Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Structured Illumination Scanning Thermography (SISTER)

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Static structured light plus sample motion equals temporal heat modulation, so continuous scanning recovers full coded thermograms without repeated excitation or stitching.

desk verdict Clean Galilean + semigroup equivalence that turns static spatial codes into lock-in-style temporal modulation, with working DSDR and real cast-specimen data; velocity calibration is the only real operational soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05565 v1 pith:N6FQE2HF submitted 2026-07-06 physics.app-ph

Pengfei Zhu , Julien Lecompagnon , Philipp Daniel Hirsch , Mathias Ziegler This is my paper
classification physics.app-ph
keywords structuredilluminationscanningthermographyphotothermalimagingdynamic-to-staticreconstructionGalileantransformationnon-destructivetestinglock-inheatdiffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Photothermal imaging is limited by heat diffusion and by the need for long, repeated temporal modulation when large areas must be inspected. This paper claims that a fixed spatial heating pattern becomes an equivalent temporal excitation once the sample moves at constant speed. Heat diffusion is a Markov semigroup; under the Galilean map that ties laboratory and material coordinates, every spatial Fourier mode of the pattern appears as a temporal harmonic whose frequency is velocity times wave-number. Mapping the recorded frames back into the material frame therefore recovers the same stationary coded response that lock-in or chirped methods would produce, without ever pulsing the source repeatedly and without stitching sub-images. Simulations and cast-metal experiments show continuous defect maps, higher contrast for coded patterns, and no boundary artifacts. The practical payoff is faster, large-area industrial non-destructive testing under a single theoretical umbrella that unifies scanning and conventional signal-modulated thermography.

What carries the argument

The Galilean-scanning operator that turns a fixed spatial pattern P(x) into the material-frame source P(X + v t), which commutes with the diffusion semigroup and yields the transfer function H(k, v) = 1/(α k^{2} + i k v). Dynamic-to-static data reconstruction then inverts the laboratory-to-material map to recover the stationary response.

What would settle it

Deliberately introduce a known few-percent velocity error between stage and reconstruction algorithm and check whether the late-time artificial peaks documented in the paper's Fig. 6 reappear; if they do not appear when velocity is perfect and do appear under mismatch, the claim of artifact-free continuous imaging stands or falls with velocity knowledge.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Sample motion under static structured illumination is mathematically equivalent to conventional temporal modulation of the heat source. The Galilean transformation converts each spatial Fourier component into a temporal harmonic ω = v k; the resulting transfer function is identical to that of lock-in thermography, so a simple coordinate remapping (dynamic-to-static reconstruction) recovers complete stationary coded thermograms from continuous scanning data.

Load-bearing premise

The velocity used for reconstruction must match the true, constant scanning speed exactly; any mismatch leaves residual motion that creates artificial temperature fluctuations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces structured illumination scanning thermography (SISTER), which replaces electronic temporal modulation of a heat source with continuous sample motion under a static spatially structured illumination pattern. Using the Markov semigroup property of the heat equation and a Galilean map x = X + vt, the authors show that a fixed spatial pattern P(x) becomes an equivalent temporal excitation S_v P, yielding the transfer function H(k,v) = 1/(αk^{2} + i k v) identical to conventional lock-in thermography at ω = v k. A dynamic-to-static data reconstruction (DSDR) algorithm maps laboratory-frame IR frames back to the material frame. Finite-element simulations and experiments on a cast-metal specimen with calibrated flat-bottom holes and a BAM logo pattern demonstrate continuous, stitch-free reconstruction, CNR trends with scanning velocity and Gaussian width, and improved defect visibility for chirp- and Legendre-coded spatial patterns relative to single-spot linear scanning, especially after PPT and PCA post-processing.

Significance. If the equivalence and reconstruction hold as claimed, SISTER supplies a practical route to large-area, continuous photothermal NDT without the long acquisition times of multi-cycle lock-in or the stitching artifacts of tiled pulsed thermography. The theoretical core is clean: the transfer-function identity follows directly from translation invariance of the Laplacian and the mild solution of the linear heat equation, without free parameters fitted to produce the claimed H(k,v). The experimental demonstration on an industrially relevant cast specimen with known FBH depths, together with systematic CNR tables versus velocity and σ, gives concrete support for industrial applicability. The framework also unifies several classical coding schemes (lock-in, chirp, Legendre, Barker) as stationary spatial patterns, which is a useful conceptual contribution for scanning thermography.

major comments (2)
  1. Section IV.B and Fig. 6 document that even small mismatches between true stage velocity and the velocity assumed in DSDR leave residual translation in the material frame and produce artificial temperature fluctuations that grow at late times. The abstract and conclusion claim that SISTER "effectively eliminat[es] stitching artifacts" and enables continuous large-area inspection; those claims are only as strong as the velocity knowledge. The paper should quantify the velocity-error tolerance (e.g., maximum fractional Δv/v for which residual motion remains below a stated temperature or CNR threshold) and state the calibration procedure used in the experiments, so that the operational limit of the method is clear.
  2. Abstract and Section IV claim that SISTER "significantly improves ... signal-to-noise ratio and detection capability." Tables II and III report CNR versus velocity and Gaussian width for SISTER alone; Fig. 7 shows qualitative PPT/PCA comparisons among linear, Legendre, and chirp patterns. A direct quantitative CNR (or equivalent) comparison of SISTER-coded reconstructions against conventional pulsed thermography (Fig. 3) and against single-spot LST+DSDR on the same defects and depths is missing. Without that baseline, the magnitude of the claimed SNR/detection improvement remains incompletely supported.
minor comments (5)
  1. Eq. (29) and the surrounding text cite CNR with a placeholder "[?]"; the reference should be completed (e.g., Usamentiaga et al. or the standard NDT definition already listed as [41]).
  2. Table I maps temporal parameters to spatial ones; the camera sampling-interval row is written as max(1/f_c, Δx/v), which is dimensionally an interval, but the corresponding spatial-resolution row uses max(Δx, v/f_c). A short clarifying sentence would avoid confusion between temporal sampling and spatial resolution.
  3. In the simulation heat-source definitions (Eqs. 20–23) the offsets are written as +5v, +8v, +10v; units of the numerical coefficients (mm or s) should be stated explicitly so that the equivalent modulation periods are unambiguous.
  4. Figure 1(d) caption lists Barker-coded excitation among the spatial patterns, but the experimental section only reports linear, chirp, and Legendre codes. Either add a brief Barker result or adjust the caption to match the data shown.
  5. Scattered typographical issues: "Hille–Yosida" is fine, but "path-parameterized" and a few hyphenation inconsistencies appear; also "tobs" vs. "t_obs" notation should be uniform.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SISTER equivalence is a direct Galilean coordinate change of the linear heat equation, not a fit or self-citation reduction.

full rationale

The load-bearing claim (Secs. II.A–C, Eqs. 1–17) starts from the standard heat equation, invokes the Markov semigroup mild solution, introduces the Galilean map x = X + vt that turns a static pattern P(x) into the temporal source S_v P, and uses translation invariance of the Laplacian to obtain the transfer function H(k,v) = 1/(\alpha k^{2} + i k v) identical to conventional lock-in. This is pure linear PDE algebra; no free parameters are fitted to data and then re-labeled as predictions, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors’ prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. Dynamic-to-static reconstruction is simply the inverse coordinate map. CNR tables and velocity/width studies are empirical characterizations of the implemented system, not circular forecasts. Self-citations appear in the broader photothermal literature but are not used to force the central identity. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The load-bearing content rests on the linear heat equation, the Markov property of the diffusion semigroup, translation invariance of the Laplacian, and the Galilean change of frame. All are standard continuum physics. Free parameters are experimental design choices (velocity, Gaussian width, coding pattern) that control contrast and waveform fidelity but do not invent new physics. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • scanning velocity v = 10 mm/s (nominal)
    Chosen by the experimenter (nominal 10 mm/s; range 5–20 mm/s explored). Directly sets equivalent modulation frequency ω = v k and controls the contrast–fidelity trade-off; not derived from first principles.
  • Gaussian beam width σ = 1.75 mm (experiment); 1 mm (some simulations)
    Hand-selected spatial scale of each heating element (explored 0.1–2.0 mm). Affects energy deposition and inter-pulse overlap; treated as a free design parameter.
  • spatial coding pattern (bit string / peak spacing)
    Arbitrary binary sequences (linear, chirp 101001000100, Legendre 111010111010) realized by which VCSEL elements are lit. Determines the equivalent temporal waveform; chosen by design, not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Heat conduction obeys the linear diffusion equation ∂T/∂t = α ∇²T + Q with constant diffusivity α.
    Invoked throughout §II; standard continuum heat transfer for the temperature and material ranges used.
  • standard math The diffusion operator generates a strongly continuous Markov semigroup P(t) = exp(t A) (Hille–Yosida).
    Stated in §II.A; used to write the mild solution and to assert memorylessness and contractivity.
  • standard math The Laplacian is translation-invariant, so the diffusion semigroup commutes with the scanning (translation) operator.
    Eqs. (9)–(10); necessary for the claim that scanning does not alter intrinsic thermal transport.
  • domain assumption Sample motion is pure rigid translation at constant known velocity (Galilean frame change x = X + v t).
    §II.B; required for the exact equivalence between spatial pattern and temporal excitation and for perfect DSDR.
  • domain assumption Optical absorption and surface heat flux can be treated as a prescribed surface source Q without significant optical penetration or nonlinear effects.
    Implicit in the experimental use of 850 nm VCSELs on metal and in the FEM source terms (19)–(23).
invented entities (1)
  • SISTER framework (structured illumination + continuous scanning + DSDR) independent evidence
    purpose: Unifies spatial scanning and temporal modulation for continuous large-area photothermal imaging without stitching.
    A methodological construct, not a new physical entity; its independent evidence is the experimental and simulated reconstructions shown in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structured Illumination Scanning Thermography (SISTER)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N6FQE2HF

@misc{pith2026260705565,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structured Illumination Scanning Thermography (SISTER)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N6FQE2HF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05565}
}
read the original abstract

Conventional non-invasive photothermal imaging techniques are fundamentally constrained by the diffusive nature of heat transport, which causes severe energy dissipation during subsurface reconstruction. Although modulation-based approaches partially mitigate this limitation by encoding depth information into phase delay and amplitude attenuation, they remain inherently restricted by repeated temporal excitation, long acquisition times, and stitching artifacts in large-area inspection. In this work, we propose a structured illumination scanning thermography (SISTER) framework that replaces conventional temporal modulation with continuous spatial scanning under static structured illumination. The key theoretical insight is that heat diffusion is governed by a Markov semigroup, while sample motion transforms static spatial illumination into an equivalent temporal excitation through a Galilean coordinate transformation. This formulation enables dynamic-to-static reconstruction without repeated temporal modulation and provides a unified interpretation of spatial scanning and conventional signal modulation. A scanning system is integrated to implement the proposed framework together with a dynamic-to-static reconstruction algorithm for continuous subsurface defect inspection. Both numerical simulations and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves spatial continuity, signal-to-noise ratio, and detection capability while effectively eliminating stitching artifacts and reducing acquisition complexity. The proposed SISTER framework establishes a unified theoretical foundation for scanning photothermal imaging and provides a practical paradigm for high-efficiency, large-scale industrial non-destructive testing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05565 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Structured illumination scanning thermography (SISTER) framework. (a) Principle of spatial-to-temporal modulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Test specimen and defect design used for experimental validation. (a) Front-side view of the cast-metal specimen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparison between pulsed thermography and linear scanning thermography (LST) with dynamic-to-static reconstruc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Influence of scanning velocity on SISTER reconstruction performance. (a) Representative raw structured illumination [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Experimental comparison of different spatial coding strategies in SISTER. (a) Representative raw SISTER measure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Reconstruction artifacts induced by velocity mis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison of image-processing methods applied to DSDR-reconstructed thermograms. DSDR-reconstructed datasets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. Zhu, H. Zhang, S. Sfarra, F. Sarasini, R. Usamenti- aga, G. Steenackers, C. Ibarra-Castanedo, X. Maldague, A comprehensive evaluation of the low-velocity impact be- haviour of intraply hybrid flax/basalt composites using infrared thermography and terahertz time-domain spec- troscopy techniques, NDT & E Int., 154, 103361 (2025)

    2025

  2. [2]

    P. Zhu, Z. Wei, A. Osman, C. Ibarra-Castanedo, A. Mandelis, X. Maldague, H. Zhang,Real-Time Super- Resolution Imaging System Based on Zero-Shot Learning for Infrared Nondestructive Testing, IEEE Tran. Instrum. Meas., 75, 4500409 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    D. L. Balageas, J. C. Krapez, P. Cielo,Pulsed photother- mal modeling of layered material, J. Appl. Phys., 59, 348- 357 (1986)

    1986

  4. [4]

    P. Zhu, H. Zhang, S. Sfarra, F. Sarasini, C. Ibarra- Castanedo, X. Maldague, A. Mandelis,Thermal Diffu- sivity Measurement Based on Thermal / Cooling Exci- tation: Theory and Experiments, IEEE Trans. Instrum. 13 Meas., 2026. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2026.3699727

    doi:10.1109/tim.2026.3699727 2026

  5. [5]

    P. Zhu, H. Zhang, S. Sfarra, F. Sarasini, R. Usamenti- aga, G. Steenackers, C. Ibarra-Castanedo, X. Maldague, Thermal Diffusivity Characterization of Impacted Com- posites Using Evaporative Cryocooling Excitation and In- verse Physics-Informed Neural Networks, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 75, 6003011 (2026)

    2026

  6. [6]

    Ricci, R

    M. Ricci, R. Zito, S. Laureti,Pseudo-noise pulse- compression thermography: A powerful tool for time- domain thermography analysis, NDT & E Int., 148, 103218 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Laureti, P

    S. Laureti, P. Bison, G. Ferrarini, R. Zito, M. Ricci,Si- multaneous multi-frequency lock-in thermography: A new flexible and effective active thermography scheme, NDT & E Int., 146, 103144 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Q. Yi, H. Malekmohammadi, G. Y. Tian, S. Laureti, M. Ricci,Quantitative evaluation of crack depths on thin aluminum plate using eddy current pulse-compression thermography, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 16, 3963-3973 (2019)

    2019

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    P. Zhu, R. Wang, K. Sivagurunathan, S. Sfarra, F. Sarasini, C. Ibarra-Castanedo, X. Maldague, H. Zhang, A. Mandelis,Frequency multiplexed photothermal correla- tion tomography for non-destructive evaluation of man- ufactured materials, Int. J. Extrem. Manuf., 7, 035601 (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    P. Zhu, H. Zhang, S. Sfarra, F. Sarasini, Z. Ding, C. Ibarra-Castanedo, X. Maldague,A novel IR-SRGAN as- sisted super-resolution evaluation of photothermal coher- ence tomography for impact damage in toughened thermo- plastic CFRP laminates under room and low temperature, Comp...

    2026

  3. [11]

    P. Zhu, H. Zhang, S. Sfarra, F. Sarasini, R. Usamenti- aga, V. Vavilov, C. Ibarra-Castanedo, X. Maldague,En- hancing resistance to low-velocity impact of electrospun- manufactured interlayer-strengthened CFRP by using in- frared thermography, NDT & E Int., 144, 103083 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Burgholzer, L

    P. Burgholzer, L. Gahleitner, G. Mayr,Linkding diffusive fields to virtual waves as their propagative duals, Phys. Rev. Applied, 24, 044094 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Gahleitner, G

    L. Gahleitner, G. Mayr, P. Burgholzer, U. Cakmak, Three-dimensional defect reconstruction in carbon fiber- reinforced composites with temporally non-uniform pulsed thermography data, NDT & E Int., 154, 103363 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Gahleitner, G

    L. Gahleitner, G. Thummerer, B. Plank, J. Wiedemann, G. Mayr, C. H¨ uhne, P. Burgholzer, U. Cakmak,Pho- tothermal defect imaging in hybrid fiber metal laminates using the vitual wave concept, J. Appl. Phys., 135, 074903 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Zhang, C

    D. Zhang, C. Li, C. Zhang, M. N. Slipchenko, G. Eakins, J. X. Cheng,Depth-resolved mid-infrared photothermal imaging of living cells and organisms with submicrometer spatial resolution, Sci. Adv., 2 e1600521 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Jiang, P

    G. Jiang, P. Zhu, Y. Gai, et al.,Non-invasive inspection for a hand-bound book of the 19th century: Numerical simulations and experimental analysis of infrared, tera- hertz, and ultrasonic methods, Infrared Phys. Technol., 140, 105353 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Jiang, P

    G. Jiang, P. Zhu, S. Sfarra, et al.,Faster R-CNN-CA and thermophysical properties of materials: An ancient mar- quetry inspection based on infrared and terahertz tech- niques, Infrared Phys. Technol., 142, 105563 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Cheng, M

    L. Cheng, M. Kersemans,Dual-IRT-GAN: A defect- aware deep adversarial network to perform super- resolution tasks in infrared thermographic inspection, Compos. Part B-Eng., 247, 110309 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    P. Zhu, H. Zhang, S. Sfarra, F. Sarasini, X. Maldague, A. Mandelis,Three-dimensional wide-bandwidth quantum energy truncation terahertz coherence tomography, Phys. Rev. Lett., (2026). https://doi.org/10.1103/spsr-xr47

    2026 doi

  12. [20]

    Holmes, B

    C. Holmes, B. W. Drinkwater, P. D. Wilcox,Post- processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit-receive array data for non-destructive evaluation, NDT & E Int., 38, 701-711 (2005)

    2005

  13. [21]

    P. Zhu, Z. Wei, S. Sfarra, R. Usamentiaga, G. Steenack- ers, A. Mandelis, X. Maldague, H. Zhang,THz- Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Network: Deep- Learning-Based Super-Resolution Imaging Using Tera- hertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy, IEEE Trans. Ind. In- form., 21, 6660-...

    2025

  14. [22]

    Maldague, S

    X. Maldague, S. Marinetti,Pulse phase infrared thermog- raphy, J. Appl. Phys., 79, 2694-2698 (1996)

    1996

  15. [23]

    Lecompagnon, S

    J. Lecompagnon, S. Ahmadi, P. Hirsch, C. Rupprecht, M. Ziegler,Thermographic detection of internal defects using 2D photothermal super resolution reconstruction with se- quential laser heating, J. Appl. Phys., 131, 185107 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Tabatabaei, A

    N. Tabatabaei, A. Mandelis,Thermal Coherence Tomog- raphy Using Match Filter Binary Phase Coded Diffusion Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 165901 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Mandelis, L

    A. Mandelis, L. Nicolaides, Y. Chen,Structure and the Reflectionless/Refractionless Nature of Parabolic Diffusion-Wave Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 020801 (2001)

    2001

  18. [26]

    Ibarra-Castanedo, J

    C. Ibarra-Castanedo, J. M. Piau, S. Guilbert, N. P. Avde- lidis, M. Genest, A. Bendada, X. P. V. Maldague,Com- parative study of active thermography techniques for the nondestructive evaluation of honeycomb structures, Res. Nondestruct. Eval., 20, 1-31 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Ibarra-Castanedo, D

    C. Ibarra-Castanedo, D. Gonz´ alez, M. Klein, S. Vallerand, X. Maldague,Infrared image processing and data analysis, Infrared Phys. Technol., 46, 75-83 (2004)

    2004

  20. [29]

    Mandelis, D

    A. Mandelis, D. Thapa,Generalized Fourier-Laplace pho- tothermal spectroscopy of optically absorbing media gen- erated by arbitrary optical-excitation waveforms, Phys. Rev. Applied, 23, 054034 (2025)

    2025

  21. [30]

    Thapa, P

    D. Thapa, P. Tavakolian, G. Zhou, et al.,Three- dimensional thermophotonic super-resolution imaging by spatiotemporal diffusion reversal method, Sci. Adv., 9, eadi1899 (2023)

    2023

  22. [31]

    Ahmadi, G

    S. Ahmadi, G. Thummerer, S. Breitwieser, et al.,Multi- dimensional Reconstruction of Internal Defects in Addi- tively Manufactured Steel Using Photothermal Super Res- olution Combined With Virtual Wave-Based Image Pro- cessing, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 17, 7368-7378 (2021)

    2021

  23. [32]

    L. M. Wilcox, M. Bonmarin, K. M. Donnell,Effect of Signal Modulation on Active Microwave Thermography, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 73, 7005314 (2024)

    2024

  24. [33]

    K. Tian, J. Peng, Q. Zhang, F. Zhang, J. Lee,Laser arrays scanning thermography with optimized excitation signals for efficient rail defect detection, NDT & E Int., 156, 103461 (2025)

    2025

  25. [34]

    Schmid, J

    S. Schmid, J. Reinhardt, C. U. Grosse,Spatial and tem- poral deep learning for defect detection with lock-in ther- mography, NDT & E Int., 143, 103063 (2024). 14

    2024

  26. [35]

    P. Zhu, D. Wu, Y. Wang, Z. Miao,Defect detectability based on square wave lock-in thermography, Appl. Opt., 61, 6134-6143 (2022)

    2022

  27. [36]

    Hedayatrasa, G

    S. Hedayatrasa, G. Poelman, J. Segers, W. V. Paopegem, M. Kersemans,Novel discrete frequency-phase modulated excitation waveform for enhanced depth resolvability of thermal wave radar, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 132, 512-522 (2019)

    2019

  28. [37]

    Tabatabaei, A

    N. Tabatabaei, A. Mandelis,Thermal-wave radar: A novel subsurface imaging modality with extended depth- resolution dynamic range, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 80, 034902 (2009)

    2009

  29. [38]

    F. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Liu, Y. Wang,The feature recogni- tion of CFRP subsurface defects using low-energy chirp- pulsed radar thermography, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 16, 5160-5168 (2019)

    2019

  30. [39]

    Hedayatrasa, W

    S. Hedayatrasa, W. V. Paepegem, M. Kersemans, Diffusion-compensated correlation analysis of frequency- modulated thermal signal for quantitative infrared ther- mography, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 197, 110373 (2023)

    2023

  31. [40]

    Ibarra-Castanedo, P

    C. Ibarra-Castanedo, P. Servais, M. Klein, T. Boulanger, A. Kinard, S. Hoffait, X. P. V. Maldague,Detection and Characterization of Artificial Porosity and Impact Dam- age in Aerospace Carbon Fiber Composites by Pulsed and Line Scan Thermography, Appl. Sci., 13, 6135 (2023)

    2023

  32. [41]

    Usamentiaga, C

    R. Usamentiaga, C. Ibarra-Castanedo, X. Maldague, More than Fifty Shades of Grey: Quantitative Charac- terization of Defects and Interpretation Using SNR and CNR, NDT & E Int., 145, 103133 (2024)

    2024

  33. [42]

    Rajic,Principal component thermography for flaw contrast enhancement and flaw depth characterisation in composite structures, Compos

    N. Rajic,Principal component thermography for flaw contrast enhancement and flaw depth characterisation in composite structures, Compos. Struct., 58, 521-528 (2002)

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.