Rigidity of Five-Dimensional shrinking gradient Ricci solitons

Fengjiang Li; Guoqiang Wu; Jianyu Ou; Yuanyuan Qu

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 33 references

Rigidity of Five-Dimensional shrinking gradient Ricci solitons

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Every 5-dimensional complete noncompact shrinking gradient Ricci soliton with constant scalar curvature 1 and bounded curvature is a finite quotient of $\mathbb{R}^3\times \mathbb{S}^2$.

desk verdict Completes the last constant-scalar-curvature case in 5D, but Theorem 3.2's topology-change step is not justified and needs a Ricci-flow argument. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00887 v1 pith:MK64G6Z3 submitted 2025-06-01 math.DG

Fengjiang Li , Jianyu Ou , Yuanyuan Qu , Guoqiang Wu This is my paper

classification math.DG MSC 53C2153C44

keywords shrinkinggradientRiccisolitonconstantscalarcurvaturerigiditytheoremflowancientsolutionGauss-Bonnet-ChernformulaWeylisoparametricfunction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper attempts to close the last open constant-scalar-curvature case of the rigidity conjecture for shrinking gradient Ricci solitons in dimension five. The main theorem asserts that if $(M,g,f)$ is a complete noncompact five-dimensional shrinking gradient Ricci soliton with scalar curvature $R=1$ and bounded curvature, then it is isometric to a finite quotient of $\mathbb{R}^3\times \mathbb{S}^2$. This matters because the other admissible constant scalar curvature values in dimension five were already handled, so a positive result would complete the five-dimensional classification under the bounded-curvature hypothesis. The proof tracks the nonnegative eigenvalue sum $\eta=\lambda_1+\lambda_2+\lambda_3$, forces it to vanish outside a compact set, and then uses analyticity of the soliton to obtain the global product splitting. The bounded-curvature assumption enters in the blow-up analysis of the associated ancient Ricci flow and is not removed.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the function $\eta=\lambda_1+\lambda_2+\lambda_3$, the sum of the three smallest eigenvalues of the Ricci tensor, together with the level hypersurfaces $\Sigma(s)=\{f=s\}$ of the normalized potential $f$, for which $|\nabla f|^2=f$ and $R=1$ make $f$ isoparametric. The focal variety $M_-=f^{-1}(0)$ is a compact minimal surface whose intrinsic volume is bounded below by $8\pi$, and that bound is used in a four-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet-Chern estimate to control the Weyl curvature of the level sets. On the flow side, an asymptotic-limit theorem from [24] reduces the decay of $\eta$ to the classification of four-dimensional $\kappa$-noncollapsed ancient solutions with scalar curvature $R=1/(-t)$ as finite quotients of $\mathbb{R}^2\times \mathbb{S}^2$. The analytic engine is the identity $\Delta_f|\mathrm{Ric}|^2=2|\mathrm{Ric}|^2+2|\nabla\mathrm{Ric}|^2-4K_{ij}\lambda_i\lambda_j$, sharpened by the estimate $|\nabla\mathrm{Ric}|^2\le -0.9999\,\eta+1.01\,(K_{12}+K_{13}+K_{23})$ outside a compact set, and then integrated over the level sets.

What would settle it

Exhibit a four-dimensional complete ancient Ricci flow that is $\kappa$-noncollapsed, has bounded curvature and scalar curvature $R=1/(-t)$, and is not a finite quotient of $\mathbb{R}^2\times \mathbb{S}^2$; such an object would falsify the paper's Theorem 3.2 and the uniform decay that feeds the main theorem. A more local check is to test the topology-invariance assertion directly by finding a smooth Ricci flow in which the diffeomorphism type of $B(p,g(-\tau),100\sqrt{\tau})$ changes as $\tau$ varies.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1.1: if $(M,g,f)$ is a 5-dimensional complete noncompact shrinking gradient Ricci soliton normalized by $\mathrm{Ric}+\nabla^2 f=\frac12 g$, with constant scalar curvature $R=1$ and bounded curvature, then $(M,g)$ is isometric to a finite quotient of $\mathbb{R}^3\times \mathbb{S}^2$. This is the last admissible constant-scalar-curvature value in dimension five whose rigidity was open under the bounded-curvature hypothesis, so it completes the five-dimensional case of the rigidity conjecture for shrinking Ricci solitons. The proof shows that the sum $\eta=\lambda_1+\lambda_2+\lambda_3$ of the three smallest Ricci eigenvalues is nonnegative, that it tends to zero at infinity by classifying the four-dimensional ancient limits as finite quotients of $\mathbb{R}^2\times \mathbb{S}^2$, and then, through level-set integral estimates and the four-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet-Chern formula, that it vanishes outside a compact set. Together with the vanishing of the full covariant derivative of Ricci curvature outside a compact set, analyticity propagates the rigidity to all of $M$, and the Riemannian splitting theorem yields the product with a two-dimensional Einstein factor, $\mathbb{S}^2$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument's most exposed premise is that in the four-dimensional limit step, the diffeomorphism type of a large geodesic ball around a fixed point does not change as the time parameter of the flow advances; smoothness of a flow does not by itself force the topology of growing balls to stay fixed, and the classification of the ancient limit depends on this.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every soliton satisfying the hypotheses, outside a compact set the Ricci eigenvalues are $\lambda_1=\lambda_2=\lambda_3=0$ and $\lambda_4=\lambda_5=1/2$, so the geometry is asymptotically a cylinder over $\mathbb{S}^2$.
The uniform decay $\lambda_1+\lambda_2+\lambda_3\to 0$ at infinity depends on the classification of four-dimensional ancient solutions with scalar curvature $1/(-t)$, so the main theorem inherits that classification.
Because the soliton equation is analytic, rigidity propagates from the exterior region to all of $M$, yielding the finite-quotient splitting $\mathbb{R}^3\times \mathbb{S}^2$.
Under the hypotheses there are no exotic examples: any such soliton must be the standard product geometry on a finite quotient of $\mathbb{R}^3\times \mathbb{S}^2$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If bounded curvature could be removed, the theorem would exactly confirm the rigidity conjecture in dimension five; the boundedness assumption enters only through the blow-up limit step, so sharper local estimates may make it redundant.
Combined with the already-rigid admissible values $R=0,2,5/2$ and the companion treatment of $R=3/2$, the result effectively closes the five-dimensional constant-scalar-curvature classification under bounded curvature.
The same eigenvalue-sum strategy may transfer to higher dimensions, where the finite list of admissible constant scalar curvature values is already known, with the role of the four-dimensional limit classification played by the corresponding dimension.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Fengjiang, Jianyu, Yuanyuan, and Guoqiang prove the R=1 case of the 5D shrinking gradient Ricci soliton rigidity problem under bounded curvature, finishing the constant scalar curvature classification in dimension 5. That is a real result. The strategy follows their earlier R=3/2 paper, and the new technical content is substantial: the asymptotic decay of λ1+λ2+λ3, the volume lower bound for the focal variety via four-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet, and the long algebraic estimate for |∇Ric|^2 with the absorbing constants -0.9999 and 1.01. Nothing looks fabricated or circular; the constants are absorbing, not fitted. The reliance on Cheng-Zhou, Naber, and Cao-Zhou is legitimate, and their own prior result is used for strategy, not as an input.

The main soft spot is exactly where the stress-test points. In Theorem 3.2, the proof that the two Cheeger-Gromov limits have the same quotient group Γ relies on the sentence: 'Since the flow is smooth, the topology of B(p,g(-τ),100√τ) does not change along τ.' That is not a standard consequence of smoothness. A fixed-radius ball in a smoothly evolving metric can change diffeomorphism type as the center moves or as the radius grows past a critical value. The rescaling makes the radius proportional to √τ, so the ball is essentially a fixed-radius ball in the limit geometry, and its topology could depend on the center's trajectory. The argument needs a Ricci-flow-specific reason—pseudo-locality, noncollapsing, or a direct classification of 4D ancient solutions with R=1/(-t)—and none is supplied. Since Theorem 3.3 uses Theorem 3.2 to get uniform decay of λ1+λ2+λ3, this gap is load-bearing.

A second, smaller issue is Section 4. The volume lower bound assumes M_- is diffeomorphic to S^2, asserted from 'M_- is the deformation contraction of M^5' on a simply connected soliton. The paper does not state the reduction to the universal cover, and the main theorem allows finite quotients. Passing to the universal cover is standard, but it should be said. The Gauss-Bonnet estimate itself is fine given S^2.

The long algebra in Section 5 is intricate; I did not spot a fatal error, but I also did not re-derive every line. Lemma 5.3 checks out, and the contradiction in Proposition 5.7 works. Proposition 5.2 is lengthy but plausible.

Who is this for? Anyone working on Ricci soliton rigidity or Cao's conjecture. It deserves a serious referee. Send it to review, but expect that Theorem 3.2's topology statement must be fixed or replaced with a real argument. If that step survives, the result is a nice completion of the 5D classification. If not, the theorem may still be true, but the proof as written is incomplete.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves Theorem 1.1: a 5-dimensional complete noncompact shrinking gradient Ricci soliton with constant scalar curvature 1 and bounded curvature is isometric to a finite quotient of R^3 × S^2. The strategy is to show that the sum of the three smallest Ricci eigenvalues λ1+λ2+λ3 is nonnegative, tends to 0 at infinity, and vanishes outside a compact set; combined with ∇Ric = 0 on that region and analyticity of the soliton, the De Rham splitting theorem then gives the product structure. The proof uses a classification of 4-dimensional ancient κ-solutions with scalar curvature 1/(-t), a lower volume bound for the focal variety M_- = f^{-1}(0), and integral estimates for |∇Ric|^2 on level sets of f.

Significance. If the proof were complete, this would finish the remaining R=1 case of Cao's constant-scalar-curvature rigidity conjecture in dimension five, complementing the authors' earlier work for R=3/2. The analytic strategy is natural and the explicit constants such as 0.9999 and 1.01 are used as absorbing constants rather than fitted data. The paper relies on external theorems (Cheng-Zhou, Naber, Cao-Zhou) in a clear way and does not appear circular. However, several load-bearing topological and algebraic steps are not justified as written, so the result cannot yet be regarded as established.

major comments (3)

[Section 3, Theorem 3.2] The proof of Theorem 3.2 relies on the assertion: "Since the flow is smooth, the topology of B(p,g(-τ),100√τ) does not change along τ." Smoothness of a one-parameter family of metrics does not imply constancy of the diffeomorphism type of geodesic balls of growing radius; the boundary can cross the cut locus or encounter quotient identifications, and the Cheeger-Gromov convergence used in the preceding paragraph only gives diffeomorphisms of the rescaled balls to balls in the two limits. The identity Γ1 = Γ2, which is needed before applying Naber's Theorem 2.3, is therefore not established. Since Theorem 3.3 uses Theorem 3.2 to obtain the uniform decay λ1+λ2+λ3 → 0, this gap affects the main line of the proof. The authors should supply a Ricci-flow-specific argument for the topological constancy, or replace the step entirely.
[Section 4, first paragraph] The paragraph asserts that M_- is a deformation retract of M, that M_- is diffeomorphic to S^2, and that the level sets f^{-1}(t) are diffeomorphic to S^2 × S^2. These facts are stated as "known" or "easy to see" without proof or reference, and they are not consequences of Theorem 2.5, which only gives that M_- is a compact connected 2-dimensional minimal submanifold. The assertions are used to obtain χ(M_-) = 2 and χ(Σ(s)) = 4, which enter Proposition 4.1, Corollary 4.2, and Lemma 5.3 through the term 32π^2χ(Σ(s)). In addition, Section 4 is stated for a simply connected M, whereas Theorem 1.1 allows finite quotients; the covering argument needs to be made explicit.
[Lemma 5.3] The displayed Gauss-Bonnet-Chern formula has the wrong signs. For a closed oriented 4-manifold the standard formula is 8π^2χ = ∫( |W|^2/4 + |Ric|^2/2 − R^2/12 ) dσ, equivalently ∫|W|^2 dσ = 32π^2χ − 2∫|Ric|^2 dσ + (1/3)∫R^2 dσ. The paper instead writes ∫|W|^2 = ∫ 2(|Ric^Σ|^2 − (1/3)(R^Σ)^2)dσ + 32π^2χ(Σ), which has positive Ricci and negative scalar contributions; on S^4 with the unit-sphere metric the right-hand side is nonzero while |W| = 0. The subsequent estimate bounds ∫|W|^2 from above by replacing 128π^2 with ∫ 1/f dσ via Corollary 4.2 and by discarding terms; with the correct formula the negative −2|Ric^Σ|^2 term cannot be discarded in the direction used. Since Proposition 5.4 and Lemma 5.5 rely on this estimate, the estimate needs to be redone.

minor comments (5)

[Section 1] The conjecture statement contains an unresolved placeholder reference '[?]' after 'Gaussian soliton R^k'; this reference should be completed.
[Section 3] The statement 'we can always assume that λ2 = 0' is not justified by the ordering λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ λ3 when the zero eigenvalue is the smallest; please clarify the relabeling convention used for the first three eigenvalues.
[Section 5, Lemma 5.5 proof] In the proof of Lemma 5.5, the text refers to 'Theorem 5.2'; this should be 'Proposition 5.2'.
[Section 5, Proposition 5.7 proof] The proof refers to 'Corollary 5.6', which does not exist; the correct reference is Proposition 5.6. The constants -0.3 and 0.6 used there also differ from the constants -0.3333 and 0.606 in Proposition 5.6, which is harmless but should be made consistent.
[Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'rescall', 'Tpye I', 'apriorily', and 'Proprosition'; a careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all load-bearing inputs are external theorems (Cheng-Zhou, Naber, Cao-Zhou), and the authors' self-citations are contextual only.

full rationale

The derivation chain does not reduce to its own inputs. Theorem 1.1 is proved by first showing λ1+λ2+λ3 tends to 0 at infinity (Theorem 3.3), then showing it vanishes outside a compact set (Propositions 5.2, 5.6, 5.7), then applying analyticity and De Rham splitting. The key classification of the 4-dimensional ancient limit is Theorem 3.2, whose proof invokes Naber's Theorem 2.3 and Cheng-Zhou's external classification of 4D constant-scalar-curvature shrinkers; neither depends on the present paper's result. The authors' own prior works ([14], [26]) are mentioned in the introduction as strategy or context, but they are not used as load-bearing premises: no equation in the proof is justified by citing [14] or [26]. The constants -0.9999 and 1.01 in Proposition 5.2 are obtained by absorbing inequalities, not fitted to data, and the nonnegativity of λ1+λ2+λ3 is derived algebraically in Lemma 3.1 rather than assumed. The one potentially serious issue is the assertion in Theorem 3.2 that 'Since the flow is smooth, the topology of B(p,g(-τ),100√τ) does not change along τ.' This is an unproved topological claim and a possible correctness gap, but it is not circularity: it does not assume the theorem's conclusion, and nothing in the argument defines a quantity in terms of the target result. Therefore the paper exhibits no self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation load-bearing circularity; the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof depends on established theorems in Ricci flow and isoparametric function theory. No new free parameters are fitted to data; the only hand-chosen numbers are absorbing constants in inequalities. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

Absorbing constants in inequalities = 0.9999, 1.01, 0.6, 0.66, 0.3333, 0.606
Introduced by hand in Propositions 5.2, 5.6 and Lemma 5.5 to absorb small error terms in the estimates. They are not physical parameters but are chosen ad hoc to make the inequalities close.

assumptions (5)

standard math Cheng-Zhou classification of 4D shrinking gradient Ricci solitons with constant scalar curvature
Used in Theorem 3.2 and 3.3 to identify the asymptotic limits as finite quotients of R^2×S^2.
standard math Naber's convergence theorem for (C,κ)-controlled Ricci flows
Theorem 2.3 and Corollary 2.4 are used to pass to asymptotic limits and to prove Theorem 3.3.
domain assumption Cao-Zhou potential estimate and isoparametric structure of f
Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.5 provide the growth of f and the structure of the focal variety M_-, used throughout the proof.
domain assumption Analyticity of gradient Ricci solitons
Used in the final step to conclude that ∇Ric=0 on all of M from vanishing on an open set.
standard math Four-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet-Chern formula and De Rham splitting theorem
Used in Lemma 5.3 and in the final decomposition of the soliton.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rigidity of Five-Dimensional shrinking gradient Ricci solitons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MK64G6Z3

@misc{pith2026250600887,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rigidity of Five-Dimensional shrinking gradient Ricci solitons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MK64G6Z3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00887}
}

abstract

Suppose $(M, g, f)$ is a 5-dimensional complete shrinking gradient Ricci soliton with $R=1$. If it has bounded curvature, we prove that it is a finite quotient of $\mathbb{R}^3\times \mathbb{S}^2$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

[1]

Brendle, Rotational symmetry of self-similar solutions to the Ricci flow , Invent

S. Brendle, Rotational symmetry of self-similar solutions to the Ricci flow , Invent. Math. 194 (2013), no. 3, 731-764

work page 2013
[2]

Brendle, Rotational symmetry of Ricci solitons in higher dimensions , J

S. Brendle, Rotational symmetry of Ricci solitons in higher dimensions , J. Differential Geom. 97 (2014), no. 2, 191-214

work page 2014
[3]

H. D. Cao, Existence of gradient K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons, Elliptic and parabolic methods in geometry (Minneapolis, MN, 1994), 1-16

work page 1994
[4]

H. D. Cao, Q. Chen, On locally conformally flat gradient steady Ricci solitons , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), no. 5, 2377-2391

work page 2012
[5]

H. D. Cao, Q. Chen, On Bach-flat gradient shrinking Ricci solitons , Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), no. 6, 1149-1169

work page 2013
[6]

H. D. Cao, B. L. Chen, X. P. Zhu, Recent developments on Hamilton ’s Ricci flow, Surveys in differential geometry. Vol. XII. Geometric flows, 47-112

work page
[7]

H. D. Cao, D. T. Zhou, On complete gradient shrinking Ricci solitons , J. Differential Geom. 85 (2010), no. 2, 175-185

work page 2010
[8]

X. D. Cao, B. Wang, Z. Zhang, On locally conformally flat gradient shrinking Ricci solitons, Commun. Contemp. Math. 13 (2011), no. 2, 269-282

work page 2011

Show all 33 references

[9]

X. X. Chen, Y. Q. Wang, On four-dimensional anti-self-dual gradient Ricci solitons, J. Geom. Anal. 25 (2015), no. 2, 1335-1343

2015
[10]

Fern´ andez-L´ opez, E

M. Fern´ andez-L´ opez, E. Garc ´ ıa-R ´ ıo,On gradient Ricci solitons with constant scalar curvature, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), no. 1, 369-378

2016
[11]

Cheng, D

X. Cheng, D. T. Zhou, Rigidity of Four-dimensional gradient shrinking Ricci solitons, J. Reine Angew. Math., 802 (2023), no. 2, 255-274

2023
[12]

R. S. Hamilton, Three-manifolds with positive Ricci curvature , J. Differential Geom. 17 (1982), no. 2, 255-306

1982
[13]

Kotschwar, On rotationally invariant shrinking Ricci solitons , Pacific J

B. Kotschwar, On rotationally invariant shrinking Ricci solitons , Pacific J. Math. 236 (2008), no. 1, 73-88

2008
[14]

F. J. Li, J. Y. Ou, Y. Y. Qu, G. Q. Wu, Rigidity of Five-dimensional Shrinking Gradient Ricci Solitons with Constant Scalar Curvature , arXiv:2411.10712

arXiv
[15]

Y. Li, B. Wang, Heat kernel on Ricci shrinkers , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 59 (2020), no. 6, Paper No. 194, 84 pp

2020
[16]

Eminenti, G

M. Eminenti, G. LaNave, C. Mantegazza, Ricci solitons: the equation point of view, Manuscripta Math. 127 (2008), no. 3, 345-367

2008
[17]

Munteanu, J

O. Munteanu, J. P. Wang, Smooth metric measure spaces with non-negative curvature, Comm. Anal. Geom. 19 (2011), no. 3, 451-486. CONSTANT SCALAR CUR V ATURE 27

2011
[18]

Munteanu, J

O. Munteanu, J. P. Wang, Analysis of weighted Laplacian and applications to Ricci solitons, Comm. Anal. Geom. 20 (2012), no. 1, 55-94

2012
[19]

Munteanu, J

O. Munteanu, J. P. Wang, Geometry of manifolds with densities , Adv. Math. 259 (2014), 269-305

2014
[20]

Munteanu, J

O. Munteanu, J. P. Wang, Topology of K¨ ahler Ricci solitons, J. Differential Geom. 100 (2015), no. 1, 109-128

2015
[21]

Munteanu, J

O. Munteanu, J. P. Wang, Geometry of shrinking Ricci solitons , Compos. Math. 151 (2015), no. 12, 2273-2300

2015
[22]

Munteanu, J

O. Munteanu, J. P. Wang, Positively curved shrinking Ricci solitons are com- pact, J. Differential Geom. 106 (2017), no. 3, 499-505

2017
[23]

Munteanu, J

O. Munteanu, J. P. Wang, Conical structure for shrinking Ricci solitons , J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 19 (2017), no. 11, 3377-3390

2017
[24]

Naber, Noncompact shrinking four solitons with nonnegative curvature , J

A. Naber, Noncompact shrinking four solitons with nonnegative curvature , J. Reine Angew. Math. 645 (2010), 125-153

2010
[25]

L. Ni, N. Wallach, On a classification of gradient shrinking solitons , Math. Res. Lett. 15 (2008), no. 5, 941-955

2008
[26]

J. Y. Ou, Y. Y. Qu, G. Q. Wu, Some rigidity results on shrinking gradient Ricci soliton, arXiv:2411.06395

arXiv
[27]

Perelman, Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds , arXiv: math/0303109

G. Perelman, Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds , arXiv: math/0303109

arXiv
[28]

Petersen, W

P. Petersen, W. Wylie, Rigidity of gradient Ricci solitons , Pacific J. Math. 241 (2009), no. 2, 329-345

2009
[29]

Pigola, M

S. Pigola, M. Rimoldi, A. Setti, Remarks on non-compact gradient Ricci soli- tons, Math. Z. 268 (2011), no. 3-4, 777-790

2011
[30]

G. Q. Wu, J. Y. Wu, Four dimensional shrinkers with nonnegative Ricci cur- vature, arXiv:2505.02315

arXiv
[31]

G. Q. Wu, S. J. Zhang, Remarks on shrinking gradient K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons with positive bisectional curvature , C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 354 (2016), no. 7, 713-716

2016
[32]

P. Wu, J. Y. Wu, W. Wylie, Gradient shrinking Ricci solitons of half harmonic Weyl curvature, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 57 (2018), no. 5, Art. 141, 15 pp

2018
[33]

Z. H. Zhang, Gradient shrinking solitons with vanishing Weyl tensor , Pacific J. Math. 242 (2009), no. 1, 189-200. 28 FENGJIANG LI, JIANYU OU, YUANYUAN QU, AND GUOQIANG WU (Fengjiang Li) Mathematical Science Research Center, Chongqing Uni- versity of Technology, Chongqing 4000...

2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Brendle, Rotational symmetry of self-similar solutions to the Ricci flow , Invent

S. Brendle, Rotational symmetry of self-similar solutions to the Ricci flow , Invent. Math. 194 (2013), no. 3, 731-764

work page 2013

[2] [2]

Brendle, Rotational symmetry of Ricci solitons in higher dimensions , J

S. Brendle, Rotational symmetry of Ricci solitons in higher dimensions , J. Differential Geom. 97 (2014), no. 2, 191-214

work page 2014

[3] [3]

H. D. Cao, Existence of gradient K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons, Elliptic and parabolic methods in geometry (Minneapolis, MN, 1994), 1-16

work page 1994

[4] [4]

H. D. Cao, Q. Chen, On locally conformally flat gradient steady Ricci solitons , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), no. 5, 2377-2391

work page 2012

[5] [5]

H. D. Cao, Q. Chen, On Bach-flat gradient shrinking Ricci solitons , Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), no. 6, 1149-1169

work page 2013

[6] [6]

H. D. Cao, B. L. Chen, X. P. Zhu, Recent developments on Hamilton ’s Ricci flow, Surveys in differential geometry. Vol. XII. Geometric flows, 47-112

work page

[7] [7]

H. D. Cao, D. T. Zhou, On complete gradient shrinking Ricci solitons , J. Differential Geom. 85 (2010), no. 2, 175-185

work page 2010

[8] [8]

X. D. Cao, B. Wang, Z. Zhang, On locally conformally flat gradient shrinking Ricci solitons, Commun. Contemp. Math. 13 (2011), no. 2, 269-282

work page 2011