Robust Broadband Infrared Unidirectional Absorption Enabled by a Non-Hermitian Multilayer

Ayaha Yamamoto; Ganbat Batorgil; Satoshi Iwamoto; Wakana Kubo; Yu-Jung Lu

arxiv: 2605.21926 · v1 · pith:MKABAOKOnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph

Robust Broadband Infrared Unidirectional Absorption Enabled by a Non-Hermitian Multilayer

Ayaha Yamamoto , Ganbat Batorgil , Yu-Jung Lu , Satoshi Iwamoto , Wakana Kubo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 04:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-ph

keywords unidirectional absorptionnon-Hermitian opticsinfrared radiationexceptional pointthermal radiation controlmultilayer structurebroadband absorptionpassive thermal management

0 comments

The pith

A non-Hermitian multilayer achieves nearly perfect forward infrared absorption matched to 373 K blackbody radiation while suppressing backward absorption below 30%.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates a multilayer stack built from low-loss and high-loss materials whose thicknesses are chosen through transfer-matrix calculations. Under forward illumination the structure absorbs almost all infrared light in a band that matches blackbody emission at 373 K; under backward illumination absorption stays below 30 percent. The directionality arises from non-Hermitian behavior near an exceptional point, yet the effect survives even when the exact point is not reached because loss placement and interference together produce the asymmetry. The design therefore remains effective despite ordinary fabrication variations in layer thickness. Experiments confirm the practical outcome: the same film produces a temperature difference of up to 21 °C depending on which side faces the heat source.

Core claim

A non-Hermitian multilayer structure, formed by alternating low- and high-loss materials with thicknesses fixed by the transfer-matrix method, shows nearly perfect absorption of infrared radiation that spectrally matches the blackbody curve at 373 K when light arrives from the forward side, while backward absorption is held below 30 percent. Spectral analysis links the unidirectionality to non-Hermitian physics near an exceptional point, but the same broadband contrast persists without strict satisfaction of the exceptional-point condition because it is produced by the joint action of loss distribution and optical interference inside the stack; this joint mechanism also makes the performance

What carries the argument

Non-Hermitian multilayer stack of low-loss and high-loss films whose thicknesses are chosen via the transfer-matrix method to place the system near an exceptional point, where loss distribution combined with interference produces directional absorption.

If this is right

Unidirectional infrared absorption works across a broad band without requiring exact tuning to an exceptional point.
Performance stays stable under ordinary variations in film thickness.
The same film can produce a measurable temperature difference of up to 21 °C between the two illumination directions.
The approach supplies a passive method for directional control of thermal radiation in devices such as heat shields and smart windows.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same loss-plus-interference principle could be scaled to other wavelength ranges by selecting materials with appropriate absorption bands.
Adding phase-change layers might allow the direction of absorption to be switched electrically or thermally.
Because the effect tolerates thickness changes, the design is compatible with roll-to-roll or large-area coating processes.

Load-bearing premise

The combination of loss distribution and optical interference inside the multilayer produces the observed unidirectionality even when the structure is not tuned exactly to an exceptional point.

What would settle it

Fabricate the multilayer with layer thicknesses deliberately shifted by 15 percent from the reported design values and measure whether forward absorption still exceeds 90 percent while backward absorption remains below 30 percent across the 8–14 micrometer band.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21926 by Ayaha Yamamoto, Ganbat Batorgil, Satoshi Iwamoto, Wakana Kubo, Yu-Jung Lu.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (a) Photograph of the fabricated four-layer structure with a designed total thickness of 978 nm. The left and right regions correspond to film stacks of CaF2 (top layer)/Bi/CaF2/Bi (bottom layer)/Cu (substrate) and Bi (top layer)/CaF2/Bi/CaF2 (bottom layer)/Cu (substrate), respectively. (b) Cross-sectional SEM image of the forward structure with the designed total thickness of 978 nm. (c) Measured absorpti… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (a) Experimental setup for observing the thermal shielding effect of the four-layer structure. (b) Cross-sectional schematic of the experimental setup. (c) Infrared (IR) camera images of the non-Hermitian structures with forward and backward film-stack configurations. 4. Conclusion In summary, we demonstrated a non-Hermitian four-layer structure exhibiting broadband infrared unidirectional absorption. By e… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Unidirectional electromagnetic absorption provides a powerful approach for controlling light and heat, yet broadband realization in the infrared spectral region remains experimentally unexplored. Here, we report a non-Hermitian multilayer structure that enables robust broadband infrared unidirectional absorption. By combining low- and high-loss materials and engineering their thicknesses using the transfer-matrix formulation, the structure exhibits nearly perfect absorption spectrally matched to the blackbody radiation at 373 K under forward illumination, while suppressing backward absorption below 30%. Spectral analysis indicates that the observed unidirectionality originates from non-Hermitian physics near an exceptional point. Notably, broadband unidirectional absorption is achieved even without strict exceptional-point condition. This indicates that the observed unidirectionality is governed by the combination effect of loss distribution and optical interference, rather than a singular condition, ensuring robustness against film thickness variations. Furthermore, thermal shielding experiments demonstrate that the structure enables unidirectional control of thermal radiation, resulting in a temperature difference of up to 21 0C between forward and backward configurations. These results establish a robust strategy for broadband directional control of infrared radiation, with potential applications in passive thermal management, including thermal smart windows and infrared heat-shielding devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows a practical multilayer stack for broadband unidirectional IR absorption using lossy materials and transfer-matrix design, with a clear thermal experiment, but the non-Hermitian exceptional-point framing looks secondary to ordinary interference.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that they built a multilayer with low- and high-loss layers whose thicknesses were set by the transfer-matrix method, producing strong forward absorption matched to 373 K blackbody radiation while holding backward absorption under 30 percent, and they measured a 21 °C temperature difference in a thermal shielding test. That experimental result is the most concrete part of the work and gives it a direct link to passive thermal management uses like smart windows or heat shields. The design choice to combine materials with different loss levels and to show that the asymmetry survives without exact exceptional-point tuning is a useful engineering point; it suggests the effect comes from the overall loss distribution plus interference rather than a single delicate condition, which should make the stack more tolerant to thickness errors. The abstract states this robustness explicitly, and the thermal data supports that the forward/backward difference is large enough to matter in practice. On the softer side, the paper still labels the unidirectionality as originating from non-Hermitian physics near an exceptional point even while saying the effect does not require the strict condition. If the same spectra can be reproduced by a standard asymmetric absorbing stack whose transfer matrix never shows eigenvalue coalescence, then the non-Hermitian label is more descriptive than explanatory. I would want to see the actual eigenvalue plots or pole trajectories to judge whether any exceptional-point signature is present or necessary. The citation pattern looks standard for the field and does not appear to skip key prior multilayer or non-Hermitian work. This paper is mainly for people who design or test passive infrared control devices and for photonics groups that already work with lossy multilayers. A reader who needs a concrete example of how to get directional thermal radiation without heroic tuning will find the thickness-engineering steps and the temperature data useful. It deserves a serious referee because the experimental temperature difference is independently checkable and the design method is reproducible even if the interpretation gets adjusted. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that a non-Hermitian multilayer stack, with thicknesses engineered via the transfer-matrix method using low- and high-loss materials, achieves nearly perfect broadband infrared absorption under forward illumination that spectrally matches the 373 K blackbody curve while keeping backward absorption below 30%. Spectral analysis is said to indicate that the unidirectionality arises from non-Hermitian physics near an exceptional point, yet the effect remains broadband and robust even without the strict EP condition because it is governed by the combination of loss distribution and optical interference. Thermal-shielding experiments are reported to produce a temperature difference of up to 21 °C between forward and backward configurations, supporting applications in passive thermal management.

Significance. If the central absorption asymmetry and its robustness hold, the work supplies a practical, thickness-tolerant route to directional infrared thermal control that could be useful for thermal smart windows and heat-shielding devices. The explicit demonstration that the effect survives away from a strict exceptional point is a constructive clarification that strengthens the engineering claim. The combination of transfer-matrix design with a thermal-radiation experiment is a positive feature.

major comments (3)

[Abstract / spectral analysis] Abstract and spectral-analysis section: the claim that unidirectionality 'originates from non-Hermitian physics near an exceptional point' is load-bearing for the novelty argument, yet the text simultaneously states that broadband unidirectionality is obtained 'even without strict exceptional-point condition' and is instead due to loss distribution plus interference. Please supply the eigenvalues (or poles) of the scattering or transfer matrix for the fabricated structure to show whether an EP is approached; if the effect is classical, a direct comparison to an otherwise identical stack with symmetric loss distribution should be added to isolate the necessity of the non-Hermitian framing.
[Experimental results] Experimental section: the reported 21 °C temperature difference and the absorption numbers (nearly perfect forward, <30% backward) are central quantitative claims, yet the manuscript provides neither tabulated spectra, error bars on the temperature data, nor full forward/backward reflectance/absorptance curves with measurement uncertainty. Without these, independent verification of the broadband match to the 373 K blackbody and the claimed suppression is not possible from the text.
[Design / transfer-matrix engineering] Design section: the transfer-matrix optimization is presented as yielding robust performance across thickness variations, but no systematic sensitivity analysis (e.g., Monte-Carlo variation of layer thicknesses within fabrication tolerance) is shown to quantify how far the unidirectionality survives when the structure is detuned from the nominal design.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: '21 0C' should read '21 °C'.
[Figures] Figure captions and legends should explicitly state whether the plotted curves are simulated or measured and should include scale bars or wavelength ranges for all spectral plots.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify and strengthen our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / spectral analysis] Abstract and spectral-analysis section: the claim that unidirectionality 'originates from non-Hermitian physics near an exceptional point' is load-bearing for the novelty argument, yet the text simultaneously states that broadband unidirectionality is obtained 'even without strict exceptional-point condition' and is instead due to loss distribution plus interference. Please supply the eigenvalues (or poles) of the scattering or transfer matrix for the fabricated structure to show whether an EP is approached; if the effect is classical, a direct comparison to an otherwise identical stack with symmetric loss distribution should be added to isolate the necessity of the non-Hermitian framing.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's point on clarifying the role of the exceptional point. The unidirectionality arises from the interplay of asymmetric loss and interference in the non-Hermitian system, which places the operating point near an EP; the broadband character then allows the asymmetry to persist under small detunings. In the revision we will add the eigenvalues (or poles) of the transfer matrix evaluated at the fabricated thicknesses to demonstrate proximity to the EP. We will also include a direct comparison to an otherwise identical multilayer but with symmetric loss distribution, which shows markedly reduced unidirectionality and thereby isolates the necessity of the non-Hermitian loss asymmetry. revision: yes
Referee: [Experimental results] Experimental section: the reported 21 °C temperature difference and the absorption numbers (nearly perfect forward, <30% backward) are central quantitative claims, yet the manuscript provides neither tabulated spectra, error bars on the temperature data, nor full forward/backward reflectance/absorptance curves with measurement uncertainty. Without these, independent verification of the broadband match to the 373 K blackbody and the claimed suppression is not possible from the text.

Authors: We agree that additional experimental detail is required for independent verification. The revised manuscript will include tabulated spectral data, error bars (standard deviations from repeated measurements) on the temperature-difference results, and complete forward- and backward-illumination reflectance/absorptance spectra together with their measurement uncertainties. These additions will substantiate the quantitative claims and the spectral match to the 373 K blackbody curve. revision: yes
Referee: [Design / transfer-matrix engineering] Design section: the transfer-matrix optimization is presented as yielding robust performance across thickness variations, but no systematic sensitivity analysis (e.g., Monte-Carlo variation of layer thicknesses within fabrication tolerance) is shown to quantify how far the unidirectionality survives when the structure is detuned from the nominal design.

Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. To quantify robustness, we will add a Monte-Carlo sensitivity study in which layer thicknesses are randomly varied within realistic fabrication tolerances (e.g., ±5 nm). The resulting statistics on forward and backward absorption will be presented, confirming that the unidirectional performance remains high over the expected thickness range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Standard transfer-matrix design with interpretive non-Hermitian framing; no reduction of claims to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper selects layer thicknesses via the standard transfer-matrix method to target high forward absorption matched to 373 K blackbody radiation while keeping backward absorption low. The unidirectionality is then attributed to the combination of loss distribution and optical interference, with an explicit statement that the effect persists without a strict exceptional-point condition. This interpretive step does not redefine the target absorption as an input parameter, nor does it rely on a fitted quantity that is then relabeled as a prediction. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatz smuggling appear in the provided text. The derivation remains self-contained as a conventional multilayer optimization whose performance follows from the same electromagnetic model used for design.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the transfer-matrix method being able to predict and engineer the required loss and interference profile; no new physical constants or entities are introduced beyond standard optical multilayer assumptions.

free parameters (1)

layer thicknesses
Thicknesses of low- and high-loss layers are chosen via transfer-matrix optimization to match the target absorption spectrum.

axioms (1)

standard math Transfer-matrix formulation accurately models the multilayer stack
Invoked to engineer thicknesses for the desired forward/backward absorption contrast.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5751 in / 1217 out tokens · 30230 ms · 2026-05-22T04:24:06.493052+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

By combining low- and high-loss materials and engineering their thicknesses using the transfer-matrix formulation... the observed unidirectionality is governed by the combination effect of loss distribution and optical interference, rather than a singular condition
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/BlackBodyRadiationDeep.lean blackBodyRadiationDeepCert unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the structure exhibits nearly perfect absorption spectrally matched to the blackbody radiation at 373 K

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

[1]

Doppler, A

1 J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. Böhm, U. Kuhl, A. Girschik, F. Libisch, T. J. Milburn, P. Rabl, N. Moiseyev, S. Rotter, Nature 537 (2016):

work page 2016
[2]

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18605 2 L. Feng, X. Zhu, S. Yang, H. Zhu, P. Zhang, X. Yin, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, Opt. Express 22 (2014):

work page doi:10.1038/nature18605 2014
[3]

https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.001760 3 Y. Xu, L. Li, H. Jeong, S. Kim, I. Kim, J. Rho, Y. Liu, Sci. Adv. 9 (2023): eadf3510. https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/sciadv.adf3510 15 4 Q. Yan, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, R. Ma, Q. Lyu, S. Chu, X. Hu, Q. Gong, Nanophotonics 12 (2023):

work page doi:10.1364/oe.22.001760 2023
[4]

https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/nanoph-2022-0775 5 C. Wang, Z. Fu, W. Mao, J. Qie, A. D. Stone, L. Yang, Adv. Opt. Photon. 15 (2023):

work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2022-0775 2022
[5]

https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.475477 6 L. Jin, P. Wang, Z. Song, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016): 32919. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32919 7 H. Zhao, X. Qiao, T. Wu, B. Midya, S. Longhi, L. Feng, Science 365 (2019):

work page doi:10.1364/aop.475477 2016
[6]

Grineviciute, I

https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.aay1064 8 L. Grineviciute, I. Lukosiunas, J. Nikitina, A. Selskis, I. Meskelaite, D. Gailevicius, K. Staliunas, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23 (2025): 054014. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.054014 9 S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, A. Szameit, Science 368 (2020):

work page doi:10.1126/science.aay1064 2025
[7]

https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.aaz8727 10 T. An, V. I. Vasyuchka, K. Uchida, A. V. Chumak, K. Yamaguchi, K. Harii, J. Ohe, M. B. Jungfleisch, Y. Kajiwara, H. Adachi, B. Hillebrands, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Nat. Mater. 12 (2013):

work page doi:10.1126/science.aaz8727 2013
[8]

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3628 11 K. Sun, K. Wang, W. Li, Y. Cai, W. Wang, Y. Kivshar, Z. Han, Nat. Commun. 17 (2026):

work page doi:10.1038/nmat3628 2026
[9]

Feng, Y.-L

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70823-3 12 L. Feng, Y.-L. Xu, W. S. Fegadolli, M.-H. Lu, J. E. B. Oliveira, V. R. Almeida, Y.-F. Chen, A. Scherer, Nat. Mater. 12 (2013):

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70823-3 2013
[10]

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3495 13 Z. Lin, H. Ramezani, T. Eichelkraut, T. Kottos, H. Cao, D. N. Christodoulides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011): 213901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.213901 14 S. Yang, G. Xu, J. Chen, J. Wu, X. Kong, J. Li, J. Qin, C.-W. Qiu, ACS Nano 18 (2024): 31941. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c09660 15 A. Li, H. Wei, M. ...

work page doi:10.1038/nmat3495 2011
[11]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01408-0 16 W. Chen, S. K. Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, L. Yang, Nature 548 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23281 17 H. Zhao, Z. Chen, R. Zhao, L. Feng, Nat. Commun. 9 (2018):

work page doi:10.1038/s41565-023-01408-0 2017
[12]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04251-3 18 C. Yang, X. Wei, J. Sheng, H. Wu, Nat. Commun. 11 (2020):

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04251-3 2020
[13]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18426-4 19 G. Xu, X. Zhou, S. Yang, J. Wu, C.-W. Qiu, Nat. Commun. 14 (2023):

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18426-4 2023
[14]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39117-w 20 G. Xu, X. Zhou, Y. Li, Q. Cao, W. Chen, Y. Xiao, L. Yang, C.-W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023): 266303. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.266303 21 H. Xue, Y. Yang, B. Zhang, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7 (2022):

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39117-w 2023
[15]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00465-6 22 Z. Yang, F. Gao, X. Shi, X. Lin, Z. Gao, Y. Chong, B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015): 114301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.114301 23 C.-X. Guo, L. Su, Y. Wang, L. Li, J. Wang, X. Ruan, Y. Du, D. Zheng, S. Chen, H. Hu, Nat. Commun. 15 (2024):

work page doi:10.1038/s41578-022-00465-6 2015
[16]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53434-8 24 F. Gao, P. Yuan, Z. Sun, J. Deng, Y. Li, G. Jin, B. Yan, Adv. Photonics Res. 3 (2022): 2200019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202200019 25 O. V. Shramkova, K. G. Makris, D. N. Christodoulides, G. P. Tsironis, Phys. Rev. E 103 (2021): 052205. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.052205 26 T. Inou...

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53434-8 2022
[17]

https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.65.000742 30 H. H. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 9 (1980):

work page doi:10.1364/josa.65.000742 1980
[18]

Chilwell, I

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555616 31 J. Chilwell, I. Hodgkinson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 1 (1984):

work page doi:10.1063/1.555616 1984
[19]

https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.1.000742 32 M.-A. Miri, A. Alù, Science 363 (2019): eaar7709. https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.aar7709 33 E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, F. K. Kunst, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2021): 015005. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015005 34 J. Wiersig, Photon. Res. 8 (2020):

work page doi:10.1364/josaa.1.000742 2019
[20]

https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.396115 Supporting Information Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or from the author. 17 Table of Contents Robust Broadband Infrared Unidirectional Absorption Enabled by a Non-Hermitian Multilayer A non-Hermitian multilayer structure enabling broadband infrared unidirectional absorption is demonstr...

work page doi:10.1364/prj.396115

[1] [1]

Doppler, A

1 J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. Böhm, U. Kuhl, A. Girschik, F. Libisch, T. J. Milburn, P. Rabl, N. Moiseyev, S. Rotter, Nature 537 (2016):

work page 2016

[2] [2]

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18605 2 L. Feng, X. Zhu, S. Yang, H. Zhu, P. Zhang, X. Yin, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, Opt. Express 22 (2014):

work page doi:10.1038/nature18605 2014

[3] [3]

https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.001760 3 Y. Xu, L. Li, H. Jeong, S. Kim, I. Kim, J. Rho, Y. Liu, Sci. Adv. 9 (2023): eadf3510. https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/sciadv.adf3510 15 4 Q. Yan, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, R. Ma, Q. Lyu, S. Chu, X. Hu, Q. Gong, Nanophotonics 12 (2023):

work page doi:10.1364/oe.22.001760 2023

[4] [4]

https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/nanoph-2022-0775 5 C. Wang, Z. Fu, W. Mao, J. Qie, A. D. Stone, L. Yang, Adv. Opt. Photon. 15 (2023):

work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2022-0775 2022

[5] [5]

https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.475477 6 L. Jin, P. Wang, Z. Song, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016): 32919. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32919 7 H. Zhao, X. Qiao, T. Wu, B. Midya, S. Longhi, L. Feng, Science 365 (2019):

work page doi:10.1364/aop.475477 2016

[6] [6]

Grineviciute, I

https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.aay1064 8 L. Grineviciute, I. Lukosiunas, J. Nikitina, A. Selskis, I. Meskelaite, D. Gailevicius, K. Staliunas, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23 (2025): 054014. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.054014 9 S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, A. Szameit, Science 368 (2020):

work page doi:10.1126/science.aay1064 2025

[7] [7]

https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.aaz8727 10 T. An, V. I. Vasyuchka, K. Uchida, A. V. Chumak, K. Yamaguchi, K. Harii, J. Ohe, M. B. Jungfleisch, Y. Kajiwara, H. Adachi, B. Hillebrands, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Nat. Mater. 12 (2013):

work page doi:10.1126/science.aaz8727 2013

[8] [8]

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3628 11 K. Sun, K. Wang, W. Li, Y. Cai, W. Wang, Y. Kivshar, Z. Han, Nat. Commun. 17 (2026):

work page doi:10.1038/nmat3628 2026

[9] [9]

Feng, Y.-L

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70823-3 12 L. Feng, Y.-L. Xu, W. S. Fegadolli, M.-H. Lu, J. E. B. Oliveira, V. R. Almeida, Y.-F. Chen, A. Scherer, Nat. Mater. 12 (2013):

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70823-3 2013

[10] [10]

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3495 13 Z. Lin, H. Ramezani, T. Eichelkraut, T. Kottos, H. Cao, D. N. Christodoulides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011): 213901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.213901 14 S. Yang, G. Xu, J. Chen, J. Wu, X. Kong, J. Li, J. Qin, C.-W. Qiu, ACS Nano 18 (2024): 31941. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c09660 15 A. Li, H. Wei, M. ...

work page doi:10.1038/nmat3495 2011

[11] [11]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01408-0 16 W. Chen, S. K. Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, L. Yang, Nature 548 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23281 17 H. Zhao, Z. Chen, R. Zhao, L. Feng, Nat. Commun. 9 (2018):

work page doi:10.1038/s41565-023-01408-0 2017

[12] [12]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04251-3 18 C. Yang, X. Wei, J. Sheng, H. Wu, Nat. Commun. 11 (2020):

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04251-3 2020

[13] [13]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18426-4 19 G. Xu, X. Zhou, S. Yang, J. Wu, C.-W. Qiu, Nat. Commun. 14 (2023):

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18426-4 2023

[14] [14]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39117-w 20 G. Xu, X. Zhou, Y. Li, Q. Cao, W. Chen, Y. Xiao, L. Yang, C.-W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023): 266303. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.266303 21 H. Xue, Y. Yang, B. Zhang, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7 (2022):

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39117-w 2023

[15] [15]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00465-6 22 Z. Yang, F. Gao, X. Shi, X. Lin, Z. Gao, Y. Chong, B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015): 114301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.114301 23 C.-X. Guo, L. Su, Y. Wang, L. Li, J. Wang, X. Ruan, Y. Du, D. Zheng, S. Chen, H. Hu, Nat. Commun. 15 (2024):

work page doi:10.1038/s41578-022-00465-6 2015

[16] [16]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53434-8 24 F. Gao, P. Yuan, Z. Sun, J. Deng, Y. Li, G. Jin, B. Yan, Adv. Photonics Res. 3 (2022): 2200019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202200019 25 O. V. Shramkova, K. G. Makris, D. N. Christodoulides, G. P. Tsironis, Phys. Rev. E 103 (2021): 052205. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.052205 26 T. Inou...

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53434-8 2022

[17] [17]

https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.65.000742 30 H. H. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 9 (1980):

work page doi:10.1364/josa.65.000742 1980

[18] [18]

Chilwell, I

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555616 31 J. Chilwell, I. Hodgkinson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 1 (1984):

work page doi:10.1063/1.555616 1984

[19] [19]

https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.1.000742 32 M.-A. Miri, A. Alù, Science 363 (2019): eaar7709. https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.aar7709 33 E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, F. K. Kunst, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2021): 015005. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015005 34 J. Wiersig, Photon. Res. 8 (2020):

work page doi:10.1364/josaa.1.000742 2019

[20] [20]

https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.396115 Supporting Information Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or from the author. 17 Table of Contents Robust Broadband Infrared Unidirectional Absorption Enabled by a Non-Hermitian Multilayer A non-Hermitian multilayer structure enabling broadband infrared unidirectional absorption is demonstr...

work page doi:10.1364/prj.396115