pith. sign in

arxiv: 1403.7053 · v1 · pith:MYPQMNEBnew · submitted 2014-03-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.GA

Spatial differences between stars and brown dwarfs: a dynamical origin?

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA
keywords browndwarfsstarsspatialdistributionslambdamathcalregions
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We use $N$-body simulations to compare the evolution of spatial distributions of stars and brown dwarfs in young star-forming regions. We use three different diagnostics; the ratio of stars to brown dwarfs as a function of distance from the region's centre, $\mathcal{R}_{\rm SSR}$, the local surface density of stars compared to brown dwarfs, $\Sigma_{\rm LDR}$, and we compare the global spatial distributions using the $\Lambda_{\rm MSR}$ method. From a suite of twenty initially statistically identical simulations, 6/20 attain $\mathcal{R}_{\rm SSR} << 1$ $and$ $\Sigma_{\rm LDR} << 1$ $and$ $\Lambda_{\rm MSR} << 1$, indicating that dynamical interactions could be responsible for observed differences in the spatial distributions of stars and brown dwarfs in star-forming regions. However, many simulations also display apparently contradictory results - for example, in some cases the brown dwarfs have much lower local densities than stars ($\Sigma_{\rm LDR} << 1$), but their global spatial distributions are indistinguishable ($\Lambda_{\rm MSR} = 1$) and the relative proportion of stars and brown dwarfs remains constant across the region ($\mathcal{R}_{\rm SSR} = 1$). Our results suggest that extreme caution should be exercised when interpreting any observed difference in the spatial distribution of stars and brown dwarfs, and that a much larger observational sample of regions/clusters (with complete mass functions) is necessary to investigate whether or not brown dwarfs form through similar mechanisms to stars.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.