Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Spanning trees in pseudorandom graphs via sorting networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.03185 v1 pith:MJLCOTG3 submitted 2023-11-06 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords lambdaconstructiongraphsnetworksproblemsortingspanningtrees
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We show that $(n,d,\lambda)$-graphs with $\lambda=O(d/\log^3 n)$ are universal with respect to all bounded degree spanning trees. This significantly improves upon the previous best bound due to Han and Yang of the form $\lambda=d/\exp{(O(\sqrt{\log n}))}$, and makes progress towards a problem of Alon, Krivelevich, and Sudakov from 2007. Our proof relies on the existence of sorting networks of logarithmic depth, as given by a celebrated construction of Ajtai, Koml\'os and Szemer\'edi. Using this construction, we show that the classical vertex-disjoint paths problem can be solved for a set of vertices fixed in advance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tree tilings in random regular graphs

    math.CO 2024-12 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    For every fixed epsilon, with high probability the random d-regular graph contains a vertex-partition into copies of any prescribed tree of size at most (1-epsilon)d/ln d.

  2. Embedding edge-colored graphs in expanders with roll-back

    math.CO 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A generalized roll-back method is claimed to embed edge-colored subdivisions of complete graphs into families of expanders, but key steps in the proof are flawed.

Pith tools