Reply to the correspondence of Drummond and Brand [arXiv:1610.07633]
classification
❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords
arxivbrandcorrespondencedrummondcriticismcriticizehttpmisleading
read the original abstract
In their correspondence [arXiv:1610.07633] Drummond and Brand criticize our work [Nature Physics 12, 451-454 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys3631]. We show that their criticism is misleading and unfounded.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.