Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The return of (I)DeFiX

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.00251 v1 pith:MDDXTZLZ submitted 2022-04-01 q-fin.CP

classification q-fin.CP
keywords defimarketcryptocurrencyreturnstokensattentiondecentralizeddefix
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is a nascent set of financial services, using tokens, smart contracts, and blockchain technology as financial instruments. We investigate four possible drivers of DeFi returns: exposure to cryptocurrency market, the network effect, the investor's attention, and the valuation ratio. As DeFi tokens are distinct from classical cryptocurrencies, we design a new dedicated market index, denoted DeFiX. First, we show that DeFi tokens returns are driven by the investor's attention on technical terms such as "decentralized finance" or "DeFi", and are exposed to their own network variables and cryptocurrency market. We construct a valuation ratio for the DeFi market by dividing the Total Value Locked (TVL) by the Market Capitalization (MC). Our findings do not support the TVL/MC predictive power assumption. Overall, our empirical study shows that the impact of the cryptocurrency market on DeFi returns is stronger than any other considered driver and provides superior explanatory power.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Verifiability of Total Value Locked (TVL) in Decentralized Finance

    q-fin.GN 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Most DeFi TVL figures are only partially verifiable: 10.5% of 939 Ethereum protocols use external servers, and only 23.5% of 400 reconstructed protocols match published values within 5%.

Pith tools