Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Ionization Energy of Rb$_2$ by electric field-ionization of molecular Rydberg states

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes the field-free ionization energy of $^{85}$Rb$_2$ as $31497.3 \pm 0.6$ cm$^{-1}$ and derives the Rb$_2^+$ dissociation energy of $6158.2 \pm 0.6$ cm$^{-1}$.

desk verdict A likely right new Rb2 ionization energy, but the absolute calibration of the PFI extrapolation needs scrutiny before it replaces the Bellos benchmark. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08634 v1 pith:MXUK3FFS submitted 2025-07-11 physics.atom-ph

Manuel Alejandro Lefrán Torres , David Rodríguez Fernández , Jaime Javier Borges Márquez , Marcos Roberto Cardoso , Luis Gustavo Marcassa , Amrendra Pandey , Romain Vexiau , Olivier Dulieu
show 1 more author
Nadia Bouloufa-Maafa
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords ionizationenergyrubidiumdimerpulsed-fieldRydbergstatesRE2PIdissociationquantumdefectsupersonicbeam
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a measurement of the ionization energy of the $^{85}$Rb$_2$ molecule using resonantly enhanced two-photon ionization with pulsed-field ionization detection. By modeling the onset of the ion signal as a function of applied electric field strength, the authors extract $E_i = 31497.3 \pm 0.6$ cm$^{-1}$, which is $149.3$ cm$^{-1}$ larger than the previously reported upper bound [12]. The same value yields a dissociation energy $D_0(X^2\Sigma_g^+) = 6158.2 \pm 0.6$ cm$^{-1}$ for the Rb$_2^+$ ground state, in line with current quantum chemistry calculations. A simple quantum-defect model assigns the unevenly spaced peaks in the spectrum to molecular Rydberg series converging to the lowest vibrational levels of Rb$_2^+$. If correct, the result converts a long-uncertain constant for the rubidium dimer into one of the best-determined among alkali dimers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is pulsed-field ionization: a positive high-voltage pulse applied $1.13\,\mu$s after the laser pulse lowers the ionization threshold of molecular Rydberg states by an amount proportional to $\sqrt{F}$. The analysis chain is to subtract the Gaussian fits to the Rydberg peaks P1-P3, fit the remaining spectrum with the logistic function of Eq. (2), extract the half-rise $\tilde{\nu}_0(F)$, and extrapolate $\tilde{\nu}_0$ versus $\sqrt{F}$ linearly to $F = 0$. A second piece is the Rydberg-series model of Eq. (1), a reduced-mass-corrected Rydberg formula with optimized quantum defects $\delta_v$ (from 1.17 to 0.07 for $v = 1$ to 5), which assigns the observed unevenly spaced lines to series $R_v(n)$ converging to the lowest vibrational levels of the Rb$_2^+$ ground state.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be an independent measurement of $E_i$ by PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectroscopy or rotationally resolved two-photon ionization; a value outside $31497.3 \pm 0.6$ cm$^{-1}$ would show the half-rise extrapolation is biased. A cheaper internal test is to repeat the same analysis with the half-rise defined at 10% and 90% of the logistic step and with different Gaussian subtraction widths: if the $\sqrt{F}$ extrapolations shift by more than about 1 cm$^{-1}$, the quoted uncertainty understates the model error.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the field-free ionization threshold of $^{85}$Rb$_2$ lies at $E_i = 31497.3 \pm 0.6$ cm$^{-1}$, obtained by extrapolating the half-rise wavenumber $\tilde{\nu}_0$ of the residual ion signal linearly in $\sqrt{F}$ to $F = 0$. For each electric field strength between 18 and 180 V/cm, the paper subtracts three Gaussian peaks assigned to Rydberg levels and fits the remaining step with a logistic function; the regression of $\tilde{\nu}_0$ against $\sqrt{F}$ gives the second-photon threshold $16744.3 \pm 0.5$ cm$^{-1}$, which added to the first photon at $14753.0$ cm$^{-1}$ yields $E_i$. Using the known $^{85}$Rb ionization limit and the measured $D_0(X^1\Sigma_g^+)$, the paper derives $D_0(X^2\Sigma_g^+) = 6158.2 \pm 0.6$ cm$^{-1}$ for Rb$_2^+$ and argues that the 2013 upper bound [12] was too low because stray electric fields of at least 300 V/cm ionized Rydberg molecules in that experiment, shifting its apparent onset.

Load-bearing premise

The half-rise of the residual ion signal, after subtracting the three Gaussian peaks, is assumed to track the field-lowered ionization threshold with a shift proportional to $\sqrt{F}$, so that linear extrapolation to $F = 0$ recovers the field-free threshold; if unresolved Rydberg structure, imperfect peak subtraction, or the pulsed-field time profile biases the half-rise, the quoted $\pm 0.6$ cm$^{-1}$ uncertainty would be too small.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Rb$_2$ ionization energy becomes known to 0.6 cm$^{-1}$, bringing the rubidium dimer in line with other alkali dimers and anchoring the Rb$_2^+$ potential curve experimentally.
  • The derived $D_0(X^2\Sigma_g^+) = 6158.2 \pm 0.6$ cm$^{-1}$ gives a direct benchmark for potential curves used in modeling cold Rb$^+$ + Rb three-body recombination and molecular-ion formation.
  • The 2013 upper bound [12] is reinterpreted as a field-affected onset lying 149.3 cm$^{-1}$ below the true threshold, which changes how that photoassociation spectrum should be used.
  • The assigned Rydberg series with strongly $v$-dependent quantum defects point to a perturbing doubly-excited autoionizing state, giving a target for higher-resolution Rydberg spectroscopy.
  • The same PFI-RE2PI approach can be applied to other alkali dimers, opening a route to complete and precise the set of dimer ionization energies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A rotationally resolved or ZEKE measurement would test whether the half-rise analysis is biased by unresolved Rydberg structure; the quoted 0.6 cm$^{-1}$ assumes the three-Gaussian subtraction removes all structure near the step.
  • Because the extrapolation slope depends on the pulsed-field slew rate, repeating the measurement with rise times other than 20 ns would give a direct handle on the systematic error not captured by the quoted uncertainty.
  • The fitted quantum defects vary from 1.17 to 0.07 across $v=1$ to 5, which is unusually strong for levels near the potential minimum; a multichannel quantum-defect treatment including the doubly-excited state might reassign some of the weaker lines.
  • If the new $E_i$ holds, the earlier photoassociation-based bound should be interpreted as a field-affected onset, which may require revisiting other molecular constants derived from that spectrum.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports a measurement of the ionization energy of 85Rb2 using resonantly enhanced two-photon ionization (RE2PI) in a supersonic beam. Molecules are first excited via the X^1Σg+ (v=0) → B^1Πu (v=2) transition at 14753 cm−1, and a second photon is scanned over 16720–16755 cm−1 while Rb2+ ions are detected after pulsed-field ionization. For six electric field strengths between 18 and 180 V/cm, the onset of the direct photoionization step is modeled by subtracting three Gaussian peaks (P1, P2, P3) and fitting the residual signal with a logistic function; the half-rise wavenumbers ν0(F) are then linearly extrapolated versus √F to F = 0, yielding Ei = 31497.3 ± 0.6 cm−1 and, via Eq. (3), D0(X^2Σg+) = 6158.2 ± 0.6 cm−1. The paper also assigns the prominent peaks and additional structure to molecular Rydberg series converging to vibrational levels of Rb2+, and compares the result with previous experiments and quantum-chemistry calculations, concluding that the 2013 Bellos et al. value is an upper bound 149.3 cm−1 below the present result.

Significance. If the measurement is correct, it provides a long-missing accurate ionization energy for Rb2 and a benchmark for theory, reducing the uncertainty from the previous ~400 cm−1 level to 0.6 cm−1 and improving on the 0.6 cm−1 upper bound of Bellos et al. The experiment is clearly described and the raw normalized spectra at six field strengths are displayed. The paper is honest in acknowledging that the fitted √F slope (0.767) differs strongly from the hydrogenic value used in the Mg+ calibration and that the slope depends on the pulsed-field slew rate; this is a significant limitation. The accompanying quantum-chemistry calculations are useful, but the claimed agreement with the measured D0 is not quantitative and needs to be restated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section V, Eq. (2)] The central result depends on the assumption that the logistic half-rise of the residual PFI signal tracks the static field-lowered ionization threshold, with a shift linear in √F. This assumption is not calibrated for Rb2. The fitted slope is 0.767 cm−1/(V/cm)^{1/2}, roughly eight times smaller than the hydrogenic value 6.12 used for Mg+ in Ref. [30], and the paper itself notes that the slope depends on the time derivative of the pulsed field [25]. With the lowest field at 18 V/cm, the implied shift is only about 3.3 cm−1, so an unmodeled offset or nonlinearity of a few cm−1 could change the F = 0 intercept by an amount comparable to the claimed 149.3 cm−1 discrepancy with Bellos et al. Please provide a calibration of the onset-extrapolation method for Rb2, or a quantitative uncertainty budget that includes the effect of the finite slew rate and the non-hydrogenic slope.
  2. [Section V and Fig. 4] The quoted uncertainty ν0(0) = 16744.3 ± 0.5 cm−1 does not include systematic contributions from the manual choice of Imin and Imax in Eq. (2), the Gaussian subtraction of P1–P3, the measured field inhomogeneity (≈11% axial and ≈3% radial, Section III), or the choice of the √F functional form. The horizontal error bars are described as ±5σ with σ = 0.09 cm−1 derived only from the laser linewidths; this is not a measure of the onset-fitting error. An estimate of these systematic effects is needed before the ±0.6 cm−1 total uncertainty on Ei and D0 can be accepted.
  3. [Table I and Section VI] The statement that the measured D0(X+) = 6158.2 ± 0.6 cm−1 "agrees with our theoretical determination" is overstated. Table I lists two present calculations: t12 gives D0 = 6200.63 cm−1 and t11 gives D0 = 6098.74 cm−1, which differ from the measurement by +42.4 cm−1 and −59.5 cm−1, respectively, i.e., roughly 70–100 times the quoted experimental uncertainty. The paper should either soften this claim to an approximate agreement at the 1% level or discuss the systematic errors in the quantum-chemistry calculations that would account for these differences.
  4. [Section IV and Fig. 2(b)] The assignment of P1–P3 to Rydberg levels such as R2(35), R1(49), and R1(50) relies on fitted quantum defects δ1–δ5 that vary strongly with v (1.17, 0.69, 0.58, 0.28, 0.07) and on an invoked but unobserved doubly-excited autoionizing perturber. Because these peaks are subtracted before the onset analysis in Section V, a misassignment or an incorrect Gaussian model for them could bias the half-rise ν0(F). The paper should demonstrate that the extracted ν0(0) is robust to reasonable variations in the peak-subtraction procedure.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The finite-mass Rydberg correction has the wrong sign: the reduced-mass Rydberg constant should be R_M = R∞/(1 + me/md), not R∞(1 + me/md). Although the effect is small at the quoted level, the formula as written would increase the Rydberg energy rather than decrease it.
  2. [Sections III and V] The red laser wavenumber is given as 14753 cm−1 in Section III but later as 14753.0 ± 0.03 cm−1 in Section V; please clarify how the 0.03 cm−1 uncertainty is obtained given the stated wavemeter accuracy of 0.1 cm−1.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] The vertical error bars are said to "mirror the relative uncertainty of F estimated at ±10%"; please specify whether ±10% is a 1σ value or a conservative bound, and how it is propagated to the error bar on ν0.
  4. [Ref. [23]] The supplemental material reference still contains the placeholder "[url]"; a working link or a more complete description should be provided.
  5. [Abstract] The phrase "We modeled the onset of the ionization signal" would be more precise as "We analyzed the onset" or "We modeled and measured the onset", since the onset position is extracted from the data rather than solely modeled.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Ei is derived from an external-field extrapolation of measured onset positions, not from the authors' fitted inputs or prior potentials.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The field-free ionization energy is obtained from a logistic fit of the residual PFI spectra after subtracting Gaussian peaks P1-P3, yielding half-rise positions ν0(F), followed by a linear regression against √F extrapolated to F=0 (Section V, Eq. (2)). Nothing in this procedure is defined in terms of the target Ei, and the √F scaling is cited to an external textbook [24], not to the authors' own work. Ei is then formed by adding the independently measured red-laser wavenumber, and D0(X+) follows from measured Ei plus two external constants via Eq. (3). The authors' own potential energy curves and fitted Rydberg quantum defects are used only for assigning the P1-P3 peaks and for a theoretical comparison; the R0-series threshold in the model is fixed at the Section-V value, not used to produce it. The self-citations [15]-[18] supply PECs for the model and theory comparison, but are not load-bearing for the ionization-energy determination. The skeptical concern about the uncalibrated √F slope and possible bias in the half-rise tracking is a modeling/calibration issue affecting accuracy, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central Ei rests on the field-extrapolation model and on external measured constants E+(Rb) and D0(X); the Rydberg assignment adds fitted quantum defects. The theory comparison is peripheral and, as tabulated, does not actually agree with the measured D0 within the quoted uncertainty. One speculative perturbing state is proposed but not used in the Ei extraction.

free parameters (4)
  • Logistic half-rise wavenumber ν0(F) at each field = Six values, not all quoted; zero-field intercept 16744.3 ±0.5 cm-1
    The central observable; each value is the half-rise of a logistic fit to the residual spectrum at F = 18, 36, 72, 108, 144, 180 V/cm.
  • Quantum defects δ1 to δ5 = 1.17, 0.69, 0.58, 0.28, 0.07
    Optimized to reproduce Rydberg line positions in Figs. 2 and 3; used only for spectral assignment, not for Ei.
  • Gaussian parameters of peaks P1, P2, P3 = Peak positions 16744.8, 16743.5, 16742.4 cm-1; widths and areas per field not listed
    Fitted and subtracted before the logistic fit; imperfect subtraction can bias ν0(F) and is not propagated into the final uncertainty.
  • Logistic shape parameters Imin, Imax, β = Imin/Imax pairs listed for each F; β not quoted
    Shape parameters of Eq. (2); Imin and Imax are manually assigned, adding unquantified systematic freedom to the onset position.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The field-ionization threshold is lowered proportional to sqrt(F), so onset positions extrapolate linearly to the field-free threshold.
    Section V uses this to regress ν0(F) versus sqrt(F); Ref. [25] notes sensitivity to the pulsed-field time derivative, and the paper's slope (0.767) differs from the Mg+ case (6.12).
  • ad hoc to paper After removing P1 to P3 with Gaussian fits, the remaining ion signal follows a logistic sigmoid whose half-rise is the ionization onset.
    Eq. (2); no derivation from ionization cross sections or Rydberg-state densities, and Imin/Imax are chosen manually.
  • domain assumption The two-photon transition reaches the v=0 level of X2Σg+ without unresolved rotational or hyperfine structure biasing the threshold position.
    Section III notes that rotational structure is not resolved; the observed step is a convolution over populated J states, yet ν0 is treated as a single threshold.
  • standard math Rydberg energy levels follow Eq. (1) with a constant quantum defect per series.
    Section IV; the fitted δv vary strongly with v, so the constant-defect assumption is strained and requires a perturbing autoionizing state.
invented entities (1)
  • Perturbing doubly-excited autoionizing state of Rb2
    purpose: Explains the strong v-dependence of fitted quantum defects δv
    Proposed in Section IV by analogy with Na2 [29]; no spectrum or calculation in this paper isolates such a state, and it is not used in the Ei extraction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ionization Energy of Rb$_2$ by electric field-ionization of molecular Rydberg states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MXUK3FFS

@misc{pith2026250708634,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ionization Energy of Rb$_2$ by electric field-ionization of molecular Rydberg states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MXUK3FFS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08634}
}
abstract

We report the measurement of the ionization energy of the $^{85}\text{Rb}_2$ molecule through resonantly enhanced 2-photon ionization in a supersonic beam. The first photon excites the $X^1\Sigma_g^+ (v_X = 0)\rightarrow B^1\Pi_u (v_B = 2)$ transition, while the second photon wavenumber is scanned over the 16720 cm$^{-1}$-16750 cm$^{-1}$ range, thus yielding a structured spectrum of Rb$_2^+$ ions extracted by an electric field and recorded by mass spectrometry. We modeled the onset of the ionization signal as a function of the electric field strength between $18 V/cm$ and $180 V/cm$, leading to the Rb$_2$ ionization energy $E_i = 31497.3 \pm 0.6 $cm$^{-1}$, and to the dissociation energy of the Rb$_2^+$ ground state $D_0 = 6158.2 \pm 0.6$ cm$^{-1}$. Our measured value $E_i$ is found to be $149.3$ cm$^{-1}$ larger than the one reported in the experiment by Bellos et al. [Phys. Rev. A 87, 012508 (2013)]. Our value of $D_0$ agrees with our theoretical determination using a quantum chemistry approach. Using a simple theoretical model, we assign unevenly spaced structures of the ionization spectrum to molecular Rydberg levels belonging to several series that converge to the lowest vibrational levels of Rb$_2^+$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.08634 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) Rb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) (a) Normalized Rb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. The normalized Rb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Experimentally measured ionization energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [30]

    Genevriez, D

    M. Genevriez, D. Wehrli, J. Agner, and F. Merkt, Pfi- zeke photoelectron spectroscopy of positively charged ions: illustration with Mg +, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 435, 209 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [25]

    See supplemental material at [url] for details of the ex- perimental setup and potential data. (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [1]

    Ultracold Interactions between Ions and Polar Molecules

    L. Karpa and O. Dulieu, Ultracold interactions be- tween ions and polar molecules (2025), arXiv:2409.16833 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  4. [2]

    H¨ arter, A

    A. H¨ arter, A. Kr¨ ukow, A. Brunner, W. Schnitzler, S. Schmid, and J. H. Denschlag, Single ion as a three- body reaction center in an ultracold atomic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 123201 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [3]

    Schmid, A

    S. Schmid, A. H¨ arter, and J. H. Denschlag, Dynamics of a cold trapped ion in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 133202 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [4]

    Schmid, A

    S. Schmid, A. H¨ arter, A. Frisch, S. Hoinka, and J. H. Denschlag, An apparatus for immersing trapped ions into an ultracold gas of neutral atoms, Review of Scientific Instruments 83, 053108 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [5]

    Dieterle, M

    T. Dieterle, M. Berngruber, C. H¨ olzl, R. L¨ ow, K. Jachymski, T. Pfau, and F. Meinert, Inelastic collision dynamics of a single cold ion immersed in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 102, 041301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [6]

    Dieterle, M

    T. Dieterle, M. Berngruber, C. H¨ olzl, R. L¨ ow, K. Jachymski, T. Pfau, and F. Meinert, Transport of a single cold ion immersed in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 033401 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 49 references
  1. [7]

    Pandey, R

    A. Pandey, R. Vexiau, L. G. Marcassa, O. Dulieu, and N. Bouloufa-Maafa, Ultracold charged atom-dimer col- lisions: State-selective charge exchange and three-body recombination, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043010 (2024)

    2024

  2. [8]

    Schnabel, L

    J. Schnabel, L. Cheng, and A. K¨ ohn, High-accuracy Rb+ 2 interaction potentials based on coupled-cluster calcula- tions, Physical Review A 106, 032804 (2022)

    2022

  3. [9]

    Pandey, R

    A. Pandey, R. Vexiau, L. G. Marcassa, O. Dulieu, and N. Bouloufa-Maafa, Ultracold charged atom-dimer colli- sions: State-selective charge exchange and three-body re- combination, Physical Review Research6, 043010 (2024)

    2024

  4. [10]

    da Silva Jr., A

    H. da Silva Jr., A. Pandey, R. Vexiau, N. Bouloufa- Maafa, O. Dulieu, M. B. Kosicki, and P. S. Zuchowski, (unpublished)

  5. [11]

    W. C. Stwalley and J. T. Bahns, Atomic, molecular, and photonic processes in laser-induced plasmas in al- kali metal vapors, Laser and Particle Beams 11, 185–204 (1993)

    1993

  6. [12]

    Bellos, R

    M. Bellos, R. Carollo, J. Banerjee, M. Ascoli, A.-R. Allouche, E. Eyler, P. Gould, and W. Stwalley, Upper bound to the ionization energy of 85Rb2, Phys. Rev. A 87, 012508 (2013)

    2013

  7. [13]

    47.47(13) 0.01952(4) t12 [15] 2065.14 47.01 0.019 2041.64 X 2Σ+ g t12 6223.81 46.37 0.017 6200.63 t11 6121.45 45.42 0.017 6098.74 e5 - - 6158.2 ±0.6 TABLE I. Well depth De, vibrational constant ωe, rotational constant Be, and dissociation energy of the lowest vibrational level...

  8. [14]

    Strauss, T

    C. Strauss, T. Takekoshi, F. Lang, K. Winkler, R. Grimm, J. Hecker Denschlag, and E. Tiemann, Hyper- fine, rotational, and vibrational structure of the a 3Σ+ u state of 87Rb2, Phys. Rev. A 82, 052514 (2010)

    2010

  9. [15]

    Amiot, Laser-induced fluorescence of Rb 2: The (1)1Σ+ g (X), (2) 1Σ+ g , (1) 1Πu(B), (1) 1Πg, and (2) 1Πu(C) electronic states, The Journal of chemical physics 93, 8591 (1990)

    C. Amiot, Laser-induced fluorescence of Rb 2: The (1)1Σ+ g (X), (2) 1Σ+ g , (1) 1Πu(B), (1) 1Πg, and (2) 1Πu(C) electronic states, The Journal of chemical physics 93, 8591 (1990)

    1990

  10. [16]

    Aymar, S

    M. Aymar, S. Azizi, and O. Dulieu, Model-potential cal- culations for ground and excited σ states of Rb + 2 , Cs + 2 and RbCs+ ions, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecu- lar and Optical Physics 36, 4799 (2003)

    2003

  11. [17]

    R. Beuc, M. Movre, V. Horvatic, C. Vadla, O. Dulieu, and M. Aymar, Absorption spectroscopy of the rubid- ium dimer in an overheated vapor: An accurate check of molecular structure and dynamics, Physical Review 7 A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 75, 032512 (2007)

    2007

  12. [18]

    Vexiau, D

    R. Vexiau, D. Borsalino, M. Lepers, A. Orb´ an, M. Ay- mar, O. Dulieu, and N. Bouloufa-Maafa, Dynamic dipole polarizabilities of heteronuclear alkali dimers: optical response, trapping and control of ultracold molecules, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry 36, 709 (2017)

    2017

  13. [19]

    Aymar and O

    M. Aymar and O. Dulieu, Calculation of accurate per- manent dipole moments of the lowest σ+ 1, 3 states of heteronuclear alkali dimers using extended basis sets, The Journal of chemical physics 122 (2005)

    2005

  14. [20]

    C. R. Menegatti, B. S. Marangoni, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, O. Dulieu, and L. G. Marcassa, Trap loss in a rubid- ium crossed dipole trap by short-range photoassociation, Phys. Rev. A 87, 053404 (2013)

    2013

  15. [21]

    Johansson, Spectra of the alkali metals in the lead- sulphide region, ARKIV FOR FYSIK 20, 135 (1961)

    I. Johansson, Spectra of the alkali metals in the lead- sulphide region, ARKIV FOR FYSIK 20, 135 (1961)

    1961

  16. [22]

    COMSOL AB, AC/DC Module User’s Guide , COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden, v. 6.2 ed. (2023)

    2023

  17. [23]

    Werner, P

    H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, F. R. Manby, J. A. Black, K. Doll, A. Heßelmann, D. Kats, A. K¨ ohn, T. Korona, D. A. Kreplin, et al. , The Molpro quantum chemistry package, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 144107 (2020)

    2020

  18. [24]

    T. F. Gallagher, Pulsed field ionization, in Rydberg Atoms, Cambridge Monographs on Atomic, Molecu- lar and Chemical Physics (Cambridge University Press,

  19. [26]

    G´ en´ evriez, M

    M. G´ en´ evriez, M. Holdener, C. Kreis, and F. Merkt, Characterization of the electronic ground state of Mg + 2 by PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectroscopy, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 385, 111591 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    Robicheaux, C

    F. Robicheaux, C. Wesdorp, and L. D. Noordam, Selec- tive field ionization in Li and Rb: Theory and experi- ment, Phys. Rev. A 62, 043404 (2000)

    2000

  21. [28]

    W. Li, I. Mourachko, M. Noel, and T. Gallagher, Millimeter-wave spectroscopy of cold Rb Rydberg atoms in a magneto-optical trap: Quantum defects of the ns, np, and nd series, Physical Review A 67, 052502 (2003)

    2003

  22. [29]

    M. G. C. Kreis, M. Holdener and F. Merkt, High- resolution photoelectron spectroscopy of the ground and first excited electronic states of MgKr +, Molecular Physics 121, e2152746 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Dulieu, A

    O. Dulieu, A. Giusti-Suzor, and F. Masnou-Seeuws, The- oretical treatment of the associative ionization reaction between two laser-excited sodium atoms. direct and indi- rect processes, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 24, 4391 (1991)

    1991

  24. [32]

    von Szentp´ aly, P

    L. von Szentp´ aly, P. Fuentealba, H. Preuss, and H. Stoll, Pseudopotential calculations on Rb+ 2 , Cs+ 2 , RbH+, CsH+ and the mixed alkali dimer ions, Chemical Physics Let- ters 93, 555 (1982)

    1982

  25. [33]

    Bellomonte, P

    L. Bellomonte, P. Cavaliere, and G. Ferrante, Alkali molecular ion energies and expectation values in a model- potential treatment, The Journal of Chemical Physics61, 3225 (1974)

    1974

  26. [34]

    Silberbach, P

    H. Silberbach, P. Schwerdtfeger, H. Stoll, and H. Preuss, Ground and excited states of Rb + 2 and Cs + 2 by means of quasi-relativistic pseudo-potentials including core po- larisation, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics 19, 501 (1986)

    1986

  27. [35]

    Jeung, J

    G. Jeung, J. Malrieu, and J. Daudey, Inclusion of core- valence correlation effects in pseudopotential calcula- tions. i. alkali atoms and diatoms, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics 77, 3571 (1982)

    1982

  28. [36]

    Patil and K

    S. Patil and K. Tang, Simple model potential and model wave functions for (H–alkali)+ and (alkali–alkali)+ ions, The Journal of Chemical Physics 113, 676 (2000)

    2000

  29. [37]

    Krauss and W

    M. Krauss and W. Stevens, Effective core potentials and accurate energy curves for Cs2 and other alkali diatomics, The Journal of chemical physics 93, 4236 (1990)

    1990

  30. [38]

    The value of the ionization energy of Rb 2 obtained in the present work completes the knowledge of this quan- tity for all alkali dimers [11]

    that an electric field strength at least 300 V/cm was present in [12] to explain the appearance of molecular ions that would have been induced by field ionization. The value of the ionization energy of Rb 2 obtained in the present work completes the knowledge of this quan- tit...

    2018

  31. [39]

    Jraij, A.-R

    A. Jraij, A.-R. Allouche, M. Korek, and M. Aubert- Fr´ econ, Theoretical electronic structure of the alkali- dimer cation Rb + 2 , Chemical physics 290, 129 (2003)

    2003

  32. [40]

    R. A. Carollo, Spectroscopy of Quasibound and Long- Range Rydberg States of Ultracold 85Rb2, Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    C. H. Greene, A. S. Dickinson, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Creation of polar and nonpolar ultra-long-range rydberg molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2458 (2000)

    2000

  34. [42]

    Farooqi, D

    S. Farooqi, D. Tong, S. Krishnan, J. Stanojevic, Y. P. Zhang, J. R. Ensher, A. S. Estrin, C. Boisseau, and R. Cˆ ot´ e, Long-range molecular resonances in a cold ryd- berg gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 183002 (2003)

    2003

  35. [43]

    Booth, S

    D. Booth, S. T. Rittenhouse, J. Yang, H. R. Sadegh- pour, and J. P. Shaffer, Production of trilobite ryd- berg molecule dimers with kilo-debye permanent electric dipole moments, Science 348, 99 (2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    Shaffer, Rittenhouse, S.T., and H

    J. Shaffer, Rittenhouse, S.T., and H. Sadeghpour, Ultra- cold rydberg molecules, Nat. Commun. 9, 1965 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    C. Fey, F. Hummel, and P. Schmelcher, Ultralong-range rydberg molecules, Molecular Physics 118, e1679401 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Londo˜ no, V

    M. Londo˜ no, V. C. Olaya-Agudelo, F. Herrera, and J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, Ultracold long-range van der waals ryd- berg trimers, Commun. Phys. 8, 232 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    Lee and B

    Y.-t. Lee and B. H. Mahan, Photosensitized ionization of alkali-metal vapors, The Journal of Chemical Physics 42, 2893 (1965)

    1965

  40. [48]

    Klucharev, A

    A. Klucharev, A. Lazarenko, and V. Vujnovic, The ion- isation rate coefficients of radiatively excited rubidium atoms Rb (n2P)+ Rb (52S), Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics 13, 1143 (1980)

    1980

  41. [49]

    Wagner and N

    G. Wagner and N. Isenor, Formation and dissociation of, and ions by ruby laser radiation, Canadian journal of physics 63, 976 (1985)

    1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.