REVIEW 2 cited by
Conformal prediction for time series
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We develop a general framework for constructing distribution-free prediction intervals for time series. Theoretically, we establish explicit bounds on conditional and marginal coverage gaps of estimated prediction intervals, which asymptotically converge to zero under additional assumptions. We obtain similar bounds on the size of set differences between oracle and estimated prediction intervals. Methodologically, we introduce a computationally efficient algorithm called \texttt{EnbPI} that wraps around ensemble predictors, which is closely related to conformal prediction (CP) but does not require data exchangeability. \texttt{EnbPI} avoids data-splitting and is computationally efficient by avoiding retraining and thus scalable to sequentially producing prediction intervals. We perform extensive simulation and real-data analyses to demonstrate its effectiveness compared with existing methods. We also discuss the extension of \texttt{EnbPI} on various other applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Climate-Invariant Conformal Prediction Intervals for Multi-Horizon Solar and Wind Forecasting
A fixed heteroscedastic asymmetric Mondrian conformal layer on a bootstrap XGBoost ensemble holds near-nominal coverage and cuts Interval Score up to 35% for multi-horizon solar and wind across four climates with no p...
-
Weighted Conformal Prediction for Lab-to-Track Thermal Transfer in EV Motorsport Powertrains
Unweighted EnbPI coverage falls from 95% to 70.13% under real CALCE drive-cycle shift; weighted EnbPI recovers only to 72.42%, with F1 telemetry used only as unsupervised OOD flags.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.