Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 81 references

An integrated multi-size collision model for flotation

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes the Integrated Multi-Size Collision model (IMSC), which combines turbulent shear, inertial drift, gravity, swarm corrections, and bubble flow-distortion into a single collision-kernel formula, and reports that it…

desk verdict Substantial integrated model, but the validation is partly circular because key constants are fitted to the same DNS data used to claim superiority; still deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03881 v1 pith:MDHBP7UK submitted 2025-06-04 physics.flu-dyn

Benedikt Tiedemann , Moritz Kreuseler , Jochen Fröhlich This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn PACS 47.55.Kf47.55.Dr47.27.-i
keywords flotationparticle-bubblecollisionkernelturbulencedirectnumericalsimulationmulti-sizemodelsphericalswarmeffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Froth flotation separates valuable minerals from waste by making hydrophobic particles attach to air bubbles, and the rate at which particles and bubbles collide is a key input to simulations of the process. This paper argues that existing collision-rate models are each valid only for a narrow slice of flotation conditions and that several have reference-frame or formulation inconsistencies. It proposes the Integrated Multi-Size Collision model (IMSC), which combines a spherical collision kernel with a decomposition of the particle-bubble relative velocity into turbulent shear, inertial drift, and gravity, plus corrections for swarm effects and for the distortion of the flow around large bubbles. Validated against direct numerical simulations of flotation and against a high-turbulence literature dataset, the IMSC is reported to match collision kernels across the tested parameter range more closely than previously used models. If this holds, flotation simulations could use one formula instead of switching between regime-specific submodels.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the radial relative velocity $w_{r,\mathrm{rms}}$ inside the spherical collision kernel. The model writes $w_{r,\mathrm{rms}} = \sqrt{(2/\pi)\sigma_I^2 + \langle w_{II,G}^2 \rangle (w_r/w_\infty)^2}$, where $\sigma_I^2$ comes from the turbulent shear mechanism and $\langle w_{II,G}^2 \rangle$ from the combined inertia-gravity mechanism. Mechanism I uses a parabolic-exponential fluid autocorrelation function for the energy spectrum and a piecewise longitudinal fluid structure function $S_{\ell\ell}^{(\mathrm{IMSC})}$ that equals the Borgas-Yeung form below $r_\eta = 1.5\eta$, blends smoothly to zero between $r_\eta$ and $r_\lambda = 0.6\lambda + 0.1L$, and is zero beyond. Mechanism II and gravity are combined through the Dodin-Elperin integral over the collision sphere, after adding swarm corrections from Garnier et al. and Richardson-Zaki and drag corrections from Schiller-Naumann and Karamanev-Nikolov. A size-ratio correction factor $(w_r/w_\infty)^2$ is applied when the radius ratio is below 0.3, using Nguyen's flow field around a bubble for ratios below 0.1 and a linear transition in between.

What would settle it

A decisive check is to run the IMSC on collision-rate data that were not used to tune the constants — for example, bubbles larger than 2.4 mm, Taylor Reynolds numbers well above 175, or non-spherical deformable bubbles — and compare the predicted particle-bubble kernel with new DNS or experiments. If the fixed thresholds $r_\lambda = 0.6\lambda + 0.1L$ and the 0.1/0.3 size-ratio boundaries systematically miss the data while existing models do not, the central claim of full parameter-range coverage is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the collision kernel for particle-bubble, particle-particle, and bubble-bubble encounters in flotation can be captured by a single model that reduces to the classical Saffman-Turner limit for inertialess particles and otherwise adds contributions from finite-inertia drift, gravity, and the wake-like distortion of the flow by the larger collision partner. The IMSC is built on the spherical collision kernel $\Gamma = 2\pi r_c^2 w_{r,\mathrm{rms}}$, with all modelling effort going into the radial relative velocity $w_{r,\mathrm{rms}}$. That velocity is decomposed into a shear-driven part (Mechanism I) and a combined part from inertia and gravity (Mechanism II + gravity). New elements include a piecewise longitudinal fluid structure function that blends the Borgas-Yeung form at small separations to zero at large separations, a consistent Eulerian treatment of the inertia term, and a size-ratio-dependent correction factor for a large bubble's disturbance of the local flow. Across the DNS cases, the authors report that the IMSC gives the best overall agreement for the particle-bubble collision kernel and, unlike other tested models, also captures the particle-particle and bubble-bubble kernels without retuning.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the constants fitted to the DNS calibration set — the structure-function cutoffs $r_\eta = 1.5\eta$ and $r_\lambda = 0.6\lambda + 0.1L$ and the size-ratio thresholds 0.1 and 0.3 — are universal across all flotation conditions; if they are not, the claimed predictive superiority over other models would not transfer outside the tested range.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Euler-Euler flotation simulations can use a single collision kernel for all collision pair types, removing the need to select a different model for fine versus coarse particles.
  • The IMSC reproduces the classical Saffman-Turner limit for zero-inertia particles, so it is consistent with established theory at one end of the parameter range.
  • The model accepts standard simulation inputs ($k$, $\varepsilon$, volume fractions, phase Reynolds numbers), so it can be inserted into existing CFD frameworks without new state variables.
  • In the high-turbulence validation case, the remaining gap between model and DNS is attributed to preferential concentration, and the paper shows that multiplying by the radial distribution function $g(r_c)$ recovers the trend, giving a ready extension for clustering-prone conditions.
  • Because the model is modular, individual submodels (drag, swarm correction, structure function) can be improved or replaced as better two-phase turbulence data become available.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the threshold constants $r_\eta = 1.5\eta$ and $r_\lambda = 0.6\lambda + 0.1L$ are expressed in viscosity-based scales, so they may transfer to other Reynolds numbers even though they were calibrated on a narrow DNS set; computing $S_{\ell\ell}$ from the existing DNS database at different $\mathrm{Re}_\lambda$ would test this directly.
  • Editorial inference: the size-ratio correction is formulated with the larger partner as a bubble with an immobile surface, but the same piecewise structure could be applied to strongly unequal particle pairs; the paper does not test this, so it is an open extension.
  • Editorial inference: a two-phase longitudinal structure function extracted from a richer DNS database could replace the single-phase $S_{\ell\ell}$ and would likely improve the gravity-driven cases, where the paper reports the largest deviations.
  • Editorial inference: the model's input requirements are all local cell quantities, so its computational cost is low enough to make cell-local evaluation in full-cell Euler-Euler simulations practical; this is the natural next deployment step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the Integrated Multi-Size Collision (IMSC) model for predicting collision kernels between particles and bubbles, and also between pairs of particles and pairs of bubbles, in turbulent flotation flows. The model is assembled from existing stochastic collision-kernel concepts with new elements: a blended longitudinal fluid structure function with fitted length constants, drag and swarm corrections, a combined Mechanism-II/gravity contribution, and a piecewise flow-modulation correction for strong size disparity. Validation is performed against the authors' own DNS for fine and coarse particles and against one literature DNS set (Chan et al. 2023). The paper claims that IMSC provides better predictions than current collision models and covers the full flotation parameter range.

Significance. If the claimed predictive accuracy were independent of the calibration data, IMSC would be a practically valuable engineering correlation for Euler-Euler flotation simulations. The paper's strengths include a thorough critical review of existing collision models, a clear modular model structure, explicit documentation of all sub-models, and an implementation summary in Appendix A. The careful reporting of the DNS data and the explicit admission that some prefactors were chosen to match these data are also commendable. The central limitation is that the model is calibrated on the same DNS data that are later presented as validation; the one external case does not exercise the flotation-specific regime or the flow-modulation correction. Thus the abstract's predictive-superiority claim is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 3.4.3 and 3.7, Eqs. (3.33) and (3.50), Figures 9-13] The length constants r_eta=1.5 eta and r_lambda=0.6 lambda+0.1 L in the blended structure function, and the size-ratio thresholds 0.1 and 0.3 in the flow-modulation correction, are, by the authors' own statement, chosen to best match the DNS collision kernels presented in Sections 4 and 5. Those same DNS results are then used as the primary evidence that IMSC outperforms earlier models, which makes the reported agreement partly a fitting result rather than an independent test. The external Chan et al. case in Section 5.2 has no gravity, no size-ratio contrast, and point particles, and the agreement requires multiplying by a radial distribution function g(r_c) taken from that same DNS via Eq. (3.1). Consequently, the abstract's claim that IMSC provides better predictions and covers the entire parameter range is not supported by an out-of-sample test. I request either a genuine out-of-sample validation (for example, calibrating on a subset of DNS cases and validating on the remaining cases) or a substantial weakening of the predictive claim.
  2. [Eq. (3.34) and Table A.1] The Mechanism I variance in the main text is sigma_I^2 = S_ll(r_i)<v_i^2>/u_rms^2 + S_ll(r_j)<v_j^2>/u_rms^2 + S_ll(r_c) f(r_c)<v_i v_j>/u_rms^2, but Table A.1 lists sigma_I^2 with 2 sqrt(S_ll(r_i) S_ll(r_j))<v_i v_j>/u_rms^2, without f(r_c). These are different expressions, so a reader implementing the model from the summary table will obtain a different collision kernel than from the derivation. Appendix A is explicitly offered as the implementation reference, so this inconsistency must be resolved.
  3. [Section 3.7, Eq. (3.51) and Table A.1] The text defines Z = ((r_i/r_j)_m)^2 * 1/(4Y) = 0.0025 Y, whereas Table A.1 gives Z = 0.01/(4Y). Since (r_i/r_j)_m = 0.1, the expression in Eq. (3.51) equals 0.0025/Y, not 0.0025Y. Continuity of the piecewise correction at r_i/r_j = 0.1 requires Z = 0.01/(4Y). The resulting factor-Y^2 discrepancy makes the interpolation branch of Eq. (3.50) ambiguous and must be corrected.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 13 caption] The caption uses 'ISMC' where 'IMSC' is meant; this should be corrected.
  2. [Section 3.4.1, after Eq. (3.18)] The sentence says 'a bubble volume fraction of eps_p = 8.8%'; this should read eps_b = 8.8%.
  3. [Table 2] The reference case G-0.6-240 is listed twice, the second time without parameter values; the duplicate row should be removed.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Validation is in-sample for the fitted constants: r_eta, r_lambda and the size-ratio thresholds are calibrated on the same DNS cases later used to claim superiority.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.4.3, Eq. (3.33)]
    "The prefactors were chosen to best match the collision kernels in the available DNS data presented in Sections 4 and 5 below."

    The constants r_eta = 1.5 eta and r_lambda = 0.6 lambda + 0.1 L define the longitudinal structure function S_l l, which directly enters the Mechanism I contribution in Eq. (3.34) and hence the collision kernel through Eq. (2.5). Section 4 then uses exactly these DNS collision kernels (Figures 9-11) as the validation evidence for the IMSC. The agreement with DNS is therefore not an independent confirmation of these constants: they were fitted to minimize error on the same data, whereas the comparison models (Saffman-Turner, Abrahamson, Zaichik, etc.) do not have such calibrated degrees of freedom. This makes the abstract's claim of 'better predictions' partly in-sample.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.7, Eq. (3.50)]
    "The DNS data utilized for subsequent validation suggest that the assumption regarding the independence of collision partners on their relative velocity, due to their coupling with the fluid, holds true for the condition r_i/r_j > (r_i/r_j)_n = 0.3 (cf. sections 4.4.1 and 5.1 below)."

    The size-ratio thresholds (r_i/r_j)_m = 0.1 and (r_i/r_j)_n = 0.3 define where the flow-modulation correction is active, transitional, or absent. They are justified by the same DNS cases used in Sections 4.4.1 and 5.1 to validate the model. In particular, the coarse-particle cases in Table 2 have d_p/d_b between 0.3 and 0.5, so Eq. (3.50) returns (w_r/w_infty)^2 = 1 because the threshold was set on those very cases. The agreement shown in Figure 13 is therefore partly encoded in the threshold choice, not an independent test.

full rationale

Section 3.4.3 states outright that the cut-off parameters r_eta = 1.5 eta and r_lambda = 0.6 lambda + 0.1 L were 'chosen to best match the collision kernels in the available DNS data presented in Sections 4 and 5 below.' Section 3.7 similarly derives the size-ratio thresholds 0.1 and 0.3 from the DNS cases listed in those same validation sections. The central validation plots (Figures 9 and 13) then compare IMSC against those same DNS collision kernels and claim the IMSC 'provides better predictions.' Since the comparison models do not have these calibration constants, part of the observed agreement is structurally built into IMSC; the comparison is not an out-of-sample test. The only independent benchmark, Chan et al. (2023) in Section 5.2, does not exercise the flotation-specific regime: it has no gravity, no size-ratio contrast, uses point particles with equal Stokes numbers, and the IMSC curve is accepted only after multiplication by an externally supplied radial distribution function g(r_c) via Eq. (3.1). That benchmark therefore cannot validate the fitted r_eta/r_lambda thresholds or the flow-modulation correction. There is no self-citation chain or definitional equivalence here; the rest of the model is assembled from external literature and documented derivations, and the paper discloses its fitting, so the appropriate verdict is partial circularity rather than complete reduction. A separate consistency issue: Eq. (3.51) gives Z = 0.0025Y while Table A.1 lists Z = 0.01/(4Y), which differ by a factor Y^2; this does not affect the circularity score but makes the piecewise correction ambiguous.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on several domain assumptions inherited from the turbulence-collision literature and on four free parameters fitted to the DNS data used for validation. There are no newly invented physical entities. The main burden is the transferability of the fitted blending constants.

free parameters (4)
  • r_eta prefactor = 1.5 (r_eta = 1.5 eta)
    In the piecewise structure function (3.33), the crossover from the Borgas-Yeung form to the blending region is set at r_eta = 1.5*eta. The text says this prefactor was chosen to best match the DNS collision kernels in Sections 4 and 5.
  • r_lambda coefficients = 0.6 and 0.1 (r_lambda = 0.6*lambda + 0.1*L)
    In (3.33), the cut-off length uses coefficients 0.6 and 0.1 chosen to match the DNS data.
  • Lower size-ratio threshold (r_i/r_j)_m = 0.1
    In (3.50), the flow-modulation correction is applied for r_i/r_j <= 0.1; this threshold is inferred from the DNS data in Section 3.7.
  • Upper size-ratio threshold (r_i/r_j)_n = 0.3
    In (3.50), the correction returns to unity for r_i/r_j > 0.3; the text says the DNS data suggest this condition.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Homogeneous and isotropic fluid turbulence (Section 3.2(i)).
    Assumed for the entire model; validated only for the forced turbulence case R53-1-30 (anisotropy 1.05), while gravity-driven cases show anisotropy ~2.4.
  • domain assumption The dispersed elements do not affect the fluid (one-way coupling), except for the separately modeled flow distortion around the large bubble (Section 3.2(iv)).
    Used throughout (3.11)-(3.37) to derive particle and bubble velocity variances.
  • domain assumption The velocity distributions of particles and bubbles are Gaussian (Section 3.3).
    Central to the stochastic derivation of the collision kernel; the paper validates only the first two moments.
  • domain assumption Mechanism I and Mechanism II are independent and uncorrelated (Section 3.3).
    Justifies the variance superposition (3.6); a linearization assumption from Yuu (1984).
  • domain assumption The Basset history force is neglected in the particle equation of motion (Section 3.4.1).
    Equation (3.11) is reduced to (3.12) without the history term, which is standard but not universally valid.
  • domain assumption The longitudinal fluid structure function and the velocity autocorrelation of single-phase isotropic turbulence apply unchanged to the dense three-phase flow (Sections 3.4.2 and 3.4.3).
    The base functions of Williams (1980) and Borgas & Yeung (2004) are single-phase; the paper assumes they hold with fitted blending constants in bubbly particle-laden flow.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An integrated multi-size collision model for flotation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MDHBP7UK

@misc{pith2026250603881,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An integrated multi-size collision model for flotation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MDHBP7UK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03881}
}
read the original abstract

The accuracy obtained with CFD and process simulations of flotation critically depends on the quality and robustness of the underlying models for the non-resolved sub-processes. An important issue in flotation is the collision between particles and air bubbles. Many models have been developed, but their accuracy for applications in flotation is limited. In particular, the significant size difference between particles and bubbles and their intricate coupling to the turbulent flow field pose severe challenges. The present paper first reviews presently employed collision models, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages when applied to flotation. On this basis, the "Integrated Multi-Size Collision model" (IMSC) is proposed. After a detailed evaluation, it combines existing approaches from various sources and introduces new developments designed to address present shortcomings. The model is validated by own DNS data as well as data from the literature. It is shown that, overall, the IMSC provides better predictions for the collision rate in typical flotation conditions than presently employed collision models and covers the entire parameter range of the flotation process very well. Using the available data, some of the underlying modelling assumptions are validated. Finally, a comprehensive overview of the model is provided for further use in Euler-Euler frameworks or process simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03881 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic overview of the framework of the IMSC indicating input and output [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Linearization of velocity of the collision partners for decomposition of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of models for the longitudinal fluid structure function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Bubble Reynolds number as a function of bubble diameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic of the deflection of a small particle by the flow field modulations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Exemplary alteration of the relative velocity due to a modulated flow field as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Instantaneous snapshot from a typical simulation to investigate the collision [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: PDF of particle and bubble velocity for simulation cases R53-1-30 and G-1-30, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of non-dimensional bubble-particle collision kernel obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of non-dimensional particle-particle collision kernel obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of non-dimensional bubble-bubble collision kernel obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of radial relative velocity for bubble pairs closer than [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of results obtained from DNS of flotation with coarse particles and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Collision kernels for the setup of Chan et al. (2023) featuring turbulent flow with 𝑅𝑒𝜆 = 175 and comparison to various models. DNS results from Chan et al., IMSC, IMSC corrected with 𝑔(𝑟𝑐), Abrahamson, Saffman & Turner, Zaichik, Zaichik corrected with 𝑔(𝑟𝑐). 0 2 4 6 …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Velocity fluctuations of bubbles and particles for the setup of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year eprint label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    1975 Collision rates of small particles in a vigorously turbulent fluid

    Abrahamson, J. 1975 Collision rates of small particles in a vigorously turbulent fluid . Chem. Eng. Sci. 30 , 1371--1379

    work page 1975

  4. [4]

    , Mininni, P

    Angriman, S. , Mininni, P. D. & Cobelli, P. J. 2020 Velocity and acceleration statistics in particle-laden turbulent swirling flows . Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 , 64605

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    & Heindel, T

    Bloom, F. & Heindel, T. J. 2002 On the structure of collision and detachment frequencies in flotation models . Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 , 2467--2473

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Borgas, M. S. & Yeung, P. K. 2004 Relative dispersion in isotropic turbulence. Part 2. A new stochastic model with reynolds-number dependence . J. Fluid Mech. 503 , 125--160

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    , Mudd, G

    Calvo, G. , Mudd, G. , Valero, A. & Valero, A. 2016 Decreasing ore grades in global metallic mining: A theoretical issue or a global reality? Resources 5

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Chan, T. T. K. , Ng, C. S. & Krug, D. 2023 Bubble-particle collisions in turbulence: insights from point-particle simulations . J. Fluid Mech. 959 , A6

    work page 2023

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    & Uhlmann, M

    Chouippe, A. & Uhlmann, M. 2015 Forcing homogeneous turbulence in direct numerical simulation of particulate flow with interface resolution and gravity . Phys. Fluids 27 , 123301

    2015

  2. [10]

    , Grace, J

    Clift, R. , Grace, J. R. & Weber, M. E. 1978 Bubbles, drops, and particles\/ . Academic Press

    1978

  3. [11]

    2012 Some observations on copper yields and ore grades

    Crowson, P. 2012 Some observations on copper yields and ore grades . Resour. Policy 37 , 59--72

    2012

  4. [12]

    , Fornasiero, D

    Dai, Z. , Fornasiero, D. & Ralston, J. 2000 Particle-bubble collision models - a review . Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 85 , 231--256

    2000

  5. [13]

    Deglon, D. A. , Egya-mensah, D. & Franzidis, J. P. 2000 Review of hydrodynamics and gas dispersion in flotation cells on south african platinum concentrators . Miner. Eng. 13 , 235--244

    2000

  6. [14]

    & Elperin, T

    Dodin, Z. & Elperin, T. 2002 On the collision rate of particles in turbulent flow with gravity . Phys. Fluids 14 , 2921--2924

    2002

  7. [15]

    & Rzehak, R

    Draw, M. & Rzehak, R. 2025 A flotation framework for E ulerian multiphase CFD : Integrating bubble-particle aggregates and flotation kinetics . Miner. Eng. 228 , 109258

    2025

  8. [16]

    , Fornasiero, D

    Duan, J. , Fornasiero, D. & Ralston, J. 2003 Calculation of the flotation rate constant of chalcopyrite particles in an ore . Int. J. Miner. Process. 72 , 227--237

    2003

  9. [17]

    & Pope, S

    Eswaran, V. & Pope, S. B. 1988 An examination of forcing in direct numerical simulations of turbulence . Comput. Fluids 16 , 257--278

    1988

  10. [18]

    & Ragab, S

    Fayed, H. & Ragab, S. 2015 Numerical simulations of two-phase flow in a self-aerated flotation machine and kinetics modeling . Miner. 5 , 164--188

    2015

  11. [19]

    Fuerstenau, M. C. , Jameson, G. J. & Yoon, R.-H. , ed. 2007 Froth flotation: a century of innovation\/ . Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration

    2007

  12. [20]

    , Lance, M

    Garnier, C. , Lance, M. & Marié, J. L. 2002 Measurement of local flow characteristics in buoyancy-driven bubbly flow at high void fraction . Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 26 , 811--815

    2002

  13. [21]

    , Sinojmeri, A

    Grieco, G. , Sinojmeri, A. , Bussolesi, M. , Cocomazzi, G. & Cavallo, A. 2021 Environmental impact variability of copper tailing dumps in fushe arrez ( Northern Albania ): The role of pyrite separation during flotation . Sustainability 13 , 9643

    2021

  14. [22]

    Hadler, K & Cilliers, J J 2019 The effect of particles on surface tension and flotation froth stability . Min. Metall. Explor. 36 , 63--69

    2019

  15. [23]

    , Firouzi, M

    Hassanzadeh, A. , Firouzi, M. , Albijanic, B. & Celik, M. S. 2018 A review on determination of particle–bubble encounter using analytical, experimental and numerical methods . Miner. Eng. 122 , 296--311

    2018

  16. [24]

    Hinze, J. O. 1975 Turbulence\/ , 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill

    1975

  17. [25]

    , L a P orta, D

    Hund, K. , L a P orta, D. , Fabregas, T. P. , Laing, T. & Drexhage, J. 2020 Minerals for climate action: T he mineral intensity of the clean energy transition (english) . W orld B ank G roup

    2020

  18. [26]

    Ireland, P. J. , Bragg, A. D. & Collins, L. R. 2016 The effect of R eynolds number on inertial particle dynamics in isotropic turbulence. Part 1 . S imulations without gravitational effects . J. Fluid Mech. 796 , 617--658

    2016

  19. [27]

    Karamanev, D. G. & Nikolov, L. N. 1992 Free rising spheres do not obey N ewton's law for free settling . AIChE J. 38 , 1843--1846

    1992

  20. [28]

    Koh, P. T. L. & Schwarz, M. P. 2003 CFD modelling of bubble-particle collision rates and efficiencies in a flotation cell . Miner. Eng. 16 , 1055--1059

    2003

  21. [29]

    Koh, P. T. L. & Schwarz, M. P. 2006 CFD modelling of bubble–particle attachments in flotation cells . Miner. Eng. 19 , 619--626

    2006

  22. [30]

    Koh, P. T. L. & Schwarz, M. P. 2007 CFD model of a self-aerating flotation cell . I. J. Miner. Proc. 85 , 16--24

    2007

  23. [31]

    , Karapantsios, T

    Kostoglou, M. , Karapantsios, T. D. & Evgenidis, S. 2020 a\/ On a generalized framework for turbulent collision frequency models in flotation: The road from past inconsistencies to a concise algebraic expression for fine particles . Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 284 , 102270

    2020

  24. [32]

    , Karapantsios, T

    Kostoglou, M. , Karapantsios, T. D. & Matis, K. A. 2006 Modeling local flotation frequency in a turbulent flow field . Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 122 , 79--91

    2006

  25. [33]

    , Karapantsios, T

    Kostoglou, M. , Karapantsios, T. D. & Oikonomidou, O. 2020 b\/ A critical review on turbulent collision frequency/efficiency models in flotation: Unravelling the path from general coagulation to flotation . Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 279 , 102158

    2020

  26. [34]

    Kruis, F. E. & Kusters, K. A. 1997 The collision rate of particles in turbulent flow . Chem. Eng. Commun. 158 , 201--230

    1997

  27. [35]

    , Govender, D

    Lelinski, D. , Govender, D. , Dabrowski, B. , Traczy, F. & Mulligan, M. 2011 Effective use of energy in the flotation process . The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

    2011

  28. [36]

    Maxey, M. R. & Riley, J. J. 1983 Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow . Phys. Fluids 26 , 883--889 , doi: 10.1063/1.864230

    1983 doi

  29. [37]

    Mesa, Diego , Morrison, Angus J & Brito-Parada, Pablo R 2020 The effect of impeller-stator design on bubble size: Implications for froth stability and flotation performance . Miner. Eng. 157 , 106533

    2020

  30. [38]

    Meyer, C. J. & Deglon, D. A. 2011 Particle collision modeling – a review . Miner. Eng. 24 , 719--730

    2011

  31. [39]

    , Nguyen, A

    Ngo-Cong, D. , Nguyen, A. V & Tran-Cong, T. 2018 Isotropic turbulence surpasses gravity in affecting bubble-particle collision interaction in flotation . Miner. Eng. 122 , 165--175

    2018

  32. [40]

    Nguyen, A. V. 1999 Hydrodynamics of liquid flows around air bubbles in flotation: a review . Int. J. Miner. Process. 56 , 165--205

    1999

  33. [41]

    Nguyen, A. V. , An-Vo, D.-A. , Tran-Cong, T. & Evans, G. M. 2016 A review of stochastic description of the turbulence effect on bubble-particle interactions in flotation . Int. J. Miner. Process. 156 , 75--86

    2016

  34. [42]

    Nguyen, A. V. & Schulze, H. J. 2004 Colloidal Science of Flotation\/ , Surfactant Science Series , vol. 118 . Marcel Dekker

    2004

  35. [43]

    , Brito-Parada, P

    Norori-McCormac, A. , Brito-Parada, P. R. , Hadler, K. , Cole, K. & Cilliers, J. J. 2017 The effect of particle size distribution on froth stability in flotation . Sep. Purif. Technol. 184 , 240--247

    2017

  36. [44]

    , Farrokhpay, S

    Ostadrahimi, M. , Farrokhpay, S. , Gharibi, K. & Dehghani, A. 2020 A new empirical model to calculate bubble size in froth flotation columns . Coll. Surfaces A 594 , 124672

    2020

  37. [45]

    Phiri, T. C. , Singh, P. & Nikoloski, A. N. 2021 The potential for copper slag waste as a resource for a circular economy: A review – Part II . Miner. Eng. 172 , 107150

    2021

  38. [46]

    Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows\/ . Cambridge University Press

    2000

  39. [47]

    , Qiu, X.-Y

    Ran, J.-C. , Qiu, X.-Y. , Hu, Z. , Liu, Q.-J. , Song, B.-X. & Yao, Y.-Q. 2019 Effects of particle size on flotation performance in the separation of copper, gold and lead . Powder Technol. 344 , 654--664

    2019

  40. [48]

    & Zaki, W.N

    Richardson, J.F. & Zaki, W.N. 1954 Sedimentation and fluidisation: P art I . Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 32 , 35--53

    1954

  41. [49]

    2001 Generalized correlation for bubble motion

    Rodrigue, D. 2001 Generalized correlation for bubble motion . AIChE J. 47 , 39--44

    2001

  42. [50]

    Saffman, P. G. & Turner, J. S. 1956 On the collision of drops in turbulent clouds . J. Fluid Mech. 1 , 16--30

    1956

  43. [51]

    & Fröhlich, J

    Santarelli, C. & Fröhlich, J. 2015 Direct numerical simulations of spherical bubbles in vertical turbulent channel flow . Int. J. Multiph. Flow 75 , 174--193

    2015

  44. [52]

    Sawford, B. L. 1991 Reynolds number effects in lagrangian stochastic models of turbulent dispersion . Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dyn. 3 , 1577--1586

    1991

  45. [53]

    & Naumann, A

    Schiller, L. & Naumann, A. 1935 A drag coefficient correlation . Z. VDI 77 , 318--320

    1935

  46. [54]

    , Sommer, A.-E

    Shi, P. , Sommer, A.-E. , Rox, H. , Eckert, K. & Rzehak, R. 2022 Euler-Euler/RANS modeling of solid-liquid flow in stirred tanks: A comprehensive model validation . Miner. Eng. 185 , 107679

    2022

  47. [55]

    1917 Versuch einer mathematischen Theorie der Koagulationskinetik kolloider Lösungen

    von Smoluchowski, M. 1917 Versuch einer mathematischen Theorie der Koagulationskinetik kolloider Lösungen . Zeitung für Physikalische Chemie 92 , 129--168

    1917

  48. [56]

    & Collins, L

    Sundaram, S. & Collins, L. R. 1997 Collision statistics in an isotropic particle-laden turbulent suspension. part 1. direct numerical simulations . J. Fluid Mech. 335 , 75--109

    1997

  49. [57]

    Sutherland, K. L. 1948 Physical chemistry of flotation. XI . K inetics of the flotation process . J. Phys. Colloid Chem. 52 , 394--425

    1948

  50. [58]

    Tabelin, C. B. , Park, I. , Phengsaart, T. , Jeon, S. , Villacorte-Tabelin, M. , Alonzo, D. , Yoo, K. , Ito, M. & Hiroyoshi, N. 2021 Copper and critical metals production from porphyry ores and e-wastes: A review of resource availability, processing/recycling challenges, socio...

    2021

  51. [59]

    , Runge, K

    Tabosa, E. , Runge, K. & Holtham, P. 2016 The effect of cell hydrodynamics on flotation performance . Int. J. Miner. Process. 156 , 99--107

    2016

  52. [60]

    Taylor, G. I. 1935 Distribution of velocity and temperature between concentric rotating cylinders . Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 151 , 494--512

    1935

  53. [61]

    Tchen, C. M. 1947 Mean value and correlation problems connected with the motion of small particles suspended in a turbulent fluid . PhD thesis, TU Delft, Hydraulic Engineering

    1947

  54. [62]

    In Proceedings of the International Minerals Processing Congress\/ , pp

    Tiedemann, Benedikt & Fröhlich, Jochen 2024 A first DNS investigation of turbulent collisions in flotation. In Proceedings of the International Minerals Processing Congress\/ , pp. 2739--2748

    2024

  55. [63]

    & Fröhlich, J

    Tiedemann, B. & Fröhlich, J. 2025 Direct numerical simulation of collision events in flotation under the influence of gravity . Int J. Multiph. Flow 188 , 105204

    2025

  56. [64]

    , Kempe, T

    Tschisgale, S. , Kempe, T. & Fröhlich, J. 2018 A general implicit direct forcing immersed boundary method for rigid particles . Comput. Fluids 170 , 285--298

    2018

  57. [65]

    Uhlmann, Markus & Doychev, Todor 2014 Sedimentation of a dilute suspension of rigid spheres at intermediate galileo numbers: the effect of clustering upon the particle motion . J. Fluid Mech. 752 , 310--348

    2014

  58. [66]

    , Goffé, B

    Vidal, O. , Goffé, B. & Arndt, N. 2013 Metals for a low-carbon society . Nat. Geosci. 6 , 894--896

    2013

  59. [67]

    , Pumir, A

    Voßkuhle, M. , Pumir, A. , Lévêque, E. & Wilkinson, M. 2014 Prevalence of the sling effect for enhancing collision rates in turbulent suspensions . J. Fluid Mech. 749 , 841--852

    2014

  60. [68]

    Wang, G. , Ge, L. , Mitra, S. , Evans, G. M. , Joshi, J. B. & Chen, S. 2018 A review of CFD modelling studies on the flotation process . Miner. Eng. 127 , 153--177

    2018

  61. [69]

    , Ayala, O

    Wang, L.-P. , Ayala, O. , Kasprzak, S. E. & Grabowski, W. W. 2005 Theoretical formulation of collision rate and collision efficiency of hydrodynamically interacting cloud droplets in turbulent atmosphere . J. Atmos. Sci. 62 , 2433--2450

    2005

  62. [70]

    , Chen, S

    Wang, L.-P. , Chen, S. , Brasseur, J. G. & Wyngaard, J. C. 1996 Examination of hypotheses in the K olmogorov refined turbulence theory through high-resolution simulations. Part 1 . Velocity field . J. Fluid Mech. 309 , 113--156

    1996

  63. [71]

    , Wexler, A

    Wang, L.-P. , Wexler, A. S. & Zhou, Y. 1998 Statistical mechanical descriptions of turbulent coagulation . Phys. Fluids 10 , 2647--2651

    1998

  64. [72]

    Williams, J. J. E. 1980 Droplet coagulation in two-phase turbulent pipe flows . PhD thesis

    1980

  65. [73]

    Williams, J. J. E. & Crane, R. I. 1983 Particle collision rate in turbulent flow . Int. J. Multiph. Flow 9 , 421--435

    1983

  66. [74]

    World Bank Group 2017 The growing role of minerals and metals for a low carbon future

    2017

  67. [75]

    2000 Flotation\/

    Yarar, B. 2000 Flotation\/ . John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

    2000

  68. [76]

    Yeung, P. K. & Pope, S. B. 1989 Lagrangian statistics from direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. 207 , 531--586

    1989

  69. [77]

    You, X. , Li, L. , Liu, J. , Wu, L. , He, M. & Lyu, X. 2017 Investigation of particle collection and flotation kinetics within the J ameson cell downcomer . Powder Technol. 310 , 221--227

    2017

  70. [78]

    1984 Collision rate of small particles in a homogeneous and isotropic turbulence

    Yuu, S. 1984 Collision rate of small particles in a homogeneous and isotropic turbulence . AICHE J. 30 , 802--807

    1984

  71. [79]

    Zaichik, L. I. , Simonin, O. & Alipchenkov, V. M. 2006 Collision rates of bidisperse inertial particles in isotropic turbulence . Phys. Fluids 18 , 035110

    2006

  72. [80]

    Zaichik, L. I. , Simonin, O. & Alipchenkov, V. M. 2010 Turbulent collision rates of arbitrary-density particles . Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 53 , 1613--1620

    2010

  73. [81]

    , Kamble, V

    Zürner, T. , Kamble, V. , Rzehak, R. & Eckert, K. 2024 Experimental and numerical investigation of turbulent multiphase jets . Miner. Eng. 211 , 108699

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.