Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Why (and How) Networks Should Run Themselves

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1710.11583 v1 pith:MK3L5KWJ submitted 2017-10-31 cs.NI

classification cs.NI
keywords networkanalysismanagementnetworksprotocolsalgorithmsapplicationapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The proliferation of networked devices, systems, and applications that we depend on every day makes managing networks more important than ever. The increasing security, availability, and performance demands of these applications suggest that these increasingly difficult network management problems be solved in real time, across a complex web of interacting protocols and systems. Alas, just as the importance of network management has increased, the network has grown so complex that it is seemingly unmanageable. In this new era, network management requires a fundamentally new approach. Instead of optimizations based on closed-form analysis of individual protocols, network operators need data-driven, machine-learning-based models of end-to-end and application performance based on high-level policy goals and a holistic view of the underlying components. Instead of anomaly detection algorithms that operate on offline analysis of network traces, operators need classification and detection algorithms that can make real-time, closed-loop decisions. Networks should learn to drive themselves. This paper explores this concept, discussing how we might attain this ambitious goal by more closely coupling measurement with real-time control and by relying on learning for inference and prediction about a networked application or system, as opposed to closed-form analysis of individual protocols.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Network Automation to Trustworthy Autonomous Networking in the LLM Era: A Network Control Intelligence Perspective

    cs.NI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new five-axis framework for profiling network control systems shows that automation progress is uneven and that LLMs should be limited to proposal generation, not commit authority.

  2. Untangling Co-Drift: Proactive Multi-Intent Failure Prediction and Root-Cause Disambiguation for Self-Driving Networks

    cs.NI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MILD jointly predicts imminent intent failures in self-driving networks and identifies the root-cause intent under co-drift, using a teacher-augmented mixture-of-experts model.

  3. Learning QoE from Packet-Level Measurements in Encrypted Video Conferencing Traffic

    cs.CR 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A self-attention CNN predicts video-call QoE (BRISQUE, FPS) from encrypted packet-size sequences, beating several baselines on one WhatsApp dataset.

Pith tools