Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Sparse nearest neighbor Cholesky matrices in spatial statistics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.13299 v2 pith:MPXSR57Q submitted 2021-02-26 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords choleskygaussiansparsespatialmatricesnngpissuesprocesses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Gaussian Processes (GP) is a staple in the toolkit of a spatial statistician. Well-documented computing roadblocks in the analysis of large geospatial datasets using Gaussian Processes have now been successfully mitigated via several recent statistical innovations. Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Processes (NNGP) has emerged as one of the leading candidates for such massive-scale geospatial analysis owing to their empirical success. This article reviews the connection of NNGP to sparse Cholesky factors of the spatial precision (inverse-covariance) matrices. Focus of the review is on these sparse Cholesky matrices which are versatile and have recently found many diverse applications beyond the primary usage of NNGP for fast parameter estimation and prediction in the spatial (generalized) linear models. In particular, we discuss applications of sparse NNGP Cholesky matrices to address multifaceted computational issues in spatial bootstrapping, simulation of large-scale realizations of Gaussian random fields, and extensions to non-parametric mean function estimation of a Gaussian Process using Random Forests. We also review a sparse-Cholesky-based model for areal (geographically-aggregated) data that addresses interpretability issues of existing areal models. Finally, we highlight some yet-to-be-addressed issues of such sparse Cholesky approximations that warrants further research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modernizing full posterior inference for surrogate modeling of categorical-output simulation experiments

    stat.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fully Bayesian GP classifier built from elliptical slice sampling and Vecchia approximation matches or beats variational baselines in log score on large benchmark and black-hole simulation problems.

Pith tools