Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.262314Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity
As of 20 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 16 of 16 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2608.11256.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: cited_works
Reference resolution
16 of 16 outbound references displayed
- verified exact1
- verified fuzzy9
- unresolved5
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier1
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
Observation fa5c9566-6eec-4eea-bd96-406b271d9bd3 · outbound
This paper cites LLM-Generated or Human-Written? Compar- ing Review and Non-Review Papers on ArXiv.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity LLM-Generated or Human-Written? Compar- ing Review and Non-Review Papers on ArXiv
Reference 2
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.196898Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation da4b4d5b-700a-4dcd-b6b6-2b48cf13e803 · outbound
This paper cites Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews
Reference 5
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.211802Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation c6675a9b-9603-4ef7-b475-17e368951fe0 · outbound
This paper cites #1 Best AI Detector.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity #1 Best AI Detector
Reference 6
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.583270Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Observation abb5fc66-e340-4993-b515-10e849e9b779 · outbound
This paper cites Trusting AI to detect AI? A systematic evaluation of the reliability and robustness of current AIGC detection tools for student academic work.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity Trusting AI to detect AI? A systematic evaluation of the reliability and robustness of current AIGC detection tools for student academic work
Reference 7
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.610025Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Observation f276c339-b96c-4824-a810-0179346e4869 · outbound
This paper cites G.2 Corpus counts See Table 1 in the main text.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity G.2 Corpus counts See Table 1 in the main text
Reference 12
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.541402Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Observation ee27dd0a-96ec-4bb3-b898-828bc3cf7589 · outbound
This paper cites On recent prose this mixes proxy false positives with unobserved real AI use; it still bounds how often human-labeled text is flagged.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity On recent prose this mixes proxy false positives with unobserved real AI use; it still bounds how often human-labeled text is flagged
Reference 14
- Resolution
- malformed identifier
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.513961Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Observation a5508e0d-8c1f-40b4-8424-0e348d8c0d6f · outbound
This paper cites Systematic suppression of detector-salient cues.Table 8 in the main text summarizes key pooled shifts; Table 22 below lists the full feature set.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity Systematic suppression of detector-salient cues.Table 8 in the main text summarizes key pooled shifts; Table 22 below lists the full feature set
Reference 15
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.500109Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Observation b45d683d-3dd9-4c1e-bc7e-5302e0d9c8ed · outbound
This paper cites Length and syntax.Humanization alsoincreasedlength: mean word count rose from 180 to 229 (Δ≈+ 49words; 𝑝< 0.001) and average words per sentence from 23.6 to 28.4 (Δ≈+ 4.8;𝑝< 0.001).
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity Length and syntax.Humanization alsoincreasedlength: mean word count rose from 180 to 229 (Δ≈+ 49words; 𝑝< 0.001) and average words per sentence from 23.6 to 28.4 (Δ≈+ 4.8;𝑝< 0.001)
Reference 16
- Resolution
- verified exact
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.389001Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Observation 79249894-4e35-46a2-a2d6-3a9eb3ac64ac · outbound
This paper cites flagged as not human.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity flagged as not human
Reference 18
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.554583Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Observation acc2723b-5b15-4724-b196-45b4132b6ac5 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity Unresolved cited work
Reference 42
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.569105Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Observation fcee6567-87f3-437c-ba6c-fcc8a1adfdcf · outbound
This paper cites AUC-PR is high (0.93-1.00) because Gemini rewrites separate cleanly from unflagged originals at𝜏= 0.50; this is a best-case separability benchmark, not current flagging exposure.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity AUC-PR is high (0.93-1.00) because Gemini rewrites separate cleanly from unflagged originals at𝜏= 0.50; this is a best-case separability benchmark, not current flagging exposure
Reference 2015
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.527628Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Observation 1155c40e-7f1e-430f-82e3-17f6c410978a · outbound
This paper cites OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts
Reference 2022
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.216461Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7e7601e7-3514-48bb-8935-f4fc0ab70d27 · outbound
This paper cites Don’t trust ChatGPT when your question is not in English: A study of multilingual abilities and types of LLMs.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity Don’t trust ChatGPT when your question is not in English: A study of multilingual abilities and types of LLMs
Reference 2023
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.596534Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Observation 820fa393-35d0-421d-bda9-e23bd27113b6 · outbound
This paper cites Technical Report on the Pangram AI-Generated Text Classifier.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity Technical Report on the Pangram AI-Generated Text Classifier
Reference 2024
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.201721Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f519aabb-213d-4ea6-8dd8-4b7acfe448f4 · outbound
This paper cites What Are We Detecting, Really? LLM- Generated Text Detection Remains an Unsolved Problem.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity What Are We Detecting, Really? LLM- Generated Text Detection Remains an Unsolved Problem
Reference 2025
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.623382Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Observation 0d46db1a-96ba-47a6-b1e4-c0ddceba16bf · outbound
This paper cites GPTZero AI Detection Benchmarking: The Industry Standard in Accuracy, Transparency and Fairness,.
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity GPTZero AI Detection Benchmarking: The Industry Standard in Accuracy, Transparency and Fairness,
Reference 2026
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:37:43.637205Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.
Pith citing papers
No inbound Pith citation observations are available.