Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 58 references

Maximal optical chirality via mode coupling in bilayer metasurfaces

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A bilayer metasurface with fourfold rotational symmetry and broken mirror symmetry can reach maximum optical chirality by strong coupling of photonic eigenmodes of opposite out-of-plane parity, followed by loss engineering near critical…

desk verdict A solid extension of the substrate-induced chirality framework to bilayer membranes, with a clean parity rule for two-mode coupling, but the headline same-sign CD scenario is under-validated and needs a direct test against full-wave CD. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17428 v2 pith:NG2X2PMH submitted 2025-07-23 physics.optics

Brijesh Kumar , Ivan Toftul , Anshuman Kumar , Maxim Gorkunov , Yuri Kivshar This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords circulardichroismchiralitybilayermetasurfacemodecouplingresonant-stateexpansionquasinormalmodescriticalparityselection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that bilayer membrane metasurfaces—two stacked patterned dielectric membranes with fourfold rotational symmetry but broken out-of-plane mirror symmetry—can be made maximally chiral, responding oppositely to left- and right-circularly polarized light, by engineering strong coupling between photonic eigenmodes and then adding controlled loss. Its central result is a parity selection rule: coupling two pairs of degenerate modes produces modal circular dichroism only when the two pairs have opposite out-of-plane parity. The paper identifies two scenarios that realize this rule: direct strong coupling of opposite-parity pairs, and indirect coupling of two same-parity pairs through an opposite-parity bridge pair, which can yield two resonances with the same sign of modal circular dichroism. It also shows that transmission circular dichroism requires dissipation and is maximized at critical coupling, when radiation loss balances absorption loss. If the claim is right, it substantially broadens the class of planar chiral surfaces that can be fabricated with standard nanolithography.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is resonant-state expansion (RSE): quasinormal modes of the unperturbed single-layer membrane are used as a basis, and adding the second layer is treated as a permittivity perturbation with a symmetric coupling matrix $V_{nm}$. Rotation symmetry lets each degenerate pair be represented by two coupling constants $M_1$, $M_2$ and one real angle $\psi$ under the assumption of close-to-linearly polarized far-field asymptotics, and mode mixing is written as a generalized rotation with a complex mixing angle. Substituting this parametrization into the definition of modal circular dichroism yields the parity selection rule $CD_{\mathrm{mode}}\propto(1-p_1p_2)$. For the three-pair case, an analogous effective two-mode problem is obtained by adiabatically eliminating the intermediate opposite-parity pair, producing effective couplings $u_3$, $u_5$ and mixing constants $q_3$, $q_5$. Transmission CD is then connected to absorption through chiral coupled-mode theory, giving the critical-coupling condition.

What would settle it

Compute the modal circular dichroism directly from numerically obtained eigenfields of a C4-symmetric bilayer at an avoided crossing of two same-parity mode pairs that are not mediated by any opposite-parity pair; a nonzero value would contradict Eq. (24). Alternatively, measure transmission CD in a lossless fabricated structure: the paper predicts exactly zero co-polarized CD, so any measurable CD in the lossless case would disprove the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Eq. (24): after hybridizing two degenerate mode pairs of a C4-symmetric single-layer membrane by adding a second layer, the modal circular dichroism of the mixed modes is proportional to $1-p_1p_2$, where $p_1,p_2=\pm1$ label the out-of-plane parity of each pair; nonzero chirality requires opposite parities. Two coupling scenarios are demonstrated. In Crossing A, two opposite-parity pairs couple directly, and the two split modes acquire opposite signs of modal CD. In Crossing B, two same-parity pairs that do not couple directly are coupled indirectly through a third opposite-parity pair, and the resulting two resonances can share the same sign of modal CD. The paper further derives that a lossless reciprocal C4-symmetric structure has zero transmission CD, and that adding dissipation with $\gamma_{\mathrm{rad}}\simeq\gamma_{\mathrm{abs}}$ (critical coupling) maximizes co-polarized circular dichroism.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation of the parity selection rule assumes each initial eigenmode pair has close-to-linearly polarized far-field plane-wave asymptotics, so all coupling to circular polarizations reduces to two complex amplitudes and one real angle; the paper itself notes that radiation from photonic crystal slabs need not be linearly polarized.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Lossless C4-symmetric reciprocal metasurfaces show zero transmission CD, so any maximally chiral response in this class requires engineered dissipation.
  • Opposite-parity mode pairs are the only direct source of modal chirality; same-parity pairs must be coupled through an opposite-parity bridge to become chiral.
  • At Crossing B, two resonances can carry the same sign of modal CD, offering a dual-resonance chiral response from one structure.
  • Each resonance reaches its maximum transmission CD at a different loss level, consistent with critical coupling per mode rather than one global optimum.
  • The RSE fits reproduce both real and imaginary parts of the hybridized branches, so the model can be used predictively to design thickness and loss parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • By the same symmetry logic, the parity rule should transfer to other rotational symmetries (such as C3 or C6) and to any perturbation—substrate, superstrate, or asymmetric environment—that couples opposite-parity mode pairs, not just the bilayer geometry simulated here.
  • The same-sign, two-resonance route at Crossing B suggests a design strategy for dual-wavelength chiral sensing in which both resonances respond identically to one enantiomer; the spectral separation could be tuned by controlling the frequency of the intermediate pair.
  • Because the indirect coupling strength scales as the product of the two bridge couplings divided by the detuning of the bridge mode, placing the bridge pair very close to the crossing should steepen the anti-crossing and enhance mode CD; this is a testable prediction about layer thickness.
  • The assumption of close-to-linearly polarized far-field asymptotics could fail for modes with elliptical far-field polarization, so testing Eq. (24) against direct numerical mode CD for such modes would delimit the rule's domain.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies planar bilayer membrane metasurfaces with C4-symmetric four-petal holes that become truly chiral by breaking the out-of-plane mirror symmetry of a single-layer C4h structure. Using resonant-state expansion (RSE) and the mode-parity classification of the C4h group, the authors derive a selection rule: coupling of two degenerate mode pairs produces modal circular dichroism only when the initial pairs have opposite parity (Eq. 24). They then distinguish two scenarios: Crossing A, where opposite-parity pairs couple directly and produce modal CDs of opposite sign, and Crossing B, where two same-parity pairs are indirectly coupled through an opposite-parity pair, which is argued to allow two resonances with the same sign of modal CD. Finally, using a coupled-mode absorption model, the authors show that transmission CD is maximized near critical coupling, Eq. (47), and demonstrate loss-engineered CD in COMSOL simulations for both crossings.

Significance. The symmetry-based selection rule is valuable: it gives a concrete group-theoretic criterion for designing chiral hybridized modes in planar multilayer structures, and the S-matrix analysis in Appendix A cleanly establishes that lossless C4-symmetric reciprocal metasurfaces have zero co-polarized transmission CD. The analytic RSE fits reproduce the numerically computed eigenfrequencies in Figs. 3 and 4, which is a useful validation of the modal-coupling picture. The paper also clearly identifies a possible route to loss-engineered maximum chirality in a lithographically simple geometry. However, the central novelty relative to Ref. [21] is Crossing B, the same-sign modal CD produced by three-mode indirect coupling, and that mechanism is not tested against the full-wave modal CD; the manuscript therefore currently establishes the existence of a plausible mechanism rather than demonstrating that the simulated structure realizes it.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III B, Eqs. (27)-(42)] The three-mode RSE model is used to explain the same-sign modal CD of Crossing B, but it is never compared with the full-wave CDmode. Appendix G and Fig. 4 fit only Re(Ω±) and Im(Ω±) using V34 and V45 as free parameters; the far-field coupling parameters M3, M4, M5, ψ, and the resulting CDmode predicted by Eqs. (42) are not extracted or tested. The statement after Eq. (42) that the signs of CD of E3' and E5' are 'not subjected to any bounds' only establishes existence, not that the simulated bilayers realize the same-sign case. Since the full-wave CDmode is already shown in Fig. 5(e), the authors should overlay the RSE-computed CDmode, or otherwise verify the same-sign prediction from the fitted parameters; without this, the observed same-sign CD remains underdetermined.
  2. [Sec. III B and Appendix F] The vanishing direct coupling V35 ≈ 0 between modes 3 and 5 is load-bearing for the indirect three-mode mechanism, but it is inferred from symmetric-perturbation simulations rather than derived from symmetry. Equation (E7) shows that a symmetric perturbation generally couples same-parity modes, so V35 = 0 is a property of these specific modes, not a consequence of C4h symmetry. Because a nonzero direct V35 would provide a simpler route to same-sign modal CD, the paper should either derive this vanishing from mode-field overlap integrals, quantify an upper bound for V35 from the fitting, or explicitly list it as a model assumption that needs independent verification.
  3. [Sec. III A and Appendix C, Eq. (20)] The derivation of the central parity-selection rule, Eq. (24), assumes that the initial single-layer modes have close-to-linearly polarized plane-wave asymptotics, parameterized by two complex amplitudes M1, M2 and a real angle ψ. The paper itself cites Ref. [52] to note that such asymptotics need not be linearly polarized. The symmetry argument that each achiral mode has zero CD is robust, but Eq. (24) is not a fully general theorem without this parametrization. For the low-Q mode 4 involved in Crossing B, the assumption is especially non-trivial. A concrete check would be to compute the m-parameters of the five single-layer modes directly from the COMSOL fields and verify Eqs. (C6)-(C15), or to prove the parity rule with a weaker assumption.
  4. [Sec. III B] The RSE treatment for Crossing B retains only the selected three mode pairs and neglects all other modes. The eigenfrequency fits in Fig. 4 are good, but they do not by themselves validate the truncation, especially because the effective model (33)-(36) contains enough free parameters (V34 and V45) to absorb deviations. Since the same-sign CD could in principle also arise from modes outside the (3,4,5) subspace, the manuscript should provide at least one additional check, such as adding a neighboring pair to the subspace or comparing the fitted effective coupling strengths with direct overlap-integral estimates.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2 and Sec. II B] The main text refers to Fig. 2(b) for the single-layer spectrum and Fig. 2(c) for the bilayer spectrum, but the figure caption only defines panels (a) and (b); this mismatch should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (23)] The formula in Eq. (23) contains a garbled typeset term: 'M*_2^2 sin^2 sin 2ϕ_+ - M*_1^2 cos^2 sin 2ϕ_+' appears to be missing brackets or exponents and should be cleaned up for the reader to verify the algebra leading to Eq. (24).
  3. [Fig. 5] The colored circles for CDmode in Fig. 5(e,f) are not accompanied by a color scale or numeric labels; adding a small color bar or explicit value marks would make the overlay between CDco and CDmode easier to assess.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the parity selection rule is derived from symmetry and far-field algebra independently of the fitted RSE parameters, and the loss-engineering maximum is a standard critical-coupling condition.

full rationale

The central result, Eq. (24), follows from the parity relations (6) and the far-field parametrization (20), which is constructed in Appendix C; it does not use the fitted V-matrix elements. The fits in Figs. 3 and G1/G2 only determine V12 and V34, V45 from COMSOL eigenfrequencies to validate the RSE dispersion (12) and (36), while CDmode is extracted from the full-wave eigenmodes, not from the fitted model. The loss-engineering condition (47) is derived from Eq. (46) via the condition ∂γabs CDco = 0 and is a conventional critical-coupling condition, not an input. The paper does rely on the authors' prior RSE framework (Ref. [21]) for Eq. (8), but that framework rests on external resonant-state expansion references [31,32,35] and the present appendices re-derive the needed mode-rotation and coupling-matrix identities. The Crossing-B argument is conditional, since same-sign CD arises only 'in the case when they are of the same sign', and the assumption V35 ≈ 0 is inferred from symmetric-perturbation simulations rather than from symmetry; these are underdetermination or assumption risks, not circularity. No prediction in the paper reduces to its fitted inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The bilayer membrane is a concrete design, and the model ingredients, modes, coupling parameters, and losses, are standard tools in resonant nanophotonics.

free parameters (2)
  • V12 (Crossing A coupling) = complex, thickness-dependent (Fig. G1e)
    Fitted to COMSOL eigenfrequency branches using Eq. (12) and BFGS minimization; a single constant V12 failed to reproduce the imaginary parts of the branches.
  • V34 and V45 (Crossing B couplings) = complex, thickness-dependent (Fig. G2c)
    Two complex parameters fitted to COMSOL eigenfrequency branches for Crossing B using Eq. (36); V33, V44, V55 are estimated from symmetric-perturbation simulations.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Resonant-state expansion (RSE) perturbation theory and quasinormal-mode normalization are valid for the bilayer perturbation.
    Used in Eqs. (7)-(8) and throughout Section III; taken from Refs. [21, 31, 32, 35] without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption The single-layer membrane has C4h point-group symmetry and the bilayer has C4 symmetry.
    Underpins the degeneracy structure, up-down parity, and mode transformation rules in Section II and Appendix B.
  • ad hoc to paper The initial modes have close-to-linearly polarized far-field asymptotics parameterized by two complex amplitudes M1, M2 and a real angle psi.
    Introduced around Eq. (20) and Appendix C; the paper cites Ref. [52] for the fact that far-field polarizations need not be linear, so this is an approximation that can affect Eq. (24).
  • ad hoc to paper Direct coupling between same-parity modes 3 and 5 vanishes, V35 approximately 0.
    Inferred from symmetric-perturbation simulations in Appendix E rather than derived from symmetry; used to justify the indirect-coupling model for Crossing B.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Maximal optical chirality via mode coupling in bilayer metasurfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NG2X2PMH

@misc{pith2026250717428,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Maximal optical chirality via mode coupling in bilayer metasurfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NG2X2PMH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17428}
}
abstract

Recent advances in the physics of resonant optical metasurfaces allowed to realize the so-called maximum chirality of planar structures by engineering their geometric parameters. Here we employ bilayer membrane metasurfaces with a square lattice of rotated C$_4$-symmetric holes and uncover very different scenarios of chirality maximization by virtue of strong coupling of photonic eigenmodes of the membranes supplemented by smart engineering of dissipation losses. Our findings substantially expand the class of planar maximally chiral resonant surfaces feasible for widespread nanolithography techniques desired for metaphotonic applications in chiral sensing, chiral light emission, detection and polarization conversion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17428 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    Tanaka, D

    K. Tanaka, D. Arslan, S. Fasold, M. Steinert, J. Sautter, M. Falkner, T. Pertsch, M. Decker, and I. Staude, Chiral bilayer all-dielectric metasurfaces, ACS Nano 14, 15926 (2020), pMID: 33179909

    work page 2020

  2. [52]

    Tsimokha, V

    M. Tsimokha, V. Igoshin, A. Nikitina, I. Toftul, K. Frizyuk, and M. Petrov, Acoustic resonators: Sym- metry classification and multipolar content of the eigen- modes, Phys. Rev. B 105, 165311 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [1]

    This group, which is a direct product of inversion and 4-fold rotation symmetries, i.e

    Properties of a four fold symmetric patterned membrane Next, we analyse eigenmodes of the structure which possesses C4h point group symmetry — a point group symmetry of the unit cell of symmetric membrane. This group, which is a direct product of inversion and 4-fold rotation symmetries, i.e. C4h = C4 ⊗ i, has 8 elements: – Identity: E; – Rotations: C4, C...

    work page

  4. [2]

    = −( ˆR2 π/2E1 · ˆRπ/2E1) = −( ˆR−1 π/2 ˆR2 π/2E1 · E1) = −(E′ 1 · E1). (B7) Here we used the fact that the eigenmodes belongs to the E irrep for which ˆR2 π/2E1 = ˆRπE1 = −E1 and assumed the rotation operator to be self-adjoint for the used scalar product definition. Then also the norm is preserved upon rotation: (E′ 1 · E′

    work page

  5. [3]

    even” for p = +1 and “ odd

    = ( ˆR−1 π/2 ˆRπ/2E1 · E1) = (E1 · E1), (B8) which shows that the pair E1 and E′ 1 constitutes an or- thogonal normalized basis in their subspace. Therefore, we conclude that the mode E′ 1 actually rep- resents the degenerate counterpart of the modeE1, which we denote as E2 in the main text, and these two modes are related by the operator ˆRπ/2 as is desc...

    work page

  6. [4]

    Consequences of the symmetry analysis for the coupling parameters of a four fold symmetric patterned membrane Here we also analyse how properties derived in sec- tion (B) manifest itself in the coupling parameters (3) and (4). As a helpful identity, one can check that for any function f (r) and transformation matrix g with | det g| = 1 we have Z V f (g−1r...

    work page

  7. [5]

    we break the symmetry as C 4h → C4

    Properties of a four fold symmetric patterned double asymmetric double layer membrane The addition of an adjacent layer break out-of-plane mirror symmetry, i.e. we break the symmetry as C 4h → C4. Character table of C 4 point group is shown in Ta- ble II. The previously considered modes which transform under Au and Ag irreps, lose their specific σh parity...

    work page

  8. [6]

    L. D. Barron, From Cosmic Chirality to Protein Struc- ture: Lord Kelvin’s Legacy, Chirality 24, 879 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 58 references
  1. [7]

    Caloz and A

    C. Caloz and A. Sihvola, Electromagnetic Chirality, Part 1: The Microscopic Perspective [Electromagnetic Per- spectives], IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 62, 58 (2020)

    2020

  2. [8]

    Caloz and A

    C. Caloz and A. Sihvola, Electromagnetic Chirality, Part 2: The Macroscopic Perspective [Electromagnetic Per- spectives], IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 62, 82 (2020)

    2020

  3. [9]

    Q.-M. Deng, X. Li, M.-X. Hu, F.-J. Li, X. Li, and Z.- L. Deng, Advances on broadband and resonant chiral 19 metasurfaces, npj Nanophotonics 1, 10.1038/s44310-024- 00018-5 (2024)

    2024 doi

  4. [10]

    Sharma, M

    V. Sharma, M. Crne, J. O. Park, and M. Srinivasarao, Structural origin of circularly polarized iridescence in jeweled beetles, Science 325, 449–451 (2009)

    2009

  5. [11]

    R. W. Woody, [4] circular dichroism, inBiochemical Spec- troscopy (Elsevier, 1995) p. 34–71

    1995

  6. [12]

    Berova, K

    N. Berova, K. Nakanishi, and R. W. Woody, Circular dichroism: principles and applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2000)

    2000

  7. [13]

    Rodger and B

    A. Rodger and B. Nord´ en,Circular dichroism and linear dichroism, Vol. 1 (Oxford university press, 1997)

    1997

  8. [14]

    P. Yu, J. Li, C. Tang, H. Cheng, Z. Liu, Z. Li, Z. Liu, C. Gu, J. Li, S. Chen, and J. Tian, Controllable optical activity with non-chiral plasmonic metasurfaces, Light: Science & Applications 5, 10.1038/lsa.2016.96 (2016)

    2016 doi

  9. [15]

    Z. Wang, Y. Wang, G. Adamo, J. Teng, and H. Sun, In- duced Optical Chirality and Circularly Polarized Emis- sion from Achiral CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots via Res- onantly Coupling with Plasmonic Chiral Metasurfaces, Laser Photonics Rev. 13, 1800276 (2019)

    2019

  10. [16]

    Ouyang, W

    L. Ouyang, W. Wang, D. Rosenmann, D. A. Czaplewski, J. Gao, and X. Yang, Near-infrared chiral plasmonic metasurface absorbers, Opt. Express 26, 31484 (2018)

    2018

  11. [17]

    H. S. Khaliq, A. Nauman, J. Lee, and H. Kim, Recent progress on plasmonic and dielectric chi- ral metasurfaces: Fundamentals, design strategies, and implementation, Advanced Optical Materials 11, 10.1002/adom.202300644 (2023)

    2023 doi

  12. [18]

    M. L. Solomon, J. Hu, M. Lawrence, A. Garc ´ ıa-Etxarri, and J. A. Dionne, Enantiospecific optical enhancement of chiral sensing and separation with dielectric metasur- faces, ACS Photonics 6, 43 (2019)

    2019

  13. [19]

    J. Wu, H. Jiang, Z. Guo, Y. Sun, Y. Li, and H. Chen, Giant optical chirality in dielectric metasurfaces induced by toroidal dipole resonances, Opt. Lett. 48, 916 (2023)

    2023

  14. [20]

    Beutel, P

    D. Beutel, P. Scott, M. Wegener, C. Rockstuhl, and I. Fernandez-Corbaton, Enhancing the optical rota- tion of chiral molecules using helicity preserving all- dielectric metasurfaces, Applied Physics Letters 118, 10.1063/5.0050411 (2021)

    2021 doi

  15. [22]

    M. V. Gorkunov, A. A. Antonov, and Y. S. Kivshar, Metasurfaces with Maximum Chirality Empowered by Bound States in the Continuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 093903 (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    M. V. Gorkunov, A. A. Antonov, V. R. Tuz, A. S. Kupriianov, and Y. S. Kivshar, Bound states in the continuum underpin near-lossless maximum chirality in dielectric metasurfaces, Advanced Optical Materials 9, 10.1002/adom.202100797 (2021)

    2021 doi

  17. [24]

    Y. Chen, H. Deng, X. Sha, W. Chen, R. Wang, Y.-H. Chen, D. Wu, J. Chu, Y. S. Kivshar, S. Xiao, et al., Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the con- tinuum, Nature 613, 474 (2023)

    2023

  18. [25]

    Overvig, N

    A. Overvig, N. Yu, and A. Al` u, Chiral quasi-bound states in the continuum, Physical Review Letters 126, 073001 (2021)

    2021

  19. [26]

    M. V. Gorkunov, A. A. Antonov, A. V. Mamonova, E. A. Muljarov, and Y. Kivshar, Substrate-Induced Maximum Optical Chirality of Planar Dielectric Structures, Adv. Opt. Mater. 13, 2402133 (2025)

    2025

  20. [27]

    Sinev, F

    I. Sinev, F. U. Richter, I. Toftul, N. Glebov, K. Koshelev, Y. Hwang, D. G. Lancaster, Y. Kivshar, and H. Altug, Chirality encoding in resonant metasurfaces governed by lattice symmetries, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2412.20955 (2024), 2412.20955

    2024 doi arXiv

  21. [28]

    M. V. Gorkunov and A. A. Antonov, Rational design of maximum chiral dielectric metasurfaces, in All-Dielectric Nanophotonics (Elsevier, 2024) pp. 243–286

    2024

  22. [29]

    A. S. Shalin, A. C. Valero, and A. Miroshnichenko, All- Dielectric Nanophotonics (Elsevier, San Diego, 2023)

    2023

  23. [30]

    Koshelev, I

    K. Koshelev, I. Toftul, Y. Hwang, and Y. Kivshar, Scat- tering matrix for chiral harmonic generation and fre- quency mixing in nonlinear metasurfaces, J. Opt. 26, 055003 (2024)

    2024

  24. [31]

    Toftul, P

    I. Toftul, P. Tonkaev, K. Koshelev, F. Lai, Q. Song, M. Gorkunov, and Y. Kivshar, Chiral Dichroism in Res- onant Metasurfaces with Monoclinic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216901 (2024)

    2024

  25. [32]

    Semnani, J

    B. Semnani, J. Flannery, R. Al Maruf, and M. Bajcsy, Spin-preserving chiral photonic crystal mirror, Light: Science & Applications 9, 10.1038/s41377-020-0256-5 (2020)

    2020 doi

  26. [33]

    Voronin, A

    K. Voronin, A. S. Taradin, M. V. Gorkunov, and D. G. Baranov, Single-handedness chiral optical cavities, ACS Photonics 9, 2652 (2022)

    2022

  27. [34]

    Lalanne, W

    P. Lalanne, W. Yan, K. Vynck, C. Sauvan, and J. Hugonin, Light interaction with photonic and plas- monic resonances, Laser & Photonics Reviews 12, 10.1002/lpor.201700113 (2018)

    2018 doi

  28. [35]

    A. V. Kondratov, M. V. Gorkunov, A. N. Darinskii, R. V. Gainutdinov, O. Y. Rogov, A. A. Ezhov, and V. V. Arte- mov, Extreme optical chirality of plasmonic nanohole ar- rays due to chiral fano resonance, Physical Review B 93, 195418 (2016)

    2016

  29. [36]

    E. A. Muljarov, W. Langbein, and R. Zimmermann, Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theory in open electro- magnetic systems, EPL 92, 50010 (2011)

    2011

  30. [37]

    E. A. Muljarov and T. Weiss, Resonant-state expansion for open optical systems: Generalization to magnetic, chiral, and bi-anisotropic materials, Opt. Lett. 43, 1978 (2018)

    2018

  31. [38]

    Koshelev, Advanced trapping of light in resonant di- electric metastructures for nonlinear optics, Ph.D

    K. Koshelev, Advanced trapping of light in resonant di- electric metastructures for nonlinear optics, Ph.D. thesis, The Australian National University (Australia) (2022)

    2022

  32. [39]

    Hopkins, A

    B. Hopkins, A. N. Poddubny, A. E. Miroshnichenko, and Y. S. Kivshar, Circular dichroism induced by Fano res- onances in planar chiral oligomers, Laser & Photonics Reviews 10, 137 (2016)

    2016

  33. [40]

    S. F. Almousa and E. A. Muljarov, Exact theory and ap- proximations for optical resonators in a changing external medium, Physical Review B 107, l081401 (2023)

    2023

  34. [41]

    Savona, L

    V. Savona, L. Andreani, P. Schwendimann, and A. Quat- tropani, Quantum well excitons in semiconductor micro- cavities: Unified treatment of weak and strong coupling regimes, Solid State Communications 93, 733 (1995)

    1995

  35. [42]

    Lalanne, W

    P. Lalanne, W. Yan, K. Vynck, C. Sauvan, and J. P. Hugonin, Light Interaction with Photonic and Plasmonic Resonances, Laser and Photonics Reviews 12, 1 (2018), 1705.02433

    2018 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Tsuji, H

    M. Tsuji, H. Shigesawa, and K. Takiyama, On the com- plex resonant frequency of open dielectric resonators, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 31, 392 (1983). 20

    1983

  37. [44]

    Tsuji, H

    M. Tsuji, H. Shigesawa, H. Aoki, and K. Takiyama, An- alytical and experimental considerations on the resonant frequency and the quality factor of dielectric resonators, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 30, 1952 (1982)

    1982

  38. [45]

    Kobayashi, A

    N. Kobayashi, A. Muranaka, and J. Mack, Circu- lar Dichroism and Magnetic Circular Dichroism Spec- troscopy for Organic Chemists(Royal Society of Chem- istry, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  39. [46]

    Toftul, D

    I. Toftul, D. Hariharan, P. Tonkaev, F. Lai, Q. Song, and Y. Kivshar, Monoclinic nonlinear metasurfaces for res- onant engineering of polarization states, Nanophotonics 10.1515/nanoph-2025-0019 (2025)

    2025 doi

  40. [47]

    D. Gryb, F. J. Wendisch, A. Aigner, T. G¨ olz, A. Tittl, L. de S. Menezes, and S. A. Maier, Two-Dimensional Chiral Metasurfaces Obtained by Geometrically Simple Meta-atom Rotations, Nano Lett. 23, 8891 (2023)

    2023

  41. [48]

    M. V. Gorkunov, A. A. Antonov, V. R. Tuz, A. S. Kupri- ianov, and Y. S. Kivshar, Bound States in the Continuum Underpin Near-Lossless Maximum Chirality in Dielectric Metasurfaces, Adv. Opt. Mater. 9, 2100797 (2021)

    2021

  42. [49]

    Hergert and R

    W. Hergert and R. M. Geilhufe, Group Theory in Solid State Physics and Photonics: Problem Solving with Mathematica (Wiley-VC, Weinheim, 2018)

    2018

  43. [50]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio, eds., Group Theory. Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter , SpringerLink B¨ ucher (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

    2008

  44. [51]

    Zee, Group Theory in a Nutshell for Physicists, In a Nutshell (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2016)

    A. Zee, Group Theory in a Nutshell for Physicists, In a Nutshell (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2016)

    2016

  45. [53]

    Sadrieva, K

    Z. Sadrieva, K. Frizyuk, M. Petrov, Y. Kivshar, and A. Bogdanov, Multipolar origin of bound states in the continuum, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115303 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Igoshin, M

    V. Igoshin, M. Tsimokha, A. Nikitina, M. Petrov, I. Tof- tul, and K. Frizyuk, Exceptional points in single open acoustic resonator due to symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. B 109, 144102 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Can´ os Valero, V

    A. Can´ os Valero, V. Bobrovs, T. Weiss, L. Gao, A. S. Shalin, and Y. Kivshar, Bianisotropic exceptional points in an isolated dielectric nanoparticle, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013053 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Gladyshev, K

    S. Gladyshev, K. Frizyuk, and A. Bogdanov, Symme- try analysis and multipole classification of eigenmodes in electromagnetic resonators for engineering their optical properties, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075103 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, and A. D. Stone, Po- larization state of radiation from a photonic crystal slab, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.1708.02197 (2017), 1708.02197

    2017 doi arXiv

  50. [58]

    B. Zhen, C. W. Hsu, L. Lu, A. D. Stone, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Topological nature of optical bound states in the contin- uum, Physical Review Letters 113, 257401 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.