Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 2 cited by

Local entropy theory, combinatorics, and local theory of Banach spaces

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For amenable group actions, the IE-tuples of the induced action on probability measures form exactly the closed convex hull of the original IE-tuples.

desk verdict A strong paper that gives the complete description of IE-tuples for the induced measure action and introduces a genuinely new combinatorial tool; the only substantial risk is the density of the Lemma 1.8 proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03338 v1 pith:MG4I4NRO submitted 2025-07-04 math.DS math.COmath.FA

Hanfeng Li , Kairan Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.COmath.FA MSC 37B4037A1505D0546B07
keywords localentropytheoryIE-tupleIN-tupleIT-tupleinducedactiononprobabilitymeasurescombinatorialindependenceamenablegroupℓ_pembedding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the action a discrete amenable group induces on the compact convex space of Borel probability measures over a system, comparing the local entropy theory of the induced action with that of the original. Its first main result is a complete structural description: for every length k, the set of IE-tuples of the induced action is the closed convex hull of the IE-tuples of the original action, its extreme points are exactly the original IE-tuples, and every induced IE-tuple is the tuple of coordinate marginals of a measure supported on the original IE-tuples. This turns the earlier zero-entropy result for induced actions into a direct corollary and yields finite-support versions of the description. The same framework is extended to measure IE-tuples, IN-tuples, measure IN-tuples, and IT-tuples, with explicit, though more delicate, descriptions for the latter classes. A new combinatorial lemma drives the proof and also produces a sharp logarithmic bound for embeddings of ℓ_q^n into ℓ_∞^m.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is Lemma 1.8, a new finite combinatorial lemma. It fixes k, thresholds 0<r<R≤C, and conjugate exponents 1<p≤∞ and 1≤q<∞, and it produces a small threshold set T plus a positive-density subset J of any sufficiently large finite set Z. Whenever a family of functions f_ψ, indexed by nearly balanced colorings ψ in R(Z,k), has ℓ_p norm at most C and normalized average at least R, the lemma guarantees J and a threshold t∈T such that every coloring of J extends to one of the ψ with f_ψ(z)≥t_j|Z|^{-1/p} on the j-th color class. Its proof combines a concentration estimate with a covering lemma from the independence literature, and the p=∞ case drives the entropy-tuple theorems while the full range 1<p≤∞ powers the Banach-space application through Lemma 9.1.

What would settle it

A concrete counterexample to Lemma 1.8 would settle the matter: produce k, thresholds 0<r<R≤C, exponents 1<p≤∞ and 1≤q<∞, and functions f_ψ on finite sets Z with ∥f_ψ∥_p≤C and normalized average at least R, yet with no positive-density subset J and no threshold t∈T satisfying the extension property. Equivalently, an amenable group action with IE_2(M(X)) containing a measure pair outside the closed convex hull of IE_2(X) would contradict the main structural theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 asserts that IE_k(M(X)) equals the closed convex hull of IE_k(X) in M(X)^k, that IE_k(X) is exactly IE_k(M(X)) intersected with X^k, and that IE_k(M(X)) is the set of tuples (μ^(1),…,μ^(k)) obtained as coordinate marginals of a Borel probability measure μ supported on IE_k(X). Since X is identified with its Dirac measures inside M(X), the statement says concretely that no new independence combinatorics appear when passing to probability measures: every IE-tuple of measures is an averaging of point IE-tuples, and the only such tuples that live entirely in X are the original point IE-tuples. The paper proves analogous containments and intersection identities for measure IE-tuples, IN-tuples, measure IN-tuples, and IT-tuples, with the IN and IT cases described through special subclasses of measures that encode independence across all Cartesian powers of X. It also proves a Banach-space consequence: if ℓ_q^n is C-isomorphic to a subspace of ℓ_∞^m, then n is at most c log m, where c depends only on C and q.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands or falls with Lemma 1.8, a new finite combinatorial lemma whose long proof leans on a concentration estimate and a cited covering lemma; if that chain has a gap, every main theorem that depends on it loses its support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Zero topological entropy of X forces zero topological entropy of M(X) for every amenable group Γ, with the k=2 case of Theorem 1.1 recovering the earlier zero-entropy theorem as a direct consequence.
  • Uniform positive entropy of order k, nullness, and tameness pass between the original action and the induced action on probability measures, and also pass through the weighted simplex spaces M_λ(X).
  • Finite-support measures cannot create new IE, IN, or IT tuples beyond the originals; the product capacity N=∏N_j bounds the support size in Corollaries 1.2, 1.5, and 7.12.
  • Any C-isomorphic copy of ℓ_q^n inside ℓ_∞^m has dimension at most c log m, with c depending only on C and q, and this logarithmic bound is sharp.
  • The descriptions of IN and IT tuples use measures that encode independence across all Cartesian powers X^n, replacing the simpler measure set M(IE_k(X)) by the more delicate IN-measures and IT-measures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One can read the convex-hull conclusion as a general principle: for tuple notions defined by combinatorial independence, passing to a compact convex envelope such as M(X) should produce at most the closed convex hull of the original tuple set, with the IN and IT cases showing that the precise formulation requires additional measure-theoretic bookkeeping.
  • The p>1 range of Lemma 1.8 is likely to be usable beyond ℓ_∞; discretizing coordinate thresholds in the manner of Lemma 9.1 may yield a unified proof of the known bounds for embedding ℓ_q^n into other ℓ_{q'}^m spaces and may extend to non-Euclidean target norms.
  • A testable extension is whether the equality IE_k(M(X)) equals the closed convex hull of IE_k(X) survives when Γ is only sofic rather than amenable; the amenability hypothesis in Theorem 1.1 is used through the independence-density technology, while the IN and IT analogues hold for arbitrary countable groups.
  • The explicit description via M(IE_k(X)) suggests a finite algorithm for membership in IE_k(M(X)): given a finite approximation of IE_k(X), project the measure polytope to M(X)^k and check whether the target tuple lies in that projection.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the induced action of a countably infinite discrete group Γ on the compact convex space M(X) of Borel probability measures on X. For amenable Γ, Theorem 1.1 characterizes IE_k(M(X)) as the closed convex hull of IE_k(X), identifies IE_k(X) as the set of extreme points, and gives the explicit barycentric description IE_k(M(X)) = {(μ(1),...,μ(k)) : μ ∈ M(IE_k(X))}. Analogous convex-hull results are proved for measure-IE tuples (Theorem 1.3), IN-tuples and measure-IN tuples (Theorems 1.4 and 1.6), and IT-tuples (Theorem 1.7), with the necessary modifications coming from the non-convexity examples in Section 8. The main technical tool is Lemma 1.8, a new combinatorial lemma proved in Section 3.3; it is also used in Section 9 to prove Theorem 1.9, a sharp logarithmic upper bound for embedding ℓ_q^n into ℓ_∞^m. The paper includes explicit obstructions and sharpness examples for its key lemmas.

Significance. If correct, these results give a complete and unified description of how local entropy-theoretic invariants behave under the quasi-factor map from X to M(X). They recover and extend the Glasner-Weiss and Glasner-Thouvenot-Weiss theorems, and the new combinatorial lemma in Section 3.3 has potential for further applications. The Banach-space application in Theorem 1.9 is concrete and yields a sharp bound. The paper is commendably explicit about where the k≥3 case differs from k=2 (Example 3.9) and about the sharp threshold in Lemma 3.14 (Example 3.15). All main proofs are present, and I found no concrete gap; the main residual risk is the complexity of the proof of Lemma 1.8, but the written argument appears internally consistent.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3 (Lemma 3.19)] The symbol R is overloaded: it is a real parameter in the hypothesis 0<r<R≤C and also a subset R⊆[k]^Z in the condition '|R| ≥ |[k]^Z| e^{-δ|Z|}'. Renaming one of them, for instance calling the subset S, would remove an unnecessary source of confusion for the reader.
  2. [Section 9 (proof of Theorem 1.9)] The final estimate uses the inequality log(2m) ≤ 2 log m, which is valid for m≥2, but this step is implicit. Spelling it out would make the end of the proof easier to follow.
  3. [Section 5 (Definition 5.1 and Remark 5.2)] The definition of IN-measures quantifies over n-tuples of points in supp(μ), and Remark 5.2 explains that repetitions do not change the definition. The explanation is correct, but it would be clearer if the closedness of IN_k(X^n) were explicitly invoked at the point where the embedding argument is used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the main theorems are derived from a new combinatorial lemma proved in the paper.

full rationale

The central result Theorem 1.1 and its downstream theorems are derived from the paper's own new Lemma 1.8, whose proof is carried out in Section 3.3 via the concentration estimate Lemma 3.16 and the cited Kerr-Li Lemma 3.18. The cited lemma comes from published prior work and is not a restatement of the paper's conclusions, so it functions as independent support rather than as a self-referential premise. The paper explicitly proves the equivalence of the three parts of Theorem 1.1 in Lemma 3.5, and the combinatorial core Lemma 1.8 is proved directly from Lemma 3.19, whose proof is self-contained except for the standard Sauer-Perles-Shelah/Karpovsky-Milman and Kerr-Li ingredients. The Banach-space application Theorem 1.9 reduces to Lemma 9.1, which in turn applies Lemma 1.8 with chosen constants; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no equation identifies the claimed output with the input by construction. The IN/IT results reduce to the same new lemma or to Rosenthal's dichotomy, and the Toeplitz construction in Section 8 is an independent example. No self-definitional, fitted-input, uniqueness-import, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming pattern is present. The paper's use of its authors' previous work is normal citation of established definitions and lemmas, not a load-bearing circular chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or invented entities. The central claims rest on standard mathematics plus the new, internally proved Lemma 1.8, which depends on cited combinatorial lemmas.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math ZFC and classical analysis
    The proofs use Hahn-Banach separation, barycenter maps, Fubini, Stirling estimates, and standard measure theory (Sections 2 and 3).
  • domain assumption Amenability of Γ for Theorems 1.1 and 1.3
    IE-tuple density limits and the topological entropy framework require Γ amenable (Section 2.2); the paper states this restriction explicitly.
  • domain assumption X compact metrizable
    Standard hypothesis ensuring M(X) is compact convex and C(X) is separable; used throughout.
  • standard math Karpovsky-Milman lemma (Lemma 3.12)
    Cited from [50] and used to prove Lemma 3.14 and Corollary 3.21.
  • standard math Kerr-Li combinatorial lemma (Lemma 3.18)
    Cited from [53, Lemma 3.3] and [56, Lemma 12.13]; it is the key input in the proof of Lemma 3.19 and therefore of Lemma 1.8.
  • standard math Rosenthal dichotomy (Lemma 7.7) and Bergelson recurrence (Lemma 7.8)
    Used in Section 7 for IT-tuples.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local entropy theory, combinatorics, and local theory of Banach spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MG4I4NRO

@misc{pith2026250703338,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local entropy theory, combinatorics, and local theory of Banach spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MG4I4NRO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03338}
}
abstract

Each continuous action of a countably infinite discrete group $\Gamma$ on a compact metrizable space X induces a continuous action of $\Gamma$ on the space M(X) of Borel probability measures on X. We compare the local entropy theory for these two actions, and describe the relation between their IE-tuples. Several other types of tuples are also studied. Our main tool is a new combinatorial lemma. We also give an application of the combinatorial lemma to the local theory of Banach spaces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Relative topological entropy and relative mean dimension of induced factors

    math.DS 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For amenable group actions, relative zero entropy is preserved under passing to induced probability-measure maps, and positive relative entropy makes the induced relative mean dimension infinite.

  2. On the entropy of processes generated by quasifactors

    math.DS 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Positive metric entropy of a homeomorphism implies positive entropy for every full-support quasifactor on the induced space of probability measures.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    R. L. Adler, A. G. Konheim, and M. H. McAndrew. Topological entropy. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 114 (1965), 309–319

    1965

  2. [2]

    Artstein-Avidan, A

    S. Artstein-Avidan, A. Giannopoulos, and V. D. Milman. Asymptotic Geometric Analysis. Part I. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 202. American Mathematical Society, Prov- idence, RI, 2015

    2015

  3. [3]

    Artstein-Avidan, A

    S. Artstein-Avidan, A. Giannopoulos, and V. D. Milman. Asymptotic Geometric Analysis. Part II. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 261. American Mathematical Society, Prov- idence, RI, 2021

    2021

  4. [4]

    Barbieri, F

    S. Barbieri, F. Garc ´ ıa-Ramos, and H. Li. Markovian properties of continuous group actions: algebraic actions, entropy and the homoclinic group. Adv. Math. 397 (2022), Paper No. 108196

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Bauer and K

    W. Bauer and K. Sigmund. Topological dynamics of transformations induced on the space of probability measures. Monatsh. Math. 79 (1975), no. 2, 81–92

    work page 1975

  6. [6]

    Bergelson

    V. Bergelson. Sets of recurrence of Z m-actions and properties of sets of differences in Z m. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 31 (1985), no. 2, 295–304

    work page 1985

  7. [7]

    N. C. Jr. Bernardes, U. B. Darji, and R. M. Vermersch. Uniformly positive entropy of induced transformations. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 42 (2022), no. 1, 9–18

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Blanchard

    F. Blanchard. Fully positive topological entropy and topological mixing. In: Symbolic Dynam- ics and its Applications (New Haven, CT, 1991) , pp. 95–105, Contemp. Math., 135, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1992

    work page 1991

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    Blanchard

    F. Blanchard. A disjointness theorem involving topological entropy. Bull. Soc. Math. France 121 (1993), no. 4, 465–478

    1993

  2. [10]

    Blanchard, E

    F. Blanchard, E. Glasner, and B. Host. A variation on the variational principle and applica- tions to entropy pairs. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 17 (1997), no. 1, 29–43

    1997

  3. [11]

    Blanchard, E

    F. Blanchard, E. Glasner, S. Kolyada, and A. Maass. On Li-Yorke pairs. J. Reine Angew. Math. 547 (2002), 51–68

    2002

  4. [12]

    Blanchard, B

    F. Blanchard, B. Host, A. Maass, S. Martinez, and D. J. Rudolph. Entropy pairs for a measure. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 15 (1995), no. 4, 621–632

    1995

  5. [13]

    Blanchard, B

    F. Blanchard, B. Host, and S. Ruette. Asymptotic pairs in positive-entropy systems. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 22 (2002), no. 3, 671–686

    2002

  6. [14]

    Bollob´ as.Combinatorics

    B. Bollob´ as.Combinatorics. Set Systems, Hypergraphs, Families of Vectors and Combinato- rial Probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986

    1986

  7. [15]

    Bourgain, D

    J. Bourgain, D. H. Fremlin, and M. Talagrand. Pointwise compact sets of Baire-measurable functions. Amer. J. Math. 100 (1978), no. 4, 845–886

    1978

  8. [16]

    Burguet and R

    D. Burguet and R. Shi. Topological mean dimension of induced systems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. to appear. arXiv:2206.10508

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Chung and H

    N.-P. Chung and H. Li. Homoclinic groups, IE groups, and expansive algebraic actions.Invent. Math. 199 (2015), no. 3, 805–858

    2015

  10. [18]

    J. B. Conway. A Course in Functional Analysis . Second edition. Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics, 96. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990

    1990

  11. [19]

    J. Elton. Sign-embeddings of ln 1 . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 279 (1983), no. 1, 113–124

    1983

  12. [20]

    Figiel, J

    T. Figiel, J. Lindenstrauss, and V. D. Milman. The dimension of almost spherical sections of convex bodies. Acta Math. 139 (1977), no. 1-2, 53–94

    1977

  13. [21]

    Frankl and N

    P. Frankl and N. Tokushige. Extremal Problems for Finite Sets . Student Mathematical Li- brary, 86. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Fuhrmann, E

    G. Fuhrmann, E. Glasner, T. J¨ ager, and C. Oertel. Irregular model sets and tame dynamics. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 374 (2021), no. 5, 3703–3734. LOCAL ENTROPY THEORY FOR INDUCED ACTIONS 73

    2021

  15. [23]

    Fuhrmann, J

    G. Fuhrmann, J. Kellendonk, and R. Yassawi. Tame or wild Toeplitz shifts. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 44 (2024), no. 5, 1379–1417

    2024

  16. [24]

    Garc ´ ıa-Ramos and H

    F. Garc ´ ıa-Ramos and H. Li. Local entropy theory and applications. Preprint, arXiv:2401.10012

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    S. Glasner. Quasifactors in ergodic theory. Israel J. Math. 45 (1983), no. 2–3, 198–208

    1983

  18. [26]

    E. Glasner. A simple characterization of the set of µ-entropy pairs and applications. Israel J. Math. 102 (1997), 13–27

    1997

  19. [27]

    E. Glasner. Ergodic Theory via Joinings. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 101. Amer- ican Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003

    2003

  20. [28]

    E. Glasner. On tame dynamical systems. Colloq. Math. 105 (2006), no. 2, 283–295

    2006

  21. [29]

    E. Glasner. The structure of tame minimal dynamical systems. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Sys- tems 27 (2007), no. 6, 1819–1837

    2007

  22. [30]

    E. Glasner. The structure of tame minimal dynamical systems for general groups. Invent. Math. 211 (2018), no. 1, 213–244

    2018

  23. [31]

    Glasner and M

    E. Glasner and M. Megrelishvili. Hereditarily non-sensitive dynamical systems and linear representations. Colloq. Math. 104 (2006), no. 2, 223–283

    2006

  24. [32]

    Glasner and M

    E. Glasner and M. Megrelishvili. More on tame dynamical systems. In: Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems in their Interactions with Arithmetics and Combinatorics , pp. 351–392, Lecture Notes in Math., 2213, Springer, Cham, 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    Glasner and M

    E. Glasner and M. Megrelishvili. Todorˇ cevi´ c’ trichotomy and a hierarchy in the class of tame dynamical systems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 375 (2022), no. 7, 4513–4548

    2022

  26. [34]

    Glasner, J.-P

    E. Glasner, J.-P. Thouvenot, and B. Weiss. Entropy theory without a past. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 20 (2000), no. 5, 1355–1370

    2000

  27. [35]

    Glasner and B

    E. Glasner and B. Weiss. Quasi-factors of zero-entropy systems. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (1995), no. 3, 665–686

    1995

  28. [36]

    Glasner and B

    E. Glasner and B. Weiss. Topological entropy of extensions. In: Ergodic Theory and its Connections with Harmonic Analysis (Alexandria, 1993) , pp. 299–307, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 205, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995

    1993

  29. [37]

    Glasner and B

    E. Glasner and B. Weiss. Quasifactors of ergodic systems with positive entropy. Israel J. Math. 134 (2003), 363–380

    2003

  30. [38]

    Glasner and X

    E. Glasner and X. Ye. Local entropy theory. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 29 (2009), no. 2, 321–356

    2009

  31. [39]

    T. N. T. Goodman. Topological sequence entropy. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 29 (1974), 331–350

    1974

  32. [40]

    W. T. Gowers. Ramsey methods in Banach spaces. In: Handbook of the Geometry of Banach Spaces, Vol. 2, pp. 1071–1097, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2003

    2003

  33. [41]

    M. Gromov. Topological invariants of dynamical systems and spaces of holomorphic maps. I. Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 2 (1999), no. 4, 323–415

    1999

  34. [42]

    W. Huang. Tame systems and scrambled pairs under an abelian group action. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 26 (2006), no. 5, 1549–1567

    2006

  35. [43]

    Huang, S

    W. Huang, S. Li, S. Shao, and X. Ye. Null systems and sequence entropy pairs. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 23 (2003), no. 5, 1505–1523

    2003

  36. [44]

    Huang, A

    W. Huang, A. Maass, P. P. Romagnoli, and X. Ye. Entropy pairs and a local Abramov formula for a measure theoretical entropy of open covers. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 24 (2004), no. 4, 1127–1153

    2004

  37. [45]

    Huang, A

    W. Huang, A. Maass, and X. Ye. Sequence entropy pairs and complexity pairs for a measure. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 54 (2004), no. 4, 1005–1028. 74 HANFENG LI AND KAIRAN LIU

    2004

  38. [46]

    Huang and X

    W. Huang and X. Ye. A local variational relation and applications.Israel J. Math. 151 (2006), 237–279

    2006

  39. [47]

    Huang and X

    W. Huang and X. Ye. Combinatorial lemmas and applications to dynamics. Adv. Math. 220 (2009), no. 6, 1689–1716

    2009

  40. [48]

    Huang, X

    W. Huang, X. Ye, and G. Zhang. Local entropy theory for a countable discrete amenable group action. J. Funct. Anal. 261 (2011), no. 4, 1028–1082

    2011

  41. [49]

    Jacobs and M

    K. Jacobs and M. Keane. 0-1-sequences of Toeplitz type. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verw. Gebiete 13 (1969), 123–131

    1969

  42. [50]

    M. G. Karpovsky and V. D. Milman. Coordinate density of sets of vectors. Discrete Math. 24 (1978), no. 2, 177–184

    1978

  43. [51]

    A. S. Kechris. Classical Descriptive Set Theory . Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 156. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995

    1995

  44. [52]

    Kerr and H

    D. Kerr and H. Li. Dynamical entropy in Banach spaces. Invent. Math. 162 (2005), no. 3, 649–686

    2005

  45. [53]

    Kerr and H

    D. Kerr and H. Li. Independence in topological and C ∗-dynamics. Math. Ann. 338 (2007), no. 4, 869–926

    2007

  46. [54]

    Kerr and H

    D. Kerr and H. Li. Combinatorial independence in measurable dynamics. J. Funct. Anal. 256 (2009), no. 5, 1341–1386

    2009

  47. [55]

    Kerr and H

    D. Kerr and H. Li. Combinatorial independence and sofic entropy. Commun. Math. Stat. 1 (2013), no. 2, 213–257

    2013

  48. [56]

    Kerr and H

    D. Kerr and H. Li. Ergodic Theory. Independence and Dichotomies. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2016

    2016

  49. [57]

    K¨ ohler

    A. K¨ ohler. Enveloping semigroups for flows.Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. Sect. A 95 (1995), no. 2, 179–191

    1995

  50. [58]

    A. G. Kushnirenko. Metric invariants of entropy type. (Russian) Uspehi Mat. Nauk 22 (1967), no. 5(137), 57–65; English transl., Russian Math. Surveys 22 (1967), no. 5, 53–61

    1967

  51. [59]

    Li and Z

    H. Li and Z. Rong. Combinatorial independence and naive entropy. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 41 (2021), no. 7, 2136–2147

    2021

  52. [60]

    J. Li, K. Yan, and X. Ye. Recurrence properties and disjointness on the induced spaces. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 35 (2015), no. 3, 1059–1073

    2015

  53. [61]

    Lindenstrauss and B

    E. Lindenstrauss and B. Weiss. Mean topological dimension. Israel J. Math. 115 (2000), 1–24

    2000

  54. [62]

    Liu and R

    K. Liu and R. Wei. Relative uniformly positive entropy of induced amenable group actions. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 44 (2024), no. 2, 569–593

    2024

  55. [63]

    C. Liu, L. Xu, and S. Zhang. Independence, sequence entropy and mean sensitivity for in- variant measures. Preprint, arXiv:2501.08069

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    V. D. Milman and G. Schechtman. Asymptotic Theory of Finite-dimensional Normed Spaces . With an appendix by M. Gromov. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1200. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986

    1986

  57. [65]

    Moulin Ollagnier

    J. Moulin Ollagnier. Ergodic Theory and Statistical Mechanics. Lecture Notes in Mathematics,

  58. [66]

    D. S. Ornstein and B. Weiss. Entropy and isomorphism theorems for actions of amenable groups. J. Analyse Math. 48 (1987), 1–141

    1987

  59. [67]

    A. Pajor. Plongement de ln 1 dans les espaces de Banach complexes. (French) [Embeddings of ln 1 in complex Banach spaces] C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math. 296 (1983), no. 17, 741–743

    1983

  60. [68]

    A. Pajor. Sous-espaces ln 1 des espaces de Banach. (French) [ ln 1 -subspaces of Banach spaces] With an introduction by Gilles Pisier. Travaux en Cours [Works in Progress], 16. Hermann, Paris, 1985. LOCAL ENTROPY THEORY FOR INDUCED ACTIONS 75

    1985

  61. [69]

    R. R. Phelps. Lectures on Choquet’s Theorem. Second edition. Lecture Notes in Mathematics,

  62. [70]

    G. Pisier. The Volume of Convex Bodies and Banach Space Geometry . Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 94. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989

    1989

  63. [71]

    Qiao and X

    Y. Qiao and X. Zhou. Zero sequence entropy and entropy dimension. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 37 (2017), no. 1, 435–448

    2017

  64. [72]

    F. P. Ramsey. On a problem of formal logic. Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 30 (1929), no. 4, 264–286

    1929

  65. [73]

    P. P. Romagnoli. A local variational principle for the topological entropy. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 23 (2003), no. 5, 1601–1610

    2003

  66. [74]

    H. P. Rosenthal. A characterization of Banach spaces containing l1. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71 (1974), 2411–2413

    1974

  67. [75]

    H. P. Rosenthal. Some recent discoveries in the isomorphic theory of Banach spaces. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 84 (1978), no. 5, 803–831

    1978

  68. [76]

    N. Sauer. On the density of families of sets. J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. A 13 (1972), 145–147

    1972

  69. [77]

    S. Shelah. A combinatorial problem; stability and order for models and theories in infinitary languages. Pacific J. Math. 41 (1972), 247–261

    1972

  70. [78]

    Shi and G

    R. Shi and G. Zhang. Mean topological dimension of induced amenable group actions. Preprint, arXiv:2308.03270

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Todorcevic

    S. Todorcevic. Topics in Topology . Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1652. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997

    1997

  72. [80]

    Tomczak-Jaegermann

    N. Tomczak-Jaegermann. Banach-Mazur Distances and Finite-dimensional Operator Ideals . Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 38. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow; copublished in the United States with John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1989

    1989

  73. [81]

    R. M. Vermersch. Measure-theoretic uniformly positive entropy on the space of probability measures. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 23 (2024), no. 1, Paper No. 29. Hanfeng Li, College of Mathematics and Statistics, Center of Mathematics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, P.R. Ch...

    2024

  74. [1115]

    Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985

    1985

  75. [1757]

    Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.