Pith. sign in

REVIEW

What is $-Q$ for a poset $Q$?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.00566 v1 pith:MRXIUH5H submitted 2021-02-01 math.CO math.GN

classification math.COmath.GN
keywords definitioneulerorderposetreciprocityspaceswhatcertain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In the context of combinatorial reciprocity, it is a natural question to ask what "$-Q$" is for a poset $Q$. In a previous work, the definition "$-Q:=Q\times\mathbb{R}$ with lexicographic order" was proposed based on the notion of Euler characteristic of semialgebraic sets. In fact, by using this definition, Stanley's reciprocity for order polynomials was generalized to an equality for the Euler characteristics of certain spaces of increasing maps between posets. The purpose of this paper is to refine this result, that is, to show that these spaces are homeomorphic if the topology of $Q$ is metrizable.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools