Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Randomization Tests for Weak Null Hypotheses in Randomized Experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.07419 v5 pith:MO43T2QY submitted 2018-09-19 stat.ME stat.AP

classification stat.MEstat.AP
keywords nullhypothesisweakoutcomespotentialtestunderexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Fisher randomization test (FRT) is appropriate for any test statistic, under a sharp null hypothesis that can recover all missing potential outcomes. However, it is often sought after to test a weak null hypothesis that the treatment does not affect the units on average. To use the FRT for a weak null hypothesis, we must address two issues. First, we need to impute the missing potential outcomes although the weak null hypothesis cannot determine all of them. Second, we need to choose a proper test statistic. For a general weak null hypothesis, we propose an approach to imputing missing potential outcomes under a compatible sharp null hypothesis. Building on this imputation scheme, we advocate a studentized statistic. The resulting FRT has multiple desirable features. First, it is model-free. Second, it is finite-sample exact under the sharp null hypothesis that we use to impute the potential outcomes. Third, it conservatively controls large-sample type I errors under the weak null hypothesis of interest. Therefore, our FRT is agnostic to the treatment effect heterogeneity. We establish a unified theory for general factorial experiments. We also extend it to stratified and clustered experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gaussian comparison above the median

    math.ST 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A centered Gaussian with smaller covariance assigns at least as much probability as one with larger covariance to any closed convex set with reference probability at least 1/2.

  2. Testing weak nulls in matched observational studies

    stat.ME 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For general matched observational studies, sensitivity analysis for the weak null cannot be simultaneously sharp for the sharp null; two procedures, one valid for heterogeneous effects but conservative and one sharp u...

Pith tools