pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.07341 · v1 · pith:N2ORM74Gnew · submitted 2019-07-17 · 🧮 math.CO · cs.SI· physics.soc-ph

Tangles in the social sciences

Reinhard Diestel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 20:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.CO cs.SIphysics.soc-ph
keywords tanglessocial sciencesclusteringtypesgraph theoryaxiomatizationconnectivitybehaviour
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tangles identify groups of co-occurring qualities to discover types of behaviour and views in social science data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that tangles, unlike traditional clustering which groups objects sharing qualities, instead group qualities that frequently appear together. This reversal can identify and discover types such as patterns of behaviour, opinions, abilities or dispositions from quantitative data. It relies on a recent axiomatization that extends the core results of tangle theory beyond its graph-theoretic origins to general contexts. A sympathetic reader would care because the method offers a distinct lens for analyzing social data and revealing consistent patterns that object-based clustering might miss.

Core claim

Tangles identify groups of qualities that often occur together and can thereby identify and discover 'types' of behaviour, views, abilities, dispositions in the quantitative social sciences. The mathematical theory of tangles has its origins in the connectivity theory of graphs and has recently been axiomatized in a way that makes its two deepest results applicable to a much wider range of contexts including social science data.

What carries the argument

Tangles, structures that group qualities occurring together rather than objects sharing qualities.

If this is right

  • Tangles can be applied to much of the quantitative social sciences.
  • They provide a striking difference from traditional clustering in various example contexts.
  • The two deepest results from the axiomatized theory become usable in these new settings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analysts might test tangle methods on existing survey datasets to compare discovered types against those from standard clustering algorithms.
  • The approach could be extended to longitudinal data to track how types evolve over time.
  • Integration with statistical validation techniques might strengthen the reliability of identified types in applied settings.

Load-bearing premise

The recent axiomatization extends the deepest results of tangle theory directly to social science data contexts.

What would settle it

A quantitative social science dataset in which the tangle axioms cannot be satisfied or in which no consistent groups of co-occurring qualities are found despite the presence of clear, repeated patterns.

read the original abstract

Traditional clustering identifies groups of objects that share certain qualities. Tangles do the converse: they identify groups of qualities that often occur together. They can thereby identify and discover 'types': of behaviour, views, abilities, dispositions. The mathematical theory of tangles has its origins in the connectivity theory of graphs, which it has transformed over the past 30 years. It has recently been axiomatized in a way that makes its two deepest results applicable to a much wider range of contexts. This expository paper indicates some contexts where this difference of approach is particularly striking. But these are merely examples of such contexts: in principle, it can apply to much of the quantitative social sciences. Our aim here is twofold: to indicate just enough of the theory of tangles to show how this can work in the various different contexts, and to give plenty of different examples illustrating this.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an expository paper arguing that tangles—recently axiomatized beyond their graph-theoretic origins—identify groups of co-occurring qualities (rather than clustering objects) and can thereby discover 'types' of behavior, views, or dispositions in quantitative social science data. It supplies just enough of the theory to illustrate the approach and provides multiple examples of non-graph instantiations of the axioms across different contexts, positioning these as indicative rather than exhaustive.

Significance. If the recent axiomatization indeed renders the two deepest results portable as claimed, the work could open a distinct methodological lens for social scientists focused on co-occurrence patterns rather than object partitions. The provision of concrete illustrative examples of axiom instantiation in non-graph settings is a strength that grounds the portability claim without requiring new theorems.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract is somewhat long and could be tightened while retaining the dual aims stated in the final sentence.
  2. A short table or bullet list summarizing the example contexts (and which tangle properties each illustrates) would improve readability for the target social-science audience.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and their recommendation to accept. There are no major comments to address.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; expository paper with independent illustrative examples

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly expository and does not advance new derivations, fitted parameters, or theorems. Its central claim—that the recent axiomatization renders the two deepest tangle results portable to social-science data—rests on the provision of concrete instantiations of the axioms in non-graph settings, which the text itself supplies. No step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain whose load-bearing content is unverified within the paper. The work therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Expository paper with no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities introduced; relies on background graph theory results not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5670 in / 1020 out tokens · 16553 ms · 2026-05-24T20:35:27.189586+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. Diestel. Homology and duality of set separations. In preparat ion

    work page

  2. [2]

    R. Diestel. Tangles in the empirical sciences: indirect clustering by sepa- ration. In preparation

    work page

  3. [3]

    R. Diestel. Abstract separation systems. Order, 35:157–170, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    R. Diestel. Tree sets. Order, 35:171–192, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Diestel, J

    R. Diestel, J. Erde, R. Pendavingh, and G. Whittle. Order functio ns for tangles of set separations. In preparation

    work page

  6. [6]

    Diestel, J

    R. Diestel, J. Erde, and D. Weißauer. Tangles in abstract separa tion sys- tems. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A , to appear

    work page

  7. [7]

    Diestel, F

    R. Diestel, F. Hundertmark, and S. Lemanczyk. Profiles of sepa rations: in graphs, matroids, and beyond. Combinatorica, 39(1):37–75, 2019. with the ecological items, the set of inexpensive items does not witness a tangle of V that specifies precisely the price-conscious customers v as →v , even in the weak sense of providing the n elements needed for its tr...

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Diestel and S

    R. Diestel and S. Oum. Tangle-tree duality in graphs, matroids an d be- yond. arXiv:1701.02651. To appear in Combinatorica

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    Diestel and S

    R. Diestel and S. Oum. Tangle-tree duality in abstract separatio n systems. Submitted, arXiv:1701.02509, 2017

    work page arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Diestel and G

    R. Diestel and G. Whittle. Tangles and the Mona Lisa. arXiv:1603.0 6652

    work page

  11. [11]

    Elbracht, J

    C. Elbracht, J. Kneip, and M. Teegen. Tangle algorithms for abs tract separation systems. In preparation

    work page

  12. [12]

    Elbracht, J

    C. Elbracht, J. Kneip, and M. Teegen. Tangles are decided by we ighted vertex sets. arXiv:1811.06821

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Elbracht, J

    C. Elbracht, J. Kneip, and M. Teegen. Trees of tangles in abstr act sepa- ration systems. In preparation

    work page

  14. [14]

    Erde and E

    J. Erde and E. G¨ urpinar. Character traits and tangles. In pr eparation

    work page

  15. [15]

    Computing with tangles

    Martin Grohe and Pascal Schweitzer. Computing with tangles. I n Proceed- ings of the Forty-seventh Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of C omput- ing, STOC ’15, pages 683–692, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Tangles: a novel way to classify texts

    NN. Tangles: a novel way to classify texts. In preparation

    work page

  17. [17]

    Robertson and P.D

    N. Robertson and P.D. Seymour. Graph minors. X. Obstruction s to tree- decomposition. J. Combin. Theory (Series B) , 52:153–190, 1991

    work page 1991

  18. [18]

    Philosophical Investigations

    Ludwig Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations . Basil Blackwell, Ox- ford, 1953. Version 17 July, 2019 60

    work page 1953