url:https://doi.org/10.1090/ 1997

  16. [16]

    Resonance relations for solutions of the elliptic QKZB equations, fusion rules, and eigenvectors of transfer matrices of re- stricted interaction-round-a-face models

    G. Felder and A. Varchenko. “Resonance relations for solutions of the elliptic QKZB equations, fusion rules, and eigenvectors of transfer matrices of re- stricted interaction-round-a-face models”. In:Commun. Contemp. Math.1.3 (1999), pp. 335–403.issn: 0219-1997.doi:10 . 1142 / S0219199799000146. url:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219199799000146

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219199799000146 1999

  17. [17]

    Elliptic quantum groups

    Giovanni Felder. “Elliptic quantum groups”. In:XIth International Congress of Mathematical Physics (Paris, 1994). Int. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995, pp. 211–218

    work page 1994

  18. [18]

    Quantum groups for restricted SOS models

    Giovanni Felder and Muze Ren. “Quantum groups for restricted SOS models”. In:SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl.17 (2021), Paper No. 005, 26.issn: 1815-0659.doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2021.005.url:https: //doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2021.005

    work page doi:10.3842/sigma.2021.005.url:https: 2021

  19. [19]

    q-deformed KZB heat equation: completeness, modular properties and SL(3,Z)

    Giovanni Felder and Alexander Varchenko. “q-deformed KZB heat equation: completeness, modular properties and SL(3,Z)”. In:Adv. Math.171.2 (2002), pp. 228–275.issn: 0001-8708.doi:10.1006/aima.2002.2080.url:https: //doi.org/10.1006/aima.2002.2080

    work page doi:10.1006/aima.2002.2080.url:https: 2002

  20. [20]

    Elliptic quantum groups and Ruijsenaars models

    Giovanni Felder and Alexander Varchenko. “Elliptic quantum groups and Ruijsenaars models”. In:J. Statist. Phys.89.5-6 (1997), pp. 963–980.issn: 0022-4715.doi:10.1007/BF02764216.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02764216

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02764216.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/ 1997

  21. [21]

    Hypergeometric theta functions and elliptic Macdonald polynomials

    Giovanni Felder and Alexander Varchenko. “Hypergeometric theta functions and elliptic Macdonald polynomials”. In:Int. Math. Res. Not.21 (2004), pp. 1037–1055.issn: 1073-7928.doi:10 . 1155 / S1073792804132893.url: https://doi.org/10.1155/S1073792804132893

    work page doi:10.1155/s1073792804132893 2004

  22. [22]

    On representations of the elliptic quantum groupE τ,η(sl2)

    Giovanni Felder and Alexander Varchenko. “On representations of the elliptic quantum groupE τ,η(sl2)”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.181.3 (1996), pp. 741– 761.issn: 0010-3616.url:http : / / projecteuclid . org / euclid . cmp / 1104287911

    work page 1996

  23. [23]

    Three formulae for eigenfunc- tions of integrable Schr¨ odinger operators

    Giovanni Felder and Alexander Varchenko. “Three formulae for eigenfunc- tions of integrable Schr¨ odinger operators”. In:Compositio Math.107.2 (1997), pp. 143–175.issn: 0010-437X.doi:10.1023/A:1000138423050.url:https: //doi.org/10.1023/A:1000138423050. 50 REFERENCES

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1000138423050.url:https: 1997

  24. [24]

    Baxter operators and asymptotic rep- resentations

    Giovanni Felder and Huafeng Zhang. “Baxter operators and asymptotic rep- resentations”. In:Selecta Math. (N.S.)23.4 (2017), pp. 2947–2975.issn: 1022- 1824.doi:10.1007/s00029-017-0320-z.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00029-017-0320-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s00029-017-0320-z.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/ 2017

  25. [25]

    Quantum affine algebras and holo- nomic difference equations

    I. B. Frenkel and N. Yu. Reshetikhin. “Quantum affine algebras and holo- nomic difference equations”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.146.1 (1992), pp. 1–60. issn: 0010-3616,1432-0916.url:http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/ 1104249974

    work page 1992

  26. [26]

    Quasi-Hopf deformations of quantum groups

    C. Frønsdal. “Quasi-Hopf deformations of quantum groups”. In:Lett. Math. Phys.40.2 (1997), pp. 117–134.issn: 0377-9017.doi:10.1023/A:1007379217382. url:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007379217382

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1007379217382 1997

  27. [27]

    Elliptic quantum groups and their finite-dimensional representations

    Sachin Gautam and Valerio Toledano-Laredo.Elliptic quantum groups and their finite-dimensional representations. arXiv 1707.06469. 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    The elliptic GL(n) dynamical quantum group as anh- Hopf algebroid

    Jonas T. Hartwig. “The elliptic GL(n) dynamical quantum group as anh- Hopf algebroid”. In:Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.(2009), Art. ID 545892, 41.issn: 0161-1712.doi:10.1155/2009/545892.url:https://doi.org/10.1155/ 2009/545892

    work page doi:10.1155/2009/545892.url:https://doi.org/10.1155/ 2009

  29. [29]

    Quasi-Hopf twistors for elliptic quantum groups

    M. Jimbo et al. “Quasi-Hopf twistors for elliptic quantum groups”. In:Trans- form. Groups4.4 (1999), pp. 303–327.issn: 1083-4362.doi:10.1007/BF01238562. url:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01238562

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01238562 1999

  30. [30]

    Aq-difference analogue ofU(g) and the Yang-Baxter equa- tion

    Michio Jimbo. “Aq-difference analogue ofU(g) and the Yang-Baxter equa- tion”. In:Lett. Math. Phys.10.1 (1985), pp. 63–69.issn: 0377-9017.doi: 10.1007/BF00704588.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704588

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00704588.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00704588 1985

  31. [31]

    Solvable lattice models related to the vector representation of classical simple Lie algebras

    Michio Jimbo, Tetsuji Miwa, and Masato Okado. “Solvable lattice models related to the vector representation of classical simple Lie algebras”. In: Comm. Math. Phys.116.3 (1988), pp. 507–525.issn: 0010-3616.url:http: //projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1104161425

    work page arXiv 1988

  32. [32]

    A categorical approach to dynamical quantum groups

    Artem Kalmykov and Pavel Safronov. “A categorical approach to dynamical quantum groups”. In:Forum Math. Sigma10 (2022), Paper No. e76, 57.issn: 2050-5094.doi:10.1017/fms.2022.68.url:https://doi.org/10.1017/ fms.2022.68

    work page doi:10.1017/fms.2022.68.url:https://doi.org/10.1017/ 2022

  33. [33]

    Elliptic U(2) quantum group and elliptic hypergeometric series

    Erik Koelink, Yvette van Norden, and Hjalmar Rosengren. “Elliptic U(2) quantum group and elliptic hypergeometric series”. In:Comm. Math. Phys. 245.3 (2004), pp. 519–537.issn: 0010-3616.doi:10 . 1007 / s00220 - 003 - 1016-0.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-003-1016-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-003-1016-0 2004

  34. [34]

    Hitoshi Konno.Elliptic quantum groups. Vol. 37. SpringerBriefs in Mathemat- ical Physics. Springer Singapore, 2020, pp. xiii+131.isbn: 978-981-15-7387-3. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7387-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7387-3 2020

  35. [35]

    Elliptic quantum groupsU q,p(bglN) andE q,p(bglN)

    Hitoshi Konno. “Elliptic quantum groupsU q,p(bglN) andE q,p(bglN)”. In:Rep- resentation theory, special functions and Painlev´ e equations—RIMS 2015. Vol. 76. Adv. Stud. Pure Math. Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2018, pp. 347– 417.doi:10.2969/aspm/07610347.url:https://doi.org/10.2969/aspm/ 07610347

    work page doi:10.2969/aspm/07610347.url:https://doi.org/10.2969/aspm/ 2015

  36. [36]

    Hopf algebroids and quantum groupoids

    Jiang-Hua Lu. “Hopf algebroids and quantum groupoids”. In:Internat. J. Math.7.1 (1996), pp. 47–70.issn: 0129-167X,1793-6519.doi:10 . 1142 / S0129167X96000050.url:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129167X96000050

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129167x96000050 1996

  37. [37]

    Muze Ren.Baxterization for the dynamical Yang-Baxter equation. 2024. arXiv: 2310.04728 [math.RT].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04728. REFERENCES 51

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Muze Ren.Groupoid intertwiner and twist for dynamical Yang–Baxter equa- tion: part I. 2023. arXiv:2311.10504 [math.RT].url:https://arxiv.org/ abs/2311.10504

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Central extensions of quantum current groups

    N. Yu. Reshetikhin and M. A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky. “Central extensions of quantum current groups”. In:Lett. Math. Phys.19.2 (1990), pp. 133–142. issn: 0377-9017,1573-0530.doi:10.1007/BF01045884.url:https://doi. org/10.1007/BF01045884

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01045884.url:https://doi 1990

  40. [40]

    Quantization of Lie groups and Lie algebras

    N. Yu. Reshetikhin, L. A. Takhtadzhyan, and L. D. Faddeev. “Quantization of Lie groups and Lie algebras”. In:Algebra i Analiz1.1 (1989), pp. 178–206. issn: 0234-0852

    work page 1989

  41. [41]

    Spherical Lagrangians via ball packings and symplectic cutting

    R. Rim´ anyi, V. Tarasov, and A. Varchenko. “Elliptic andK-theoretic stable envelopes and Newton polytopes”. In:Selecta Math. (N.S.)25.1 (2019), Art. 16, 43.issn: 1022-1824.doi:10.1007/s00029- 019- 0451- 5.url:https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00029-019-0451-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00029- 2019

  42. [42]

    Felder’s elliptic quantum group and elliptic hyperge- ometric series on the root systemA n

    Hjalmar Rosengren. “Felder’s elliptic quantum group and elliptic hyperge- ometric series on the root systemA n”. In:Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN13 (2011), pp. 2861–2920.issn: 1073-7928

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Quantum groupoids

    Ping Xu. “Quantum groupoids”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.216.3 (2001), pp. 539– 581.issn: 0010-3616,1432-0916.doi:10.1007/s002200000334.url:https: //doi.org/10.1007/s002200000334

    work page doi:10.1007/s002200000334.url:https: 2001

  44. [44]

    How to Sheafify an Elliptic Quantum Group

    Yaping Yang and Gufang Zhao. “How to Sheafify an Elliptic Quantum Group”. In:2017 MATRIX Annals. Ed. by Jan de Gier, Cheryl E. Praeger, and Ter- ence Tao. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 675–691.isbn: 978-3-030-04161-8.doi:10 . 1007 / 978 - 3 - 030 - 04161 - 8 _ 54.url:https : //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04161-8_54

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04161-8_54 2017

  45. [45]

    Yaping Yang and Gufang Zhao.Quiver varieties and elliptic quantum groups

    work page

  46. [46]

    arXiv:1708.01418 [math.RT].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/1708. 01418

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Elliptic quantum groups and Baxter relations

    Huafeng Zhang. “Elliptic quantum groups and Baxter relations”. In:Algebra Number Theory12.3 (2018), pp. 599–647.issn: 1937-0652.doi:10 .2140 / ant.2018.12.599.url:https://doi.org/10.2140/ant.2018.12.599. Department of Mathematics, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland Email address:jelena.anic@math.ethz.ch Department of Mathematics, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich...

    work page doi:10.2140/ant.2018.12.599 2018