pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07014 · v1 · pith:MKRWMVILnew · submitted 2026-06-05 · 📊 stat.AP

Networked Spatial Effects in European Electricity Price Forecasting

Sultan Mahmud Chomon , Florian Ziel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 20:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.AP
keywords electricity price forecastingspatio-temporal modelEuropean bidding zonesnetwork effectsday-ahead pricesmetric graphspatial propagationtransmission interconnection
0
0 comments X

The pith

A networked spatio-temporal model that incorporates connections between European bidding zones outperforms models treating each zone in isolation for day-ahead electricity price forecasts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that spatial influences from the European transmission network and auction process propagate across bidding zones and must be modeled explicitly rather than ignored. It introduces the Networked Spatio-Temporal Model that converts irregular geographic nodes into an ordered network using a metric graph and a defined neighborhood measure. This structure allows systematic addition of cross-zone effects alongside autoregressive, seasonal, cross-hour, fuel, emission, and fundamental forecast terms. When tested across 39 bidding zones in a high-resolution streaming setup, the networked approach produces lower forecast errors than traditional local island models. The result indicates that treating markets as isolated understates the role of interconnection in price formation.

Core claim

The Networked Spatio-Temporal Model maps European bidding zones into an ordered network via a metric graph and well-defined neighborhood measure, allowing the model to incorporate spatial propagation of information from the transmission network and day-ahead auction algorithm; when applied to 39 zones with autoregressive, cross-hour, seasonal, fuel, emission, and fundamental inputs, this yields consistently lower errors than pure local models.

What carries the argument

The Networked Spatio-Temporal Model (NSTM), which converts irregular spatial nodes into an ordered network using a metric graph to incorporate neighborhood information.

If this is right

  • Day-ahead price forecasts improve when cross-border network effects are included rather than modeled zone by zone.
  • The same networked structure applies across the majority of European markets in a streaming, high-resolution setting.
  • Fuel prices, emission prices, and day-ahead fundamental forecasts act as interconnected inputs within the spatial network.
  • Autoregressive, cross-hour, and seasonal terms combine with spatial neighborhood terms to capture price dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be tested on other interconnected commodity markets such as natural gas or carbon allowances where auction and transmission effects cross borders.
  • Changes to transmission capacity or bidding-zone reconfiguration could be evaluated in advance by updating the metric graph and re-running the forecasts.
  • Real-time topology data from transmission operators could be fed directly into the neighborhood measure to reduce lag in spatial information.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen metric graph and neighborhood measure accurately represent how spatial influences and auction information actually propagate across bidding zones.

What would settle it

Re-running the Europe-wide streaming forecasts on the same data but with neighborhood connections removed or replaced by random links, and finding that forecast accuracy does not decline.

read the original abstract

As European bidding zones are highly interconnected by physical transmission lines, spatial influences propagate across neighboring nodes through a network. It is reflected in the day-ahead electricity prices across European bidding zones, as the auction algorithm also uses information beyond each bidding zone's geographic boundary. To capture how this interconnection affects the electricity prices in neighboring bidding zones, we have used a metric graph to map the spatial coverage of information using a well-defined neighborhood measure. We propose the Networked Spatio-Temporal Model (NSTM), which maps irregular spatial nodes into an ordered network, enabling the systematic incorporation of neighborhood information. We implement the NSTM across 39 bidding zones covering the majority of European electricity markets in a high-resolution, streaming-forecasting setup. The model uses autoregressive, cross-hour, and seasonal effects, along with fuel and emission prices and day-ahead forecasts of fundamentals, as interconnected information to predict the day-ahead prices for each bidding zone. A Europe-wide study presented in this paper shows that the NSTM consistently outperforms traditional island-based pure local models. This paper provides a framework that demonstrates the critical role the networked structure plays in propagating information across interconnected markets and its vast implications for day-ahead electricity price forecasting.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the Networked Spatio-Temporal Model (NSTM) that represents European electricity bidding zones as a metric graph with a well-defined neighborhood measure to capture spatial propagation of influences via transmission lines and auction information. The model incorporates autoregressive, cross-hour, seasonal, fuel, emission, and day-ahead fundamental forecast terms and is evaluated in a high-resolution streaming setup across 39 zones, claiming consistent outperformance relative to traditional island-based local models.

Significance. If the reported outperformance is supported by the experiments, the work would be significant for applied statistics and energy forecasting. It provides empirical evidence that networked spatial structure improves forecast accuracy in interconnected markets, with direct implications for day-ahead trading and market efficiency. The Europe-wide scope and streaming design are strengths that distinguish it from smaller-scale studies.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the outperformance claim would be strengthened by including the primary evaluation metric (e.g., MAE or RMSE) and the magnitude of improvement over local baselines.
  2. [Methods] The construction of the metric graph and neighborhood measure should be illustrated with a small example or figure early in the methods section to clarify how irregular bidding-zone nodes are ordered.
  3. [Results] Results tables should report both point-forecast accuracy and a statistical test (Diebold-Mariano or similar) for the claimed superiority across the 39 zones.
  4. [Discussion] Add a short discussion of computational cost of the networked model relative to the local baselines, given the streaming-forecasting requirement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and accurate summary of our manuscript on the Networked Spatio-Temporal Model (NSTM) and for recommending minor revision. The referee correctly identifies the core contribution: mapping European bidding zones into a metric graph to capture spatial propagation effects in day-ahead price forecasting across 39 zones, with consistent outperformance over local models in a streaming setup. No major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical comparison of the NSTM (built on a metric-graph neighborhood) against local models across 39 European bidding zones. The abstract describes model construction and reports outperformance from a high-resolution forecasting study but contains no equations, derivation steps, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citations. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs; the central claim is an external empirical result rather than a self-referential derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted beyond the implicit assumption that the neighborhood measure on the metric graph captures relevant spatial propagation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5734 in / 996 out tokens · 13287 ms · 2026-06-27T20:39:02.022562+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cross-border effects on electricity spot prices - a meta-study , abstract =

    De Blauwe, Jilles and Marc Deissenroth-Uhrig and Henrik Mantke and Dogan Keles , note =. Cross-border effects on electricity spot prices - a meta-study , abstract =. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , issn =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  2. [3]

    Supply--demand price decoupling in European-type day-ahead electricity markets , journal =

    Varga, Anita and Feczk. Supply--demand price decoupling in European-type day-ahead electricity markets , journal =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  3. [7]

    Cross-Border Information in Electricity Price Forecasting: Benefits of a Panel Data Approach , year =

    Schnabel, Tobias , booktitle =. Cross-Border Information in Electricity Price Forecasting: Benefits of a Panel Data Approach , year =

  4. [9]

    The Energy Journal , volume =

    Girum Dagnachew Abate and Niels Haldrup , title =. The Energy Journal , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  5. [23]

    Energies , volume =

    Frauendorfer, Karl and Paraschiv, Florentina and Schürle, Michael , title =. Energies , volume =. 2018 , number =

    2018

  6. [28]

    Energies , volume =

    Uniejewski, Bartosz and Nowotarski, Jakub and Weron, Rafał , title =. Energies , volume =. 2016 , number =

    2016

  7. [31]

    Energies , volume =

    Uniejewski, Bartosz and Weron, Rafał , title =. Energies , volume =. 2018 , number =

    2018

  8. [34]

    Quantile Connectedness: Modeling Tail Behavior in the Topology of Financial Networks , abstract =

    Tomohiro Ando and Matthew Greenwood-Nimmo and Yongcheol Shin , note =. Quantile Connectedness: Modeling Tail Behavior in the Topology of Financial Networks , abstract =. Management Science , issn =. 2022 , month = apr, doi =

    2022

  9. [37]

    2025 , note =

    ENTSO-E Transparency Platform , author =. 2025 , note =

    2025

  10. [38]

    2025 , note =

    European Energy Exchange (EEX) , author =. 2025 , note =

    2025

  11. [40]

    Stewart Fotheringham and Martin Charlton , title =

    Chris Brunsdon and A. Stewart Fotheringham and Martin Charlton , title =. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) , volume =. 1998 , doi =

    1998

  12. [41]

    The Annals of Statistics , number =

    Eric Moulines and Pierre Priouret and Fran. The Annals of Statistics , number =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

  13. [42]

    , journal =

    Angelosante, Daniele and Bazerque, Juan Andrés and Giannakis, Georgios B. , journal =. Online Adaptive Estimation of Sparse Signals: Where RLS Meets the _1 -Norm , year =

  14. [45]

    Diebold and Roberto S

    Francis X. Diebold and Roberto S. Mariano , title =. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , year =

  15. [46]

    De Blauwe, M

    J. De Blauwe, M. Deissenroth-Uhrig, H. Mantke, and D. Keles. Cross-border effects on electricity spot prices - a meta-study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 224, 2025. ISSN 1364-0321. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.116094. Publisher Copyright: 2025 The Author(s)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.116094 2025

  16. [47]

    J. Lago, F. De Ridder , P. Vrancx, and B. De Schutter . Forecasting day-ahead electricity prices in europe: The importance of considering market integration. Applied Energy, 211: 0 890--903, 2018. ISSN 0306-2619. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.098. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917316999

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.098 2018

  17. [48]

    Varga, B

    A. Varga, B. Feczk \'o , M. E.-Nagy, and D. Csercsik. Supply--demand price decoupling in european-type day-ahead electricity markets. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 169: 0 110788, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110788. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061525003369

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110788 2025

  18. [49]

    F. Ziel, R. Steinert, and S. Husmann. Forecasting day ahead electricity spot prices: The impact of the exaa to other european electricity markets. Energy Economics, 51: 0 430--444, 2015 a . ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.005. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988315002261

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.005 2015

  19. [50]

    C. C. Karahan, A. Odabaşı, and C. S. Tiryaki. Wired together: Integration and efficiency in european electricity markets. Energy Economics, 133: 0 107505, 2024. ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107505. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324002135

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107505 2024

  20. [51]

    Schnabel

    T. Schnabel. Cross-border information in electricity price forecasting: Benefits of a panel data approach. In 2025 21st International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), pages 1--5, 2025. doi:10.1109/EEM64765.2025.11050080

    work page doi:10.1109/eem64765.2025.11050080 2025

  21. [52]

    Stiewe, A

    C. Stiewe, A. L. Xu, A. Eicke, and L. Hirth. Cross-border cannibalization: Spillover effects of wind and solar energy on interconnected european electricity markets. Energy Economics, 143: 0 108251, 2025. ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108251. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832500074X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108251 2025

  22. [53]

    G. D. Abate and N. Haldrup. Space-time modeling of electricity spot prices. The Energy Journal, 38 0 (5): 0 175--196, 2017. doi:10.5547/01956574.38.5.gaba. URL https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.5.gaba

    work page doi:10.5547/01956574.38.5.gaba 2017

  23. [54]

    H. X. Do, R. Nepal, S. D. Pham, and T. Jamasb. Electricity market crisis in europe and cross border price effects: A quantile return connectedness analysis. Energy Economics, 135: 0 107633, 2024. ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107633. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324003414

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107633 2024

  24. [55]

    L. Wen, K. Suomalainen, B. Sharp, M. Yi, and M. S. Sheng. Impact of wind-hydro dynamics on electricity price: A seasonal spatial econometric analysis. Energy, 238: 0 122076, 2022. ISSN 0360-5442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122076. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221023240

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122076 2022

  25. [56]

    Y. Yang, J. Guo, Y. Li, and J. Zhou. Forecasting day-ahead electricity prices with spatial dependence. International Journal of Forecasting, 40 0 (3): 0 1255--1270, 2024. ISSN 0169-2070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.11.006. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207023001152

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.11.006 2024

  26. [57]

    Aliyon and J

    K. Aliyon and J. Ritvanen. Deep learning-based electricity price forecasting: Findings on price predictability and european electricity markets. Energy, 308: 0 132877, 2024. ISSN 0360-5442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132877. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224026513

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.132877 2024

  27. [58]

    M. M. Mascarenhas, J. De Blauwe , M. Amelin, and H. Kazmi. Leveraging asynchronous cross-border market data for improved day-ahead electricity price forecasting in european markets. Applied Energy, 404: 0 127077, 2026. ISSN 0306-2619. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127077. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925018070

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127077 2026

  28. [59]

    Trebbien, A

    J. Trebbien, A. Tausendfreund, L. Rydin Gorjão, and D. Witthaut. Patterns and correlations in european electricity prices. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 34 0 (7): 0 073108, 07 2024. ISSN 1054-1500. doi:10.1063/5.0201734. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201734

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0201734 2024

  29. [60]

    A. G. Billé, A. Gianfreda, F. Del Grosso , and F. Ravazzolo. Forecasting electricity prices with expert, linear, and nonlinear models. International Journal of Forecasting, 39 0 (2): 0 570--586, 2023. ISSN 0169-2070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.01.003. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207022000036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.01.003 2023

  30. [61]

    Abrell and M

    J. Abrell and M. Kosch. Cross-country spillovers of renewable energy promotion—the case of germany. Resource and Energy Economics, 68: 0 101293, 2022. ISSN 0928-7655. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101293. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765522000100

    work page doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101293 2022

  31. [62]

    Madadkhani and S

    S. Madadkhani and S. Ikonnikova. Toward high-resolution projection of electricity prices: A machine learning approach to quantifying the effects of high fuel and co2 prices. Energy Economics, 129: 0 107241, 2024. ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107241. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323007399

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107241 2024

  32. [63]

    D. P. Macedo, A. C. Marques, and O. Damette. The merit-order effect on the swedish bidding zone with the highest electricity flow in the elspot market. Energy Economics, 102: 0 105465, 2021. ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105465. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988321003510

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105465 2021

  33. [64]

    Keles, J

    D. Keles, J. Dehler-Holland, M. Densing, E. Panos, and F. Hack. Cross-border effects in interconnected electricity markets - an analysis of the swiss electricity prices. Energy Economics, 90: 0 104802, 2020. ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104802. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988320301420

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104802 2020

  34. [65]

    L. M. Abadie and J. M. Chamorro. Evaluation of a cross-border electricity interconnection: The case of spain-france. Energy, 233: 0 121177, 2021. ISSN 0360-5442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121177. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221014250

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121177 2021

  35. [66]

    Annan-Phan and F

    S. Annan-Phan and F. A. Roques. Market integration and wind generation: An empirical analysis of the impact of wind generation on cross-border power prices. The Energy Journal, 39 0 (3): 0 1--24, 2018. doi:10.5547/01956574.39.3.spha. URL https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.3.spha

    work page doi:10.5547/01956574.39.3.spha 2018

  36. [67]

    Frauendorfer, F

    K. Frauendorfer, F. Paraschiv, and M. Schürle. Cross-border effects on swiss electricity prices in the light of the energy transition. Energies, 11 0 (9), 2018. ISSN 1996-1073. doi:10.3390/en11092188. URL https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2188

    work page doi:10.3390/en11092188 2018

  37. [68]

    R. Weron. Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future. International Journal of Forecasting, 30 0 (4): 0 1030--1081, 2014. ISSN 0169-2070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.08.008. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207014001083

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.08.008 2014

  38. [69]

    Uniejewski and F

    B. Uniejewski and F. Ziel. The role of probabilistic load and renewable prediction in enhancing day-ahead electricity price forecasts. Renewable Energy, 269: 0 125844, 2026. ISSN 0960-1481. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2026.125844. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148126006701

    work page doi:10.1016/j.renene.2026.125844 2026

  39. [70]

    Ghelasi and F

    P. Ghelasi and F. Ziel. A data-driven merit order: Learning a fundamental electricity price model. Energy Economics, 154: 0 109114, 2026. ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.109114. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325009442

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.109114 2026

  40. [71]

    F. Ziel, R. Steinert, and S. Husmann. Efficient modeling and forecasting of electricity spot prices. Energy Economics, 47: 0 98--111, 2015 b . ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.10.012. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988314002576

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.10.012 2015

  41. [72]

    F. Ziel. Forecasting electricity spot prices using lasso: On capturing the autoregressive intraday structure. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31: 0 4977--4987, nov 2016. doi:doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2521545. URL http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7398175/

    work page doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2521545 2016

  42. [73]

    Uniejewski, J

    B. Uniejewski, J. Nowotarski, and R. Weron. Automated variable selection and shrinkage for day-ahead electricity price forecasting. Energies, 9 0 (8), 2016. ISSN 1996-1073. doi:10.3390/en9080621. URL https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/8/621

    work page doi:10.3390/en9080621 2016

  43. [74]

    Nowotarski and R

    J. Nowotarski and R. Weron. On the importance of the long-term seasonal component in day-ahead electricity price forecasting. Energy Economics, 57: 0 228--235, 2016. ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.05.009. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098831630127X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2016.05.009 2016

  44. [75]

    Ziel and R

    F. Ziel and R. Weron. Day-ahead electricity price forecasting with high-dimensional structures: Univariate vs. multivariate modeling frameworks. Energy Economics, 70: 0 396--420, 2018. ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.12.016. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098831730436X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.12.016 2018

  45. [76]

    Uniejewski and R

    B. Uniejewski and R. Weron. Efficient forecasting of electricity spot prices with expert and lasso models. Energies, 11 0 (8), 2018. ISSN 1996-1073. doi:10.3390/en11082039. URL https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2039

    work page doi:10.3390/en11082039 2018

  46. [77]

    F. X. Diebold and K. Yilmaz. Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. The Economic Journal, 119 0 (534): 0 158--171, 12 2008. ISSN 0013-0133. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x. URL https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x 2008

  47. [78]

    F. X. Diebold and K. Yilmaz. Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting, 28 0 (1): 0 57--66, 2012. ISSN 0169-2070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920701100032X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006 2012

  48. [79]

    T. Ando, M. Greenwood-Nimmo, and Y. Shin. Quantile connectedness: Modeling tail behavior in the topology of financial networks. Management Science, 68 0 (4): 0 2401--2431, April 2022. ISSN 0025-1909. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.3984. Publisher Copyright: Copyright: 2022 INFORMS

    work page doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.3984 2022

  49. [80]

    H. Park, J. W. Mjelde, and D. A. Bessler. Price dynamics among u.s. electricity spot markets. Energy Economics, 28 0 (1): 0 81--101, 2006. ISSN 0140-9883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2005.09.009. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988305000903

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2005.09.009 2006

  50. [81]

    E. D. Kolaczyk and G. Cs \'a rdi. Statistical Analysis of Network Data with R . Use R! Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2 edition, 2020. ISBN 978-3-030-44128-9. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44129-6. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44129-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44129-6 2020

  51. [82]

    Entso-e transparency platform, 2025

    ENTSO-E . Entso-e transparency platform, 2025. URL https://transparency.entsoe.eu/. Accessed: 2025-10-26

    2025

  52. [83]

    European energy exchange (eex), 2025

    EEX . European energy exchange (eex), 2025. URL https://www.eex.com/. Accessed: 2025-10-26

    2025

  53. [84]

    Halleck Vega and J

    S. Halleck Vega and J. P. Elhorst. The slx model. Journal of Regional Science, 55 0 (3): 0 339--363, 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12188. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jors.12188

    work page doi:10.1111/jors.12188 2015

  54. [85]

    Brunsdon, A

    C. Brunsdon, A. S. Fotheringham, and M. Charlton. Geographically weighted regression: Modelling spatial non‑stationarity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 47 0 (3): 0 431--443, 1998. doi:10.1111/1467-9884.00145. URL https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00145

    work page doi:10.1111/1467-9884.00145 1998

  55. [86]

    Moulines, P

    E. Moulines, P. Priouret, and F. Roueff. On recursive estimation for time varying autoregressive processes . The Annals of Statistics, 33 0 (6): 0 2610 -- 2654, 2005. doi:10.1214/009053605000000624. URL https://doi.org/10.1214/009053605000000624

    work page doi:10.1214/009053605000000624 2005

  56. [87]

    Angelosante, J

    D. Angelosante, J. A. Bazerque, and G. B. Giannakis. Online adaptive estimation of sparse signals: Where rls meets the _1 -norm. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58 0 (7): 0 3436--3447, 2010. doi:10.1109/TSP.2010.2046897

    work page doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2046897 2010

  57. [88]

    Hirsch, J

    S. Hirsch, J. Berrisch, and F. Ziel. Online distributional regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08750, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  58. [89]

    J. W. Messner and P. Pinson. Online adaptive lasso estimation in vector autoregressive models for high dimensional wind power forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 35 0 (4): 0 1485--1498, 2019. ISSN 0169-2070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2018.02.001. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207018300347

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2018.02.001 2019

  59. [90]

    F. X. Diebold and R. S. Mariano. Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13 0 (3): 0 253--263, 1995. doi:10.1080/07350015.1995.10524599

    work page doi:10.1080/07350015.1995.10524599 1995