Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Cyber-Physical Power System Layers: Classification, Characterization, and Interactions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.06772 v1 pith:MLBWHHH3 submitted 2023-02-14 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords layerslayersystemintra-actionscomponentscyberpowercharacterization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper provides a strategy to identify layers and sub-layers of cyber-physical power systems (CPPS) and characterize their inter- and intra-actions. The physical layer usually consists of the power grid and protection devices whereas the cyber layer consists of communication, and computation and control components. Combining components of the cyber layer in one layer complicates the process of modeling intra-actions because each component has different failure modes. On the other hand, dividing the cyber layers into a large number of sub-layers may unnecessarily increase the number of system states and increase the computational burden. In this paper, we classify system layers based on their common, coupled, and shared functions. Also, interactions between the classified layers are identified, characterized, and clustered based on their impact on the system. Furthermore, based on the overall function of each layer and types of its components, intra-actions within layers are characterized. The strategies developed in this paper for comprehensive classification of system layers and characterization of their inter- and intra-actions contribute toward the goal of accurate and detailed modeling of state transition and failure and attack propagation in CPPS, which can be used for various reliability assessment studies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools