pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.11386 · v1 · pith:NGBLTVV2new · submitted 2019-07-26 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · physics.ao-ph

Investigation on the Atmospheric Incoming Flow of a Utility-Scale Wind Turbine using Super-large-scale Particle Image Velocimetry

Cheng Li , Aliza Abraham , Biao Li , Jiarong Hong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 15:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn physics.ao-ph
keywords wind turbineincoming flowSLPIVsnowflake tracersinduction zoneyaw errorincidence anglevelocity ratio
0
0 comments X

The pith

The sonic-SLPIV velocity ratio for incoming flow to a utility-scale wind turbine is normally distributed and below unity 85 percent of the time.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents high-resolution measurements of the atmospheric incoming flow to a utility-scale wind turbine using super-large-scale particle image velocimetry with natural snowflakes as tracers. The field of view covers an 85 m vertical by 40 m streamwise region centered 0.2 rotor diameters upstream over more than one hour. Mean flow fields reveal an induction zone and a distinct region of enhanced vertical velocity. Time series comparisons between nacelle sonic anemometer readings and SLPIV velocities outside the induction zone show matched trends but time-varying discrepancies. These are quantified as a sonic-SLPIV velocity ratio that is normally distributed, less than one 85 percent of the time, and varies systematically with wind speed, yaw error, and incidence angle.

Core claim

Using SLPIV with snowflakes, the incoming flow shows an induction zone and a region with enhanced vertical velocity. Time series comparisons indicate that the sonic-SLPIV velocity ratio is normally distributed and less than unity 85% of the time. The ratio decreases with wind speed up to rated speed then plateaus and rises, increases in mean and spread with larger yaw error, and exhibits non-monotonic behavior with incidence angle from negative to positive. Short-term velocity fluctuation intensity has limited impact on the ratio.

What carries the argument

Super-large-scale particle image velocimetry (SLPIV) using natural snowflakes to image the flow field in an 85 m vertical by 40 m streamwise volume 0.2 rotor diameters upstream of the turbine.

If this is right

  • The sonic-SLPIV velocity ratio is normally distributed and less than unity 85% of the time.
  • The velocity ratio decreases with increasing wind speed up to the rated speed, then plateaus and rises with further increase.
  • Larger yaw error leads to an increase in both the mean and the spread of the velocity ratio distribution.
  • As incidence angle changes from negative to positive, the velocity ratio first decreases toward zero then plateaus while fluctuations increase.
  • The intensity of short-term velocity fluctuation has limited impact on the sonic-SLPIV velocity ratio.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Accounting for these ratio variations in control algorithms could reduce errors in estimated power production caused by nacelle sensor placement.
  • The non-monotonic incidence angle dependence implies that vertical flow components may interact with blade aerodynamics in ways that affect fatigue loads beyond standard models.
  • Repeating the SLPIV campaign across seasons or sites would test whether the reported ratio behaviors generalize beyond the specific turbine and snow conditions observed.

Load-bearing premise

Snowflakes serve as faithful, unbiased tracers of the true atmospheric velocity field throughout the 85 m by 40 m measurement volume without significant settling, clustering, or illumination artifacts that bias the reported velocity ratios.

What would settle it

Simultaneous independent velocity measurements using lidar or a calibrated probe array in the same upstream volume showing that snowflake-derived SLPIV velocities are systematically offset from the true flow.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.11386 by Aliza Abraham, Biao Li, Cheng Li, Jiarong Hong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic showing the dimension and detailed geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) A Google map showing the location of the wind turb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Time series of (a) wind direction superimposed with the nacelle, and light sheet direction and (b) wind speed for the time duration of the deployment on December 4th, 2017. Note that the gray vertical bands mark the SLPIV video data collection periods. 2.3. Metrological condition For each run, SCADA sonic and met tower measurements are used to quantify the overall meteorological conditions, with data provi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A sample of (a) raw image, (b) distortion corrected i [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time-averaged SLPIV velocity vector field of Run 1 (1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mean streamwise velocity at hub height obtained from SLPIV data least square fitted with the analytical formula based on the vortex theory. To obtain the induction factor (𝑎) and the free stream wind speed approaching the turbine ( 𝑈ஶ), the SLPIV data is fitted (least square sense) with the analytical formula proposed by Medici et al. [23] as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The variation of the SLPIV mean streamwise velocity ap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Temporal correlation between SLPIV data at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison between SLPIV at 𝑥/𝐷 ≃ െ0.4 and the nacelle sonic measurements at the same elevation 𝑧 ൌ 84 m. Note that the gray vertical bands mark the SLPIV video data collection periods [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Effect of incoming wind speed on the sonic-SLPIV vel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The histogram of the sonic-SLPIV velocity ratio in the period of our field deployment. To show the statistical distribution of the mismatch between the incoming flow and the nacelle measurements, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The histograms of sonic-SLPIV velocity ratio under low yaw errors (i.e. |Δ𝛾| ൏ σ୼ఊሻ and high yaw errors (i.e. |Δ𝛾| ൐ 2σ୼ఊሻ. To further explore the connection between turbine misalignment and nacelle measurement accuracy, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Sample time series of the sonic-SLPIV velocity ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Effect of incoming flow incident angle on the nacell [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Effect of velocity fluctuation on the nacelle sonic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The atmospheric incoming flow of a wind turbine is intimately connected to its power production as well as its structural stability. Here we present an incoming flow measurement of a utility-scale turbine at the high spatio-temporal resolution, using super-large-scale particle image velocimetry (SLPIV) with natural snowflakes. The datasets include over a one-hour duration of incoming flow with a field of view of 85 m (vertical) x 40 m (streamwise) centered at 0.2 rotor diameter upstream of the turbine. The mean flow shows the presence of the induction zone and a distinct region with enhanced vertical velocity. Time series of nacelle sonic anemometer and SLPIV measured streamwise velocity outside the induction zone show generally matched trends with time-varying discrepancies potentially due to the induction effect and the flow acceleration around the nacelle. These discrepancies between the two signals, characterized by the sonic-SLPIV velocity ratio, is normally distributed and is less than unity 85% of the time. The velocity ratio first decreases with increasing wind speed up to around the rated speed of the turbine, then plateaus, and finally rises with a further increase in wind speed. With conditional sampling, the distribution of the velocity ratio shows that larger yaw error leads to an increase in both the mean and the spread of the distribution. Moreover, as the incident angle of the incoming flow changes from negative to positive (i.e. from pointing downward to upward), the velocity ratio first decreases as the angle approaches zero. With further increase of the incidence angle, the ratio then plateaus and fluctuations are augmented. Finally, our results show that the intensity of short-term velocity fluctuation has a limited impact on the sonic-SLPIV velocity ratio.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports super-large-scale PIV measurements of the incoming atmospheric flow to a utility-scale wind turbine using natural snowflakes as tracers. Over one hour of data are acquired in an 85 m (vertical) by 40 m (streamwise) field of view located 0.2 rotor diameters upstream. The work documents the induction zone, a region of enhanced vertical velocity, and the statistical properties of the ratio between nacelle sonic-anemometer and SLPIV streamwise velocities, which is found to be normally distributed, less than unity 85 % of the time, and to vary systematically with wind speed, yaw error, and incidence angle.

Significance. If the tracer fidelity holds, the measurements supply rare, high-resolution field data on real atmospheric inflow in the induction zone of a full-scale turbine. Such data are valuable for validating CFD and engineering models of turbine aerodynamics and for quantifying the effects of yaw and incidence on local velocity ratios.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods / Experimental setup] The entire set of statistical claims (normal distribution of the velocity ratio, 85 % occurrence below unity, conditional trends with wind speed, yaw, and incidence) rests on the unverified premise that snowflakes act as unbiased tracers throughout the 85 m × 40 m volume. No Stokes-number estimate, terminal-fall-speed correction, or test for preferential concentration appears in the methods description; without such checks the reported ratios cannot be interpreted as pure flow quantities.
  2. [Results / Velocity ratio analysis] The nacelle sonic reference is itself located in a region perturbed by the turbine nacelle and rotor. The manuscript does not present an independent verification (e.g., comparison with a far-upstream reference or a second measurement technique) that would allow the sonic-SLPIV ratio to be cleanly attributed to induction-zone effects rather than local flow distortion around the anemometer.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the velocity ratio “first decreases … then plateaus, and finally rises” with wind speed, but the corresponding figure or table that quantifies the transition points around rated speed is not referenced.
  2. [Results] Notation for the incidence angle (positive/negative convention) and the precise definition of the sonic-SLPIV ratio should be stated explicitly in the text rather than left to figure captions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the opportunity to address concerns regarding tracer fidelity and reference measurement attribution. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods / Experimental setup] The entire set of statistical claims (normal distribution of the velocity ratio, 85 % occurrence below unity, conditional trends with wind speed, yaw, and incidence) rests on the unverified premise that snowflakes act as unbiased tracers throughout the 85 m × 40 m volume. No Stokes-number estimate, terminal-fall-speed correction, or test for preferential concentration appears in the methods description; without such checks the reported ratios cannot be interpreted as pure flow quantities.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantification of tracer response would strengthen the claims. The original manuscript does not contain Stokes-number estimates or preferential-concentration tests. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section providing a Stokes-number estimate based on representative snowflake diameters (0.5–2 mm) and densities drawn from the literature, together with a note that terminal-fall velocities remain << horizontal flow speeds in the recorded range. Visual inspection of the raw images showed no obvious clustering; this observation will also be stated. These additions will be included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / Velocity ratio analysis] The nacelle sonic reference is itself located in a region perturbed by the turbine nacelle and rotor. The manuscript does not present an independent verification (e.g., comparison with a far-upstream reference or a second measurement technique) that would allow the sonic-SLPIV ratio to be cleanly attributed to induction-zone effects rather than local flow distortion around the anemometer.

    Authors: We acknowledge the limitation. The manuscript already notes that discrepancies may arise from both induction-zone effects and local acceleration around the nacelle. The systematic dependence of the ratio on wind speed, yaw error, and incidence angle is difficult to explain by nacelle-local distortion alone, because the SLPIV plane lies 0.2 D upstream. Nevertheless, no independent far-upstream reference was deployed during the campaign, so a direct separation of the two contributions cannot be demonstrated. We will expand the Discussion to state this caveat explicitly while retaining the conditional-sampling results as supporting evidence for an upstream-flow contribution. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Independent far-upstream reference measurement to isolate nacelle-local distortion from induction-zone effects (unavailable in the original field campaign).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: all results are direct experimental measurements and statistical summaries

full rationale

The paper presents field measurements of incoming flow using SLPIV with natural snowflakes and compares them to nacelle sonic anemometer data. Reported quantities (velocity ratios, distributions, conditional dependencies on wind speed/yaw/incidence) are computed directly from acquired image sequences and time series without any derivations, model equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks (raw PIV correlations and anemometer readings).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central observational claims rest on the domain assumption that natural snowflakes faithfully trace the flow and on standard statistical assumptions for conditional sampling; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Natural snowflakes act as faithful passive tracers of the atmospheric velocity field across the imaged volume
    Invoked by the choice of SLPIV with snowflakes; required for the velocity fields and ratios to represent true flow.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5859 in / 1300 out tokens · 24988 ms · 2026-05-24T15:44:34.371559+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introduction Understanding the characteristics of the atmospheric turbulent flow approaching the wind turbine (referred to as the incoming flow hereafter) plays a crucial role in improving the turbine operation for better energy extraction effi ciency and structural reliabil ity. Specifically, for example, the relationship between energy extr action and i...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Experimental Methods 2.1 Field site The measurements of the incoming flow were conducted in the Uni versity of Minnesota EOLOS Wind Research Field Station in Rosemount, Minnesota. The statio n consists of a 2.5 MW three- bladed, horizontal-axis Clipper Liberty wind turbine (referred to as the EOLOS turbine hereafter) with pitch-regulating capability and a...

    work page 1920

  3. [3]

    Power output stays at the rated power at Region 3 with increasing wind speed

    The turbine operational region is based on the rotor speed a nd power constraints of the turbine and is determined by incoming flow and the control strategy. Power output stays at the rated power at Region 3 with increasing wind speed. In order to mitigate st rong wind, pitch angle increases almost linearly with increasing wind speed for winds over 𝑈୰ୟ୲ୣୢ...

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Results 3.1 Mean flow characteristics of incoming flow Figure 5. Time-averaged SLPIV velocity vector field of Run 1 (1:3 skip applied in both horizontal and vertical directions for cla rity) superimposed with (a) mean horizontal velocity ( 𝑈), and (b) mean vertical velocity ( 𝑊) contours and iso-velocity lines from 8 to 13 m/s and -0.5 to 0.1 m/s, respect...

    work page

  5. [5]

    as shown in Figure 6. According to Medici et al.[23], the incoming flow speed along the turbine axis can be expressed as ௎ሺ௫ሻ ௎ಮ ൌ1െ𝑎቎ 1൅ మೣ ವ ටଵାቀమೣ ವቁ మ቏ ( 1 ) The figure presents the SLPIV data spatially averaged around hub height (z = 80 m) with a vertical span of ± 1 m. As the figure shows, the experimental data fits reasonably well in the majority o...

    work page

  6. [6]

    The datasets include over one hour duration of incoming flow with an effective field of view 85 m (vertical) ൈ 40 m (streamwise) centered at 0.2 𝐷 upstream

    Summary and Discussion The current study reports incoming flow measurements of a 2.5 M W pitch-regulated turbine at high spatio-temporal resolution, using super-large-scale particle image velocimetry (SLPIV) with natural snowflakes. The datasets include over one hour duration of incoming flow with an effective field of view 85 m (vertical) ൈ 40 m (streamw...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Wind Shear and Unce rtainties in Power Curve Measurement and Wind Resources

    Antoniou I, Pedersen SM, Enevoldsen PB. Wind Shear and Unce rtainties in Power Curve Measurement and Wind Resources. Wind Eng 2009;33:449–68. doi:10.1260/030952409790291208

    work page doi:10.1260/030952409790291208 2009

  8. [8]

    Uncertainty estimation for wind energy conversion by probabilistic wind turbine power curve modelling

    Yan J, Zhang H, Liu Y, Han S, Li L. Uncertainty estimation for wind energy conversion by probabilistic wind turbine power curve modelling. Appl Energy 2 019;239:1356–70. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.180

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.180 2019

  9. [9]

    Monitoring of wind farms’ power cu rves using machine learning techniques

    Marvuglia A, Messineo A. Monitoring of wind farms’ power cu rves using machine learning techniques. Appl Energy 2012;98:574–83. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.037

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.037 2012

  10. [10]

    Rev iew of power curve modelling for windturbines

    Carrillo C, Obando Montaño AF, Cidrás J, Díaz-Dorado E. Rev iew of power curve modelling for windturbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013;21:57 2–81. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.012 2013

  11. [11]

    A comprehe nsive review on wind turbine power curve modeling techniques

    Lydia M, Kumar SS, Selvakumar AI, Prem Kumar GE. A comprehe nsive review on wind turbine power curve modeling techniques. Renew Sustain Energy R ev 2014;30:452–60. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.030 2014

  12. [12]

    Wind turbine power curves incorporating turbule nce intensity

    Hedevang E. Wind turbine power curves incorporating turbule nce intensity. Wind Energy 2014;17:173–95. doi:10.1002/we.1566

    work page doi:10.1002/we.1566 2014

  13. [13]

    De velopment of an enhanced parametric model for wind turbine power curve

    Taslimi-Renani E, Modiri-Delshad M, Elias MFM, Rahim NA. De velopment of an enhanced parametric model for wind turbine power curve. Appl Energy 2016;177:544–52. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.124

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.124 2016

  14. [14]

    Wind turbine control for load reduction

    Bossanyi EA. Wind turbine control for load reduction. Wind Energy 2003;6:229–44. doi:10.1002/we.95

    work page doi:10.1002/we.95 2003

  15. [15]

    Review of state of the art in smar t rotor control research for wind turbines

    Barlas TK, van Kuik GAM. Review of state of the art in smar t rotor control research for wind turbines. Prog Aerosp Sci 2010;46:1–27. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2009.08.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2009.08.002 2010

  16. [16]

    A spinner- integrated wind lidar for enhan ced wind turbine control

    Mikkelsen T, Angelou N, Hansen K, Sjöholm M, Harris M, Sli nger C, et al. A spinner- integrated wind lidar for enhan ced wind turbine control. Wind E nergy 2013;16:625–43. doi:10.1002/we.1564

    work page doi:10.1002/we.1564 2013

  17. [17]

    LiDAR-ena bled model predictive control of wind turbines with real-time capabilities

    Bottasso CL, Pizzinelli P, Riboldi CED, Tasca L. LiDAR-ena bled model predictive control of wind turbines with real-time capabilities. Renew Energy 2014 ;71:442–52. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.041 2014

  18. [19]

    Flow Structure and Turbulence in Wind Farms

    Stevens RJAM, Meneveau C. Flow Structure and Turbulence in Wind Farms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2017;49:311–39. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060206

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060206 2017

  19. [20]

    Review of computatio nal fluid dynamics for wind turbine wake aerodynamics

    Sanderse B, Van der Pijl SP, Koren B. Review of computatio nal fluid dynamics for wind turbine wake aerodynamics. Wind Energy 2011;14:799–819

    work page 2011

  20. [21]

    Field measurements of wind turbine wakes with lidars

    Iungo GV, Wu YT, Porté-Agel F. Field measurements of wind turbine wakes with lidars. J Atmos Ocean Technol 2013;30:274–87. doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00051.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jtech-d-12-00051.1 2013

  21. [22]

    Volumetric lidar scanning of wind turbine wakes under convective and neutral atmospheric stability regimes

    Iungo GV, Porté-Agel F. Volumetric lidar scanning of wind turbine wakes under convective and neutral atmospheric stability regimes. J Atmos Ocean Techno l 2014;31:2035–48. doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00252.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jtech-d-13-00252.1 2014

  22. [23]

    3D volumetric analysis of wind turbine wake properties in the atmosphere using high-resolution Doppler lidar

    Banta RM, Pichugina YL, Brewer WA, Lundquist JK, Kelley ND , Sandberg SP, et al. 3D volumetric analysis of wind turbine wake properties in the atmosphere using high-resolution Doppler lidar. J Atmos Ocean Technol 2015;32:904–14. doi:10.117 5/JTECH-D-14- 00078.1

    work page 2015

  23. [24]

    Comparison of wind turbine wake properties in non-sheared inflow predicted by different computational fluid dynamics rotor models

    Troldborg N, Zahle F, Réthoré P-E, Sørensen NN. Comparison of wind turbine wake properties in non-sheared inflow predicted by different computational fluid dynamics rotor models. Wind Energy 2015;18:1239–50. doi:10.1002/we.1757

    work page doi:10.1002/we.1757 2015

  24. [25]

    Wake structure in actuator disk models of wind turbines in yaw under uniform infl ow conditions

    Howland MF, Bossuyt J, Martínez-Tossas LA, Meyers J, Menev eau C. Wake structure in actuator disk models of wind turbines in yaw under uniform infl ow conditions. J Renew Sustain Energy 2016;8. doi:10.1063/1.4955091

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4955091 2016

  25. [26]

    High resolution wind turbine wake measurements with a scanning lidar

    Herges TG, Maniaci DC, Naughton BT, Mikkelsen T, Sjöholm M . High resolution wind turbine wake measurements with a scanning lidar. J Phys Conf Se r 2017;854:0–11. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012021

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012021 2017

  26. [27]

    Detailed analysis of a waked turbine using a high-resolution scanning lidar

    Herges TG, Berg JC, Bryant JT, White JR, Paquette JA, Naug hton BT. Detailed analysis of a waked turbine using a high-resolution scanning lidar. J Phys Conf Ser 2018;1037:0–10. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072009

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072009 2018

  27. [28]

    The aerodynamics of the curled wake: a simplified model in view of flow control

    Martínez-Tossas LA, Annoni J , Fleming PA, Churchfield MJ. The aerodynamics of the curled wake: a simplified model in view of flow control. Wind Energy Sci 2019;4:127–38. doi:10.5194/wes-4-127-2019

    work page doi:10.5194/wes-4-127-2019 2019

  28. [29]

    The upst ream flow of a wind turbine: blockage effect

    Medici D, Ivanell S, Dahlberg J-Å, Alfredsson PH. The upst ream flow of a wind turbine: blockage effect. Wind Energy 2011;14:691–7. doi:10.1002/we.451

    work page doi:10.1002/we.451 2011

  29. [30]

    The Betz-Joukowsky limit: on the contribution to rotor aerodynamics by the British, German and Russian scientific scho ols

    Okulov VL, van Kuik GAM. The Betz-Joukowsky limit: on the contribution to rotor aerodynamics by the British, German and Russian scientific scho ols. Wind Energy 2012;15:335–44. doi:10.1002/we.464

    work page doi:10.1002/we.464 2012

  30. [31]

    The General Momentum Theory

    Sørensen JN. The General Momentum Theory. vol. 4. 2016. do i:10.1007/978-3-319-22114- 4_4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22114- 2016

  31. [32]

    A simplified vortex model of propeller and wind-turbine wakes

    Segalini A, Alfredsson PH. A simplified vortex model of propeller and wind-turbine wakes. J Fluid Mech 2013;725:91–116. doi:10.1017/jfm.2013.182

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2013.182 2013

  32. [33]

    Upwind preview to a horizontal axis wi nd turbine: a wind tunnel and field-scale study

    Howard KB, Guala M. Upwind preview to a horizontal axis wi nd turbine: a wind tunnel and field-scale study. Wind Energy 2016;19:1371–89. doi:10.1002/we.1901

    work page doi:10.1002/we.1901 2016

  33. [34]

    Rotor equivalent wind speed for power curve measurement-comparative exercise for IEA Wind Annex 32

    Wagner R, Cañadillas B, Clifton A, Feeney S, Nygaard N, Po odt M, et al. Rotor equivalent wind speed for power curve measurement-comparative exercise for IEA Wind Annex 32. J Phys Conf Ser 2014;524. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012108

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012108 2014

  34. [35]

    Wind tunnel study of the wind turbine interaction with a boundary-layer flow: Upwind region, turbine performance, and wa ke region

    Bastankhah M, Porte-Agel F. Wind tunnel study of the wind turbine interaction with a boundary-layer flow: Upwind region, turbine performance, and wa ke region. Phys Fluids 2017;29. doi:10.1063/1.4984078

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4984078 2017

  35. [36]

    Characterization of wind velocities in the upstream induction zone of a wind turbine using scanning continuous-wave lidars

    Simley E, Angelou N, Mikkelsen T, Sjöholm M, Mann J, Pao L Y. Characterization of wind velocities in the upstream induction zone of a wind turbine using scanning continuous-wave lidars. J Renew Sustain Energy 2016;8. doi:10.1063/1.4940025

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4940025 2016

  36. [37]

    Modelling Wind Turbine Inflow: The Indu ction Zone Meyer

    Meyer Forsting AR. Modelling Wind Turbine Inflow: The Indu ction Zone Meyer. PhD Thesis,Technical University of Denmark, 2017. doi:10.11581/DTU

    work page doi:10.11581/dtu 2017

  37. [38]

    Using a cylindrical vortex model to assess the induction zone infront of aligned and yawed rotors

    Branlard E, Meyer Forsting AR. Using a cylindrical vortex model to assess the induction zone infront of aligned and yawed rotors. EWEA Offshore 2015 Conf 2015:1–10

    work page 2015

  38. [39]

    A simple model of the wind turbine induction zone derived from numerical simulations

    Troldborg N, Meyer Forsting AR. A simple model of the wind turbine induction zone derived from numerical simulations. Wind Energy 2017;20:2011–20. doi:10.1002/we.2137

    work page doi:10.1002/we.2137 2017

  39. [40]

    Validation of a CFD model with a synchronized triple-lidar syst em in the wind turbine induction zone

    Meyer Forsting AR, Troldborg N, Murcia Leon JP, Sathe A, A ngelou N, Vignaroli A. Validation of a CFD model with a synchronized triple-lidar syst em in the wind turbine induction zone. Wind Energy 2017;20:1481–98. doi:10.1002/we.2103

    work page doi:10.1002/we.2103 2017

  40. [41]

    Thermal effects and their compen- sation in advanced virgo.Journal of Physics: Confer- ence Series, 363:012016, jun 2012

    Meyer Forsting AR, Bechmann A, Troldborg N. A numerical st udy on the flow upstream of a wind turbine in complex terrain. J Phys Conf Ser 2016;753. doi:10.1088/1742- 6596/753/3/032041

    work page doi:10.1088/1742- 2016

  41. [42]

    Nacelle Anemometry on a 1MW Wind Turbine: Comparing the power performance results by use of the nacelle or mast anemome ter 1997

    Antoniou I, Pedersen TF. Nacelle Anemometry on a 1MW Wind Turbine: Comparing the power performance results by use of the nacelle or mast anemome ter 1997. Denmark. Forskningscenter Risoe. Risoe-R, No. 941 (EN)

    work page 1997

  42. [43]

    IEC 61400-12-2:2013, Wind turbines - Part 12- 2: Power performance of electricity-producing wind turbines based on nacelle anemometry

    International Electrotech nical Commission. IEC 61400-12-2:2013, Wind turbines - Part 12- 2: Power performance of electricity-producing wind turbines based on nacelle anemometry. 2013

    work page 2013

  43. [44]

    Investigation of the flow in relation to nacelle anemometry

    Diznabi B. Investigation of the flow in relation to nacelle anemometry. Master Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, 2009

    work page 2009

  44. [45]

    Martin CM, Lundquist JK, Clifton A, Poulos GS, Schreck SJ

    St. Martin CM, Lundquist JK, Clifton A, Poulos GS, Schreck SJ. Atmospheric turbulence affects wind turbine nacelle transfer functions. Wind Energy Sc i Discuss 2016:1–22. doi:10.5194/wes-2016-45

    work page doi:10.5194/wes-2016-45 2016

  45. [46]

    Numerical study of turbulent flow arou nd a wind turbine nacelle

    Masson C, Smaïli A. Numerical study of turbulent flow arou nd a wind turbine nacelle. Wind Energy 2006;9:281–98. doi:10.1002/we.171

    work page doi:10.1002/we.171 2006

  46. [47]

    Char acterization of the unsteady flo w in th e n a c e ll e re g io n o f a modern wind turbine

    Zahle F, Sørensen NN. Char acterization of the unsteady flo w in th e n a c e ll e re g io n o f a modern wind turbine. Wind Energy 2011;14:271–83. doi:10.1002/we.418

    work page doi:10.1002/we.418 2011

  47. [48]

    A numerical investigation of nacelle anemometry f or a HAWT using actuator disc and line models in CFX

    Keck RE. A numerical investigation of nacelle anemometry f or a HAWT using actuator disc and line models in CFX. Renew Energy 2012;48:72–84. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.04.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.04.004 2012

  48. [49]

    Natural snowfall reveals large-scale flow structu res in the wake of a 2.5-MW win d turbine

    Hong J, Toloui M, Chamorro LP, Guala M, Howard K, Riley S, et al. Natural snowfall reveals large-scale flow structu res in the wake of a 2.5-MW win d turbine. Nat Commun 2014;5:1–9. doi:10.1038/ncomms5216

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms5216 2014

  49. [50]

    Measurement of atmospheric boundary layer based on super-large-scale particle image velocimetry using natural snowfall

    Toloui M, Riley S, Hong J, Howard K, Chamorro LP, Guala M, et al. Measurement of atmospheric boundary layer based on super-large-scale particle image velocimetry using natural snowfall. Exp Fluids 2014;55:1–14. doi:10.1007/s00348-014-1737-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00348-014-1737-1 2014

  50. [51]

    Near-wake behaviour of a ut ility-scale wind turbine

    Dasari T, Wu Y, Liu Y, Hong J. Near-wake behaviour of a ut ility-scale wind turbine. J Fluid Mech 2019;859:204–46. doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.779

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.779 2019

  51. [52]

    The spatial structure of the logarithmic region in very-high-Reynolds-number rough wall turb ulent boundary layers

    Heisel M, Dasari T, Liu Y, Hong J, Coletti F, Guala M. The spatial structure of the logarithmic region in very-high-Reynolds-number rough wall turb ulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 2018;857:704–47. doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.759

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.759 2018

  52. [53]

    Snowflakes in the atmospheric surface layer: observation of particle–turbulence dynamics

    Nemes A, Dasari T, Hong J, Guala M, Coletti F. Snowflakes in the atmospheric surface layer: observation of particle–turbulence dynamics. J Fluid Mec h 2017;814:592–613. doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.13

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.13 2017

  53. [54]

    Precision and shortcomings of yaw error estimation using spinner-based light detection and ranging

    Kragh KA, Hansen MH, Mikke lsen T. Precision and shortcomings of yaw error estimation using spinner-based light detection and ranging. Wind Energy 20 13;16:353–66. doi:10.1002/we.1492

    work page doi:10.1002/we.1492

  54. [55]

    UniTTe- Nordtank Measurement Campaign (Turbin e and Met Masts)

    Vignaroli A. UniTTe- Nordtank Measurement Campaign (Turbin e and Met Masts). DTU Wind Energy. DTU Wind Energy I, No. 0363 2015

    work page 2015