Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Optimal Forecast Reconciliation with Uncertainty Quantification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.06480 v1 pith:N6Z3OJ63 submitted 2024-02-09 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords matrixcovarianceforecast-errorreconciliationweightforecasterrorsformulated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose to estimate the weight matrix used for forecast reconciliation as parameters in a general linear model in order to quantify its uncertainty. This implies that forecast reconciliation can be formulated as an orthogonal projection from the space of base-forecast errors into a coherent linear subspace. We use variance decomposition together with the Wishart distribution to derive the central estimator for the forecast-error covariance matrix. In addition, we prove that distance-reducing properties apply to the reconciled forecasts at all levels of the hierarchy as well as to the forecast-error covariance. A covariance matrix for the reconciliation weight matrix is derived, which leads to improved estimates of the forecast-error covariance matrix. We show how shrinkage can be introduced in the formulated model by imposing specific priors on the weight matrix and the forecast-error covariance matrix. The method is illustrated in a simulation study that shows consistent improvements in the log-score. Finally, standard errors for the weight matrix and the variance-separation formula are illustrated using a case study of forecasting electricity load in Sweden.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Online forecast reconciliation using linear models

    stat.ME 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A framework for online forecast reconciliation is developed via multivariate linear models on graph hierarchies, ridge regression, and recursive least squares, with a demonstration on district heating load data.

  2. Model selection with proper scoring rules on data sets of time series: prefer the mean scaled score

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Mean scaled score is recommended over rank-based aggregation for model selection on time series datasets because skewness causes non-mean criteria to select misspecified models with short tests.

Pith tools