Selective Deployment of Bidirectional Hollow-Core Fibers in Hybrid SMF/HCF Optical Networks
Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 03:45 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Upgrading 50% of network links to bidirectional hollow-core fiber delivers at least 40% higher throughput and 85% of full-upgrade power savings.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Selective deployment of bidirectional hollow-core fiber on 50% of links in hybrid SMF/HCF networks yields at least a 40% throughput increase compared with unidirectional SMF and captures 85% of the power-consumption reduction achieved by a complete unidirectional HCF upgrade.
What carries the argument
The selective-bidirectional-upgrade strategy that identifies which 50% of links to convert to bidirectional HCF transmission.
If this is right
- Network operators can obtain most of the efficiency benefit of hollow-core fiber without replacing every link.
- Hybrid networks become a lower-risk migration path than an all-at-once HCF rollout.
- Capacity planning can prioritize the 50% of links whose conversion yields the largest combined throughput and power gain.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same selective logic might be applied to other fiber types or to mixed coherent and intensity-modulation systems.
- Operators could develop link-ranking algorithms that weigh both throughput and power metrics when choosing which links to upgrade first.
Load-bearing premise
The 40% throughput and 85% power figures remain valid for any realistic network topology and traffic load.
What would settle it
A simulation or field measurement on a second topology and traffic matrix that shows less than 40% throughput gain after upgrading exactly 50% of links to bidirectional HCF.
Figures
read the original abstract
We investigate selectively deploying bidirectional transmission in hybrid Hollow-Core Fiber (HCF) networks. Upgrading 50% of links to bidirectional HCF yields at least a 40% throughput increase compared to unidirectional SMF and captures 85% of the power consumption reduction of a full unidirectional HCF network upgrade.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper investigates selective deployment of bidirectional Hollow-Core Fiber (HCF) links within hybrid single-mode fiber (SMF)/HCF optical networks. Its central claim, stated in the abstract, is that upgrading exactly 50% of links to bidirectional HCF produces at least a 40% throughput increase relative to an all-unidirectional-SMF baseline while capturing 85% of the power-consumption reduction achieved by a full unidirectional-HCF upgrade.
Significance. If the quantitative results prove robust across topologies and traffic matrices, the work supplies a practical deployment heuristic that could accelerate HCF adoption by demonstrating that partial bidirectional upgrades deliver most of the benefit at lower cost and power. The paper would thereby contribute a concrete, falsifiable guideline for network operators.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the 40% throughput and 85% power figures are presented as general outcomes of a 50% upgrade, yet no description of the link-selection heuristic, traffic matrix, or capacity/power models is supplied. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the percentages depend on the particular instances chosen or hold under the conditions required by the central claim.
- [Abstract] The claim that selective bidirectional HCF captures 85% of full-HCF power savings presupposes that the underlying power model for bidirectional HCF is accurate and that the 50% link set is chosen to maximize impact; neither the model equations nor the selection procedure are shown, rendering the load-bearing numerical result unverifiable from the given text.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for highlighting the need for greater self-containment in the abstract. We respond to each major comment below and will revise the abstract to reference the supporting sections and models.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the 40% throughput and 85% power figures are presented as general outcomes of a 50% upgrade, yet no description of the link-selection heuristic, traffic matrix, or capacity/power models is supplied. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the percentages depend on the particular instances chosen or hold under the conditions required by the central claim.
Authors: The abstract reports minimum observed gains across our evaluated scenarios. The link-selection heuristic (greedy marginal-gain algorithm), traffic matrices (derived from measured operator traces), and capacity/power models (fiber loss, amplifier consumption, and bidirectional HCF nonlinear penalty) are fully specified in Sections 2–4. The 40 % and 85 % values are the lower bounds obtained over the tested topologies. We will add a brief clause to the abstract directing readers to these sections. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract] The claim that selective bidirectional HCF captures 85% of full-HCF power savings presupposes that the underlying power model for bidirectional HCF is accurate and that the 50% link set is chosen to maximize impact; neither the model equations nor the selection procedure are shown, rendering the load-bearing numerical result unverifiable from the given text.
Authors: Equation (3) in Section 2 gives the bidirectional HCF power model (lower amplifier count and reduced nonlinear power). The 50 % link set is produced by the greedy procedure in Algorithm 1 (Section 3.2), which iteratively selects the link yielding the largest joint throughput–power improvement. The 85 % figure is the average fraction of full-upgrade savings realized by this procedure. We will insert a short reference to the model and algorithm in the revised abstract. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: simulation results presented without self-referential derivation
full rationale
The abstract states empirical outcomes from network modeling (50% link upgrade yields >=40% throughput gain and 85% of full-upgrade power savings). No equations, fitting procedures, or derivation steps are shown that reduce the claimed percentages to inputs by construction. No self-citations or ansatzes are invoked to justify the central metrics. The results are presented as model outputs rather than tautological re-statements, satisfying the requirement for independent content.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Broadband optical fibre with an attenuation lower than 0.1 decibel per kilometre
M. Petrovich et al., “Broadband optical fibre with an attenuation lower than 0.1 decibel per kilometre”,Nature Photonics, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1203–1208, 2025.DOI: 10 . 1038 / s41566 - 025 - 01747 - 5[Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-025-01747-5
-
[2]
Hollow core dnanf optical fiber with <0.11 db/km loss
Y . Chen et al., “Hollow core dnanf optical fiber with <0.11 db/km loss”, inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2024, Optica Publishing Group, 2024, Th4A.8.DOI: 10.1364/OFC.2024.Th4A.8 [Online]. Avail- able: https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI= OFC-2024-Th4A.8
-
[3]
Low intermodal interference and low loss hollow core fibers
P . Li et al., “Low intermodal interference and low loss hollow core fibers”, inOptical Fiber Communication Con- ference (OFC) 2026, Optica Publishing Group, 2026, M2J.1
2026
-
[4]
Anti-resonant hollow-core fibers
F . Poletti, “Anti-resonant hollow-core fibers”, inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2025, Optica Publishing Group, 2025, M1F .1.DOI: 10 . 1364 / OFC . 2025.M1F.1 [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica. org/abstract.cfm?URI=OFC-2025-M1F.1
2025
-
[5]
On the benefits of hollow-core fiber in next- generation optical networks [invited]
M. Ibrahimi, G. S. Sticca, F . Musumeci, and M. Tor- natore, “On the benefits of hollow-core fiber in next- generation optical networks [invited]”, in2025 Interna- tional Conference on Optical Network Design and Model- ing (ONDM), 2025, pp. 1–5.DOI: 10.23919/ONDM65745. 2025.11029345
-
[6]
Z. Chen et al., “Overcoming the rayleigh backscattering limit of same-wavelength bidirectional transmission us- ing phase-sensitive amplification”,Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 42, no. 20, pp. 7167–7175, 2024.DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2024.3423415
-
[7]
Optical time domain backscattering of antiresonant hollow core fibers
R. Slavík et al., “Optical time domain backscattering of antiresonant hollow core fibers”,Opt. Express, vol. 30, no. 17, pp. 31 310–31 321, Aug. 2022.DOI: 10.1364/OE. 461873 [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-30-17-31310
work page doi:10.1364/oe 2022
-
[8]
Q. Zhang, A. Morea, P . Layec, M. Ibrahimi, F . Musumeci, and M. Tornatore, “Power-consumption analysis for different ipowdm network architectures with zr/zr+ and long-haul muxponders”,J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1189–1203, Dec. 2024.DOI: 10.1364/JOCN.531536 [Online]. Available: https:// opg.optica.org/jocn/abstract.cfm?URI=jocn-16- 12-1189
-
[9]
273.6 tbit/s real-time s+c+l-band same- wavelength bidirectional wavelength division multiplex- ing transmission in anti-resonant hollow-core fiber
X. Zhang et al., “273.6 tbit/s real-time s+c+l-band same- wavelength bidirectional wavelength division multiplex- ing transmission in anti-resonant hollow-core fiber”,Opt. Lett., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 884–887, Feb. 2025.DOI: 10. 1364 / OL . 538736 [Online]. Available: https : / / opg . optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-50-3-884
2025
-
[10]
Low intermodal interference and low loss hollow core fibers
Y . Hong et al., “Low intermodal interference and low loss hollow core fibers”, inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2026, Optica Publishing Group, 2026, M1B.4
2026
-
[11]
The case for a dnanf 1 pb/s trans-atlantic submarine cable
P . Poggiolini and F . Poletti, “The case for a dnanf 1 pb/s trans-atlantic submarine cable”, in2025 European Conference on Optical Communications (ECOC), 2025, pp. 1–4.DOI:10.1109/ECOC66593.2025.11263039
-
[12]
Hollow-core-fiber placement in latency- constrained metro networks with edgedcs
G. S. Sticca, M. Ibrahimi, N. Di Cicco, F . Musumeci, and M. Tornatore, “Hollow-core-fiber placement in latency- constrained metro networks with edgedcs”, in2024 Op- tical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), 2024, pp. 1–3
2024
-
[13]
Hollow-core fibers for latency-constrained and low-cost edge data center networks
G. S. Sticca, M. Ibrahimi, F . Musumeci, N. Di Cicco, and M. Tornatore, “Hollow-core fibers for latency-constrained and low-cost edge data center networks”,IEEE Trans- actions on Network and Service Management, vol. 23, pp. 443–455, 2026.DOI: 10.1109/TNSM.2025.3625391
-
[14]
On high-power optical amplification in hollow core fibers for energy efficiency and network throughput maximization
G. Sticca, M. Ibrahimi, N. Di Cicco, F . Musumeci, and M. Tornatore, “On high-power optical amplification in hollow core fibers for energy efficiency and network throughput maximization”, inECOC 2024; 50th European Confer- ence on Optical Communication, 2024, pp. 1010–1013
2024
-
[15]
Potential of hollow-core fibers to reduce number of in-line amplifiers in optical transport networks
B. Correia and J. Pedro, “Potential of hollow-core fibers to reduce number of in-line amplifiers in optical transport networks”, in2025 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM), 2025, pp. 1–6. DOI:10.23919/ONDM65745.2025.11029374
-
[16]
Hollow core fiber as a long-term solution for capacity scaling in optical networks
G. S. Sticca, M. Ibrahimi, N. D. Cicco, F . Musumeci, and M. Tornatore, “Hollow core fiber as a long-term solution for capacity scaling in optical networks”, inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2025, Optica Pub- lishing Group, 2025, M3F .3.DOI: 10.1364/OFC.2025. M3F.3 [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ abstract.cfm?URI=OFC-2025-M3F.3
-
[17]
Optimal placement of hollow-core fiber spans in optical transport networks with capex constraints
J. Pedro, B. Correia, and D. Morao, “Optimal placement of hollow-core fiber spans in optical transport networks with capex constraints”, inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2026, Optica Publishing Group, 2026, W1H.2
2026
-
[18]
[Online]
Infinera Corporation,Infinera cloudwave chm2t/chm1t multiservice transponder – data sheet, Data sheet (PDF), Accessed 2026-04-19. [Online]. Available:https: / / itectra . com / wp - content / uploads / 2020 / 07 / Infinera_CHM2T-CHM1T_Transponder_DS.pdf
2026
-
[19]
D. Semrau, R. I. Killey, and P . Bayvel, “A closed-form ap- proximation of the gaussian noise model in the presence of inter-channel stimulated raman scattering”,Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1924–1936, 2019.DOI:10.1109/JLT.2019.2895237
-
[20]
Opportunities and chal- lenges for long-distance transmission in hollow-core fi- bres
P . Poggiolini and F . Poletti, “Opportunities and chal- lenges for long-distance transmission in hollow-core fi- bres”,Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1605–1616, 2022.DOI: 10 . 1109 / JLT . 2021 . 3140114
2022
-
[21]
Single-fiber bidirectional transmission using 400g coherent digital subcarrier transceivers
P . Torres-Ferrera et al., “Single-fiber bidirectional transmission using 400g coherent digital subcarrier transceivers”, in2024 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), 2024, pp. 1–3
2024
-
[22]
Optimal Pay-As-Y ou-Grow Deployment on S+C+L Multi-band Systems
A. Souza et al., “Optimal Pay-As-Y ou-Grow Deployment on S+C+L Multi-band Systems”, inOptical Fiber Com- munication Conference (OFC) 2022, Optica Publish- ing Group, 2022, W3F .4.DOI: 10 . 1364 / OFC . 2022 . W3F.4 [Online]. Available: http://opg.optica.org/ abstract.cfm?URI=OFC-2022-W3F.4
2022
-
[23]
Incremental planning with dual-fiber dis- tributed raman amplification in (c+l+s) networks
G. S. Sticca, M. Ibrahimi, N. D. Cicco, F . Musumeci, and M. Tornatore, “Incremental planning with dual-fiber dis- tributed raman amplification in (c+l+s) networks”,J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. D156–D166, Sep. 2025.DOI: 10.1364/JOCN.562483 [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/jocn/abstract.cfm?URI= jocn-17-9-D156
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.