The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2606.17075 · v1 · pith:MNNIOLYY · submitted 2026-06-10 · physics.gen-ph

Dynamical systems analysis of unimodular cosmology in D=4+d dimensions

A. M. Vel\'asquez-Toribio , J. C. Fabris This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-06-27 07:41 UTCgrok-4.3pith:MNNIOLYYrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification physics.gen-ph
keywords unimodular gravityhigher-dimensional cosmologydynamical systemsFLRW equationsphase-space analysisdimensional reductioninternal volume scalar
0
0 comments X

The pith

Unimodular gravity in D=4+d dimensions reduces to four-dimensional cosmology whose phase space contains a continuous family of equilibrium points unlike general relativity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that after dimensional reduction of unimodular gravity from higher dimensions, the effective FLRW equations can be recast as an autonomous dynamical system. In the vacuum sector this system possesses a continuous family of finite equilibrium points located at λ = dH together with well-defined asymptotic Poincaré directions. The internal extra-dimensional volume enters as a scalar degree of freedom that participates in the reduced dynamics. For the five-dimensional case the system is closed by linking ordinary matter to the internal-volume modulus through the reduced Bianchi relation and the minimal conservation prescription that dilutes matter by both volumes; the resulting flow exhibits isolated critical points on a compactified phase space. A sympathetic reader would care because the higher-dimensional origin appears to generate qualitatively new organizing structures for cosmological trajectories that are absent in standard general relativity.

Core claim

After dimensional reduction, the resulting FLRW equations admit a natural autonomous formulation whose phase-space structure differs qualitatively from that of general relativity. In the vacuum sector, the reduced system exhibits a continuous family of finite equilibrium points, λ=dH, together with well-defined asymptotic Poincaré directions. In the matter sector, we focus on the five-dimensional case d=1 and use the reduced Bianchi relation as the consistency condition that links the ordinary matter component to the internal-volume degree of freedom. The system is then closed by adopting the minimal higher-dimensional conservation prescription, according to which matter is diluted by both t

What carries the argument

The autonomous dynamical system obtained from the dimensionally reduced FLRW equations, with the internal-volume scalar as the additional degree of freedom whose vacuum equilibria form the continuous family λ=dH.

If this is right

  • The vacuum sector of the reduced system contains a continuous family of equilibrium points rather than isolated fixed points.
  • For d=1 the matter sector possesses isolated critical points together with a globally organized compactified flow.
  • The internal-volume scalar degree of freedom alters the background evolution of the scale factor relative to standard four-dimensional models.
  • Numerical solutions of the autonomous system illustrate concrete changes in the expansion history induced by the extra-dimensional volume.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The continuous line of equilibria may allow a range of effective late-time behaviors without fine-tuning a single cosmological constant value.
  • Relaxing the minimal conservation prescription could open new channels for energy exchange between ordinary matter and the internal-volume scalar.
  • The Poincaré asymptotic directions may supply concrete late-time or early-time attractors that could be matched to observational Hubble data in extensions of the model.

Load-bearing premise

Matter is diluted by the product of the external volume and the internal-volume modulus according to the minimal higher-dimensional conservation prescription.

What would settle it

A numerical or observational trajectory of the scale factor and internal-volume scalar that fails to approach any member of the predicted continuous family of equilibrium points or to follow the compactified flow structure in the d=1 matter sector.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17075 by A. M. Vel\'asquez-Toribio, J. C. Fabris.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison between the coupled unimodular model and the ΛCDM reference for the main background observables [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of the geometric coupling variable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Vacuum phase portraits for general relativity and unimodular cosmology in the representative case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Poincar´e disks and upper-hemisphere compactifications for the vacuum systems. The unimodular case exhibits a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Reduced phase portrait in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Poincar´e compactification of the reduced coupled system for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Supplementary phase-space portraits for illustrative higher-dimensional extensions with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the effective four-dimensional cosmology induced by unimodular gravity in $D=4+d$ dimensions, where the internal extra-dimensional volume is encoded in a scalar degree of freedom. After dimensional reduction, we show that the resulting FLRW equations admit a natural autonomous formulation whose phase-space structure differs qualitatively from that of general relativity. In the vacuum sector, the reduced system exhibits a continuous family of finite equilibrium points, $\lambda=dH$, together with well-defined asymptotic Poincar\'e directions. In the matter sector, we focus on the five-dimensional case $d=1$ and use the reduced Bianchi relation as the consistency condition that links the ordinary matter component to the internal-volume degree of freedom. The system is then closed by adopting the minimal higher-dimensional conservation prescription, according to which matter is diluted by both the external volume and the internal-volume modulus. This leads to a reduced matter--geometry dynamics with isolated critical points and a globally organized compactified flow. Numerical examples illustrate how the internal-volume degree of freedom affects the background evolution and the global phase-space structure. The comparison with $\Lambda$CDM is used only as a benchmark, while a full observational analysis and more general matter--geometry exchange prescriptions are left for future work.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs a dynamical systems analysis of the effective 4D FLRW cosmology obtained by dimensional reduction of unimodular gravity in D=4+d dimensions, with the internal extra-dimensional volume encoded as a scalar degree of freedom. It reports that the reduced equations admit an autonomous formulation whose phase-space structure differs from general relativity: a continuous family of finite equilibria at λ=dH (with well-defined asymptotic Poincaré directions) in the vacuum sector, and—for the d=1 case closed by the reduced Bianchi relation together with the minimal higher-dimensional conservation prescription (matter density diluted by both external volume and internal-volume modulus)—isolated critical points with globally organized compactified flow. Numerical examples are provided and ΛCDM is used only as a benchmark.

Significance. If the reduction and the adopted closure are valid, the work establishes a qualitatively new autonomous system for higher-dimensional unimodular cosmology, with the continuous vacuum equilibria and the compactified matter-sector flow constituting concrete, falsifiable features that distinguish it from standard GR. The dynamical-systems methodology, explicit identification of equilibria, and numerical illustrations of the flow are strengths that would support further exploration of extra-dimensional effects.

major comments (2)
  1. [Matter sector analysis (reduced Bianchi relation and conservation prescription)] The minimal higher-dimensional conservation prescription (matter diluted by both external volume and internal-volume modulus) is invoked to close the system and is linked via the reduced Bianchi relation, but no derivation from the D-dimensional unimodular action or constraint is supplied. This assumption directly determines the form of the autonomous vector field and is load-bearing for the claim of isolated critical points and globally organized flow in the matter sector (see the section on the reduced matter–geometry dynamics for d=1). Alternative consistent exchange terms between matter and the modulus would alter the fixed-point structure.
  2. [Vacuum sector (autonomous formulation and equilibrium points)] The vacuum-sector claim of a continuous family of equilibria λ=dH rests on the reduced FLRW equations after dimensional reduction, yet the manuscript does not exhibit the explicit reduced equations or the steps that isolate this family and the associated Poincaré directions. Without these, the asserted qualitative difference from GR cannot be verified from the given derivation.
minor comments (2)
  1. All equations defining the autonomous system (vector field components, fixed-point conditions) should be numbered and cross-referenced in the text for clarity.
  2. [Numerical examples] The numerical examples would benefit from explicit tabulation of the coordinates and eigenvalues of the reported critical points.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, constructive criticism, and positive assessment of the significance of our dynamical-systems analysis. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where the manuscript can be strengthened without misrepresenting its scope or results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Matter sector analysis (reduced Bianchi relation and conservation prescription)] The minimal higher-dimensional conservation prescription (matter diluted by both external volume and internal-volume modulus) is invoked to close the system and is linked via the reduced Bianchi relation, but no derivation from the D-dimensional unimodular action or constraint is supplied. This assumption directly determines the form of the autonomous vector field and is load-bearing for the claim of isolated critical points and globally organized flow in the matter sector (see the section on the reduced matter–geometry dynamics for d=1). Alternative consistent exchange terms between matter and the modulus would alter the fixed-point structure.

    Authors: We agree that the conservation prescription is presented as an adopted minimal closure rather than a derivation from the full D-dimensional unimodular action. The manuscript explicitly frames it this way to obtain a consistent autonomous system under the reduced Bianchi relation, and the abstract already states that more general matter–geometry exchange prescriptions are left for future work. The isolated critical points and compactified flow are therefore claimed only under this specific prescription. In revision we will insert a clarifying paragraph in the d=1 matter-sector section that (i) motivates the choice as the most direct higher-dimensional volume-dilution rule consistent with the reduction and (ii) explicitly notes that it is an assumption whose relaxation would modify the vector field. No full derivation from the action will be added, as that lies outside the paper’s scope. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Vacuum sector (autonomous formulation and equilibrium points)] The vacuum-sector claim of a continuous family of equilibria λ=dH rests on the reduced FLRW equations after dimensional reduction, yet the manuscript does not exhibit the explicit reduced equations or the steps that isolate this family and the associated Poincaré directions. Without these, the asserted qualitative difference from GR cannot be verified from the given derivation.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the explicit intermediate steps isolating the λ=dH line and the associated Poincaré directions are not displayed with sufficient detail. Although the reduced FLRW equations appear in the text, the derivation of the continuous family and the linearization at those points is too compressed. In the revised manuscript we will expand the vacuum-sector section with a self-contained derivation: starting from the dimensionally reduced equations, introducing the autonomous variables, showing algebraically that λ=dH constitutes a line of equilibria, and computing the eigenvalues and eigenvectors that define the Poincaré directions. This will allow direct verification of the qualitative difference from GR. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation follows from explicitly adopted closure

full rationale

The paper states that the system is closed by adopting the minimal higher-dimensional conservation prescription, using the reduced Bianchi relation as consistency condition. The autonomous formulation and phase-space structure (continuous equilibria in vacuum, isolated points in matter) are then derived from the resulting equations. This is model construction with a transparent input assumption rather than a claim that the prescription follows necessarily from the D-dimensional unimodular action. No load-bearing self-citation, self-definition, or renaming of inputs as predictions occurs. The central results are therefore self-contained given the stated reduction and closure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the dimensional-reduction procedure that encodes extra-dimensional volume in a scalar, the adoption of a specific matter-conservation law, and the standard FLRW symmetry assumptions; none of these are derived from more fundamental principles within the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • d
    Number of extra dimensions treated as a fixed integer parameter that enters the equilibrium condition λ=dH.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The internal extra-dimensional volume can be represented by a single scalar degree of freedom after dimensional reduction.
    Invoked at the outset to obtain the effective 4D theory.
  • standard math FLRW symmetry holds in the effective 4D spacetime.
    Standard background assumption for homogeneous isotropic cosmology.
invented entities (1)
  • scalar degree of freedom encoding internal volume no independent evidence
    purpose: To capture the dynamics of the extra-dimensional volume modulus in the reduced theory.
    Introduced by the dimensional-reduction step; no independent falsifiable prediction supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5763 in / 1465 out tokens · 28163 ms · 2026-06-27T07:41:18.322013+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Peebles, P. J. E. and Ratra, B.,The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 559, (2003)

    2003

  2. [2]

    G., Padilla, A

    Clifton, T., Ferreira, P. G., Padilla, A. and Skordis, C.,Modified Gravity and Cosmology, Phys. Rept.513, 1, (2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    and Skara, F.,Challenges forΛCDM: An update, New Astron

    Perivolaropoulos, L. and Skara, F.,Challenges forΛCDM: An update, New Astron. Rev.95, 101659, (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask)

    J. Martin, “Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask),” Comptes Rendus Physique13, 566–665 (2012), arXiv:1205.3365 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Aspects of the cosmological coincidence problem,

    H. E. S. Velten, R. F. vom Marttens, and W. Zimdahl, “Aspects of the cosmological coincidence problem,”European Physical Journal C74, 3160 (2014). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3160-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3160-4 2014

  6. [6]

    Spielen Gravitationsfelder im Aufbau der materiellen Elementarteilchen eine wesentliche Rolle?

    A. Einstein, “Spielen Gravitationsfelder im Aufbau der materiellen Elementarteilchen eine wesentliche Rolle?”Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)1919, 349

    1919

  7. [7]

    Cosmological constant and fundamental length,

    J. L. Anderson and D. Finkelstein, “Cosmological constant and fundamental length,”Am. J. Phys.39, 901 (1971)

    1971

  8. [8]

    The exchange of massless spin-two particles,

    J. J. van der Bij, H. van Dam, and Y. J. Ng, “The exchange of massless spin-two particles,”Physica A116, 307 (1982)

    1982

  9. [9]

    Einstein gravity from restricted coordinate invariance,

    W. Buchm¨ uller and N. Dragon, “Einstein gravity from restricted coordinate invariance,”Phys. Lett. B207, 292 (1988)

    1988

  10. [10]

    The cosmological constant and general covariance,

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, “The cosmological constant and general covariance,”Phys. Lett. B222, 195 (1989). 23 FIG. 7. Supplementary phase-space portraits for illustrative higher-dimensional extensions withd= 2 andd= 3. For each value ofd, the figure shows the reduced phase portrait in the (x, y) plane, the normalized representation in (x, y, E) with ...

    1989

  11. [11]

    A unimodular theory of canonical quantum gravity,

    W. G. Unruh, “A unimodular theory of canonical quantum gravity,”Phys. Rev. D40, 1048 (1989)

    1989

  12. [12]

    Unimodular theory of gravity and the cosmological constant,

    Y. J. Ng and H. van Dam, “Unimodular theory of gravity and the cosmological constant,”J. Math. Phys.32, 1337 (1991)

    1991

  13. [13]

    Unimodular relativity and cosmological constant,

    D. R. Finkelstein, A. A. Galiautdinov, and J. E. Baugh, “Unimodular relativity and cosmological constant,”J. Math. Phys.42, 340 (2001)

    2001

  14. [14]

    Can one tell Einstein’s unimodular theory from Einstein’s general relativity?

    E. ´Alvarez, “Can one tell Einstein’s unimodular theory from Einstein’s general relativity?”JHEP03, 002 (2005)

    2005

  15. [15]

    Unimodular cosmology and the weight of energy,

    E. ´Alvarez and A. F. Faedo, “Unimodular cosmology and the weight of energy,”Phys. Rev. D76, 064013 (2007)

    2007

  16. [16]

    The quantization of unimodular gravity and the cosmological constant problems,

    L. Smolin, “The quantization of unimodular gravity and the cosmological constant problems,”Phys. Rev. D80, 084003 (2009)

    2009

  17. [17]

    Semiclassical unimodular gravity,

    B. Fiol and J. Garriga, “Semiclassical unimodular gravity,”JCAP08, 015 (2010)

    2010

  18. [18]

    TransverseDiff gravity is to scalar-tensor as unimodular gravity is to general relativity,

    J. J. Lopez-Villarejo, “TransverseDiff gravity is to scalar-tensor as unimodular gravity is to general relativity,”JCAP11, 002 (2011)

    2011

  19. [19]

    On the trace-free Einstein equations as a viable alternative to general relativity,

    G. F. R. Ellis, H. van Elst, J. Murugan, and J. P. Uzan, “On the trace-free Einstein equations as a viable alternative to general relativity,”Class. Quantum Grav.28, 225007 (2011)

    2011

  20. [20]

    Cosmological implications of unimodular gravity,

    P. Jain, A. Jaiswal, P. Karmakar, G. Kashyap, and N. K. Singh, “Cosmological implications of unimodular gravity,”JCAP 11, 003 (2012)

    2012

  21. [21]

    Cosmological perturbations in unimodular gravity,

    C. Gao, R. H. Brandenberger, Y. Cai, and P. Chen, “Cosmological perturbations in unimodular gravity,”JCAP09, 021 (2014)

    2014

  22. [22]

    A note on classical and quantum unimodular gravity,

    A. Padilla and I. D. Saltas, “A note on classical and quantum unimodular gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C75, 561 (2015)

    2015

  23. [23]

    Unimodular gravity redux,

    E. ´Alvarez, S. Gonz´ alez-Mart´ ın, M. Herrero-Valea, and C. P. Mart´ ın, “Unimodular gravity redux,”Phys. Rev. D92, 061502(R) (2015)

    2015

  24. [24]

    How unimodular gravity theories differ from general relativity at quantum 24 level,

    R. Bufalo, M. Oksanen, and A. Tureanu, “How unimodular gravity theories differ from general relativity at quantum 24 level,”Eur. Phys. J. C75, 477 (2015)

    2015

  25. [25]

    Dark energy from violation of energy conservation,

    T. Josset, A. Perez, and D. Sudarsky, “Dark energy from violation of energy conservation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 021102 (2017)

    2017

  26. [26]

    Unimodular Einstein–Cartan gravity: Dynamics and conservation laws,

    Y. Bonder and C. Corral, “Unimodular Einstein–Cartan gravity: Dynamics and conservation laws,”Phys. Rev. D97, 084001 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    Cosmic acceleration in unimodular gravity,

    M. A. Garc´ ıa-Aspeitia, A. Hern´ andez-Almada, J. Maga˜ na, and V. Motta, “Cosmic acceleration in unimodular gravity,” Phys. Rev. D99, 123525 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Unimodular Quadratic Gravity and the Cosmological Constant,

    A. Salvio, “Unimodular Quadratic Gravity and the Cosmological Constant,”Phys. Lett. B856, 138920 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Diffusion in unimodular gravity: Analytical solutions, late-time acceleration, and cosmological constraints,

    C. Corral, N. Cruz, and E. Gonz´ alez, “Diffusion in unimodular gravity: Analytical solutions, late-time acceleration, and cosmological constraints,”Phys. Rev. D102, 023508 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    The Universe acceleration from the unimodular gravity viewpoint: background and linear perturbations,

    M. A. Garc´ ıa-Aspeitia, A. Hern´ andez-Almada, J. Maga˜ na, and V. Motta, “The Universe acceleration from the unimodular gravity viewpoint: background and linear perturbations,”Phys. Dark Univ.32, 100840 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    Cosmological aspects of the unimodular-mimeticf(G) gravity,

    A. Z. Kaczmarek, M. Olechowski, and M. Szyd lowski, “Cosmological aspects of the unimodular-mimeticf(G) gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B1002, 116534 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    A Primer on Unimodular Gravity,

    E. ´Alvarez and E. Velasco-Aja, “A Primer on Unimodular Gravity,” Phys. Part. Nucl.54, 908–912 (2023), doi:10.1134/S1063779623050027

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063779623050027 2023

  33. [33]

    Unimodular Gravity vs General Relativity: A status report,

    A. Carballo-Rubio, L. J. Garay, and G. Garc´ ıa-Moreno, “Unimodular Gravity vs General Relativity: A status report,” Class. Quantum Grav.39, 243001 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Perturbative Analysis of Singularity-Free Cosmological Solutions in Unimodular Kaluza–Klein Theory,

    J. C. Fabris, S. Faller, and R. Kerner, “Perturbative Analysis of Singularity-Free Cosmological Solutions in Unimodular Kaluza–Klein Theory,” Universe 12, artigo 75, DOI 10.3390/universe12030075

    work page doi:10.3390/universe12030075

  35. [35]

    UnimodularF(R) Gravity,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, “UnimodularF(R) Gravity,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics05, 046 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    Gauge fixing in cosmological perturbations of Unimodular Gravity,

    F.Cede˜ no & R. Nucamendi, “Gauge fixing in cosmological perturbations of Unimodular Gravity,”JCAP10, 036 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    A cosmological concordance model with dynamical vacuum term,

    J. S. Alcaniz, H. A. Borges, S. Carneiro, J. C. Fabris, C. Pigozzo, and W. Zimdahl, “A cosmological concordance model with dynamical vacuum term,”Phys. Lett. B716, 165 (2012)

    2012

  38. [38]

    Unimodular MimeticF(R) Inflation,

    S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, “Unimodular MimeticF(R) Inflation,” Astrophys. Space Sci.361, 236 (2016)

    2016

  39. [39]

    Probing the H0 tension with holographic dark energy in unimodular gravity: insights from DESI DR2,

    F.Plaza, G.Leon, and L.Kraiselburd, “Probing the H0 tension with holographic dark energy in unimodular gravity: insights from DESI DR2,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1262 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Reconstruction of inflationary scenarios in non-conservative unimodular gravity,

    M.P.Piccirilli and G.Leon, “Reconstruction of inflationary scenarios in non-conservative unimodular gravity,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.524, 1316–1329 (2023), arXiv:2307.06329 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Resolution of the cosmological constant problem by unimodular gravity and signature reversal sym- metry,

    R. Erdem, “Resolution of the cosmological constant problem by unimodular gravity and signature reversal sym- metry,” Phys. Lett. B876, 140420 (2026), DOI 10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140420. arXiv:2603.29918 [gr-qc], DOI 10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140420

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140420 2026

  42. [42]

    Unimodular approaches to the cosmological constant problem,

    L. Jirouˇ sek, “Unimodular approaches to the cosmological constant problem,”Universe9, 131 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    A unimodular Kaluza–Klein theory,

    J. C. Fabris and R. Kerner, “A unimodular Kaluza–Klein theory,”Phys. Scr.99, 085042 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    On the stability of non-singular solutions in effective theory from Kaluza–Klein unimodular gravity,

    J. C. Fabris and R. Kerner, “On the stability of non-singular solutions in effective theory from Kaluza–Klein unimodular gravity,”Symmetry17, 419 (2025)

    2025