pith. sign in

arxiv: 1007.1338 · v3 · pith:NEQHYB2Hnew · submitted 2010-07-08 · 🧮 math.RT

Bounded reductive subalgebras of sl(n)

classification 🧮 math.RT
keywords mathfrakboundedreductivesubalgebrasmodulesmoduledescribesubset
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Let $\mathfrak g$ be a semisimple Lie algebra and $\mathfrak k\subset\mathfrak g$ be a reductive in $\mathfrak g$ subalgebra. A $(\mathfrak g, \mathfrak k)$-module is a $\mathfrak g$-module which after restriction to $\mathfrak k$ becomes a direct sum of finite-dimensional $\mathfrak k$-modules. I.Penkov and V.Serganova introduce definition of bounded $(\mathfrak g, \mathfrak k)$-modules for reductive subalgebras $\mathfrak k\subset\mathfrak g$, i.e. $(\mathfrak g, \mathfrak k)$-modules whose $\mathfrak k$-multiplicities are uniformly bounded. A question arising in this context is, given $\mathfrak g$, to describe all reductive in $\mathfrak g$ bounded subalgebras, i.e. reductive in $\mathfrak g$ subalgebras $\mathfrak k$ for which at least one infinite-dimensional bounded $(\mathfrak g, \mathfrak k)$-module exists. In the present paper we describe explicitly all reductive in $\mathfrak{sl}_n$ bounded subalgebras. Our technique is based on symplectic geometry and the notion of spherical variety. We also characterize the irreducible components of the associated varieties of simple bounded $(\mathfrak g, \mathfrak k)$-modules.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.