Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Ferrimagnetism and anisotropic phase tunability by magnetic fields in Na$_2$Co$_2$TeO$_6$

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Na2Co2TeO6's low-temperature order is a canted mix of zigzag and Néel-type antiferromagnetism, revealed by a ferrimagnetic compensation point at 12.5 K.

desk verdict A careful experimental study that reports a weak ferrimagnetic response in Na2Co2TeO6 and a plausible canting-reversal reinterpretation of the ~6 T transition, but the central Néel-admixture claim is not yet established because all bulk data come from one crystal and the SI admits sample dependence. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09427 v1 pith:MGPUT6PA submitted 2019-08-26 cond-mat.str-el

Weiliang Yao , Yuan Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Na2Co2TeO6KitaevquantumspinliquidhoneycomblatticeferrimagnetismzigzagantiferromagnetismNéelordermomentcantingfield-inducedphasetransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Na2Co2TeO6, a honeycomb-lattice magnet proposed as a Kitaev spin-liquid candidate, turns out to carry extra order inside its low-temperature state. Magnetization and specific heat measurements show that below 27 K — exactly within the previously identified zigzag antiferromagnetic phase — cooling in a weak field leaves a residual moment that reverses sign at about 12.5 K, the hallmark of ferrimagnetism. Because a collinear zigzag order cannot produce net moments on either cobalt sublattice, the paper argues that the real order is a superposition of zigzag and $q=0$ Néel-type order with moments canted away from the zigzag chains. This matters because it changes what it means for Na2Co2TeO6 to be a Kitaev candidate, and it shows that moderate magnetic fields can toggle the canting and suppress the ordered phase.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the two-sublattice ferrimagnetic response probed by low-field training. Cooling through $T_N$ in a small field selects a net moment whose temperature dependence shows the ferrimagnetic compensation anomaly; this signal cannot arise from the propagation-vector $(1/2,0,0)$ zigzag order alone, which has no net sublattice magnetization, so its presence is taken as evidence for a coexisting $q=0$ Néel component. The companion piece is the first-order transition seen only for fields applied perpendicular to the zigzag chains ($H \parallel a^*$, near 6 T), which is interpreted as field-induced reversal of the moment canting.

What would settle it

A zero-field muon spin rotation or polarized neutron diffraction experiment on the same crystals below 27 K would settle the matter: if the state is intrinsically ferrimagnetic, muons will precess in a static internal field whose magnitude scales with the sample's bulk net moment, whereas an impurity origin would leave the majority of the sample without such a static field; alternatively, a measurement showing that the residual moment scales with impurity concentration rather than sample volume would falsify the intrinsic-admixture claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the low-temperature magnetic order of Na2Co2TeO6 is not the purely collinear zigzag antiferromagnet reported earlier. Instead, the order is a non-collinear superposition of the zigzag state and a $q=0$ Néel-type state, giving the two cobalt sublattices small, unequal, opposite net moments — hence ferrimagnetism. The key evidence is a canonical compensation-point signal: cooling in a $\pm 0.005$ T training field along $c$ produces a residual moment of a few times $10^{-3}\,\mu_{\rm B}$ per Co that changes sign at 12.5 K and vanishes at $T_N$. The same measurements rule out a spin-flop interpretation of a first-order transition near 6 T seen when the field is perpendicular to the zigzag chains; the authors attribute that transition to partial reversal of the Néel-type moment canting. They further show that in-plane fields suppress the 27 K transition (critical field near 8.4 T) while out-of-plane fields leave it almost unchanged but induce a separate low-temperature transition, and that the pseudospin-1/2 degrees of freedom remain strongly fluctuating even in the ordered state.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation collapses if the weak ferrimagnetic signal is extrinsic — an impurity phase or defect effect rather than an intrinsic property of the cobalt sublattices; the paper's own supplement notes that the in-plane ferrimagnetic component shows noticeable sample dependence that may be related to disorder and impurity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The previously accepted collinear zigzag description of Na2Co2TeO6 is incomplete; refinements of neutron data should allow for a canted, Néel-admixed ordered state, and exchange models should include terms that stabilize such non-collinearity.
  • In-plane magnetic fields suppress the 27 K order with a power-law boundary $T_N(H) = 17.8\,(8.4-H)^{0.20}$, implying that fields above about 8.4 T could drive the system toward a disordered or quantum-fluctuating regime, reminiscent of the Kitaev candidate $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$.
  • A transverse in-plane field $H \parallel a^*$ converts part of the Néel-type canting into a ferromagnetic arrangement at a first-order transition near 6 T, providing a clean handle to toggle moment canting with an external field.
  • The reduced magnetic entropy (only about 70% of $2R\ln 2$ by 40 K) indicates strong short-range correlations persist well above $T_N$, a feature expected near a Kitaev-like spin-liquid boundary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Néel admixture is intrinsic, any mapping of Na2Co2TeO6 onto a pure Kitaev-honeycomb Hamiltonian needs re-examination: the ordered state contains an extra $q=0$ term, and the off-diagonal exchanges that stabilize it may also affect the proximity to a spin liquid.
  • The 12.5 K compensation point offers a direct probe: measuring the residual moment as a function of field and temperature on multiple samples could separate the intrinsic two-sublattice signal from the impurity-related in-plane component acknowledged in the supplement.
  • The field-induced canting reversal suggests a test of the Kitaev physics: thermal conductivity or muon spin rotation measurements just above the 8.4 T critical field may reveal whether the field-suppressed state is a quantum spin liquid or simply a paramagnet.
  • Tilting the applied field at small angles away from $a^*$ and $c$ would map out the canting-reversal surface and constrain the microscopic Hamiltonian.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports DC magnetization and specific heat measurements on a single crystal of Na2Co2TeO6, with fields applied along the zigzag chain direction a, the in-plane perpendicular direction a*, and the out-of-plane direction c. After cooling in small training fields along c, the authors observe a weak negative remnant magnetization that reverses sign at about 12.5 K and vanishes near TN ~ 27 K, which they identify as canonical ferrimagnetic behavior. They argue that the known collinear zigzag order cannot produce net moments on either Co sublattice, so the ferrimagnetism implies an admixture of q = 0 Néel-type order with the zigzag order and a non-collinear moment canting. They further report that in-plane fields suppress TN, that H//a* induces a hysteretic first-order transition near 6 T interpreted as a reversal of moment canting, that H//c leaves TN largely unchanged but produces a low-temperature transition, and they construct a field-temperature phase diagram with a power-law boundary TN(H) = 17.8(Hc − H)^0.20 and Hc = 8.4 T. The results are discussed in the context of the Kitaev spin-liquid candidate α-RuCl3.

Significance. If the ferrimagnetic signal is intrinsic to the two Co sublattices, the paper reports a qualitatively new ingredient in a Kitaev candidate material—coexisting Néel-type canting—that would constrain microscopic exchange models and enrich the field-tunable phase competition. The study has clear strengths: explicit crystal orientation by X-ray diffraction, consistent magnetization and specific heat measurements over a broad field range, use of an isostructural Na2Zn2TeO6 reference for phonon subtraction, and a textbook compensation-point signature that is internally reproducible within the single crystal studied. The significance is conditional, however, because the central attribution of the weak signal to intrinsic ferrimagnetism rests on a single crystal and on an in-plane component that the authors themselves describe as sample-dependent and possibly impurity-related.

major comments (2)
  1. [Fig. 2(d) and SI Section II] The central claim that Na2Co2TeO6 exhibits intrinsic ferrimagnetism arising from the two Co sublattices rests on a weak trained moment of roughly 5×10^-3 μB per Co along c, and all bulk data were taken on one 1.64 mg crystal. The SI caption to Fig. S5 states that the in-plane ferrimagnetic component shows 'noticeable sample dependence and may be related to disorder and impurity.' Because the in-plane component is one of the two pieces of evidence for non-collinear canted order, and because an impurity or defect-stabilized phase with a transition near 27 K could in principle reproduce the observed training-field reversal, negative remanence, and compensation point, the bulk magnetization data do not by themselves establish that the effect is intrinsic to the Co sublattices. The authors should provide reproducibility on multiple crystals, a quantitative bound on impurity/defect contributions, or an independent probe of the proposed q = 0 order.
  2. [Fig. 2(e-f) and Fig. 4] The assignment of the H//a* first-order transition near 6 T to a reversal of Néel-type moment canting is an inference from the field geometry and from the absence of a spin-flop feature for H//a. Since the intrinsic nature of the ferrimagnetic component is not yet established, and since no microscopic measurement of moment directions across the transition is presented, alternative explanations such as field-induced domain redistribution or a transition associated with the same extrinsic component are not excluded. This does not invalidate the reported phenomenology, but it makes the 'canting reversal' interpretation tentative and in need of direct evidence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 4] The power-law fit TN(H) = 17.8(Hc − H)^n with n = 0.20 and Hc = 8.4 T is presented without uncertainties, the number of points used, or the fitted temperature/field range; the comparison with the α-RuCl3 exponent would be more convincing with these details.
  2. [Fig. 2(d) inset] The inset labels M1 and M2 are not defined in the caption; please define them in terms of the two sublattice magnetizations discussed in the text.
  3. [Fig. 2(a-c)] The quantity M/H is plotted with different normalizations (emu mol^-1 Co in panels a-c and μB/Co in panel d-e); the caption should state the conversion and units for each panel explicitly.
  4. [Main text, page 2] The statement that cooling in the largest available fields produced no magnetic detwinning would be more useful if the corresponding data were shown or at least described in the Supplemental Material.
  5. [Fig. 2(c)] For H//c, the text says TN manifests as an anomaly in M, but the anomaly is described differently in different places; please specify whether it is an upturn, a dip, or a slope change.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ferrimagnetism claim is an empirical observation interpreted through standard sublattice arguments, not a derived quantity that reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central finding is an experimental observation: cooling in small fields along c produces a small residual magnetization that reverses sign at about 12.5 K and vanishes above TN. The interpretation that this indicates a q=0 Néel admixture rests on the known zigzag order having no net sublattice moment, a premise from neutron diffraction (refs 35,36), not on any parameter fitted in this paper. The Curie-Weiss and power-law phase-boundary fits are descriptive and are not used to predict the ferrimagnetic signal. The only self-citation (ref 28, Winter, Li, et al.) is background context about Kitaev interactions in other materials and does not carry the ferrimagnetism argument. The SI caveat about sample dependence of the in-plane component is a robustness concern, not a circularity: identifying a possible extrinsic origin is the opposite of assuming the conclusion. No equation in the paper defines the conclusion into existence.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard experimental methods and prior structural and neutron-diffraction results. The power-law fit parameters are descriptive and do not enter the ferrimagnetism interpretation. No new particles, forces, or other entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Hc (critical field in TN(H) fit) = 8.4 T
    Fitted to the field dependence of the transition temperature for in-plane fields (Fig. 4).
  • n (critical exponent) = 0.20
    Fitted exponent in TN(H) = A(Hc - H)^n; compared with the α-RuCl3 value of 0.18.
  • A (prefactor) = 17.8 K/T^0.2
    Fitted prefactor in the PM-AFM phase boundary power law.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The low-temperature magnetic order of Na2Co2TeO6 is collinear zigzag AFM with propagation vector (1/2,0,0) and moments along the zigzag chains, as reported by neutron diffraction.
    Used to argue that zigzag order alone has zero net moment per Co sublattice, so the observed ferrimagnetism requires an additional Néel component.
  • domain assumption There is no structural distortion below TN that could break the equivalence of the two Co sublattices.
    Needed for the conclusion that the ferrimagnetism cannot be explained by the zigzag order alone.
  • domain assumption The specific heat of the nonmagnetic Na2Zn2TeO6 accurately represents the phonon background of Na2Co2TeO6.
    Used to extract magnetic specific heat and entropy; an inaccurate subtraction would change the reported 70% entropy estimate.
  • domain assumption The d7 Co2+ ions form pseudospin-1/2 degrees of freedom with bond-dependent Kitaev interactions.
    This is the conceptual framework motivating the study, though it is not strictly necessary for the main experimental claims.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ferrimagnetism and anisotropic phase tunability by magnetic fields in Na$_2$Co$_2$TeO$_6$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MGPUT6PA

@misc{pith2026190809427,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ferrimagnetism and anisotropic phase tunability by magnetic fields in Na$_2$Co$_2$TeO$_6$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MGPUT6PA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09427}
}
abstract

Na$_2$Co$_2$TeO$_6$ has recently been proposed to be a Kitaev-like honeycomb magnet. To assess how close it is to realizing Kitaev quantum spin liquids, we have measured magnetization and specific heat on high-quality single crystals in magnetic fields applied along high-symmetry directions. Small training fields reveal a weak but canonical ferrimagnetic behavior below 27 K, which cannot be explained by the zigzag antiferromagnetic order alone and suggests coexisting N\'{e}el-type order of moments canted away from the zigzag chains. Moderate fields in the honeycomb plane suppress the thermal transition at 27 K, and seem to partly reverse the moment-canting when applied perpendicular to the zigzag chains. In contrast, out-of-plane fields leave the transition largely unaffected, but promotes another transition below 10 K, possibly also related to canting reversal. The magnetism in Na$_2$Co$_2$TeO$_6$ is highly anisotropic and close to tipping points between competing phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09427 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of Na [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (e) displays isothermal magnetization as func￾tions of fields. The super-linear field dependence, more pronounced for the in-plane fields, is again similar to α￾RuCl3 49. The smaller susceptibility along c can be ex￾plained by g-factor anisotropy caused by a nonzero trig￾onal crystal field on Co2+50,51. In line with the large increase of low-T magnetization in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Phase diagram under in-plane magnetic fields. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hunting Majorana Fermions in Kitaev Magnets

    cond-mat.str-el 2019-09 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review of theoretical and experimental evidence that Kitaev magnets exhibit thermal fractionalization into Majorana fermions and Z2 fluxes, with the half-quantized thermal Hall effect as the strongest proposed signature.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Kitaev ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005 journal journal Annals of Physics \ volume 321 ,\ pages 2 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    author author A. Kitaev ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005 journal journal Annals of Physics \ volume 321 ,\ pages 2 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005 2005

  2. [2]

    author author S. M. \ Winter , author A. A. \ Tsirlin , author M. Daghofer , author J. van den Brink , author Y. Singh , author P. Gegenwart ,\ and\ author R. Valent\' i ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa8cf5 journal journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter \ volume 29 ,\ pages 493002 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa8cf5

  3. [3]

    Hermanns , author I

    author author M. Hermanns , author I. Kimchi ,\ and\ author J. Knolle ,\ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-033117-053934 journal journal Annu. Rev. of Condens. Matter Phys. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 17 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-033117-053934 2018

  4. [4]

    Takagi , author T

    author author H. Takagi , author T. Takayama , author G. Jackeli , author G. Khaliullin ,\ and\ author S. E. \ Nagler ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0038-2 journal journal Nature Reviews Physics \ volume 1 ,\ pages 264 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0038-2

  5. [5]

    Nayak , author S

    author author C. Nayak , author S. H. \ Simon , author A. Stern , author M. Freedman ,\ and\ author S. Das Sarma ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1083 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 1083 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1083

  6. [6]

    Balents ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08917 journal journal Nature \ volume 464 ,\ pages 199 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    author author L. Balents ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08917 journal journal Nature \ volume 464 ,\ pages 199 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nature08917 2010

  7. [7]

    Zhou , author K

    author author Y. Zhou , author K. Kanoda ,\ and\ author T.-K. \ Ng ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.025003 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 025003 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.025003 2017

  8. [8]

    Chaloupka , author G

    author author J. Chaloupka , author G. Jackeli ,\ and\ author G. Khaliullin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.027204 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 027204 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.027204 2010

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Chaloupka , author G

    author author J. Chaloupka , author G. Jackeli ,\ and\ author G. Khaliullin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.097204 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 097204 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    author author V. M. \ Katukuri , author S. Nishimoto , author V. Yushankhai , author A. Stoyanova , author H. Kandpal , author S. Choi , author R. Coldea , author I. Rousochatzakis , author L. Hozoi ,\ and\ author J. van den Brink ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/0130...

    doi

  3. [11]

    author author J. G. \ Rau , author E. K.-H. \ Lee ,\ and\ author H.-Y. \ Kee ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.077204 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 112 ,\ pages 077204 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    Khaliullin ,\ @noop journal journal Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement \ volume 160 ,\ pages 155 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    author author G. Khaliullin ,\ @noop journal journal Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement \ volume 160 ,\ pages 155 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  5. [13]

    Chen \ and\ author L

    author author G. Chen \ and\ author L. Balents ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.094403 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 78 ,\ pages 094403 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  6. [14]

    author author J. G. \ Rau , author E. K.-H. \ Lee ,\ and\ author H.-Y. \ Kee ,\ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031115-011319 journal journal Annu. Rev. of Condens. Matter Phys. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 195 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    Jackeli \ and\ author G

    author author G. Jackeli \ and\ author G. Khaliullin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.017205 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 102 ,\ pages 017205 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  8. [16]

    author author K. W. \ Plumb , author J. P. \ Clancy , author L. J. \ Sandilands , author V. V. \ Shankar , author Y. F. \ Hu , author K. S. \ Burch , author H.-Y. \ Kee ,\ and\ author Y.-J. \ Kim ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.041112 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volu...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Liu \ and\ author G

    author author H. Liu \ and\ author G. Khaliullin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.014407 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 014407 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    Sano , author Y

    author author R. Sano , author Y. Kato ,\ and\ author Y. Motome ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.014408 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 014408 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    Liu , author T

    author author X. Liu , author T. Berlijn , author W.-G. \ Yin , author W. Ku , author A. Tsvelik , author Y.-J. \ Kim , author H. Gretarsson , author Y. Singh , author P. Gegenwart ,\ and\ author J. P. \ Hill ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.220403 journal journal Phys. ...

    doi

  12. [20]

    author author S. K. \ Choi , author R. Coldea , author A. N. \ Kolmogorov , author T. Lancaster , author I. I. \ Mazin , author S. J. \ Blundell , author P. G. \ Radaelli , author Y. Singh , author P. Gegenwart , author K. R. \ Choi , author S.-W. \ Cheong , author P. J. \ Bak...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Ye , author S

    author author F. Ye , author S. Chi , author H. Cao , author B. C. \ Chakoumakos , author J. A. \ Fernandez-Baca , author R. Custelcean , author T. F. \ Qi , author O. B. \ Korneta ,\ and\ author G. Cao ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.180403 journal journal Phys. Rev. B...

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author J. A. \ Sears , author M. Songvilay , author K. W. \ Plumb , author J. P. \ Clancy , author Y. Qiu , author Y. Zhao , author D. Parshall ,\ and\ author Y.-J. \ Kim ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.144420 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 91 ,\ pages 144...

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author R. D. \ Johnson , author S. C. \ Williams , author A. A. \ Haghighirad , author J. Singleton , author V. Zapf , author P. Manuel , author I. I. \ Mazin , author Y. Li , author H. O. \ Jeschke , author R. Valent\' ,\ and\ author R. Coldea ,\ https://doi.org/10.110...

    doi

  16. [24]

    author author S. H. \ Chun , author J.-W. \ Kim , author J. Kim , author H. Zheng , author C. C. \ Stoumpos , author C. D. \ Malliakas , author J. F. \ Mitchell , author K. Mehlawat , author Y. Singh , author Y. Choi , author T. Gog , author A. Al-Zein , author M. Moretti Sala...

    2015

  17. [25]

    Yamaji , author Y

    author author Y. Yamaji , author Y. Nomura , author M. Kurita , author R. Arita ,\ and\ author M. Imada ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.107201 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 113 ,\ pages 107201 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  18. [26]

    Sizyuk , author C

    author author Y. Sizyuk , author C. Price , author P. W\"olfle ,\ and\ author N. B. \ Perkins ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.155126 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 90 ,\ pages 155126 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    Hu , author F

    author author K. Hu , author F. Wang ,\ and\ author J. Feng ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.167204 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 115 ,\ pages 167204 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    author author S. M. \ Winter , author Y. Li , author H. O. \ Jeschke ,\ and\ author R. Valent\' ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214431 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 214431 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    \ Kim \ and\ author H.-Y

    author author H.-S. \ Kim \ and\ author H.-Y. \ Kee ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.155143 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 155143 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    Ran , author J

    author author K. Ran , author J. Wang , author W. Wang , author Z.-Y. \ Dong , author X. Ren , author S. Bao , author S. Li , author Z. Ma , author Y. Gan , author Y. Zhang , author J. T. \ Park , author G. Deng , author S. Danilkin , author S.-L. \ Yu , author J.-X. \ Li ,\ a...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Banerjee , author P

    author author A. Banerjee , author P. Lampen-Kelley , author J. Knolle , author C. Balz , author A. A. \ Aczel , author B. Winn , author Y. Liu , author D. Pajerowski , author J. Yan , author C. A. \ Bridges , author A. T. \ Savici , author B. C. \ Chakoumakos , author M. D. \...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Kimchi \ and\ author Y.-Z

    author author I. Kimchi \ and\ author Y.-Z. \ You ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.180407 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 84 ,\ pages 180407 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  25. [33]

    Singh , author S

    author author Y. Singh , author S. Manni , author J. Reuther , author T. Berlijn , author R. Thomale , author W. Ku , author S. Trebst ,\ and\ author P. Gegenwart ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.127203 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 127203 ( ...

    doi

  26. [34]

    author author S. D. \ Das , author S. Kundu , author Z. Zhu , author E. Mun , author R. D. \ McDonald , author G. Li , author L. Balicas , author A. McCollam , author G. Cao , author J. G. \ Rau , author H.-Y. \ Kee , author V. Tripathi ,\ and\ author S. E. \ Sebastian ,\ http...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Lefran c c ois , author M

    author author E. Lefran c c ois , author M. Songvilay , author J. Robert , author G. Nataf , author E. Jordan , author L. Chaix , author C. V. \ Colin , author P. Lejay , author A. Hadj-Azzem , author R. Ballou ,\ and\ author V. Simonet ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.2...

    doi

  28. [36]

    author author A. K. \ Bera , author S. M. \ Yusuf , author A. Kumar ,\ and\ author C. Ritter ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094424 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 95 ,\ pages 094424 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    Viciu , author Q

    author author L. Viciu , author Q. Huang , author E. Morosan , author H. Zandbergen , author N. Greenbaum , author T. McQueen ,\ and\ author R. Cava ,\ https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2007.01.002 journal journal Journal of Solid State Chemistry \ volume 180 ,\ pages 1060 ( y...

    2007 doi

  30. [38]

    Xiao , author Z

    author author G. Xiao , author Z. Xia , author W. Zhang , author X. Yue , author S. Huang , author X. Zhang , author F. Yang , author Y. Song , author M. Wei , author H. Deng ,\ and\ author D. Jiang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.8b01770 journal journal Cryst. Growth Des. ...

    doi

  31. [39]

    note See Supplementary Information for additional methods, measurement data and analyses. Stop

  32. [40]

    author author Y. J. \ Yu , author Y. Xu , author K. J. \ Ran , author J. M. \ Ni , author Y. Y. \ Huang , author J. H. \ Wang , author J. S. \ Wen ,\ and\ author S. Y. \ Li ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.067202 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 120 ,\ pages...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Kasahara , author K

    author author Y. Kasahara , author K. Sugii , author T. Ohnishi , author M. Shimozawa , author M. Yamashita , author N. Kurita , author H. Tanaka , author J. Nasu , author Y. Motome , author T. Shibauchi ,\ and\ author Y. Matsuda ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.2172...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Kasahara , author T

    author author Y. Kasahara , author T. Ohnishi , author Y. Mizukami , author O. Tanaka , author S. Ma , author K. Sugii , author N. Kurita , author H. Tanaka , author J. Nasu , author Y. Motome , author T. Shibauchi ,\ and\ author Y. Matsuda ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-01...

    doi

  35. [43]

    Wellm , author J

    author author C. Wellm , author J. Zeisner , author A. Alfonsov , author A. U. B. \ Wolter , author M. Roslova , author A. Isaeva , author T. Doert , author M. Vojta , author B. B\"uchner ,\ and\ author V. Kataev ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.184408 journal journal Ph...

    doi

  36. [44]

    author author J. A. \ Sears , author Y. Zhao , author Z. Xu , author J. W. \ Lynn ,\ and\ author Y.-J. \ Kim ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.180411 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 95 ,\ pages 180411 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    author author L. Y. \ Shi , author Y. Q. \ Liu , author T. Lin , author M. Y. \ Zhang , author S. J. \ Zhang , author L. Wang , author Y. G. \ Shi , author T. Dong ,\ and\ author N. L. \ Wang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.094414 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 9...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Kumar \ and\ author S

    author author A. Kumar \ and\ author S. Yusuf ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.10.003 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 556 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  39. [47]

    Chaloupka \ and\ author G

    author author J. Chaloupka \ and\ author G. Khaliullin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.064435 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 94 ,\ pages 064435 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  40. [48]

    Rusna c c ko , author D

    author author J. Rusna c c ko , author D. Gotfryd ,\ and\ author J. Chaloupka ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.064425 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 064425 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  41. [49]

    \ Baek , author S.-H

    author author S.-H. \ Baek , author S.-H. \ Do , author K.-Y. \ Choi , author Y. S. \ Kwon , author A. U. B. \ Wolter , author S. Nishimoto , author J. van den Brink ,\ and\ author B. B\"uchner ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.037201 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. ...

    doi

  42. [50]

    Abragam \ and\ author M

    author author A. Abragam \ and\ author M. Pryce ,\ https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1951.0063 journal journal Proc. R. Soc. A \ volume 206 ,\ pages 173 ( year 1951 ) NoStop

    1951

  43. [51]

    author author M. E. \ Lines ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.131.546 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 546 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

    1963 doi

  44. [52]

    Blundell ,\ @noop title Magnetism in condensed matter \ ( publisher Oxford University Press, New York ,\ year 2001 ) NoStop

    author author S. Blundell ,\ @noop title Magnetism in condensed matter \ ( publisher Oxford University Press, New York ,\ year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  45. [53]

    Berthelot , author W

    author author R. Berthelot , author W. Schmidt , author A. Sleight ,\ and\ author M. Subramanian ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2012.06.022 journal journal Journal of Solid State Chemistry \ volume 196 ,\ pages 225 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.