The regularity properties of nonlocal abstract wave equations

Veli Shakhmurov

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 32 references

The regularity properties of nonlocal abstract wave equations

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that the Cauchy problem for nonlocal abstract wave equations with operator-valued convolution kernels has a unique local strong solution, and a global one whenever a uniform norm bound holds.

desk verdict A genuinely new operator-valued framework for nonlocal wave equations, but the load-bearing multiplier estimate and energy identity both have sign/operator errors that make the proofs unsound as written. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09759 v1 pith:NFBVNKBD submitted 2019-08-20 math.AP

Veli Shakhmurov This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35L0535L7035Q5342B1547D06

keywords nonlocalwaveequationsoperator-valuedconvolutionkernelsFouriermultiplierscosineoperatorfunctionsHilbert-space-valuedSobolevspacesBoussinesqwell-posednessenergyconservation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the Cauchy problem for nonlocal wave equations of the form $u_{tt} - a*\Delta u + A*u = \Delta[g*f(u)]$, where $A$ and $g$ are convolution kernels taking values as operators on a Hilbert space $H$, and $a$ is a scalar kernel. It claims that, under sectoriality and smoothness hypotheses on the Fourier symbols, the problem has a unique local strong solution in the $H$-valued Sobolev-type space $Y^{s,p}_\infty(A,H)$, with the maximal existence time controlled by the size of the initial data. If the solution's norm stays bounded up to that maximal time, the solution extends to all times. The same framework yields global solutions for small data through a conserved energy, and it covers infinite systems of nonlocal wave equations and degenerate mixed problems as applications.

What carries the argument

The central object is the operator-valued Fourier symbol $\eta(\xi)=[\hat a(\xi)|\xi|^2+\hat A(\xi)]^{1/2}$ together with the cosine and sine operator families $C(\xi,t)=\frac12(e^{it\eta(\xi)}+e^{-it\eta(\xi)})$ and $S(\xi,t)=(2i\eta(\xi))^{-1}(e^{it\eta(\xi)}-e^{-it\eta(\xi)})$. These families solve the Fourier-transformed ODE and, through uniform Fourier multiplier estimates, transfer spatial regularity of the data to temporal regularity of the solution. The differentiability bound $\|[D^\alpha \hat A(\xi)]\eta(\xi)^{-1}\|_{B(H)}\le M$ is what makes those multiplier estimates uniform in $\xi$ and $t$.

What would settle it

Solve the scalar case $H=\mathbb{C}$, $a=1$, $\hat A(\xi)=1$, $\hat g(\xi)=(1+|\xi|^2)^{-1}$, $f(u)=u^3$, with smooth initial data in the stated spaces, using a spectrally accurate spatial discretization. Lemma 4.3 asserts the energy $E(t)$ is exactly constant; any drift in $E(t)$ beyond numerical error would falsify the energy identity and therefore the global-existence theorem built on it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the nonlocal operator terms can be handled by a Fourier-multiplier machine: after taking the Fourier transform in the spatial variable, the linearized equation becomes $\hat u_{tt} + \eta(\xi)^2 \hat u = \hat g$ with $\eta(\xi)=[\hat a(\xi)|\xi|^2+\hat A(\xi)]^{1/2}$, whose solution is written with cosine and sine operator families. The load-bearing estimates are uniform bounds on these families as Fourier multipliers between $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n;H)$ and $L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n;H)$, obtained from the differentiability condition on $\hat A(\xi)$. The nonlinear term is then a small perturbation, so contraction mapping gives local existence and uniqueness; a Gronwall-type continuation argument promotes this to a global solution whenever the relevant norm does not blow up. The paper also constructs an energy functional that is constant along solutions and uses it to prove global existence for small initial data in the $L^2$-based setting.

Load-bearing premise

The proof needs the Fourier symbol of the operator $A$ to be differentiable with a fixed domain and to satisfy the uniform bound $\|[D^\alpha \hat A(\xi)]\eta(\xi)^{-1}\|\le M$; if that single bound fails, the multiplier estimates that support the whole argument collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every concrete kernel and operator satisfying the stated symbol conditions, including the infinite-matrix and degenerate-operator examples in the applications, inherits local well-posedness in the same solution spaces.
If a solution's $Y^{s,p}_\infty(A,H)$ norm remains bounded up to its maximal existence time, it can be continued for all time, so finite-time blow-up is characterized by the divergence of this norm.
Small initial data in $Y^{s,2}_1(A^{1/2})$ produce global strong solutions in $C^{(2)}([0,\infty);Y^{s,2}(A,H))$.
The conserved energy $E(t)$ provides an a priori bound that rules out blow-up for data with $B\phi,B\psi\in L^2$ and $G(\phi)\in L^1$ under the stated kernel-decay conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The differentiability condition on $\hat A(\xi)$ resembles the classical multiplier condition for Fourier integrals; one could try replacing it with weaker Besov-type operator multiplier conditions, which would extend the results to rougher symbols.
The energy identity suggests an underlying Hamiltonian structure; if the operator $B$ is invertible on appropriate spaces, the equation may be rewritten as a second-order Hamiltonian system, opening the door to scattering or invariant-measure questions.
The framework absorbs the usual scalar Boussinesq and double-dispersion equations by taking $H=\mathbb{C}$; a natural testable extension is to verify the differentiability bound for the bi-Helmholtz kernels used in nonlocal elasticity, making the theorem directly applicable to those models.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a paper with a genuinely new abstract setup—operator-valued convolution kernels for Boussinesq-type wave equations in H-valued Lp spaces—but the central estimates do not hold as written. The framework deserves attention; the manuscript in front of us does not.

What is new: the operator-coefficient formulation is a real extension of scalar nonlocal wave theory. It covers infinite systems and degenerate boundary-value problems in one package, and I don't see that in the cited literature. The general strategy—Duhamel's formula, Fourier multiplier estimates, contraction mapping—is standard, and the author does engage with the Boussinesq literature. Credit where due: the abstraction is plausible.

Where it falls apart: Equation (2.11) is algebraically wrong. Differentiating (1+|ξ|^2)^{-s/2} C(ξ,t) gives a leading term with a minus sign and a factor -(t/2)(1+|ξ|^2)^{-s/2}(2ξ_k a + ∂_ξ_k Â) S, not the displayed +(t/4)... η^{1/2}... S. The extra η^{1/2} matters: it changes the hypotheses needed for (2.12), and Condition 2.1(4) doesn't control it. Worse, the computation differentiates e^{itη} as if η commutes with ∂η; no such commutativity is assumed. The multiplier bounds (2.12), and with them Theorem 2.1 and the contraction argument in Theorem 3.1, are unsupported. Lemma 4.3's energy conservation has the same sign disease: the equation has −Δ[g*f(u)] on the right, but the bracket in the energy derivative writes +Δ[...]. The integral representation (3.4) also uses an undefined operator U. The applications verify sectoriality in one line citing [32], with none of the required details.

These are load-bearing problems, not typos. The local existence theorem rests on the broken multiplier estimate, and the global existence theorem rests on the broken energy identity. The abstraction might be repairable, but a reader cannot verify it from this text.

Who this is for: people working on nonlocal wave equations and operator-valued Fourier multipliers may find the setup worth thinking about. But I wouldn't cite this version as a proof.

Recommendation: don't desk-reject, because the framework is legitimate and the defects, while serious, look repairable. Send to a serious referee with an expectation of major revision. As it stands, the manuscript is not acceptable.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the Cauchy problem for a nonlocal abstract wave equation u_tt - a*Delta u + A*u = Delta[g*f(u)] with operator-valued convolution kernels acting in a Hilbert space H. The authors derive Fourier multiplier estimates for the linearized problem, then prove local and global strong well-posedness by contraction arguments, add a conservation-of-energy argument for global existence, and apply the abstract theorems to finite systems of nonlocal wave equations and to a degenerate nonlocal wave equation. The main results are Theorem 3.1 (local and global existence under a maximal-time criterion), Theorems 3.2-3.4 (well-posedness in H^s and Y^{s,2}_infty spaces), and Theorem 4.1 (global existence under an energy condition).

Significance. The abstract framework is broad, and the strategy of reducing the problem to uniform operator-valued Fourier multiplier estimates is natural; the applications to systems and degenerate equations are potentially interesting. The paper would be a useful contribution if the estimates were correct. However, the central multiplier computation contains an algebraic error that changes the required hypotheses, the Duhamel representation uses an undefined operator and an inconsistent sign, and the energy identity is derived with the wrong sign. I do not see a way to salvage the main theorems as stated without substantial reworking; the verification of the key hypotheses in the applications is also mostly asserted rather than proved.

major comments (5)

[Section 2, Eq. (2.11)] Equation (2.11) is algebraically incorrect, and the error is load-bearing. Direct differentiation of C(xi,t) in (2.3) gives partial_{xi_k} C = (it/2)(partial_{xi_k} eta)(e^{it eta}-e^{-it eta}) = -t(partial_{xi_k} eta) eta S. With partial_{xi_k} eta = (1/2) eta^{-1}(2 xi_k a + partial_{xi_k} A_hat), and assuming eta commutes with its derivative, this becomes -(t/2)(1+|xi|^2)^{-s/2}(2 xi_k a + partial_{xi_k} A_hat)S. The paper instead gives +(t/4)(1+|xi|^2)^{-s/2} eta^{1/2}(2 xi_k a + partial_{xi_k} A_hat)S: wrong sign, wrong factor, and a spurious eta^{1/2}. Thus the bound (2.12), and with it the Lp-to-Linfty multiplier estimates used in Theorem 2.1, are not established from Condition 2.1 as stated. The extra eta^{1/2} is not a harmless typo, since it would require a hypothesis on eta^{1/2}(2 xi a + partial A_hat)S that Condition 2.1(4) does not provide. Moreover, differentiating e^{it eta(xi)} for operator-valued eta(xi) requires time-ordered exponentials or a commutativity assumption; no such assumption appears in Condition 2.1.
[Section 3, Eq. (3.4) and the fixed-point equation] In the proof of Theorem 3.1, Q(u) is defined in (3.4) with the operator U(xi,t-tau), which is never defined, and with a factor -i; in the subsequent fixed-point equation after (3.14) the term is written as an integral of F^{-1}[S(t-tau,xi)|xi|^2 g_hat(xi) f_hat(u)(xi,tau)] d tau with no minus sign. Since the nonlinear term in (1.1) is +Delta[g*f(u)], its Fourier transform is -|xi|^2 g_hat f_hat, so the Duhamel term must carry a minus sign. The contraction argument therefore operates on an incorrectly stated integral equation, and the asserted equivalence between (1.1)-(1.2) and the fixed-point problem is not established.
[Section 3, Condition 3.1(1) and Condition 3.2(2)] Condition 3.1 assumes only s>n/p, while the linear estimates (2.15)-(2.16) used in the contraction argument are proved in Theorem 2.1 under the stronger condition s>1+n/p. No argument is supplied to close this gap. Similarly, Theorem 3.2 is proved using Theorem 2.2, which requires s>1+n/2, whereas Condition 3.2(2) only assumes s>n/2. These mismatched regularity thresholds affect the function spaces in which the contraction is claimed and are not merely technical details.
[Section 4, Lemma 4.3] The energy identity is derived with the wrong sign for the nonlinear term. The equation (1.1) is u_tt - a*Delta u + A*u = Delta[g*f(u)], so the bracket in the displayed derivative should be u_tt - a*Delta u + A*u - Delta[g*f(u)] = 0. As printed, the bracket contains '+ Delta[g*f(u)]' and does not vanish; therefore the constancy of E(t) in (4.14) is not established. This undermines Theorem 4.1 and the global application theorems that rely on it.
[Section 5, applications] The applications do not verify the key Condition 2.1(4). In Theorem 5.1 the uniform sectoriality of A_1_hat(xi) and the bound ||D^alpha A_1_hat(xi) eta_1^{-1}(xi)|| <= M are asserted in one sentence from assumptions (1)-(2), with no proof; in Theorem 5.3 the uniform sectoriality is delegated to [32, Theorem 4.1], but the derivative bound in Condition 5.1(5) is not checked. Since these are the same hypotheses used to justify the multiplier estimates, the applications inherit the gaps of the abstract theorems.

minor comments (4)

[Throughout] The text repeatedly says 'strange solution' where 'strong solution' is meant (Theorems 3.1, 3.2, 5.1, and 5.3).
[Section 4, Eq. (4.5)] Equation (4.5) contains the typo 'g_hat^{- -1/2}', and the notation g_hat^{-1/2} for an operator-valued symbol is used without defining its domain.
[Section 4, Eqs. (4.14)-(4.15)] The energy E(t) in (4.14) uses a||g*u||^2, while (4.15) writes a||F^{-1} g_hat * u||^2; these notations should be reconciled.
[Title and inline text] The title has a typo ('equati ons'), and several inline formulas are corrupted by OCR-like artifacts (e.g., 'g_hat^{- -1/2}'); a careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the well-posedness theorems are derived from stated sectoriality and multiplier hypotheses by standard arguments; the only self-citation is an external sectoriality criterion in an application and does not feed back into the main derivation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular in the sense targeted by this pass. Lemma 2.1 obtains the solution representation (2.5)-(2.6) from the Fourier-transformed linear equation (2.4) using standard cosine-operator theory. Theorem 2.1 then derives the Lp-to-L-infinity multiplier bounds (2.12) from the assumed derivative bounds in Condition 2.1(4); whether the intermediate formula (2.11) is algebraically correct is a correctness issue, not a circularity, because Condition 2.1(4) is genuinely stronger than and different from the conclusion, and no parameter is fitted to the target estimate. Theorem 3.1 is a standard contraction-mapping argument: the solution space Y^{s,p}_\infty(A,H) is not assumed to contain the solution; instead the fixed-point map is shown to map and contract a ball Q(M;T) for T satisfying (3.9) and (3.14), and the continuation blip-up statement is obtained by contradiction. The nonlinear estimates in Lemmas 3.2-3.7 and the energy estimates in Section 4 are external or standard elliptic/commutator estimates; none of them is identical to the claimed conclusions. The applications in Section 5 verify the hypotheses rather than assuming the theorems. The one self-citation that appears is [32, Theorem 4.1] in the proof of Theorem 5.3, used to assert uniform sectoriality of the degenerate operator A2. That cited theorem is an external mathematical result with its own hypotheses and does not state or presuppose the well-posedness conclusion of the present paper; it is therefore independent support for an application, not a circular load-bearing step. Accordingly, the central claim has independent content and the circularity burden is zero.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fundamentally new free parameters, fitted quantities, or invented entities. The assumptions are conditions on the data and on the operator functions. The main unstated burden is the strong spectral and differentiability assumptions on the operator-valued Fourier symbol, which are not independently verified in the applications.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Uniform sectoriality and derivative bound for \hat{A}(\xi) (Condition 2.1(2),(4))
Required for resolvent estimates and for the Fourier multiplier estimates (2.11)-(2.12); not derived from the equation and not verified in detail for the applications.
domain assumption \eta(\xi) generates a strongly continuous cosine operator function in H
Cited to Fattorini [29] and Pazy [30], but the stated conditions on \hat{A} do not by themselves guarantee cosine generation for arbitrary sectorial operators; this is a nontrivial spectral assumption.
standard math H-valued Fourier multiplier theorem of Girardi-Weis applies to C(\xi,t) and S(\xi,t)
Hilbert spaces are UMD spaces, so the theorem is applicable provided the derivative estimates (2.12) hold; the paper asserts these estimates without fully verifying the symbol bounds.
standard math Nirenberg inequality in H-valued spaces (Lemma 3.1)
The paper cites interpolation theory and the scalar proof of Nirenberg, and states that the scalar case lifts to Hilbert spaces via norms. The proof is plausible but relies on the missing 'Theorem A1'.
standard math Real interpolation and Sobolev embedding results for Sobolev-Lions spaces ([23,31])
Used to define interpolation spaces and to control L^\infty norms in terms of Sobolev norms; standard results, though the H-valued formulation requires care.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The regularity properties of nonlocal abstract wave equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NFBVNKBD

@misc{pith2026190809759,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The regularity properties of nonlocal abstract wave equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NFBVNKBD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09759}
}

read the original abstract

In this paper, the regularity properties of Cauchy problem for linear and nonlinear nonlocal wave equations are studied.The equation involves a convolution integral operators with a general kernel operator functions whose Fourier transform are operator functions defined in Hilbert space H together with some growth conditions. We establish local and global existence and uniqueness of solutions assuming enough smoothness on the initial data and the operator functions. By selecting the space H and the operators, the wide class of wave equations in the field of physics are obtained.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

[32]

V. B. Shakhmurov, Linear and nonlinear abstract diﬀerential e quations with small marameters, Banach J. Math. Anal. 10 (2016)(1), 147– 168. 30

work page 2016
[1]

A. C. Eringen, Nonlocal Continuum Field Theories, New York, Sprin ger (2002),. 28

work page 2002
[2]

Huang, Formulations of nonlocal continuum mechanics based o n a new deﬁnition of stress tensor Acta Mech

Z. Huang, Formulations of nonlocal continuum mechanics based o n a new deﬁnition of stress tensor Acta Mech. (2006)187, 11–27

work page 2006
[3]

Polizzotto, Nonlocal elasticity and related variational principle s Int

C. Polizzotto, Nonlocal elasticity and related variational principle s Int. J. Solids Struct. ( 2001) 38 7359–80

work page 2001
[4]

C. A. Silling, Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities a nd long-range forces J. Mech. Phys. Solids (2000)48 175-209

work page 2000
[5]

Arndt and M

M. Arndt and M. Griebel, Derivation of higher order gradient cont inuum models from atomistic models for crystalline solids Multiscale Modeling Simul. (2005)4, 531–62

work page 2005
[6]

Blanc, C

X. Blanc, C. LeBris, P. L. Lions, Atomistic to continuum limits for co m- putational materials science, ESAIM— Math. Modelling Numer. Anal. (2007)41, 391–426

work page 2007
[7]

De Godefroy, Blow up of solutions of a generalized Boussinesq e quation IMA J

A. De Godefroy, Blow up of solutions of a generalized Boussinesq e quation IMA J. Appl. Math.(1998) 60 123–38

work page 1998

Show all 32 references

[8]

Constantin and L

A. Constantin and L. Molinet, The initial value problem for a genera lized Boussinesq equation, Diﬀ.Integral Eqns. (2002)15, 1061–72

2002
[9]

Chen and S

G. Chen and S. Wang, Existence and nonexistence of global solut ions for the generalized IMBq equation Nonlinear Anal.—Theory Methods Appl. (1999)36, 961–80

1999
[10]

Lazar, G

M. Lazar, G. A. Maugin and E. C. Aifantis, On a theory of nonloca l elasticity of bi-Helmholtz type and some applications Int. J. Solids and Struct. (2006)43, 1404–21

2006
[11]

Duruk, H.A

N. Duruk, H.A. Erbay and A. Erkip, Global existence and blow-up for a class of nonlocal nonlinear Cauchy problems arising in elasticity, Nonlin - earity, (2010)23, 107–118

2010
[12]

S. Wang, G. Chen, Small amplitude solutions of the generalized IM Bq equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 274 (2002) 846–866

2002
[13]

(2006 )64 159–73

S.Wang and G.Chen, Cauchy problem of the generalized double disp ersion equation Nonlinear Anal.— Theory Methods Appl. (2006 )64 159–73

2006
[14]

Bona, R.L

J.L. Bona, R.L. Sachs, Global existence of smooth solutions and stability of solitary waves for a generalized Boussinesq equation, Comm. Mat h. Phys. 118 (1988), 15–29

1988
[15]

Linares, Global existence of small solutions for a generalized Boussinesq equation, J

F. Linares, Global existence of small solutions for a generalized Boussinesq equation, J. Diﬀerential Equations 106 (1993), 257–293

1993
[16]

Liu, Instability and blow-up of solutions to a generalized Bouss inesq equation, SIAM J

Y. Liu, Instability and blow-up of solutions to a generalized Bouss inesq equation, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 26 (1995), 1527–1546. 29

1995
[17]

Makhankov, Dynamics of classical solutions (in non-integra ble sys- tems), Phys

V.G. Makhankov, Dynamics of classical solutions (in non-integra ble sys- tems), Phys. Lett. C 35(1978), 1–128

1978
[18]

Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves, Wiley–Interscience, N ew York, 1975

G.B. Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves, Wiley–Interscience, N ew York, 1975

1975
[19]

Zabusky, Nonlinear Partial Diﬀerential Equations, Academ ic Press, New York, 1967

N.J. Zabusky, Nonlinear Partial Diﬀerential Equations, Academ ic Press, New York, 1967

1967
[20]

Ashyralyev, N

A. Ashyralyev, N. Aggez, Nonlocal boundary value hyperbolic p roblems involving Integral conditions, Bound.Value Probl., 2014 V (2014):214

2014
[21]

L. S. Pulkina, A non local problem with integral conditions for hyp erbolice quations, Electron.J.Diﬀer.Equ.(1999)45, 1-6

1999
[22]

Girardi, L

M. Girardi, L. Weis, Operator-valued multiplier theorems on Beso v spaces, Math. Nachr. 251 (2003), 34-51

2003
[23]

Triebel, Interpolation theory, Function spaces, Diﬀerentia l operators, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978

H. Triebel, Interpolation theory, Function spaces, Diﬀerentia l operators, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978

1978
[24]

Triebel, Fractals and spectra, Birkhauser Verlag, Related t o Fourier analysis and function spaces, Basel, 1997

H. Triebel, Fractals and spectra, Birkhauser Verlag, Related t o Fourier analysis and function spaces, Basel, 1997

1997
[25]

Nirenberg, On elliptic partial diﬀerential equations, Ann

L. Nirenberg, On elliptic partial diﬀerential equations, Ann. Scu ola Norm. Sup. Pisa (1959)13 , 115–162

1959
[26]

Klainerman, Global existence for nonlinear wave equations, C omm

S. Klainerman, Global existence for nonlinear wave equations, C omm. Pure Appl. Math.(1980)33 , 43–101

1980
[27]

Coifman and Y

R. Coifman and Y. Meyer, Wavelets. Calder´on-Zygmund and Mu ltilinear Operators, Cambridge University Press, 1997

1997
[28]

T. Kato, G. Ponce, Commutator estimates and the Euler and Na vier– Stokes equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (1988)41, 891–907

1988
[29]

H. O. Fattorini, Second order linear diﬀerential equations in Ban ach spaces, in North Holland Mathematics Studies, V. 108, North-Holland, Amste r- dam, 1985

1985
[30]

Pazy, Semigroups of linear operators and applications to par tial diﬀer- ential equations

A. Pazy, Semigroups of linear operators and applications to par tial diﬀer- ential equations. Springer, Berlin, 1983

1983
[31]

V. B. Shakhmurov, Embedding and separable diﬀerential opera tors in Sobolev-Lions type spaces, Math. Notes, 84(2008) (6), 906-92 6

2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [32]

V. B. Shakhmurov, Linear and nonlinear abstract diﬀerential e quations with small marameters, Banach J. Math. Anal. 10 (2016)(1), 147– 168. 30

work page 2016

[2] [1]

A. C. Eringen, Nonlocal Continuum Field Theories, New York, Sprin ger (2002),. 28

work page 2002

[3] [2]

Huang, Formulations of nonlocal continuum mechanics based o n a new deﬁnition of stress tensor Acta Mech

Z. Huang, Formulations of nonlocal continuum mechanics based o n a new deﬁnition of stress tensor Acta Mech. (2006)187, 11–27

work page 2006

[4] [3]

Polizzotto, Nonlocal elasticity and related variational principle s Int

C. Polizzotto, Nonlocal elasticity and related variational principle s Int. J. Solids Struct. ( 2001) 38 7359–80

work page 2001

[5] [4]

C. A. Silling, Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities a nd long-range forces J. Mech. Phys. Solids (2000)48 175-209

work page 2000

[6] [5]

Arndt and M

M. Arndt and M. Griebel, Derivation of higher order gradient cont inuum models from atomistic models for crystalline solids Multiscale Modeling Simul. (2005)4, 531–62

work page 2005

[7] [6]

Blanc, C

X. Blanc, C. LeBris, P. L. Lions, Atomistic to continuum limits for co m- putational materials science, ESAIM— Math. Modelling Numer. Anal. (2007)41, 391–426

work page 2007

[8] [7]

De Godefroy, Blow up of solutions of a generalized Boussinesq e quation IMA J

A. De Godefroy, Blow up of solutions of a generalized Boussinesq e quation IMA J. Appl. Math.(1998) 60 123–38

work page 1998