Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 101 references

Plasma sheath physics: A circuital description, amelioration, and application

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The plasma sheath is a series LCR circuit whose element laws fix ion current and sheath width from the applied wall voltage alone.

desk verdict A readable review of the authors' own 2004 LCR sheath model, but the numerical example has an arithmetic error and the negative-inductance runaway is unresolved, so the quantitative claims don't hold. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03935 v1 pith:N6ZMOMC2 submitted 2025-06-04 physics.plasm-ph

Pralay Kumar Karmakar , Subham Dutta , Utpal Deka This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.40.Kh52.35.-g
keywords plasmasheathcircuitalmodelseriesLCRcircuitnegativeinductanceionimplantationcurrentwaveChildcapacitivelycoupled
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the plasma sheath, the thin charge-separated layer that forms between a plasma and any wall it touches, can be treated as a series electrical circuit made of an inductor, a capacitor, and a resistor, with those three element values set by analytic formulas in terms of ion sound speed, ion transit time, a normalized time scale, and sheath width. The payoff is closure: the space-charge-limited (Child) current law alone cannot give the sheath current and the sheath width simultaneously from the applied wall voltage, so earlier treatments fixed the current by assuming a constant sheath current, while the circuital model solves one Kirchhoff voltage-current equation for the current and obtains both quantities self-consistently from the wall voltage alone. From that single equation the paper derives transient currents in the capacitive-resistive and inductive-resistive sheath limits, an unusual negative inductance, and a catalogue of applications, from ion implantation current and plasma sheath wave excitation in processing plasmas to double layers and solitons in astrophysical plasmas. The reason to care is that the model replaces multifluid sheath equations with a one-equation circuit law: if the picture is right, the ion flux onto a substrate follows from the applied voltage waveform alone.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the sheath-equivalent series LCR circuit with $L_{sh}$, $C_{sh}$, and $R_{sh}$ given by Eqs. (1)-(3), whose stated origin is ion transit time physics in the sheath. The argument runs through a single Kirchhoff voltage-current equation written for the current perturbation alone, with plasma parameters such as charge density, Mach number, and electric potential absorbed into the three element expressions; the paper then takes a CR limit (short ion transit time) and an LR limit (long ion transit time) to obtain closed-form transient currents, Eqs. (4)-(7), and their explicit versions, Eqs. (8)-(11). The mechanism behind the unusual predictions is the sign of $L_{sh}$: the derived inductance is negative, which flips the LR time constants to positive exponents and produces growth without saturation inside the linear model. The same elements carry the applications, since the CR limit is claimed to act as a band-pass filter and a periodic switch, the oscillating sheath is claimed to excite plasma sheath waves and ion acoustic waves when its oscillation amplitude crosses a threshold of about $10^{-2}$ J m$^{-3}$, and any sufficiently large non-neutral space charge cloud with excess positive charge, such as a double layer (a localized potential jump) or a soliton, is claimed to admit the same circuital description.

What would settle it

Apply a step voltage to a wall electrode in a hydrogen plasma with $k_BT_e \approx 2$ eV, $n_0 = 10^{14}$ m$^{-3}$, and $\tau_{io} \sim 10^{-6}$ s, and record the transient current. The model fixes the CR-limit decay as $\exp(-1.81\times 10^{5}\,t)$ and the LR-limit growth as $\exp(4.60\times 10^{6}\,t)$ at $V_0 = 10$ V, so a measured rate that disagrees with these constants, or a current that saturates before the predicted growth scale, refutes the constant-element linear circuit picture. The sharpest single test is the sign of $L_{sh}$: the model requires the LR transient to amplify without saturation, so an impedance or phase measurement showing no such amplifying response falsifies the negative-inductance prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a space-charge-limited (Child) sheath is not merely a capacitor, as earlier circuit-based sheath treatments assumed, but simultaneously an inductor, a capacitor, and a resistor in series, with element values $$L_{sh} = -\frac{c_s\tau_{io}^3\$lambda^{2}$}{40\epsilon_0}, \qquad C_{sh} = \frac{\epsilon_0(1 + 0.17\$lambda^{2}$)}{X_0}, \qquad R_{sh} = \frac{c_s\$lambda^{2}$\tau_{io}^2}{12\epsilon_0},$$ where $c_s$ is the ion sound speed, $\tau_{io}$ is the ion transit time across the sheath, $\lambda$ is the normalized ion plasma oscillation time, $X_0$ is the equilibrium sheath width, and $\epsilon_0$ is the vacuum permittivity. For a hydrogen plasma with $k_BT_e \approx 2$ eV and $n_0 = 10^{14}$ m$^{-3}$, these give $L_{sh} \approx -1.36\times 10^{-7}$ H, $C_{sh} \approx 8.84\times 10^{-8}$ F, and $R_{sh} \approx 62.5$ $\Omega$. The negative inductance is read physically: free energy stored in the plasma can align the induced field with the source field, so the sheath aids rather than opposes current change, and the LR-limit currents grow as $\exp(+(40/12)t/\tau_{io})$ until nonlinearities take over. Wall-directed transient currents are identified as ion implantation current, and the stated virtue of the model is self-consistency: sheath current and sheath width follow from the applied wall voltage through one Kirchhoff voltage-current (KVL-KCL) equation, with charge density, Mach number, and potential effects absorbed into the circuit elements, instead of being fixed by an assumed constant sheath current.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise, which the paper states in its results section, is that the sheath keeps constant values of $L_{sh}$, $C_{sh}$, and $R_{sh}$ while one linear Kirchhoff equation in the current alone describes the dynamics; if the circuit elements actually vary with time or the current response is nonlinear, the transient formulas and the applications built on them do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sheath current and sheath width become mutually determined by the applied wall voltage through a single Kirchhoff equation, replacing the unproved constant-current assumption with a self-consistent calculation.
  • With $V_0 = 10$ V and $\tau_{io} \sim 10^{-6}$ s, the model gives explicit numbers: the CR decay runs at about $1.81\times 10^{5}$ s$^{-1}$ and the LR growth at about $4.60\times 10^{6}$ s$^{-1}$, so the predicted transient shapes are directly checkable.
  • An oscillating sheath excites plasma sheath waves and ion acoustic waves, and once the oscillation amplitude crosses a threshold of roughly $10^{-2}$ J m$^{-3}$ the excitation grows into an instability, all readable from the current perturbation alone.
  • Tuning the ion transit time, equivalently the sheath width, switches the sheath between CR and LR behavior, which the paper connects to ion energy modulation, electron heating, band-pass filtering, higher harmonic generation, and periodic switching in capacitively coupled plasma processing.
  • The same three-element circuit is claimed to describe any sufficiently large positively charged non-neutral cloud, including double layers and solitons, so the model is offered as a circuital route to astrophysical current systems such as auroral particle energization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Testable extension: a step-voltage experiment in a well-characterized plasma could extract the CR decay rate $12/(\lambda^2 \tau_{io})$ and the LR growth rate $40/(12\tau_{io})$ from the measured transient, testing whether the negative-inductance sign is real rather than a modeling artifact.
  • Implicit consequence: a negative inductance is an active element, so the sheath should exchange energy with the plasma reservoir on the LR time scale; a driven-sheath experiment might show net amplification or an anomalous phase advance that no positive-inductance model can produce.
  • Testable extension: a swept-frequency impedance measurement across a capacitively coupled plasma sheath would confront the most distinctive prediction, since Eqs. (1)-(3) place an inductive phase anomaly at a frequency set by $\tau_{io}$; the paper proposes no such measurement.
  • The claimed extension to gravito-electrostatic sheaths of the solar wind would need time-dependent elements, which the constant-element linear theory forbids; a tractable intermediate test is to let $C_{sh}$ depend on the measured sheath width alone and check the predicted transit-time scaling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a plasma sheath can be described as a lumped series LCR circuit with inductance, capacitance, and resistance given by Eqs. (1)-(3), and that Kirchhoff voltage/current laws applied to this circuit yield transient current expressions (Eqs. (4)-(19)) which predict ion implantation current (IIC) and plasma sheath wave (PSW) excitation. The manuscript also discusses the physical origin of inductive, capacitive, and resistive sheath behavior, the possibility of negative L_sh, C_sh, and R_sh, and a long list of applications in plasma processing, astrophysics, and electronics. The central argument is that this circuital model can self-consistently determine sheath current and width from the applied wall voltage, avoiding the usual assumption of a constant Bohm current.

Significance. If the circuit representation were quantitatively valid, it would offer a computationally simple lumped model for sheath dynamics, with direct consequences for ion implantation, etching, deposition, and sheath-wave excitation. The paper usefully collects standard transient circuit formulas and connects them to a substantial body of literature, and it explicitly identifies the constant-Bohm-current assumption as a gap in conventional sheath models. However, the numerical implementation is internally inconsistent, the derived transients diverge in the operating regime of interest while experiments saturate (as the paper itself admits), and the claimed PSW and instability predictions are not derived from the circuit equations. As it stands, the contribution is a compilation of prior results rather than a validated predictive model.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, Eqs. (9), (13), (15)] The numerical exponents in the LR-equivalent current expressions are internally inconsistent. With tau_io ~ 1e-6 s as stated in Section 2, the exponent in Eq. (9) is 40/(12 tau_io) = 3.33e6 s^-1, not the 4.60e6 s^-1 quoted in Eqs. (13) and (15). Moreover, the quoted CR exponent in Eq. (12), 1.81e5 s^-1, together with Eq. (8) gives lambda^2 = 12/(1.81e5 * 1e-6) ~ 66, which contradicts the quoted resistance R_sh = 62.5 Ohm through Eq. (3) (which would require lambda^2 ~ 0.48). The numerical example therefore does not follow from the stated model equations.
  2. [Section 4, after Eq. (15)] The LR-equivalent currents in Eqs. (9) and (11) grow exponentially without bound because L_sh < 0, and the paper states: 'It is emphasized that the sheath current saturates during experiments, against the theoretical current predictions, once the nonlinearities take over the linear dispersive effects.' This is a load-bearing admission: the model's linear equations diverge in exactly the regime where the claimed IIC and PSW predictions are made, and no saturation mechanism is derived. Until a nonlinear or otherwise regularizing closure is provided, the exponential transients cannot support quantitative predictions of ion implantation current or sheath wave excitation.
  3. [Section 5, first paragraph] The central reduction to a constant-coefficient lumped circuit is assumed, not derived. The text states: 'The assumption of constant L_sh, C_sh, and R_sh magnitudes in the analyses [22,23] further simplifies the numerical analysis.' Equations (1)-(3) themselves contain tau_io and lambda, and C_sh depends on the dynamic sheath width X_o through Eq. (2). No timescale separation or closure argument is given to justify treating these as constant during the transients of Eqs. (4)-(19). Since the claimed self-consistent determination of sheath current and width rests on this reduction, the predictive claim is unsupported.
  4. [Section 5, application (xi) and Section 8 (PSW)] The claim that the circuital model predicts plasma sheath wave excitation is qualitative. The paper states that 'the spatiotemporal variation of only current perturbation evaluated from the KVL equation is sufficient to anticipate the formation of the PSW, IAW,' but no dispersion relation, growth rate, or instability threshold is derived from Eqs. (1)-(3) or from the KVL equation. Without such a derivation, the application to PSW excitation is an assertion rather than a result of the model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (15)] Equation (15) is labeled I_c,LR(t) but it is the dissolution current I_d,LR(t) from Eq. (11); the subscript should be corrected to avoid confusion with the formation current in Eq. (9).
  2. [Figure 8 caption] The caption says 'formation (I_c,LR < 0, USC) and dissolution (I_c,LR > 0, IIC)', but the dissolution current is I_d,LR, not I_c,LR; the notation is inconsistent with the text.
  3. [References] Reference [64] duplicates reference [16]; the two entries are the same Cluggish, Danielson, and Driscoll paper and should be merged.
  4. [Table A1, row 6] The entry 'No (with biasing voltage)' is confusing; if the claim is that component values are independent of biasing voltage, this should be stated explicitly, and it appears to conflict with the discussion of time-varying sheaths elsewhere.
  5. [Abstract and Section 1] The abstract promises an 'amelioration' of the circuital description, but the manuscript does not quantify an improvement over refs. [22,23,26] beyond relabeling currents as IIC/USC and adding a descriptive discussion of negative elements; a clearer statement of the novel contribution would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the LCR-element transients are ordinary circuit solutions of an explicitly imported model, not a prediction that reduces to a fit or to a definition.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: assume a series LCR sheath with elements (1)-(3) from Rosa [26] and the authors' earlier models [22,23]; insert those expressions into textbook CR/LR transient solutions [30] to obtain Eqs. (8)-(19). Each step is a stated substitution, not a re-definition or fit. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then reported as a prediction; the transient currents are closed-form circuit responses conditional on the imported element values. The central premise that the sheath behaves as a lumped, constant-parameter LCR circuit is explicitly acknowledged as an assumption in Section 5 ('The assumption of constant L_sh, C_sh, and R_sh magnitudes in the analyses [22,23] further simplifies the numerical analysis'), and an admitted limitation is that the linear transients diverge while 'the sheath current saturates during experiments, against the theoretical current predictions.' These are validation/correctness concerns, not circularity. Heavy reliance on the authors' prior papers and on Rosa is a citation-practice issue; the cited results are externally falsifiable and are not used to forbid alternatives. No equation is equivalent to its own input by construction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central model is inherited from the authors' earlier publications and from Rosa (1971). The free parameters are physical inputs taken from references, plus an unspecified lambda. The main axiom is that a lumped constant LCR circuit with a linear perturbation equation captures a plasma sheath. The only invented entities are negative component values and an ad hoc free-energy alignment mechanism, neither of which has independent experimental evidence in this paper.

free parameters (4)
  • lambda = unspecified
    Normalized ion plasma oscillation time-scale parameter in Eqs. (1)-(3); plotted over a range, but the specific value needed for the numerical exponents in Eqs. (12)-(15) is not stated.
  • tau_io = 1e-6 s
    Ion transit time through the sheath, taken from reference [22]; controls L_sh and R_sh magnitudes.
  • V0 = 10 V
    Initial sheath potential from references [13,17]; used to normalize the transient current values.
  • plasma parameters (T_e, n0, m_i) = 2 eV, 1e14 m^-3, 1.67e-27 kg
    Thermal energy, density, and ion mass of a hydrogen plasma, taken from reference [27].
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper A plasma sheath can be modeled as a lumped series LCR circuit with constant L_sh, C_sh, and R_sh.
    Invoked throughout Sections 2-5; the paper itself notes the constancy is an assumption that simplifies the analysis.
  • domain assumption Linear KVL/KCL perturbation in the current alone is sufficient to describe sheath dynamics.
    Section 5 states the linear perturbation scheme 'justifiably ignores several variable plasma parameters' that are absorbed into the circuit elements.
  • standard math Standard RC and LR transient formulas apply with the sheath element values.
    Eqs. (4)-(7) are textbook circuit solutions applied without modification.
  • ad hoc to paper Negative L, C, and R can arise from free energy in the plasma, and the fields align to produce them.
    Sections 2.1-2.3 and 3 present qualitative field-alignment arguments without quantitative derivation.
  • domain assumption The Child law current cannot be simultaneously solved with sheath width, so a circuital closure is needed.
    Section 2 states this premise to motivate the model.
invented entities (2)
  • Negative sheath inductance, capacitance, and resistance
    purpose: Explains L_sh < 0 from Eq. (1) and generalizes to C_sh < 0 and R_sh < 0 using free-energy arguments.
    The paper cites negative components in electronic circuits, but does not provide experimental evidence that plasma sheaths exhibit them; the claims are qualitative.
  • Ion implantation current (IIC) classification
    purpose: Labels positive transient currents as useful for substrate implantation.
    The distinction is a bookkeeping choice based on current direction, not an independently measured quantity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Plasma sheath physics: A circuital description, amelioration, and application." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N6ZMOMC2

@misc{pith2026250603935,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Plasma sheath physics: A circuital description, amelioration, and application},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N6ZMOMC2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03935}
}
read the original abstract

A synoptic review of the electrical circuital model-based analysis of laboratory plasma sheaths, alongside their stability features in a realistic broader horizon, is systematically presented herein. It explains the basic physics responsible for the inductive (L_sh), capacitive (C_sh), and resistive (R_sh) properties simultaneously, exhibited by plasma sheaths. The analyzed model sheath behaviors are judiciously described in the light of the state-of-the-art sheath scenarios, illustratively. The sheath-based circuital components are minutely contrasted with the traditionally available circuital counterparts. The applications of the novel circuital sheath model in widespread fields of research having both fundamental and applied importance are discussed. The main merits of modelling plasma sheaths through the circuital formalism over the existing non-circuital theoretical ones are briefly outlined, jointly with future applied scope.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Plasma summary

    The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. Plasma summary. Encyclopedia Britannica https://www.britannica.com/summary/plasma-state-of-matter (2003)

    2003

  2. [2]

    Misra, O

    N.N. Misra, O. Schlüter, P.J. Cullen, Cold plasma in food and agriculture. Academic Press, San Diego (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    Pankaj, C

    S.K. Pankaj, C. Bueno -Ferrer, et al. Applications of cold plasma technology in food packaging. Trends in Food Science & Technology 35, 5-17 (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    J. Li, H. Gao, et al. Plasma air filtration system for intercepting and inactivation of pathogenic microbial aerosols. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 11(5), 110728 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Thin Solid Films 295(1), 185-192 (1997)

    Bong-Seok Suh, Won -Jong Lee, Surface hardening of AISI 316L stainless steel using plasma carburizing. Thin Solid Films 295(1), 185-192 (1997)

    1997

  6. [6]

    Takahashi, Magnetic nozzle radiofrequency plasma thruster approaching twenty percent thruster efficiency

    K. Takahashi, Magnetic nozzle radiofrequency plasma thruster approaching twenty percent thruster efficiency. Sci Rep 11, 2768 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Degrave, F

    J. Degrave, F. Felici, et al., Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 602, 414–419 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    C.S. Wu, L. Wang, et al. Plasma arc welding: Process, sensing, control and modeling. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 12(1), 74-85 (2014)

    2014

Show all 101 references
  1. [9]

    Keidar, I.I

    M. Keidar, I.I. Beilis, Plasma medicine. Plasma Engineering. Academic press, Boston, pp. 359-413 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Somov, Plasma Astrophysics

    B.V . Somov, Plasma Astrophysics. Springer, New York, 1, 1-17 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Liley, S

    B.S. Liley, S. Potter, M.C. Kelley, Plasma. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/plasma-state-of-matter (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    Stenzel, et al., Sheaths and double layers with instabilities

    R.L. Stenzel, et al., Sheaths and double layers with instabilities. J. Technol. Space Plasmas 2(1), 70-92 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Chen, Introduction to plasma physics and controlled fusion

    F.F. Chen, Introduction to plasma physics and controlled fusion. Springer Science + business Media (2011)

    2011

  6. [14]

    Dutta, P.K

    S. Dutta, P.K. Karmakar, Sheath plasma instability in inverted fireballs. Chaos Solit. Fract. 186, 115259 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Beers, et al

    C.J. Beers, et al. RF sheath induced sputtering on Proto -MPEX. I. Sheath equivalent dielectric layer for modeling the RF sheath. Phys. Plasmas 28(9), 1-12 (2021)

    2021

  8. [17]

    Bittencourt, Fundamentals of Plasma Physics

    J.A. Bittencourt, Fundamentals of Plasma Physics. Third -Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, (2004)

    2004

  9. [18]

    Kohno, J.R

    H. Kohno, J.R. Myra, A finite element procedure for radio -frequency sheath –plasma interactions based on a sheath impedance model. Computer Physics Communications 220, 129-142 (2017)

    2017

  10. [19]

    Stenzel, Instability of sheath -plasma resonance

    R.L. Stenzel, Instability of sheath -plasma resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60(8), 704 -707 (1988) 22

    1988

  11. [20]

    Z. Wang, L. Guo, et al., Non-uniform electron density estimation based on electromagnetic wave attenuation in plasma. Chinese Phys. B 34(1), 1-6 (2025)

    2025

  12. [21]

    Stenzel, High-frequency instability of the sheath-plasma resonance

    R.L. Stenzel, High-frequency instability of the sheath-plasma resonance. Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics 1(11), 2273-2282 (1989)

    1989

  13. [22]

    U. Deka, R. Prakash, et al. Sheath equivalent electrical circuit model for transient sheath dynamics. Jap. Journal. Applied. Phys. 43(5R), 2704-2710 (2004)

    2004

  14. [23]

    C. B. Dwivedi, U. Deka, A. Sarma, Sheath equivalent electrical circuit model for equilibrium child sheath description. Physica Scripta 69(2), 108-114 (2004)

    2004

  15. [24]

    Makaba, Z

    T. Makaba, Z. Petrovic, Plasma electronics: Applications in microelectronic device fabrication. Taylor & Francis LLC (2006)

    2006

  16. [25]

    Block, A double layer review

    L.P. Block, A double layer review. Astrophysics and Space Sci. 55, 59-83 (1978)

    1978

  17. [26]

    Rosa, Ion transit time effects in the plasma sheath

    R. Rosa, Ion transit time effects in the plasma sheath. J. Phys. A: Gen. Phys. 4(6), 934-943 (1971)

    1971

  18. [27]

    Mukherjee, K

    S. Mukherjee, K. Avinash, P.I. John, Dynamic sheath expansion and ion current in transient ion sheath experiments. Pramana J. Phys. 44, 263-270 (1995)

    1995

  19. [28]

    Lieberman, A.J

    M.A. Lieberman, A.J. Lichtenberg, Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing. John Wiley & Sons (2005)

    2005

  20. [29]

    Inductance

    The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. Inductance. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/inductance (2025)

    2025

  21. [30]

    Nahvi, J.A

    M. Nahvi, J.A. Edminister, Schaum's Outline of Electric Circuits. McGraw -Hill, New York (2018)

    2018

  22. [31]

    Capacitor

    The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. Capacitor. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/technology/capacitor (2025)

    2025

  23. [32]

    Gans, et al., Frequency coupling in dual frequency capacitively coupled radio-frequency plasmas

    T. Gans, et al., Frequency coupling in dual frequency capacitively coupled radio-frequency plasmas. Appl. Phys. Lett. 25(26), 261502 (2006)

    2006

  24. [33]

    M. Li, Y. Wang, K. Wang, Z. Wang, Application of negative inductor in Distributed Flexible AC Transmission System. Proceedings of The 7th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, Harbin, China, pp. 99 -103, DOI: 10.1109/IPEMC.2012.6258863 (2012)

    2012

  25. [34]

    M.A. Alam, N. Zagni, et al. Negative capacitors and applications . Handbook of Semiconductor Devices. Springer (2023)

    2023

  26. [35]

    Danting, K

    X. Danting, K. Sitthisak, L. Chi-Kwan, Study of negative impedance and its applications to power electronics. 7th International Conference on Power Electronics Systems and Applications-Smart Mobility, Power Transfer & Security (PESA), Hong Kong, China, pp. 1-5, DOI: 10.1109/PE...

    2017

  27. [36]

    Panagopoulos, D.J

    T. Panagopoulos, D.J. Economou, Plasma sheath model and ion energy distribution for all radio frequencies. J. Appl. Phys. 85(7), 3435–3443 (1999)

    1999

  28. [37]

    Donkó, J

    Z. Donkó, J. Schulze, B.G. Heil, U. Czarnetzki, PIC simulations of the separate control of ion flux and energy in CCRF discharges via the electrical asymmetry effect. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42(2), 025205 (2009)

    2009

  29. [38]

    Sharma, M.M

    S. Sharma, M.M. Turner, Investigation of wave emission phenomena in dual frequency capacitive discharges using particle -in-cell simulation. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47(28), 285201 (2014)

    2014

  30. [39]

    Lafleur, P

    T. Lafleur, P. Chabert, J.P. Booth, Secondary electron induced asymmetry in capacitively coupled plasmas. J. Phys. D: Applied Phys. 46(13), 135201 (2013)

    2013

  31. [40]

    Bruneau, T

    B. Bruneau, T. Novikova, T. Lafleur, J.P. Booth, E.V . Johnson, Control and optimization of the slope asymmetry effect in tailored voltage waveforms for capacitively coupled plasmas. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 24(1), 015021 (2015) 23

    2015

  32. [41]

    Sharma, et al., High frequency sheath modulation and higher harmonic generation in a low pressure very high frequency capacitively coupled plasma excited by sawtooth waveform

    S. Sharma, et al., High frequency sheath modulation and higher harmonic generation in a low pressure very high frequency capacitively coupled plasma excited by sawtooth waveform. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29(11), 114001 (2020)

    2020

  33. [42]

    Sharma, N

    S. Sharma, N. Sirse, A. Kuley, A. Sen, M.M. Turner, Driving frequency effect on discharge parameters and higher harmonic generation in capacitive discharges at constant power densities. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54(5), 055205 (2021)

    2021

  34. [43]

    Kawamura, V

    E. Kawamura, V . Vahedi, M.A. Lieberman, C.K. Birdsall, Ion energy distributions in rf sheaths; review, analysis and simulation. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 8(3), R45-R64 (1999)

    1999

  35. [44]

    Boyle, A.R

    P.C. Boyle, A.R. Ellingboe, M.M. Turner, Independent control of ion current and ion impact energy onto electrodes in dual frequency plasma devices. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37(5), 697 (2004)

    2004

  36. [45]

    Sharma, N

    S. Sharma, N. Sirse, A. Kuley, M.M. Turner, Ion energy distribution function in very high frequency capacitive discharges excited by saw -tooth waveform. Phys. Plasmas 28(10), 103502 (2021)

    2021

  37. [46]

    Sharma, N

    S. Sharma, N. Sirse, M.M. Turner, Spatial flux and energy asymmetry in a low pressure capacitively coupled plasma discharge excited by sawtooth waveform: A harmonic study. Phys. Plasmas 30(7), 073506. (2023)

    2023

  38. [47]

    Schüngel, Z

    E. Schüngel, Z. Donkó, Z, et al., Customized ion flux -energy distribution functions in capacitively coupled plasmas by voltage waveform tailoring. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 24(4), 045013 (2015)

    2015

  39. [48]

    Mitura, L

    S. Mitura, L. Klimek, Z. Haś, Etching and deposition phenomena in an R.F. CH4 plasma. Thin Solid Films 147(1), 83-92 (1987)

    1987

  40. [49]

    Wertheimer, M

    M.R. Wertheimer, M. Moisan, Comparison of microwave and lower frequency plasmas for thin film deposition and etching. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films 3(6), 2643–2649 (1985)

    1985

  41. [50]

    Schiller, S

    S. Schiller, S. Panzer, Thermal surface modification by electron beam high -speed scanning. Surface and Coatings Technology 39-40, 521-529 (1989)

    1989

  42. [51]

    S.-O. Kim, D. -C. Lee, A complete dry lithography using plasma processes. Surface and Coating Technol. 120-121, 746-751 (1999)

    1999

  43. [52]

    Kong, et al

    M.G. Kong, et al. Plasma medicine: an introductory review. New J. Phys. 11, 115012 (2009)

    2009

  44. [53]

    Lieberman, Analytical solution for capacitive RF sheath

    M.A. Lieberman, Analytical solution for capacitive RF sheath. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 16(6), 638-644 (1988)

    1988

  45. [54]

    Gozadinos, M.M

    G. Gozadinos, M.M. Turner, D. Vender, Collisionless electron heating by capacitive rf sheaths. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(13), 135004 (2001)

    2001

  46. [55]

    Popov, V .A

    O.A. Popov, V .A. Godyak, Power dissipated in low‐pressure radio‐frequency discharge plasmas. J. Appl. Phys. 57(1), 53–58 (1985)

    1985

  47. [56]

    Kaganovich, Anomalous capacitive sheath with deep radio -frequency electric-field penetration

    I.D. Kaganovich, Anomalous capacitive sheath with deep radio -frequency electric-field penetration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(26), 265006 (2002)

    2002

  48. [57]

    Sharma, et al

    S. Sharma, et al. Electric field nonlinearity in very high frequency capacitive discharges at constant electron plasma frequency. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29(4), 045003 (2020)

    2020

  49. [58]

    Sharma, M.M

    S. Sharma, M.M. Turner, Simulation study of stochastic heating in single -frequency capacitively coupled discharges with critical evaluation of analytical models. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 22(3), 035014 (2013)

    2013

  50. [59]

    Sharma, N

    S. Sharma, N. Sirse, et al. Influence of select discharge parameters on electric field transients triggered in collisionless very high frequency capacitive discharges. Phys. Plasmas 26(10), 103508 (2019)

    2019

  51. [60]

    Sharma, S.K

    S. Sharma, S.K. Mishra, P.K. Kaw, Observation of transient electric fields in particle -in- cell simulation of capacitively coupled discharges. Phys. Plasmas 21(7), 073511 (2014) 24

    2014

  52. [61]

    Kaganovich, O.V

    I.D. Kaganovich, O.V . Polomarov, C.E. Theodosiou, Revisiting the anomalous RF field penetration into a warm plasma. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 34(3), 696-717 (2006)

    2006

  53. [62]

    Surendra, D.B

    M. Surendra, D.B. Graves, Capacitively coupled glow discharges at frequencies above 13.56 MHz. Appl. Phys. Lett. 59(17), 2091–2093 (1991)

    1991

  54. [63]

    Peters, L

    G.I. Peters, L. Allen, Amplified spontaneous emission. IV . Beam divergence and spatial coherence. J. Phys. A: Gen. Phys. 5(4), 546 (1972)

    1972

  55. [64]

    Cluggish, J.R

    B.P. Cluggish, J.R. Danielson, C.F. Driscoll, Resonant particle heating of an electron plasma by oscillating sheaths. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(2), 353-356 (1998)

    1998

  56. [65]

    Kaufman, W.H

    L. Kaufman, W.H. Steier, A plasma-column band-pass microwave filter. IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 10(6), 431-439 (1962)

    1962

  57. [66]

    Sharma, S. et al. Electric field filamentation and higher harmonic generation in very high frequency capacitive discharges. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52(36), 365201 (2019)

    2019

  58. [67]

    Trieschmann, et al

    Wilczek, S. Trieschmann, et al. Disparity between current and voltage driven capacitively coupled radio frequency discharges. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27(12), 125010 (2018)

    2018

  59. [68]

    Upadhyay, I.R

    R.R. Upadhyay, I.R. Sawada, et al. Effect of electromagnetic waves and higher harmonics in capacitively coupled plasma phenomena. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46(47), 472001 (2013)

    2013

  60. [69]

    Economou, Tailored ion energy distributions on plasma electrodes

    D.J. Economou, Tailored ion energy distributions on plasma electrodes. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 31(5), 050823 (2013)

    2013

  61. [70]

    Kawamura, M.A

    E. Kawamura, M.A. Lieberman, A.J. Lichtenberg, Stochastic heating in single and dual frequency capacitive discharges. Phys. Plasmas 13(5), 053506 (2006)

    2006

  62. [71]

    Schulze, E

    J. Schulze, E. Schuengel, et al. The influence of the secondary electron induced asymmetry on the Electrical Asymmetry Effect in capacitively coupled plasmas. 2014 IEEE 41st International Conference on Plasma Sciences (ICOPS) held with 2014 IEEE International Conference on Hig...

    2014

  63. [72]

    Baloniak, R

    T. Baloniak, R. Reuter, A.V . Keudell, Fundamental aspects of substrate biasing: ion velocity distributions and nonlinear effects. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43(33), 335201 (2010)

    2010

  64. [73]

    Miller, E.V

    P.A. Miller, E.V . Barnat, et al. Spatial and frequency dependence of plasma currents in a 300mm capacitively coupled plasma reactor. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 15(4), 889–899 (2006)

    2006

  65. [74]

    Simha, S

    S. Simha, S. Sharma, et al. Kinetic simulation of a 50 mTorr capacitively coupled argon discharge over a range of frequencies and comparison to experiments. Phys. Plasmas 30(8), 083509 (2023)

    2023

  66. [75]

    Sharma, et al

    S. Sharma, et al. Plasma asymmetry and electron and ion energy distribution function in capacitive discharges excited by tailored waveforms. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 55(27), 275202 (2022)

    2022

  67. [76]

    Widner, I

    M. Widner, I. Alexeff, W.D. Jones, Ion acoustic wave -sheath interaction. Phys. Lett. A 32(3), 177-178 (1970)

    1970

  68. [77]

    Christensen, N

    T. Christensen, N. Hershkowitz, Ion acoustic waves excited by boundary sheaths. Physics Letters 61(A)(3), 170-172 (1977)

    1977

  69. [78]

    Alfven, Double layers and circuits in astrophysics

    H. Alfven, Double layers and circuits in astrophysics. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. PS -14(6), 779-793 (1986)

    1986

  70. [79]

    Tskhakaya, One -dimensional plasma sheath model in front of the divertor plates

    D. Tskhakaya, One -dimensional plasma sheath model in front of the divertor plates. Plasma Phys. Controlled. Fusion 59, 114001 (2017)

    2017

  71. [80]

    Osborne, A

    A. Osborne, A. Lucas, Stochastic theory of nonlinear electrical circuits in thermal equilibrium. Annals of Physics 478, 169997 (2025) 25

    2025

  72. [81]

    Bellan, Motion of a single plasma particle

    P.M. Bellan, Motion of a single plasma particle. In: Fundamentals of Plasma Physics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 75-145 (2006)

    2006

  73. [82]

    Piel, Kinetic Description of Plasmas

    A. Piel, Kinetic Description of Plasmas. In: Plasma Physics. Graduate Texts in Physics. Springer (2017)

    2017

  74. [83]

    Akabe, Basic Properties of Plasma in Fluid Model

    H. Akabe, Basic Properties of Plasma in Fluid Model. In: The Physics of Laser Plasmas and Applications, 2, Springer Series in Plasma Science and Technology. Springer (2024)

    2024

  75. [84]

    Horsten, G

    N. Horsten, G. Samaey, M. Baelmans, Hybrid fluid -kinetic model for neutral particles in the plasma edge. Nuclear Materials and Energy 18, 201-207 (2019)

    2019

  76. [85]

    Beklemishev, M

    A. Beklemishev, M. Tessarotto, Covariant gyrokinetic description of relativistic plasmas. Astronomy and Astrophys. 428(1), 1-19 (2004)

    2004

  77. [86]

    Zezhong, W

    L. Zezhong, W. Xue, et al. Synchronicity and energy evolution of field -coupled Chua's circuits via parallel inductor-capacitor coupling channel. Chaos Solit. Fract. 197, 116545 (2025)

    2025

  78. [87]

    Chu, M.Z

    K.T. Chu, M.Z. Bazant, Nonlinear electrochemical relaxation around conductors. ArXiv, arXiv:cond-mat/0603220v2 (2006)

    2006 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Hadi, R.T

    J.H. Hadi, R.T. Kareem, et al. The study of ion transport parameters connected with Na+ ion dynamics in biopolymer electrolytes through electrical equivalent circuits: Dielectric and electrochemical properties. Results in Physics 54, 107076 (2023)

    2023

  80. [89]

    P. M. Sockol, Sheath structure in a plasma diode. Phys. Fluids 13, 1060–1065 (1970)

    1970

  81. [90]

    Carneiro, C

    L.T. Carneiro, C. da C. Rapozo, Parametric amplification in a low-density plasma sheath. Phys. Rev. A 43, 4473-4479 (1991)

    1991

  82. [91]

    Tabib-Azar, P

    M. Tabib-Azar, P. Pai, Microplasma field effect transistors. Micromachines 8, 117 (2017)

    2017

  83. [92]

    Kumar, K

    M.J. Kumar, K. Nadda, Bipolar charge -plasma transistor: A novel three terminal device. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 59, 962-967 (2012)

    2012

  84. [93]

    Dzafic, et al., Plasma sheath modelling to predict etch -induced overlay

    H. Dzafic, et al., Plasma sheath modelling to predict etch -induced overlay. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 55 (7), 075201 (2021)

    2021

  85. [94]

    Hecht, et al., First -principles analysis of energy exchange in time -varying capacitors for energy trapping applications

    K. Hecht, et al., First -principles analysis of energy exchange in time -varying capacitors for energy trapping applications. IEEE Access 11, 71494-71502 (2023)

    2023

  86. [95]

    Elgendy, et al., New achievement of the global sheath-bulk model for the collisionless radio-frequency using in scale industries

    A.T. Elgendy, et al., New achievement of the global sheath-bulk model for the collisionless radio-frequency using in scale industries. Heliyon 8, e12264 (2022)

    2022

  87. [96]

    Schwarzenbach, et al., Sheath impedance effects in very high frequency plasma experiments

    W. Schwarzenbach, et al., Sheath impedance effects in very high frequency plasma experiments. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14 (1), 132–138 (1996)

    1996

  88. [97]

    Suzuki, M

    M. Suzuki, M. Takayama, K.Z. Zhang, Nonlinear stability and instability of plasma boundary layers. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2025.134743

    2025

  89. [98]

    Dwivedi, P.K

    C.B. Dwivedi, P.K. Karmakar, S.C. Tripathy, A Gravito -electrostatic sheath model for surface origin of subsonic solar wind plasma. Astrophys. J. 663 (2), 1340-1353 (2007)

    2007

  90. [99]

    Sarma, P.K

    P. Sarma, P.K. Karmakar, Solar plasma characterization in Kappa (𝜅)-modified polytropic turbomagnetic GES-model perspective. MNRAS 519 (2), 2879-2916 (2023)

    2023

  91. [100]

    S. Das, A. Atteya, P.K. Karmakar, A theoretic analysis of magnetoactive GES -based turbulent solar plasma instability. MNRAS 523 (4), 5635-5660 (2023)

    2023

  92. [101]

    Karmakar, H.P

    P.K. Karmakar, H.P. Gautam, M. Lal, C.B. Dwivedi, Stability analysis of the Gravito - Electrostatic Sheath-based solar plasma equilibrium. MNRAS 460 (3), 2919-2932 (2016)

    2016

  93. [102]

    Kuijpers, H.U

    J. Kuijpers, H.U. Frey, L. Fletcher, Electric current circuits in astrophysics. Space Sci. Rev. 188, 3-57 (2015)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.