Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

On modified Euler methods for McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equations with super-linear coefficients

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that a new family of explicit modified Euler schemes, including tanh and sin versions, attains strong order one-half for McKean–Vlasov SDEs with super-linear drift and diffusion, and that the full error to the mean-field…

desk verdict A genuinely useful framework for explicit modified Euler methods for McKean–Vlasov SDEs, but the main theorem overclaims the parameter range for the new tanh and sin schemes. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05057 v1 pith:MURNBXSH submitted 2025-02-07 math.NA cs.NA

Jiamin Jian , Qingshuo Song , Xiaojie Wang , Zhongqiang Zhang , Yuying Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NA MSC 65C3060H3560H10
keywords McKean–VlasovSDEsmean-fieldmodelsinteractingparticlesystemsmodifiedEulermethodssuper-linearcoefficientsstrongconvergenceratespropagationofchaostanhmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Solving McKean–Vlasov SDEs numerically is hard when drift and diffusion grow super-linearly, because standard Euler–Maruyama can explode in finite time. The paper proposes a general class of modified Euler methods that compress the coefficients through bounded maps, proves their moments stay bounded, and shows half-order strong convergence to the interacting particle system. By combining with propagation of chaos, the paper obtains the full convergence rate of the schemes to the McKean–Vlasov solution: $O(h + N^{-1/2})$ when the dimension is below 4. The authors validate the theory on examples including a double-well mean-field model, where the new tanh Euler method is more stable than other explicit tamed schemes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the pair of modifier maps $T_1,T_2:\mathbb{R}^d\times(0,1)\to\mathbb{R}^d$ that replace the raw drift and diffusion increments. Conditions H1 cap their size (bounded by $\min(Lh^{-2},|x|)$ and $\min(Lh^{-3/2},|x|)$) to prevent moment explosion, while H2/H3 require them to be $O(h^{r_1})$, $r_1\ge 1/2$, close to the identity so the scheme is consistent. The proof chain is: a localized-subevent moment bound for the discrete scheme, a one-step error estimate against the interacting particle system, and a Grönwall argument that delivers the half-order strong rate.

What would settle it

Take Example 22 with the tanh Euler method at $\alpha=0.2$ and measure the strong RMSE at $T=1$ over step sizes down to $2^{-16}$. If the error decays at $h^{1/2}$ despite $\alpha<1/2$, then the H3 verification gap is harmless; if the rate drops toward $h^{\alpha}$, the claimed range $\alpha\in(0,3/2)$ is not covered by the proof.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For McKean–Vlasov SDEs whose drift and diffusion grow super-linearly in the state, the Euler–Maruyama scheme can lose finite moments. This paper introduces modified Euler approximations in which drift and diffusion increments pass through bounded maps $T_1,T_2$ (e.g., $x\mapsto h^{-\alpha}\tanh(h^\alpha x)$ or $h^{-\alpha}\sin(h^\alpha x)$), and proves under a coercivity-type condition, a one-sided Lipschitz condition, and consistency conditions H1–H3 that the schemes have uniformly bounded moments and converge to the interacting particle system with strong $L^p$ rate $1/2$. Combining this with propagation of chaos, the $L^2$ distance between the scheme and the true McKean–Vlasov solution is bounded by $h + N^{-1/2}$ for $d<4$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise of the convergence theorem is that the modifier maps $T_1,T_2$ are $O(h^{1/2})$-close to the identity, which the tanh and sin examples achieve only for $\alpha\ge 1/2$, not for the full advertised range $\alpha\in(0,3/2)$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The modified Euler schemes (ME, tanh, sin) converge in the strong $L^p$ sense with order $1/2$ to the interacting particle system under non-globally Lipschitz drift and diffusion, so super-linear growth no longer forces fully implicit or tamed schemes.
  • The total $L^2$ error of the discretized particle method relative to the true McKean–Vlasov solution is $O(h + N^{-1/2})$ for $d<4$ (with logarithmic or slower particle-rate corrections for $d=4$ and $d>4$), quantifying how the time step and the number of particles should be balanced.
  • The moment bounds hold without the coercivity condition used by earlier tamed methods, so the framework covers schemes whose tamed coefficients do not preserve the monotonicity-based stability estimate.
  • In the double-well numerical example, the tanh Euler method remains stable and accurate at step sizes where the drift-tamed and sin Euler methods produce unacceptable densities, which is a concrete stability advantage for explicit methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A close reading of Discussion 20 suggests the tanh and sin Euler methods satisfy the consistency condition H3 with $r_1=1/2$ only when $\alpha\ge 1/2$; the stated range $\alpha\in(0,3/2)$ is therefore wider than the proof's natural bound supports.
  • The same $T_1,T_2$ framework should accommodate other smooth functions that saturate to $\pm h^{-\alpha}$ asymptotically (e.g., $\mathrm{erf}$ or rational approximants), with identical moment bounds and convergence rates; replacing sin by $\mathrm{erf}$ is a cheap test.
  • If the half-order rate is tight, the scheme cannot reach strong order 1 without adding a Milstein-type correction for the diffusion; composing the modified maps with the Milstein term is a natural next step.
  • The superior stability of tanh over sin seen in Example 24 is not explained by the finite-time convergence theorem; a plausible mechanism is the concavity and saturation shape of tanh, which could be tested by comparing $\tanh$ and $\sin$ at many step sizes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a general class of modified Euler methods for McKean–Vlasov SDEs with super-linear drift and diffusion coefficients. The methods are defined through operators T1, T2 in a uniform framework that covers a drift-tamed method, a modified Euler method, and the new tanh and sin Euler methods. Under explicit structural assumptions on the coefficients and on the operators, the authors prove a uniform moment bound for the numerical particle system (Lemma 13, proven in Appendix A), then prove a strong Lp convergence rate of order 1/2 to the interacting particle system (Theorem 19) and combine this with a propagation-of-chaos result from the literature to obtain a full error rate of h + N^{-1/2} for d<4 to the McKean–Vlasov solution (Corollary 21). Numerical experiments on several mean-field models, including a double-well example, illustrate the rates and compare the stability of the methods.

Significance. If the results are correct for the stated parameter ranges, the paper adds a useful and reasonably general construction: explicit tanh and sin Euler schemes that retain finite moments under super-linear drift and diffusion, with a transparent operator-based set of sufficient conditions and a clean route from particle-system error to McKean–Vlasov error via propagation of chaos. Strengths of the manuscript include the fully written proof of the key moment bound in Appendix A, explicit and checkable assumptions, no fitted parameters in the convergence statements, and concrete falsifiable rate predictions. The numerical section is informative, especially the double-well stability comparison. The main weakness is a specific, load-bearing verification gap in the parameter range claimed for the tanh and sin methods; it does not destroy the overall framework but it does require correction.

major comments (1)
  1. [Discussion 20; Examples 8–9; Theorem 19] Discussion 20 asserts that the tanh Euler method (Example 8, Eq. (7)) and the sin Euler method (Example 9, Eq. (8)) satisfy Assumption 17 (H3) with r1 = r3 = 1/2 and r2 = 2 for every α in (0,3/2). This verification is incorrect for α < 1/2. With y = h^α x, one has T1(x,h) - x = h^{-α}(tanh y - y); at |y| = 1, |T1(x,h)-x| ≈ (1 - tanh 1) h^{-α}, while the claimed bound with r2 = 2 is L h^{1/2} |x|^2 = L h^{1/2 - 2α}. Since -α < 1/2 - 2α when α < 1/2, the ratio diverges as h → 0. The same failure occurs for the sin Euler method because the expansion of sin(y) - y has the same order. Moreover, for α < 1/4 no choice of r2 can satisfy (H3): evaluating at x = 1 gives |T1(1,h) - 1| ≍ h^{2α}, so any bound with r1 ≥ 1/2 would require 2α ≥ r1 ≥ 1/2, which is impossible. Consequently, as written, Theorem 19 does not cover Examples 8–9 for α in (0,1/2), and the advertised range (0,3/2) is unsupported. The gap is repairable — for α in [1/4,1/2) one could prove (H3) with r2 = 3 and adjust the p-range in Lemma 18 accordingly — but this is not done in the manuscript. I note that the numerical experiments use α = 1/2 and α = 1, so the empirical rate observations are not affected by this gap.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Proof of Lemma 18, last sentence] The concluding sentence says the diffusion estimate is completed 'with r2 ≥ 1/2', but Assumption 17 gives r3 ≥ 1/2 for the T2-consistency bound; the sentence should refer to r3, or the notation in Assumption 17 should be adjusted to avoid confusion.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.2)] The identity W_2^2(μ_{t_k}^{X,N,n}, δ_0) = (1/N) Σ_i |X_k^{i,N,n}|^2 is cited to [16]; it is elementary and would be clearer if proved in one line, since the rest of the proof depends on it.
  3. [Section 5, Fig. 2 and RMSE notation] In Fig. 2 the labels 'SE with = 0.5' and 'TE with = 0.5' appear to be missing the symbol α; also the notation X_T^{i,N,nh} in the RMSE formula is confusing because nh is used both as a step count and as a superscript, and should be defined more explicitly.
  4. [General presentation] There are several typos that should be corrected: 'aviod' in Remark 5, 'refrees' in the Acknowledgements, and 'Lion's derivative' in the Introduction should be 'Lions' derivative'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main convergence theorem is proved from explicit assumptions within the paper; the only imported result is an external propagation-of-chaos theorem, and the sole self-citation is motivational.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at the level of the paper's claims. Theorem 19 proves the half-order strong rate from Assumptions (A1), (A2), (A5), (A6), (A7), (H1), and (H3) via a complete Gronwall argument, and Lemma 13's moment bound is proved in Appendix A rather than imported. The propagation-of-chaos input (Proposition 3) is taken from [27], whose authors do not overlap with the present authors, so Corollary 21's h + N^{-1/2} rate is an honest composition of an internal convergence estimate and an external POC estimate. Reference [45], which does include current authors, is cited only as motivation for Lemma 13 ('motivated by [45]'), and the proof is written out in full; it is not load-bearing. There are no fitted parameters called predictions, no renamed known pattern, and no assumption that is defined in terms of the target conclusion. I do flag a correctness gap, though not a circular one: in Examples 8-9 and Discussion 20 the paper asserts that the tanh and sin operators satisfy (H3) with r1 = r3 = 1/2, r2 = 2 for all alpha in (0,3/2) ('For Example 8, we demonstrate that assumption (H3) is fulfilled with r1 = 1/2, r2 = 2, r3 = 1/2'); this verification is invalid for alpha < 1/2 because at x = h^{-alpha} the difference |T1(x,h) - x| is of order h^{-alpha}, while h^{1/2}|x|^2 = h^{1/2 - 2alpha}, and for alpha < 1/4 no choice of r2 can repair the bound because at x = 1 the difference is of order h^{2alpha}, which cannot be dominated by L h^{r1} with r1 >= 1/2. That is a false premise in the application of Theorem 19 to the advertised parameter range, not a reduction of the theorem's conclusion to its input, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central convergence theorem is conditional on a list of explicit structural assumptions. No constants are fitted to data. The only hand-chosen method parameter is alpha, and its stated range is not fully supported. The proof of Lemma 13 is included in the appendix, so reliance on the self-cited [45] is only methodological.

free parameters (1)
  • alpha (tanh/sin Euler scaling exponent)
    Hand-chosen method parameter in Examples 8 and 9. The paper claims alpha in (0,3/2), but the H3 verification only supports alpha at least 1/2. Experiments use alpha = 1/2 and alpha = 1. No parameter is fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard filtered probability space, augmented Brownian filtration, Ito formula, Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality, and Gronwall lemma
    Used throughout the proofs in Sections 3 and 4 and in Appendix A.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1 (A1-A4): integrability of initial data, coercivity and monotonicity in state and measure, continuity; imported from [27] for well-posedness and propagation of chaos
    Propositions 2 and 3 rely on these conditions; the paper does not prove well-posedness itself.
  • domain assumption Assumption 11 (A5-A7): one-sided Lipschitz condition with factor (2p1-1) and polynomial growth of drift and diffusion
    Used in Theorem 19 and Lemma 18 to control the error equation between the numerical and particle-system solutions.
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 4 (H1-H2) and Assumption 17 (H3): modified operators bounded by min(Lh^{-2}, |x|) and consistency of order at least 1/2
    These structural conditions are introduced specifically to make the proposed methods work; their verification for the tanh and sin methods is the weakest point of the paper.
  • domain assumption Propagation of chaos (Proposition 3, from [27, Proposition 1]) with rate N^{-1/2} for d < 4
    Corollary 21 imports this external result to convert the particle-system error into an MV-SDE error.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On modified Euler methods for McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equations with super-linear coefficients." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MURNBXSH

@misc{pith2026250205057,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On modified Euler methods for McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equations with super-linear coefficients},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MURNBXSH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05057}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a new class of numerical methods for solving McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equations, which are relevant in the context of distribution-dependent or mean-field models, under super-linear growth conditions for both the drift and diffusion coefficients. Under certain non-globally Lipschitz conditions, the proposed numerical approaches have half-order convergence in the strong sense to the corresponding system of interacting particles associated with McKean-Vlasov SDEs. By leveraging a result on the propagation of chaos, we establish the full convergence rate of the modified Euler approximations to the solution of the McKean-Vlasov SDEs. Numerical experiments are included to validate the theoretical results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05057 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Several choices for the operators Ti , i = 1, 2. Also, we mention that Assumption 4 just provides sufficient conditions used to derive the moment bounds of the numerical approximations. We present in Subsection 3.2 some examples of modified Euler methods fulfilling As￾sumption 4. In the literature, there are numerical methods that do not satisfy the condition (H1) in Assumption 4, whose moment boundedness can be der… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Strong errors for Example 22 and 23 Example 22 As the first test model, we consider the following McKean-Vlasov SDE  dXt = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Density with X0 ∼ N (0, 1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Density with X0 ∼ N (3, 9) Example 23 For the second test model, we consider a McKean-Vlasov SDE in which the drift term preserves higher-order growth condition:  dXt = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Density with X0 ∼ N (0, 1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Density with X0 ∼ N (3, 9) (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Density with X0 ∼ N (0, 1)(a) and X0 ∼ N (3, 9)(b) indicated by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Density with X0 ∼ N (0, 1)(a) and X0 ∼ N (3, 9)(b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Paths of drift-tamed method for Example 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Paths of modified Euler method for Example 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Paths of tanh Euler method for Example 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Paths of split-step method for Example 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Paths of fully-tamed Euler method for Example 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Paths of sin Euler method for Example 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Long time strong convergence analysis of one-step methods for McKean-Vlasov SDEs with superlinear growth coefficients

    math.NA 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For contractive McKean-Vlasov SDEs with superlinear drift and diffusion, the projected Euler and backward Euler schemes converge in mean square at rate 1/2 uniformly in time.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [45]

    Weak error analysis for strong approximation schemes of SDEs with super-linear coefficients II: finite moments and higher-order schemes

    Yuying Zhao, Xiaojie Wang, and Zhongqiang Zhang. Weak error analysis for strong approximation schemes of SDEs with super-linear coefficients II: finite moments and higher-order schemes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14065 , 2024. A Proof of Lemma 13 in Section 3.3 Proof of Lemma 13 . In the following, we use K to denote the generic constant which is independe...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Mean-field description and propagation of chaos in networks of Hodgkin-Huxley and FitzHugh-Nagumo neurons

    Javier Baladron, Diego Fasoli, Olivier Faugeras, and Jonathan Touboul. Mean-field description and propagation of chaos in networks of Hodgkin-Huxley and FitzHugh-Nagumo neurons. Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience , 2:Art. 10, 50, 2012

    work page 2012

  3. [2]

    First-order convergence of Milstein schemes for McKean– Vlasov equations and interacting particle systems

    Jianhai Bao, Christoph Reisinger, Panpan Ren, and Wolfgang Stockinger. First-order convergence of Milstein schemes for McKean– Vlasov equations and interacting particle systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society A , 477(2245):20200258, 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [3]

    Projected particle methods for solving McKean–Vlasov stochastic differential equations

    Denis Belomestny and John Schoenmakers. Projected particle methods for solving McKean–Vlasov stochastic differential equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , 56(6):3169–3195, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [4]

    Nonlinear self-stabilizing processes–I Existence, invariant probability, propagation of chaos

    Saıd Benachour, Bernard Roynette, Denis Talay, and Pierre Vallois. Nonlinear self-stabilizing processes–I Existence, invariant probability, propagation of chaos. Stochastic processes and their applications , 75(2):173–201, 1998

    work page 1998

  6. [5]

    Mean field games and mean field type control theory , volume 101

    Alain Bensoussan, Jens Frehse, Phillip Yam, et al. Mean field games and mean field type control theory , volume 101. Springer, 2013

    work page 2013

  7. [6]

    Ca˜ nizo, and Jos´ e A

    Fran¸ cois Bolley, Jos´ e A. Ca˜ nizo, and Jos´ e A. Carrillo. Stochastic mean-field limit: non-Lipschitz forces and swarming.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences , 21(11):2179–2210, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [7]

    Mean-field description and propagation of chaos in networks of Hodgkin-Huxley and FitzHugh-Nagumo neurons

    Mireille Bossy, Olivier Faugeras, and Denis Talay. Clarification and complement to “Mean-field description and propagation of chaos in networks of Hodgkin-Huxley and FitzHugh-Nagumo neurons”. Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience , 5:Art. 19, 23, 2015

    work page 2015

Show all 45 references
  1. [8]

    A stochastic particle method for the McKean–Vlasov and the Burgers equation

    Mireille Bossy and Denis Talay. A stochastic particle method for the McKean–Vlasov and the Burgers equation. Mathematics of computation, 66(217):157–192, 1997

    1997

  2. [9]

    Springer, Cham, 2018

    Ren´ e Carmona and Fran¸ cois Delarue.Probabilistic theory of mean field games with applications I , volume 83 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling . Springer, Cham, 2018. Mean field FBSDEs, control, and games

    2018

  3. [10]

    Springer, Cham, 2018

    Ren´ e Carmona and Fran¸ cois Delarue.Probabilistic theory of mean field games with applications II , volume 84 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling . Springer, Cham, 2018. Mean field games with common noise and master equations

    2018

  4. [11]

    A flexible split-step scheme for solving McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equations

    Xingyuan Chen and Gon¸ calo Dos Reis. A flexible split-step scheme for solving McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equations. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 427:127180, 2022

    2022

  5. [12]

    Euler simulation of interacting particle systems and McKean–Vlasov SDEs with fully super-linear growth drifts in space and interaction

    Xingyuan Chen and Goncalo Dos Reis. Euler simulation of interacting particle systems and McKean–Vlasov SDEs with fully super-linear growth drifts in space and interaction. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , 44(2):751–796, 2024

    2024

  6. [13]

    Wellposedness, exponential ergodicity and numerical approximation of fully super-linear McKean–Vlasov SDEs and associated particle systems

    Xingyuan Chen, Goncalo dos Reis, and Wolfgang Stockinger. Wellposedness, exponential ergodicity and numerical approximation of fully super-linear McKean–Vlasov SDEs and associated particle systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.05133 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Approximate McKean–Vlasov representations for a class of SPDEs

    Dan Crisan and Jie Xiong. Approximate McKean–Vlasov representations for a class of SPDEs. Stochastics An International Journal of Probability and Stochastics Processes , 82(1):53–68, 2010

    2010

  8. [15]

    Critical dynamics and fluctuations for a mean-field model of cooperative behavior

    Donald A Dawson. Critical dynamics and fluctuations for a mean-field model of cooperative behavior. Journal of Statistical Physics , 31(1):29–85, 1983

    1983

  9. [16]

    Freidlin–Wentzell LDP in path space for McKean–Vlasov equations and the functional iterated logarithm law

    Gon¸ calo dos Reis, William Salkeld, and Julian Tugaut. Freidlin–Wentzell LDP in path space for McKean–Vlasov equations and the functional iterated logarithm law. Annals of Applied Probability , 29(3):1487–1540, 2019

    2019

  10. [17]

    Simulation of McKean-Vlasov SDEs with super-linear growth.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , 42(1):874–922, 2022

    Gon¸ calo dos Reis, Stefan Engelhardt, and Greig Smith. Simulation of McKean-Vlasov SDEs with super-linear growth.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , 42(1):874–922, 2022

    2022

  11. [18]

    Phase transition in a rechargeable lithium battery

    Wolfgang Dreyer, Miran Gaberˇ sˇ cek, Clemens Guhlke, Robert Huth, and Janko Jamnik. Phase transition in a rechargeable lithium battery. European Journal of Applied Mathematics , 22(3):267–290, 2011

    2011

  12. [19]

    Adaptive Euler–Maruyama method for SDEs with nonglobally Lipschitz drift

    Wei Fang and Michael B Giles. Adaptive Euler–Maruyama method for SDEs with nonglobally Lipschitz drift. The Annals of Applied Probability, 30(2):526–560, 2020

    2020

  13. [20]

    Convergence rate in Lp sense of tamed EM scheme for highly nonlinear neutral multiple-delay stochastic McKean–Vlasov equations

    Shuaibin Gao, Qian Guo, Junhao Hu, and Chenggui Yuan. Convergence rate in Lp sense of tamed EM scheme for highly nonlinear neutral multiple-delay stochastic McKean–Vlasov equations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , 441:115682, 2024

    2024

  14. [21]

    Friz, and Wolfgang Dreyer

    Clemens Guhlke, Paul Gajewski, Mario Maurelli, Peter K. Friz, and Wolfgang Dreyer. Stochastic many-particle model for LFP electrodes. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics , 30(3):593–628, 2018

    2018

  15. [22]

    Convergence analysis of an explicit method and its random batch approximation for the McKean– Vlasov equations with non-globally Lipschitz conditions

    Qian Guo, Jie He, and Lei Li. Convergence analysis of an explicit method and its random batch approximation for the McKean– Vlasov equations with non-globally Lipschitz conditions. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis , 58(2):639–671, 2024

    2024

  16. [23]

    Higham, Xuerong Mao, and Chenggui Yuan

    Desmond J. Higham, Xuerong Mao, and Chenggui Yuan. Almost sure and moment exponential stability in the numerical simulation of stochastic differential equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , 45(2):592–609, 2007

    2007

  17. [24]

    Martin Hutzenthaler, Arnulf Jentzen, and Peter E. Kloeden. Strong and weak divergence in finite time of Euler’s method for stochastic differential equations with non-globally Lipschitz continuous coefficients. Proceedings of The Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical,...

    2011

  18. [25]

    A strongly monotonic polygonal Euler scheme

    Tim Johnston and Sotirios Sabanis. A strongly monotonic polygonal Euler scheme. Journal of Complexity , 80:101801, 2024

    2024

  19. [26]

    On explicit Milstein-type scheme for McKean–Vlasov stochastic differential equations with super-linear drift coefficient

    Chaman Kumar and Neelima. On explicit Milstein-type scheme for McKean–Vlasov stochastic differential equations with super-linear drift coefficient. Electronic Journal of Probability , 26:1–32, 2021

    2021

  20. [27]

    Well-posedness and tamed schemes for McKean-Vlasov equations with common noise

    Chaman Kumar, Neelima, Christoph Reisinger, and Wolfgang Stockinger. Well-posedness and tamed schemes for McKean-Vlasov equations with common noise. The Annals of Applied Probability , 32(5):3283–3330, 2022

    2022

  21. [28]

    On explicit approximations for L´ evy driven SDEs with super-linear diffusion coefficients

    Chaman Kumar and Sotirios Sabanis. On explicit approximations for L´ evy driven SDEs with super-linear diffusion coefficients. Electronic Journal of Probability , 2017. 19

    2017

  22. [29]

    Strong convergence of Euler–Maruyama schemes for McKean– Vlasov stochastic differential equations under local Lipschitz conditions of state variables

    Yun Li, Xuerong Mao, Qingshuo Song, Fuke Wu, and George Yin. Strong convergence of Euler–Maruyama schemes for McKean– Vlasov stochastic differential equations under local Lipschitz conditions of state variables. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , 43(2):1001–1035, 2023

    2023

  23. [30]

    Convergence and qualitative properties of modified explicit schemes for BSDEs with polynomial growth

    Arnaud Lionnet, Goncalo dos Reis, and Lukasz Szpruch. Convergence and qualitative properties of modified explicit schemes for BSDEs with polynomial growth. The Annals of Applied Probability , 28(4):2544–2591, 2018

    2018

  24. [31]

    Cours au college de france

    Pierre-Louis Lions. Cours au college de france. Available at www. college-de-france. fr , 2007

    2007

  25. [32]

    Huagui Liu, Banban Shi, and Fuke Wu. Tamed Euler–Maruyama approximation of McKean–Vlasov stochastic differential equations with super-linear drift and H¨ older diffusion coefficients.Applied Numerical Mathematics , 183:56–85, 2023

    2023

  26. [33]

    The tamed Euler–Maruyama approximation of McKean–Vlasov stochastic differential equations and asymptotic error analysis

    Huagui Liu, Fuke Wu, and Minyu Wu. The tamed Euler–Maruyama approximation of McKean–Vlasov stochastic differential equations and asymptotic error analysis. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series S , 16(5), 2023

    2023

  27. [34]

    Ergodicity for SDEs and approximations: locally Lipschitz vector fields and degenerate noise

    Jonathan C Mattingly, Andrew M Stuart, and Desmond J Higham. Ergodicity for SDEs and approximations: locally Lipschitz vector fields and degenerate noise. Stochastic processes and their applications , 101(2):185–232, 2002

    2002

  28. [35]

    A class of Markov processes associated with nonlinear parabolic equations

    Henry P McKean. A class of Markov processes associated with nonlinear parabolic equations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 56(6):1907–1911, 1966

    1907

  29. [36]

    Propagation of chaos for a class of non-linear parabolic equations

    Henry P McKean. Propagation of chaos for a class of non-linear parabolic equations. Stochastic Differential Equations (Lecture Series in Differential Equations, Session 7, Catholic Univ., 1967) , pages 41–57, 1967

    1967

  30. [37]

    Numerical integration of stochastic differential equations with nonglobally Lipschitz coefficients

    Grigori N Milstein and Michael V Tretyakov. Numerical integration of stochastic differential equations with nonglobally Lipschitz coefficients. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , 43(3):1139–1154, 2005

    2005

  31. [38]

    Existence and uniqueness theorems for solutions of McKean–Vlasov stochastic equations

    Yuliya Mishura and Alexander Veretennikov. Existence and uniqueness theorems for solutions of McKean–Vlasov stochastic equations. Theory of Probability and Mathematical Statistics , 103:59–101, 2020

    2020

  32. [39]

    Well-posedness and tamed Euler schemes for McKean–Vlasov equations driven by L´ evy noise.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08585 , 2020

    Sani Biswas Neelima, Chaman Kumar, Gon¸ calo dos Reis, and Christoph Reisinger. Well-posedness and tamed Euler schemes for McKean–Vlasov equations driven by L´ evy noise.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08585 , 2020

    2010 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for modified tamed unadjusted Langevin algorithm in non-convex setting

    Ariel Neufeld, Matthew (Cheng En) Ng, and Ying Zhang. Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for modified tamed unadjusted Langevin algorithm in non-convex setting. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 543(1):128892, 2025

    2025

  34. [41]

    Christoph Reisinger and Wolfgang Stockinger. An adaptive Euler–Maruyama scheme for McKean–Vlasov SDEs with super-linear growth and application to the mean-field FitzHugh–Nagumo model.Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 400:113725, 2022

    2022

  35. [42]

    Topics in propagation of chaos

    Alain-Sol Sznitman. Topics in propagation of chaos. Ecole d’´ et´ e de probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour XIX—1989, 1464:165–251, 1991

    1989

  36. [43]

    Convergence to the equilibria for self-stabilizing processes in double-well landscape

    Julian Tugaut. Convergence to the equilibria for self-stabilizing processes in double-well landscape. Annals of probability: An official journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics , 41(3):1427–1460, 2013

    2013

  37. [44]

    Stabilization of stochastic McKean–Vlasov equations with feedback control based on discrete-time state observation

    Hao Wu, Junhao Hu, Shuaibin Gao, and Chenggui Yuan. Stabilization of stochastic McKean–Vlasov equations with feedback control based on discrete-time state observation. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization , 60(5):2884–2901, 2022

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.