Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Cuntz--Pimsner algebras of partial automorphisms twisted by vector bundles II: Nuclear dimension

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Twisted partial automorphisms yield classifiable C*-algebras

desk verdict The trace-conformal measure bijection is a genuine contribution, but the main classification theorem is not supported as written because Y_− need not be closed. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.16630 v1 pith:MKSQ7XGM submitted 2025-06-19 math.OA

Aaron Kettner This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.OA MSC 37A5546L3546L08
keywords Cuntz-PimsneralgebraspartialautomorphismsC*-correspondencesnucleardimensionElliottclassificationprogramconformalmeasuresorbit-breakingsubalgebrastracialstatespace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the Cuntz-Pimsner algebra built from a minimal partial automorphism on a compact space, twisted by a vector bundle over its domain, is classifiable whenever the space is infinite and has finite covering dimension. Classifiable means the algebra is determined up to isomorphism by the Elliott invariant, the combination of its K-theoretic and tracial data, and here the operative mechanism is a bound of at most one on nuclear dimension. The same theorem draws the stably finite versus purely infinite line: the algebra is stably finite if the bundle has rank one or if the one-sided past orbit region $D_-$ is nonempty, and purely infinite otherwise. The proof identifies traces on the algebra with certain conformal probability measures on the base space, a bijection that does the work of separating the finite case from the infinite case. This matters because it adds a large family of explicit stably finite examples to the classification program and shows that orbit-breaking subalgebras remain classifiable and stably finite even when the ambient twisted algebra is purely infinite.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the fixed point algebra $O(E)_0$ of the gauge circle action, described as the section algebra of a continuous field over $X$. Its fiber over $D_j \setminus D_{j+1}$ is the matrix algebra $M_{d^j}$, and over $\bigcap_j D_j$ it is the UHF algebra $M_{d^\infty}$; this model comes from the companion paper and is recalled in Section 2.4. This continuous-field description makes traces on $O(E)_0$ integrals of normalized matrix traces against probability measures, and through the conditional expectation onto $O(E)_0$ it converts the trace condition on $O(E)$ into exactly the $d$-conformal measure equation. The nuclear dimension bound is then reached by decomposing the space by orbit length: when all orbits have one fixed length the algebra is subhomogeneous with decomposition rank bounded by $\dim(X)$, and the general minimal case is exhausted by sub-actions with finite orbit length while the remaining global-orbit piece is controlled by the same machinery.

What would settle it

Compute the tracial state space of a concrete example with $D_-=\emptyset$ and a rank-two bundle on a minimal partial action coming from orbit breaking: if it contains any trace, Proposition 4.5 and Theorem 5.17 are false. Alternatively, exhibit any algebra in the theorem's class with nuclear dimension two or failing the UCT, which would contradict the claimed bound and classification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 5.17: for a minimal partial automorphism $\theta: U \to V$ with $U$ a proper open subset of an infinite compact second countable Hausdorff space $X$ of finite covering dimension, and for the Cuntz-Pimsner algebra $O(E)$ of the $C^*$-correspondence associated to $\theta$ and a complex vector bundle over $U$, one has $\dim_{\mathrm{nuc}}(O(E)) \le 1$, and $O(E)$ is classifiable. In the same situation $O(E)$ is stably finite when the bundle is a line bundle or when $D_-$ is nonempty, where $D_-$ is the set of points whose forward partial orbit extends indefinitely but whose bi-infinite orbit does not; if neither holds, $O(E)$ is purely infinite. The paper also establishes, for free partial automorphisms, an affine homeomorphism between the tracial state space of $O(E)$ and the compact convex set of $d$-conformal probability measures on $X$, $\mu(\theta(Y)) = d\mu(Y)$, which for line bundles reduces to invariance. This trace bijection is what turns the existence of a faithful trace into a dynamical condition on the base space.

Load-bearing premise

The proof depends on the companion description of $O(E)_0$ as a continuous field with fiber $M_{d^j}$ over $D_j\setminus D_{j+1}$ and $M_{d^\infty}$ over $\bigcap_j D_j$; if that fibered model failed, the trace homeomorphism, the conformal-measure bijection, and the decomposition-rank argument would all lose their footing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every minimal partial automorphism on an infinite compact finite-dimensional base space with proper domain produces a Cuntz-Pimsner algebra that satisfies the classification hypothesis for simple nuclear $C^*$-algebras, with nuclear dimension at most one.
  • Higher-rank bundles no longer force pure infiniteness: whenever $D_-$ is nonempty the algebra has faithful traces and is stably finite, even though the analogous global-action algebra is purely infinite.
  • Orbit-breaking subalgebras obtained by deleting a closed set that meets every orbit at most once are classifiable and stably finite under the same finite-dimensionality assumption.
  • Deleting a closed set from a minimal partial action preserves minimality and the invariant-measure simplex exactly when the set meets every orbit at most once, so the classification result applies to those restricted actions.
  • For a line bundle the algebra has a faithful trace for every minimal such action; for rank higher than one a trace exists exactly when $D_-$ is nonempty.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper: the tracial half of the Elliott invariant is now explicitly computable as the simplex of $d$-conformal measures, so determining the full range of the invariant reduces largely to computing $K$-theory from the gauge-action filtration.
  • Going beyond the paper: the same continuous-field model suggests a route to non-minimal actions, namely bounding the nuclear dimension of $O(E)$ by the dimension of the base plus the nuclear dimension of the restriction to the global-orbit piece; examples with $\bigcap_j D_j$ a Cantor set would test this directly.
  • Going beyond the paper: because an orbit-breaking subalgebra of a purely infinite algebra can be stably finite, the paper rules out large-subalgebra embeddings in this setting, and one could test whether the same obstruction persists for twisted partial actions not induced by a global homeomorphism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies Cuntz–Pimsner algebras O(E) associated to partial automorphisms θ : U → V on a locally compact Hausdorff space X, twisted by a vector bundle over U. The main result, Theorem 5.17, asserts that if X is infinite, compact, second countable, of finite covering dimension, and θ is minimal with U ⊊ X, then O(E) has nuclear dimension at most one and is classifiable in the Elliott sense; it further gives a stably finite / purely infinite dichotomy in terms of the existence of conformal measures. Section 4 establishes an affine bijection between tracial states on O(E) (when θ is free) and d-conformal probability measures on X, generalizing the trace picture from the line-bundle case. Section 6 applies the main theorem to orbit-breaking subalgebras, generalizing results of Lin–Phillips, Deeley–Putnam–Strung, and Adamo et al.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, the paper would give a broad class of classifiable C*-algebras arising from partial dynamical systems with twists, simultaneously covering stably finite and purely infinite examples and placing them on an equal footing. The trace–conformal-measure bijection in Proposition 4.5 is a genuine conceptual contribution, and the orbit-breaking applications (Theorem 6.13, Proposition 6.12) are natural and useful extensions of prior work. The paper is clearly written and carefully organized, and it explicitly credits the companion paper [24] for the fixed-point algebra model and Geffen's work for the nuclear-dimension technology. However, the central classification result depends on Theorem 5.14, whose proof contains a false topological assertion; until that is repaired, the nuclear-dimension bound and the classification conclusion are unsupported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 5.2, proof of Theorem 5.14] The proof asserts that Y_- := ∩_{n≥0} D_{-n} is closed and θ-invariant. But by Definition 2.1 each D_{-n} is an open subset of X, so Y_- is in general only a G_δ set, not necessarily closed. In the paper's own Example 3.5, Y_- = T \ Orb^-(x), which is dense and not closed; its complement X\Y_- is countable dense and not locally closed. The immediately invoked [24, Proposition 4.11] requires a locally closed, θ-invariant subset to yield the short exact sequence 0 → O(E_{X\Y_-}) → O(E) → O(E_{Y_-}) → 0, so this sequence is not justified. The same problem affects the later claim that \tilde{X} := ∩_{n∈Z} D_n is closed in Y_-. Since Corollary 5.15, Theorem 5.16, and Theorem 5.17 all rely on Theorem 5.14, the nuclear-dimension bound and the resulting classification theorem are unsupported as written.
  2. [Section 5.2, proof of Theorem 5.14] The proof states that it can be copied 'almost word by word' from [16, Theorem 6.2], and it uses the decomposition of θ|_{X\Y_-} as an inductive limit of partial automorphisms with finitely supported domains. In Geffen's setting the corresponding sets may have different topological properties, and the open-domain issue identified above means that the cited argument does not transfer verbatim. The author needs to provide a direct proof that the relevant subsets are locally closed (or otherwise establish the exact sequences) in the present generality.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.2, proof of Proposition 4.5] The proof uses the notation E^k without prior definition; this should be O(E)_k, the k-th spectral subspace of the gauge action.
  2. [Section 4.1, Proposition 4.3] The statement of Proposition 4.3 does not explicitly assume X is compact, although the proof and the surrounding discussion treat tracial states on possibly non-unital algebras B_[0,n]. The author should either state a compactness hypothesis or clarify the convention for tracial states on non-unital C*-algebras.
  3. [Theorem 5.17] After establishing finite nuclear dimension, the paper invokes [4, Theorems A and B] to obtain nuclear dimension at most one. For a simple nuclear C*-algebra, finite nuclear dimension implies Z-stability (a theorem of Winter); please add an explicit reference and a sentence spelling out this implication.
  4. [References] References [4] and [5] are the same paper (Castillejos et al., Invent. Math. 224 (2021), pp. 245–290); the duplicate should be removed.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical slips, e.g., 'fullfilled' in Section 2.5, missing spaces after 'C∗' in the abstract and introduction, and inconsistent capitalization of 'Cuntz–Pimsner algebra'. A careful proofreading pass would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the classification proof is a standard chain of external theorems plus an independent prior-work structural input, with no self-referential reduction.

full rationale

No step of the derivation reduces to its own input. The fibered description of O(E)_0 (Section 2.4) is quoted from the same author's companion paper [24], but [24] is a separate structural theorem whose assumptions (partial automorphism, vector bundle, second-countable space) do not include the target conclusion of this paper; it is therefore independent support, not a circular premise. The trace-conformal-measure bijection (Proposition 4.5) is proved directly: a trace produces a probability measure via restriction to C0(X), and the trace identity is verified to be equivalent to mu(theta(Y)) = d mu(Y) by explicit computation with rank-one operators in spectral subspaces; the bijection is not a definitional identity. The decomposition-rank and nuclear-dimension bounds (Theorem 5.12 and Theorem 5.14) follow from Geffen's inductive-limit argument [16], Winter's decomposition-rank theorem [41], and permanence properties of nuclear dimension; none of these presuppose classifiability of O(E). There are no fitted parameters, no predictions from fitted values, and no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors to force the choice. For completeness, Theorem 5.14's assertion that Y_- := intersection of D_{-n} is closed is questionable since each D_{-n} is open by Definition 2.1, and Example 3.5 exhibits a dense G_delta Y_-; this is a correctness concern, not a circularity, so it does not change the circularity score. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem is not self-contained: it imports the structural theory of the fixed point algebra from the author's companion paper [24], and the key nuclear-dimension arguments from Geffen [16] and Hirshberg-Wu [20]. These are published or posted derivations with stated hypotheses rather than ad hoc assumptions, but an independent verification of the main theorem would have to audit them. No free parameters or new entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Elliott classification theorem: unital, separable, simple, nuclear, infinite-dimensional C*-algebras with finite nuclear dimension and UCT are classified by the Elliott invariant.
    Invoked as the definition of classifiable in Section 2.5 and as the target of Theorem 5.17.
  • standard math Castillejos et al., Theorems A and B: simple separable unital nuclear Z-stable C*-algebras have nuclear dimension at most one and fall under the classification theorem.
    Used in Theorem 5.17 to upgrade finite nuclear dimension to nuclear dimension at most one and to conclude classification.
  • domain assumption The fixed point algebra O(E)_0 from [24, Theorem 3.28] is a C0(X)-algebra with fibers M_{d^j} over D_j\D_{j+1} and UHF algebra M_{d^∞} over the intersection of all D_j.
    This companion-paper result is the foundation for the trace computations in Section 4 and the decomposition-rank estimates in Section 5.
  • domain assumption Simplicity and ideal structure from [24, Corollary 4.17 and Proposition 4.11]: minimality implies simplicity of O(E) in the relevant setting, and restricting to invariant subsets yields exact sequences of Cuntz-Pimsner algebras.
    Used in Theorem 5.17, Theorem 5.12, Proposition 5.3, and Section 6.
  • standard math Geffen's Theorems 6.2 and 7.5 [16]: nuclear dimension bounds for partial crossed products via inductive limits of actions with finitely supported domains.
    Theorem 5.14 copies the proof of [16, Theorem 6.2] and Theorem 5.16 uses [16, Theorem 7.5] to choose exhausting open sets.
  • standard math Decomposition rank of subhomogeneous C*-algebras is bounded by the covering dimension of the primitive ideal space, and covering dimension behaves well under closed subspaces and one-point compactification.
    Used in Proposition 5.11, Theorem 5.12, and Corollary 5.13 via [41] and [31].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cuntz--Pimsner algebras of partial automorphisms twisted by vector bundles II: Nuclear dimension." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MKSQ7XGM

@misc{pith2026250616630,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cuntz--Pimsner algebras of partial automorphisms twisted by vector bundles II: Nuclear dimension},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MKSQ7XGM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.16630}
}
abstract

We show that Cuntz--Pimsner algebras associated to partial automorphisms twisted by vector bundles are classifiable in the sense of the Elliott program whenever the action is minimal and the base space is compact, infinite and has finite covering dimension. We also investigate the tracial state space of our algebras, and show that traces are in bijection to certain conformal measures. This generalizes results about partial crossed products by Geffen and complements results about the $C^*$-algebras associated to homeomorphisms twisted by vector bundles of Adamo, Archey, Forough, Georgescu, Jeong, Strung and Viola. We use our findings to generalize various existing statements about orbit-breaking subalgebras.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    Cuntz--Pimsner algebras of partial automorphisms twisted by vector bundles I: Fixed point algebra, simplicity and the tracial state space

    Aaron Kettner. Cuntz–Pimsner algebras of partial automorphisms twisted by vector bun- dles I: Fixed point algebra, simplicity and the tracial state space.2024.arXiv: 2408.10047 [math.OA]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10047

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    C∗-algebras associated to homeomorphisms twisted by vec- tor bundles over finite dimensional spaces

    Maria Stella Adamo et al. “C∗-algebras associated to homeomorphisms twisted by vec- tor bundles over finite dimensional spaces”. In:Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.377.3 (2024), pp. 1597–1640. issn: 0002-9947,1088-6850. doi: 10 . 1090 / tran / 8900. url: https : //doi.org/10.1090/tran/8900. REFERENCES 22

    work page doi:10.1090/tran/8900 2024

  3. [2]

    Joan Bosa et al.Covering dimension ofC∗-algebras and 2-coloured classification. 2016. arXiv: 1506.03974 [math.OA]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.03974

    arXiv 2016

  4. [3]

    Classifying∗-homomorphisms I: Unital simple nuclearC∗-algebras

    JoséR.Carriónetal. Classifying∗-homomorphisms I: Unital simple nuclearC∗-algebras

    work page

  5. [4]

    Nuclear dimension of simpleC∗-algebras

    Jorge Castillejos et al. “Nuclear dimension of simpleC∗-algebras”. English. In:Invent. Math. 224.1 (2021), pp. 245–290.issn: 0020-9910.doi: 10.1007/s00222-020-01013-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00222-020-01013-1 2021

  6. [5]

    Nuclear dimension of simpleC∗-algebras

    Jorge Castillejos et al. “Nuclear dimension of simpleC∗-algebras”. In:Inventiones math- ematicae 224.1 (Dec. 2020), pp. 245–290.issn: 1432-1297.doi: 10.1007/s00222-020- 01013-1. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00222-020-01013-1

    doi:10.1007/s00222-020- 2020

  7. [6]

    ClassifiableC∗-algebras from minimal Z-actions and their orbit-breaking subalgebras

    Robin J. Deeley, Ian F. Putnam, and Karen R. Strung. “ClassifiableC∗-algebras from minimal Z-actions and their orbit-breaking subalgebras”. English. In:Math. Ann.388.1 (2024), pp. 703–729.issn: 0025-5831.doi: 10.1007/s00208-022-02526-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00208-022-02526-1 2024

  8. [7]

    Constructing minimal homeo- morphisms on point-like spaces and a dynamical presentation of the Jiang-Su algebra

    Robin J. Deeley, Ian F. Putnam, and Karen R. Strung. “Constructing minimal homeo- morphisms on point-like spaces and a dynamical presentation of the Jiang-Su algebra”. English. In: J. Reine Angew. Math. 742 (2018), pp. 241–261. issn: 0075-4102. doi: 10.1515/crelle-2015-0091

    work page doi:10.1515/crelle-2015-0091 2018

Show all 46 references
  1. [8]

    On the existence of conformal measures

    Manfred Denker and Mariusz Urbański. “On the existence of conformal measures”. English. In: Trans. Am. Math. Soc.328.2 (1991), pp. 563–587.issn: 0002-9947. doi: 10.2307/2001795

    1991 doi

  2. [9]

    Operator Theoretic Aspects of Ergodic Theory

    Tanja Eisner et al. Operator Theoretic Aspects of Ergodic Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 272. Springer, 2016

    2016

  3. [10]

    Elliott et al.On the classification of simple amenableC∗-algebras with finite decomposition rank, II

    George A. Elliott et al.On the classification of simple amenableC∗-algebras with finite decomposition rank, II. 2023. arXiv:1507.03437 [math.OA].url: https://arxiv.org/ abs/1507.03437

    2023 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Circle actions on C∗-algebras, partial automorphisms, and a generalized Pimsner-Voiculescu exact sequence

    Ruy Exel. “Circle actions on C∗-algebras, partial automorphisms, and a generalized Pimsner-Voiculescu exact sequence”. English. In:J. Funct. Anal.122.2 (1994), pp. 361–

    1994

  5. [12]

    Partialactionsofgroupsandactionsofinversesemigroups

    RuyExel.“Partialactionsofgroupsandactionsofinversesemigroups”.English.In: Proc. Am. Math. Soc.126.12 (1998), pp. 3481–3494.issn: 0002-9939.doi: 10.1090/S0002- 9939-98-04575-4

    1998 doi

  6. [13]

    Partial dynamical systems, Fell bundles and applications

    Ruy Exel. Partial dynamical systems, Fell bundles and applications. English. Vol. 224. Math. Surv. Monogr. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 2017. isbn: 978-1-4704-3785-5; 978-1-4704-4236-1.doi: 10.1090/surv/224

    2017 doi

  7. [14]

    The structure of algebras of operator fields

    J. M. G. Fell. “The structure of algebras of operator fields”. English. In:Acta Math.106 (1961), pp. 233–280.issn: 0001-5962.doi: 10.1007/BF02545788

    1961 doi

  8. [15]

    Strung.Recursive subhomogeneity of orbit- breaking subalgebras ofC∗-algebras associated to minimal homeomorphisms twisted by line bundles

    Marzieh Forough, Ja A Jeong, and Karen R. Strung.Recursive subhomogeneity of orbit- breaking subalgebras ofC∗-algebras associated to minimal homeomorphisms twisted by line bundles. 2025. arXiv: 2410 . 07424 [math.OA]. url: https : / / arxiv . org / abs / 2410.07424

    2025 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Nuclear dimension of crossed products associated to partial dynamical systems

    Shirly Geffen. “Nuclear dimension of crossed products associated to partial dynamical systems”. English. In:J. Funct. Anal.281.2 (2021). Id/No 109031, p. 31.issn: 0022-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2021.109031

    2021

  10. [17]

    An Introduction to Crossed Products by Minimal Homeomor- phisms

    Thierry Giordano et al. “An Introduction to Crossed Products by Minimal Homeomor- phisms”. In: Crossed Products ofC∗-Algebras, Topological Dynamics, and Classifica- tion. Ed. by Francesc Perera. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 221–

    2018

  11. [18]

    Niu.A classification of finite simple amenable Z-stable C∗-algebras, II, –C∗-algebras with rational generalized tracial rank one

    Guihua Gong, Huaxin Lin, and Z. Niu.A classification of finite simple amenable Z-stable C∗-algebras, II, –C∗-algebras with rational generalized tracial rank one. 2021. arXiv: 1909.13382 [math.OA]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.13382

    2021 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Classification of finite simple amenable Z-stable C∗-algebras

    Guihua Gong, Huaxin Lin, and Zhuang Niu. Classification of finite simple amenable Z-stable C∗-algebras. 2015. arXiv:1501.00135 [math.OA]. url: https://arxiv.org/ abs/1501.00135. REFERENCES 23

    2015 arXiv

  13. [20]

    The nuclear dimension ofC∗-algebras associated to homeomorphisms

    Ilan Hirshberg and Jianchao Wu. “The nuclear dimension ofC∗-algebras associated to homeomorphisms”. English. In:Adv. Math.304 (2017), pp. 56–89.issn: 0001-8708.doi: 10.1016/j.aim.2016.08.022

    2017 doi

  14. [21]

    Husemoller

    Dale H. Husemoller. Fibre bundles.English. 3rd ed. Vol. 20. Grad. Texts Math. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1993.isbn: 0-387-94087-1

    1993

  15. [22]

    Ideal structure ofC∗-algebras associated withC∗-correspondences

    Takeshi Katsura. “Ideal structure ofC∗-algebras associated withC∗-correspondences”. English. In: Pac. J. Math.230.1 (2007), pp. 107–145.issn: 1945-5844.doi: 10.2140/ pjm.2007.230.107

    2007

  16. [23]

    On C∗-algebras associated withC∗-correspondences

    Takeshi Katsura. “On C∗-algebras associated withC∗-correspondences”. English. In:J. Funct. Anal.217.2 (2004), pp. 366–401.issn: 0022-1236.doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2004. 03.010

    2004 doi

  17. [25]

    The Classification of Purely Infinite C∗-Algebras Using Kas- parov’s Theory

    Eberhard Kirchberg. “The Classification of Purely Infinite C∗-Algebras Using Kas- parov’s Theory”. Preprint.url: https : / / ivv5hpp . uni - muenster . de / u / echters / ekneu1.pdf,

  18. [26]

    Embedding of exactC∗-algebras in the Cuntz algebraO2

    Eberhard Kirchberg and N. Christopher Phillips. “Embedding of exactC∗-algebras in the Cuntz algebraO2”. In: J. Reine Angew. Math.525 (2000), pp. 17–53.issn: 0075- 4102,1435-5345. doi: 10 . 1515 / crll . 2000 . 065. url: https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1515 / crll.2000.065

    2000

  19. [27]

    Christopher Lance

    E. Christopher Lance. Hilbert C∗-modules. A toolkit for operator algebraists. English. Vol. 210. Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1995.isbn: 0-521- 47910-X

    1995

  20. [28]

    Crossed products by minimal homeomor- phisms

    Huaxin Lin and N. Christopher Phillips. “Crossed products by minimal homeomor- phisms”. English. In:J. Reine Angew. Math.641 (2010), pp. 95–122.issn: 0075-4102. doi: 10.1515/CRELLE.2010.029

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    K-theory for partial crossed products by discrete groups

    Kevin McClanahan. “K-theory for partial crossed products by discrete groups”. English. In: J. Funct. Anal.130.1 (1995), pp. 77–117.issn: 0022-1236.doi: 10.1006/jfan.1995. 1064

    1995 doi

  22. [30]

    C∗-bundles andC0(X)-algebras

    May Nilsen. “C∗-bundles andC0(X)-algebras”. English. In:Indiana Univ. Math. J.45.2 (1996), pp. 463–477.issn: 0022-2518.doi: 10.1512/iumj.1996.45.1086

    1996 doi

  23. [31]

    A. R. Pears. Dimension theory of general spaces. English. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. XII, 428 p. £ 16.50 (1975). 1975

    1975

  24. [32]

    A classification theorem for nuclear purely infinite simpleC∗- algebras

    N. Christopher Phillips. “A classification theorem for nuclear purely infinite simpleC∗- algebras”. In:Doc. Math.5 (2000), pp. 49–114.issn: 1431-0635,1431-0643

    2000

  25. [34]

    Recursive subhomogeneous algebras

    N. Christopher Phillips. “Recursive subhomogeneous algebras”. English. In:Trans. Am. Math. Soc.359.10 (2007), pp. 4595–4623.issn: 0002-9947.doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947- 07-03850-0

    2007 doi

  26. [35]

    A class ofC∗-algebras generalizing both Cuntz-Krieger algebras and crossed products byZ

    Michael V. Pimsner. “A class ofC∗-algebras generalizing both Cuntz-Krieger algebras and crossed products byZ”. English. In:Free probability theory. Papers from a workshop on random matrices and operator algebra free products, Toronto, Canada, Mars 1995. Providence, RI: America...

    1995

  27. [36]

    Classification of nuclearC∗-algebras

    Mikael Rørdam and Erling Størmer. Classification of nuclearC∗-algebras. Entropy in operator algebras. English. Vol. 126. Encycl. Math. Sci. Berlin: Springer, 2002.isbn: 3-540-42305-2

    2002

  28. [37]

    Traces on topological-graph algebras

    Christopher Schafhauser. “Traces on topological-graph algebras”. English. In: Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst.38.5 (2016), pp. 1923–1953.issn: 0143-3857. doi: 10.1017/etds. 2016.114

    2016 doi

  29. [38]

    Graph-based models for Kirchberg algebras

    Jack Spielberg. “Graph-based models for Kirchberg algebras”. English. In:J. Oper. The- ory 57.2 (2007), pp. 347–374.issn: 0379-4024. REFERENCES 24

    2007

  30. [39]

    An introduction toC∗-algebras and the classification program

    Karen Strung. An introduction toC∗-algebras and the classification program. Edited by Francesc Perera. English. Ed. by Francesc Perera. Adv. Courses in Math. – CRM Barc. Cham: Birkhäuser/Springer, 2021. isbn: 978-3-030-47464-5; 978-3-030-47465-2. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47465-2

    2021 doi

  31. [40]

    Quasidiagonality of nuclearC∗- algebras

    Aaron Tikuisis, Stuart White, and Wilhelm Winter. “Quasidiagonality of nuclearC∗- algebras”. In:Annals of Mathematics185.1 (Jan. 2017).issn: 0003-486X.doi: 10.4007/ annals.2017.185.1.4. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.4007/annals.2017.185.1.4

    2017 doi

  32. [41]

    Decomposition rank of subhomogeneous C∗-algebras

    Wilhelm Winter. “Decomposition rank of subhomogeneous C∗-algebras”. English. In: Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)89.2 (2004), pp. 427–456.issn: 0024-6115.doi: 10.1112/ S0024611504014716

    2004

  33. [42]

    The nuclear dimension ofC∗-algebras

    Wilhelm Winter and Joachim Zacharias. “The nuclear dimension ofC∗-algebras”. Eng- lish. In:Adv. Math.224.2 (2010), pp. 461–498.issn: 0001-8708.doi: 10.1016/j.aim. 2009.12.005

    2010 doi

  34. [43]

    C∗-algebras associated to directed graphs of groups, and models of Kirch- berg algebras

    Victor Wu. “C∗-algebras associated to directed graphs of groups, and models of Kirch- berg algebras”. English. In: J. Funct. Anal.288.3 (2025). Id/No 110740, p. 39.issn: 0022-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2024.110740. Department of Abstract Analysis, Institute of Mathematics, Czech...

    2025

  35. [274]

    doi: 10.1007/978- 3- 319- 70869- 0_11

    isbn: 978-3-319-70869-0. doi: 10.1007/978- 3- 319- 70869- 0_11 . url: https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70869-0_11

    doi

  36. [401]

    issn: 0022-1236.doi: 10.1006/jfan.1994.1073

    1994

  37. [2014]

    url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.5546

    arXiv

  38. [2023]

    url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06480

    arXiv: 2307.06480 [math.OA]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06480

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.