Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Inverse design of mirror-symmetric disordered systems for broadband perfect transmission

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that in left-right mirror-symmetric disordered media a reflection zero at a real frequency reduces to $\det(\operatorname{Im}(r'_1(\nu_0)))=0$, so inverse design only needs to tune the imaginary part of the…

desk verdict A credible inverse-design demonstration that mirror symmetry helps place multiple reflection zeros; the only real gap is some overclaiming and an unchecked technical assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01220 v1 pith:NI2YCED7 submitted 2025-05-02 physics.optics cond-mat.dis-nnphysics.app-ph

Zhazira Zhumabay , Clément Ferise , Vincent Pagneux , Stefan Rotter , Matthieu Davy This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.dis-nnphysics.app-ph
keywords inversedesignmirrorsymmetrybroadbandperfecttransmissiondisorderedmediareflectionlessscatteringmodesexceptionalpointscoupleddipoleapproximationmicrowavewaveguide
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that mirror symmetry turns the hard problem of broadband perfect transmission through a disordered medium into a much simpler real-matrix one. The load-bearing identity is that, for a left-right symmetric system, a reflection zero at frequency $\nu_0$ exists exactly when the real symmetric matrix $\operatorname{Im}(r'_1(\nu_0))$ has a zero singular value. Optimizers therefore tune only the imaginary parts of the half-system reflection matrix, which makes it feasible to place several reflection zeros with prescribed input and output wavefronts in one structure. The authors use this to design a reflectionless exceptional point, single-mode bandpass filters, and a 600 MHz quasi-perfect transmission plateau in a four-mode microwave waveguide, and to lift transmission through a centered barrier from 0.28 to 0.99. If the method holds, broadband perfect transmission becomes something a structure can be designed to do, not a wavefront that must be shaped in real time.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the factored reflection matrix and its mirror-symmetric specialization. For two half-systems, $r = t_1^{-1}(1 - r_2 r'_1)^{-1}(r_2 - r'^*_1)t^{*-1}_1$, and when $r'_1 = r_2$ the zero-reflection condition is $\det(\operatorname{Im}(r'_1(\nu_0))) = 0$. This identity carries the argument: it converts the condition that one eigenvalue of the full reflection matrix be zero into a real symmetric matrix becoming singular, which is exactly the quantity an optimizer can most easily push toward zero. It also explains why random mirror-symmetric media already show reflectionless states: the smallest singular value of a real random matrix approaches zero much faster than that of a complex random matrix.

What would settle it

Measure the transmission $T_{11}(\nu)$ of the fabricated optimized waveguide from 6.7 to 7.3 GHz: if the CDA-planned flat plateau is not reproduced, for example if transmission drops far below unity where the model predicts $T_{11}\approx 1$, then the claim that the half-system imaginary-reflection-matrix optimization transfers to a real device fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a symmetry reduction of the zero-reflection condition. Combining two half-systems with scattering matrices $S_1$ and $S_2$, the composite reflection matrix factorizes as $r = t_1^{-1}(1 - r_2 r'_1)^{-1}(r_2 - r'^*_1)t^{*-1}_1$, so $\det(r(\nu_0))=0$ becomes $\det(r_2(\nu_0)-r'^*_1(\nu_0))=0$. Under left-right mirror symmetry $r'_1=r_2$, and the condition collapses to $\det(\operatorname{Im}(r'_1(\nu_0)))=0$: a reflection zero is a singular value of a real symmetric matrix. This is the reduced optimization problem the paper exploits: only the $N(N+1)/2$ real entries of $\operatorname{Im}(r'_1)$ need to be controlled instead of all complex entries of a full reflection matrix. The authors then show that multiple zeros can be positioned at chosen frequencies, each with a user-defined input and output wavefront, producing flattened exceptional-point lineshapes, bandpass filters, a 600 MHz plateau, and enhanced transmission around an opaque barrier. Experimental transmission matrices measured in the microwave waveguide reproduce the numerical spectra.

Load-bearing premise

The whole procedure relies on the coupled-dipole model, with polarizabilities calibrated at one frequency, remaining accurate over the entire target band while the scatterers stay at least three radii apart and the half-system transmission matrix stays invertible.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single inverse-design run can place several reflection zeros with preselected wavefronts, so broadband quasi-perfect transmission can be engineered rather than searched for.
  • The optimization cost drops by a factor of two in parameter count, and each scattering-matrix evaluation takes milliseconds in the coupled-dipole model, so multi-frequency constraints over hundreds of megahertz are solvable in minutes.
  • The four fabricated single-mode bandpass filters, the 600 MHz plateau, and the barrier-enhanced transmission spectra all reproduce the numerical predictions in microwave measurements, indicating the designs transfer to physical devices.
  • Placing symmetric disorder around an otherwise opaque barrier raises average transmission from about 0.28 to about 0.99 at the target frequency and creates flat bands for individual modes, so the method works even when the central obstacle cannot be moved.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The factor-of-two reduction is generic: for $N$ propagating channels the search space has $N(N+1)/2$ real parameters, so the approach may scale to waveguides with many more modes than the four used here.
  • Any scalar wave system with mirror symmetry and unitary scattering, such as acoustics, elastic plates, or quantum wires, should admit the same real-symmetric zero-reflection condition, making the procedure portable outside electromagnetics.
  • The flat phase-delay time and frequency-correlated field maps suggest that the optimized structure behaves like a particle-like ballistic channel inside a scattering medium; a direct test would be to check whether the transmitted wavefront stays nearly identical across the whole plateau, which would make the structures useful as mode-preserving multiplexers.
  • For fixed obstacles, the paper's route suggests a design recipe: surround the obstacle with a mirror-symmetric disorder and tune $\operatorname{Im}(r'_1)$ to be singular at the operating frequencies, potentially with reconfigurable elements as a tunable anti-reflection coating.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents an inverse-design framework for achieving broadband quasi-perfect transmission in left-right mirror-symmetric disordered waveguides. The central theoretical result is that, for a system composed of two mirror-symmetric halves, a real-frequency reflection zero of the full system is equivalent to the condition det(Im(r'_1(ν0)))=0 on the half-system reflection matrix, reducing the number of real parameters that must be controlled. The authors implement this using a coupled-dipole-approximation model in a multichannel microwave waveguide, carry out gradient-based optimization of cylinder positions, and validate the results experimentally. They demonstrate a reflectionless exceptional point, single-mode bandpass filters for each of the four propagating modes, an ultra-broadband quasi-perfect transmission plateau over 600 MHz, and broadband transmission enhancement around a central barrier. Numerical CDA results are benchmarked against COMSOL and compared with microwave measurements.

Significance. The paper's strength is the combination of a clean symmetry reduction with direct experimental validation in a multimode waveguide. If the factorization leading to Eq. (4) holds, the reduction of the optimization space by a factor of two is a useful design principle for complex scattering media. The CDA model is carefully benchmarked (unitarity error below 10^-9) and the experimental agreement for the optimized devices is convincing. The demonstrations of an RL-EP, mode-selective filters, and a 600 MHz plateau go beyond prior single-frequency designs. The main caveats are the reliance on the invertibility of the half-system transmission matrix t1, which is not verified for the optimized structures, and the single-frequency calibration of the dipole polarizabilities used for broadband predictions. Both issues are addressable in revision.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theory, Eq. (2)-(4) and SM Section I] The derivation of the central condition det(Im(r'_1(ν0)))=0 requires t1 to be non-singular; the SM explicitly states that when t1 is singular the factorization cannot be written and a closed channel with perfect reflection exists. The manuscript never checks whether the optimized structures in Figs. 2-4 keep det(t1) nonzero (or t1 well-conditioned) over the targeted frequency bands, nor whether the optimization trajectories avoid near-singular regions. At any frequency where t1 is singular, the full system necessarily has a perfectly reflected channel, so Eq. (4) may be satisfied without a physical reflection zero; the symmetry reduction would then not be operative. Please add a numerical assessment (e.g., the smallest singular value or condition number of t1 across the band for each optimized configuration) and discuss the implications for the theoretical claim.
  2. [SM Section II / Optimization procedure] The coupled dipole approximation uses bare polarizabilities α_Al = -6i and α_Teflon = 0.048i calibrated against COMSOL at a single frequency (7 GHz) and then treats them as frequency-independent throughout the 600 MHz target band. The SM states that "the variations of α_n over the bandwidth considered in simulations are small" but provides no quantitative data. Since the broadband quasi-perfect transmission plateau and the barrier-enhanced transmission are the central numerical results, please report the frequency dependence of the calibrated polarizabilities (or a sensitivity analysis) showing that the optimized spectra are stable under the expected drift. Without this, the reader cannot exclude the possibility that the broadband design exploits an artifact of the constant-polarizability model; the experimental agreement mitigates this concern but does not remove the need for quantitative support.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Theory, paragraph after Eq. (4)] The statement that "real random matrices also exhibit reduced level repulsion between singular values" cites distributions for general real and complex Gaussian matrices, whereas the object Im(r'_1) is real symmetric; the cited references are for non-symmetric random matrices. Please clarify that this is an analogy or supply the corresponding result for real symmetric matrices.
  2. [Fig. 3(a)] The text says "the smallest reflection eigenvalue 1−τ1(ν) shown in a dB scale reveals that the flat shape is due to the presence of three reflection zeroes," but the figure caption and legend do not explicitly identify which curve corresponds to 1−τ1. Please label the curves clearly.
  3. [Abstract and Fig. 3 caption] The terms "rainbow effect" and "rainbow-trapping effect" are used to describe a phenomenon where the field pattern is highly correlated across frequencies, which is the opposite of conventional rainbow trapping (frequency-selective spatial localization). Consider renaming to avoid confusion.
  4. [Eq. (6)] The renormalization formula \tilde{t}_{mn} = t_{mn}\sqrt{T^0_n} uses the empty-waveguide transmission; please clarify whether the same normalization is applied to the numerical data used for comparison in Figs. 1-4 or only to the experimental data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central condition det(Im(r'_1))=0 is derived algebraically from unitarity and mirror symmetry, not fitted or assumed.

full rationale

The central theoretical reduction, Eq. (4), follows from the composite reflection formula, the push-through identity, unitarity of the left subsystem, and the mirror-symmetry relation r'_1 = r_2. These inputs do not already contain the desired reflection-zero condition; the derivation is an algebraic transformation of det(r)=0 and is presented with its assumptions in the Supplemental Material. The only genuinely fitted quantities are the coupled-dipole polarizabilities alpha_Al = -6i and alpha_teflon = 0.048i, calibrated against COMSOL at 7 GHz (SM Section II). That is an explicit model calibration rather than a hidden prediction, and the paper's subsequent validation uses different random configurations and independent microwave measurements, so the loop is not closed by construction. The optimized spectra naturally track their own cost functions, such as f = integral [1 - T11(nu)] dnu for the broadband plateau, but presenting the achieved objective is standard inverse-design practice rather than a claimed first-principles prediction; the experimental data independently confirm the designed behavior. The SM's explicit caveat that the factorization requires a non-singular half-system transmission matrix t1 is a validity condition and a possible robustness gap for optimized structures, but it is not a circular reduction: Eq. (4) is derived from, not equivalent to, its inputs. Self-citations such as Ref. [16] supply standard composition laws and prior constructions, but the paper re-derives the factorization in the SM and does not rest any uniqueness or impossibility claim on a self-citation. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the scattering-matrix factorization (standard unitary scattering theory), the mirror-symmetry condition from prior work, and the calibrated coupled-dipole model. Free parameters are the fitted polarizabilities and the hand-chosen truncation parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Bare polarizability of aluminum cylinder α_Al = -6i (arbitrary units implied by the Green's function normalization)
    Fitted at 7 GHz by minimizing the difference between CDA and COMSOL scattering matrices for a single aluminum cylinder (SM Section II).
  • Bare polarizability of teflon cylinder α_teflon = 0.048i (same units)
    Fitted with the same calibration procedure at 7 GHz.
  • Number of dipoles per metallic cylinder = 8
    Hand-chosen to mimic the metallic boundary because a single dipole cannot represent the large radar cross-section.
  • Number of waveguide modes in the dipole Green's function Neff = 6N (with N=4 propagating modes, Neff=24)
    Hand-chosen truncation of the logarithmically diverging return Green's function; needed to keep unitarity error below 1e-9.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The waveguide is two-dimensional and scalar because only one vertical mode propagates in the frequency band 6.5-7.5 GHz.
    Used throughout the experimental and numerical model; justified by the waveguide height h=8mm and the operating frequencies.
  • domain assumption All scatterers are lossless, so the scattering matrix is unitary.
    The bare polarizabilities are purely imaginary and the reported unitarity error is below 1e-9; experimental losses cause small deviations from unitarity.
  • domain assumption The coupled dipole approximation with calibrated point-dipole polarizabilities accurately models the multiple scattering between cylinders.
    Required for the optimization and for the predicted spectra; validated against COMSOL for a random disorder, but remains an approximation that fails if scatterers come closer than about 3 radii.
  • standard math The factorization r = t1^{†-1}(r2 - r'1^†)(1 - r'1 r2)^{-1} t1^{T-1} requires the half-system transmission matrix t1 to be invertible.
    Stated in the SM, Section I; if t1 is singular, a closed channel with zero transmission and perfect reflection exists and the factorization cannot be written.
  • domain assumption Left-right mirror symmetry imposes r'_1 = r2, so the reflection-zero condition reduces to det(Im(r'_1)) = 0.
    Takes the symmetry relation from the physical setup and prior work [43]; it is the basis of the parameter-space reduction claim.
  • standard math The smallest singular value of a real random matrix is more likely to be near zero than for a complex random matrix.
    Cited from random matrix literature [44-46]; used to argue the mirror-symmetric optimization has easier access to reflection zeros.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inverse design of mirror-symmetric disordered systems for broadband perfect transmission." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NI2YCED7

@misc{pith2026250501220,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inverse design of mirror-symmetric disordered systems for broadband perfect transmission},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NI2YCED7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01220}
}
read the original abstract

We present a framework for achieving broadband perfect wave transmission in complex systems by optimizing symmetric disordered media via inverse design. We show that leveraging symmetry of complex media reduces the optimization's complexity enabling the incorporation of additional constraints in the parameter space. Starting from a single perfectly transmitting state with predefined input and output wavefronts at a specific frequency, we progressively broaden the bandwidth - from a reflectionless exceptional point with a flattened lineshape to narrowband filters and ultimately to broadband quasi-perfect transmission exhibiting a rainbow effect. Numerical simulations based on the coupled dipole approximation are validated experimentally in a multichannel microwave waveguide with dielectric and metallic scatterers. Finally, we demonstrate broadband enhanced wave transmission through barriers highlighting the potential for advanced wave control applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.01220 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tailoring reflectionless complex media for non-Abelian braiding of acoustic modes

    physics.app-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Passive acoustic multiple scattering is inverse-designed to realize reflectionless unitary mode transformations, experimentally demonstrating non-Abelian braid generators on four waveguide modes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (2) The condition det(r(ν0)) = 0 giving a real zero at fre- quency ν0 therefore translates into det(r2(ν0)−r′∗ 1(ν0)) = 0

    (1) Using the push-through identity [24] and the unitarity of the scattering matrix, we show in SM that for non- singular matrices t1, this equation can be factorized as r =t−1 1 (1−r2r′ 1)−1(r2−r′∗ 1)t∗−1 1 . (2) The condition det(r(ν0)) = 0 giving a real zero at fre- quency ν0 therefore translates into det(r2(ν0)−r′∗ 1(ν0)) = 0. (3) This can be interpre...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Rotter and S

    S. Rotter and S. Gigan, Light fields in complex media: Mesoscopic scattering meets wave control, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015005 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    H. Cao, A. P. Mosk, and S. Rotter, Shaping the propa- gation of light in complex media, Nature Physics 18, 994 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Agence Nationale de la Recherche

    needs to be adjusted to get perfect transmission of the incident wavefront ψin, fixing the output wavefront also requires adjusting the transmission matrix t and thus t1. At the end of the optimization, the spectrum of the transmission T (ν) = ||t(ν)ϕin||2 presents a peak at ν0, T (ν) = 0.999, as seen in Fig. 1(d). The complex elements of the output wavef...

    work page

  5. [5]

    A. P. Mosk, A. Lagendijk, G. Lerosey, and M. Fink, Con- trolling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media, Nat. Photonics 6, 283 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Y. D. Chong and A. D. Stone, Hidden Black: Coherent Enhancement of Absorption in Strongly Scattering Me- dia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 163901 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Pichler, M

    K. Pichler, M. K¨ uhmayer, J. B¨ ohm, A. Brandst¨ otter, P. Ambichl, U. Kuhl, and S. Rotter, Random anti- lasing through coherent perfect absorption in a disor- dered medium, Nature 567, 351 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    G´ erardin, J

    B. G´ erardin, J. Laurent, A. Derode, C. Prada, and A. Aubry, Full transmission and reflection of waves prop- agating through a maze of disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 173901 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Sarma, A

    R. Sarma, A. G. Yamilov, S. Petrenko, Y. Bromberg, and H. Cao, Control of energy density inside a disordered medium by coupling to open or closed channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 086803 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    N. V. Sapra, D. Vercruysse, L. Su, K. Y. Yang, J. Skarda, A. Y. Piggott, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Inverse design and demonstration of broadband grating couplers, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 25, 1 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Pande, J

    D. Pande, J. Gollub, R. Zecca, D. L. Marks, and D. R. Smith, Symphotic multiplexing medium at microwave frequencies, Physical Review Applied 13, 024033 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    A. Y. Piggott, J. Lu, K. G. Lagoudakis, J. Petykiewicz, T. M. Babinec, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Inverse design and demonstration of a compact and broadband on-chip wavelength demultiplexer, Nat. Photonics 9, 374 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    H. Kwon, D. Sounas, A. Cordaro, A. Polman, and A. Al` u, Nonlocal metasurfaces for optical signal process- ing, Physical review letters 121, 173004 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Z. Li, R. Pestourie, Z. Lin, S. G. Johnson, and F. Ca- passo, Empowering metasurfaces with inverse design: Principles and applications, Acs Photonics 9, 2178 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Cao and Y

    H. Cao and Y. Eliezer, Harnessing disorder for photonic device applications, Appl. Phys. Rev. 9, 011309 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Rothammer, C

    M. Rothammer, C. Zollfrank, K. Busch, and G. von Frey- mann, Tailored disorder in photonics: learning from na- ture, Advanced Optical Materials 9, 2100787 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Yu, C.-W

    S. Yu, C.-W. Qiu, Y. Chong, S. Torquato, and N. Park, Engineered disorder in photonics, Nature Reviews Mate- rials 6, 226 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    R. S. Whitney, P. Marconcini, and M. Macucci, Huge conductance peak caused by symmetry in double quan- tum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186802 (2009)

    2009

  11. [19]

    F´ elix, and V

    ˆ ı Ch´ eron, S. F´ elix, and V. Pagneux, Broadband-enhanced transmission through symmetric diffusive slabs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 125501 (2019), pRL

    2019

  12. [20]

    Horodynski, M

    M. Horodynski, M. K¨ uhmayer, C. Ferise, S. Rotter, and M. Davy, Anti-reflection structure for perfect transmis- sion through complex media, Nature 607, 281 (2022-07- 01)

    2022

  13. [21]

    V. A. Gopar, S. Rotter, and H. Schomerus, Transport in chaotic quantum dots: Effects of spatial symme- tries which interchange the leads, Physical Review B 73, 165308 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    M. Davy, C. Ferise, ˆ ı Ch´ eron, S. F´ elix, and V. Pagneux, Experimental evidence of enhanced broadband transmis- sion in disordered systems with mirror symmetry, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 141104 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L

    A.-S. Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L. Chesnel, and V. Pagneux, Trapped modes and reflectionless modes as eigenfunc- tions of the same spectral problem, Proc. R. Soc. A 474, 20180050 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    S. K. Saini, E. Marakis, K. Start, G. Osnabrugge, I. M. Vellekoop, and P. W. Pinkse, Mirror Symmetry in three- dimensional Multiple-Scattering Media, Physical Review Letters 133, 223802 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Borcea and J

    L. Borcea and J. Garnier, Enhanced wave transmission in random media with mirror symmetry, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 480, 20240073 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    J. Sol, A. Alhulaymi, A. D. Stone, and P. Del Hougne, Reflectionless programmable signal routers, Science Ad- vances 9, eadf0323 (2023). 10

    2023

  19. [27]

    Jiang, S

    X. Jiang, S. Yin, H. Li, J. Quan, H. Goh, M. Cotrufo, J. Kullig, J. Wiersig, and A. Al` u, Coherent control of chaotic optical microcavity with reflectionless scattering modes, Nature Physics 20, 109 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    W. R. Sweeney, C. W. Hsu, and A. D. Stone, Theory of reflectionless scattering modes, Phys. Rev. A102, 063511 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Ferise, P

    C. Ferise, P. Del Hougne, S. F´ elix, V. Pagneux, and M. Davy, Exceptional points of pt-symmetric reflection- less states in complex scattering systems, Physical Re- view Letters 128, 203904 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    del Hougne, K

    P. del Hougne, K. B. Yeo, P. Besnier, and M. Davy, On- demand coherent perfect absorption in complex scatter- ing systems: Time delay divergence and enhanced sensi- tivity to perturbations, Laser Photonics Rev.15, 2000471 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    B. W. Frazier, T. M. Antonsen, S. M. Anlage, and E. Ott, Wavefront shaping with a tunable metasurface: Creating cold spots and coherent perfect absorption at arbitrary frequencies, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043422 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Liu and A

    T. Liu and A. Fiore, Designing open channels in random scattering media for on-chip spectrometers, Optica7, 934 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    M. F. Imani, D. R. Smith, and P. del Hougne, Perfect Absorption in a Disordered Medium with Programmable Meta-Atom Inclusions, Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2005310 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    W. R. Sweeney, C. W. Hsu, S. Rotter, and A. D. Stone, Perfectly absorbing exceptional points and chiral ab- sorbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 093901 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    C. Wang, W. R. Sweeney, A. D. Stone, and L. Yang, Co- herent perfect absorption at an exceptional point, Science 373, 1261 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    L. Chen, T. Kottos, and S. M. Anlage, Perfect absorption in complex scattering systems with or without hidden symmetries, Nat. Commun. 11, 1 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Del Hougne, K

    P. Del Hougne, K. B. Yeo, P. Besnier, and M. Davy, Coherent wave control in complex media with arbitrary wavefronts, Physical Review Letters 126, 193903 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Soleymani, Q

    S. Soleymani, Q. Zhong, M. Mokim, S. Rotter, R. El- Ganainy, and ˚U K. ¨Ozdemir, Chiral and degenerate per- fect absorption on exceptional surfaces, Nature Commu- nications 13, 599 (2022-02-01)

    2022

  31. [39]

    H¨ orner, L

    H. H¨ orner, L. Wild, Y. Slobodkin, G. Weinberg, O. Katz, and S. Rotter, Coherent Perfect Absorption of Arbitrary Wavefronts at an Exceptional Point, Physical Review Letters 133, 173801 (2024-10-22)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Now we focus on the case of a mirror-symmetric sys- tem

    or critical coupling condition [41, 42] for a single in- put wavefront. Now we focus on the case of a mirror-symmetric sys- tem. The left-right symmetry imposes a relation between reflection matrices of the two media, r′ 1 = r2, such that Eq. (3) simplifies to [43] det(Im(r′ 1...

  33. [41]

    Suwunnarat, Y

    S. Suwunnarat, Y. Tang, M. Reisner, F. Mortessagne, U. Kuhl, and T. Kottos, Non-linear coherent perfect ab- sorption in the proximity of exceptional points, Commun. Phys. 5, 1 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    J. Sol, D. R. Smith, and P. del Hougne, Meta- programmable analog differentiator, Nat. Commun. 13, 1 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    H. Schomerus, From scattering theory to complex wave dynamics in non-Hermitian PT-symmetric resonators, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 371, 20120194 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    Im, J.-H

    K. Im, J.-H. Kang, and Q.-H. Park, Universal impedance matching and the perfect transmission of white light, Na- ture Photonics 12, 143 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Yariv, Universal relations for coupling of optical power between microresonators and dielectric waveguides, Elec- tron

    A. Yariv, Universal relations for coupling of optical power between microresonators and dielectric waveguides, Elec- tron. Lett. 36, 321 (2000)

    2000

  38. [46]

    M. Cai, O. Painter, and K. J. Vahala, Observation of critical coupling in a fiber taper to a silica-microsphere whispering-gallery mode system, Physical Review Letters 85, 74 (2000), pRL

    2000

  39. [47]

    We note that the bare polarizabilities for our lossless scatter- ers are imaginary numbers that are positive for dielectric scatterers and negative for metallic scatterers

    and setting the diagonal elements ofGdd to zero. We note that the bare polarizabilities for our lossless scatter- ers are imaginary numbers that are positive for dielectric scatterers and negative for metallic scatterers. Moreover, the return Green’s function displays a logari...

  40. [48]

    Edelman, Eigenvalues and condition numbers of ran- dom matrices, SIAM journal on matrix analysis and ap- plications 9, 543 (1988)

    A. Edelman, Eigenvalues and condition numbers of ran- dom matrices, SIAM journal on matrix analysis and ap- plications 9, 543 (1988)

    1988

  41. [49]

    Rudelson and R

    M. Rudelson and R. Vershynin, Smallest singular value of a random rectangular matrix, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal Issued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences 62, 1707 (2009)

    2009

  42. [50]

    D. S. Dean and S. N. Majumdar, Extreme value statistics of eigenvalues of Gaussian random matrices, Physical Re- view E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 77, 041108 (2008)

    2008

  43. [51]

    V. A. Markel, Extinction, scattering and absorption of electromagnetic waves in the coupled-dipole approxima- tion, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 236, 106611 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    P. C. Chaumet, The discrete dipole approximation: A review, Mathematics 10, 3049 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Rescanieres, R

    R. Rescanieres, R. Pierrat, and A. Goetschy, Open and trapping channels in complex resonant media, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19818 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    J. D. H. Rivero and L. Ge, Green’s function as a defect state in a boundary value problem, Physical Review B 103, 195142 (2021-05-18)

    2021

  47. [55]

    D. P. Kingma, Adam: A method for stochastic optimiza- tion, 1412.6980 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Wu, C.-H

    C.-H. Wu, C.-H. Wang, S.-Y. Chen, and C. H. Chen, Balanced-to-unbalanced bandpass filters and the antenna application, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 56, 2474 (2008)

    2008

  49. [57]

    Ho and J

    K.-P. Ho and J. M. Kahn, Linear propagation effects in mode-division multiplexing systems, Journal of lightwave technology 32, 614 (2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    Jim´ enez, V

    N. Jim´ enez, V. Romero-Garc´ ıa, V. Pagneux, and J.-P. Groby, Rainbow-trapping absorbers: Broadband, perfect and asymmetric sound absorption by subwavelength pan- els for transmission problems, Scientific reports 7, 13595 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    Al Jahdali and Y

    R. Al Jahdali and Y. Wu, Coupled resonators for sound trapping and absorption, Scientific Reports 8, 13855 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Wilks, F

    B. Wilks, F. Montiel, and S. Wakes, Rainbow reflec- tion and broadband energy absorption of water waves by graded arrays of vertical barriers, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 941, A26 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    Rotter, P

    S. Rotter, P. Ambichl, and F. Libisch, Generating Parti- clelike Scattering States in Wave Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 120602 (2011)

    2011

  54. [62]

    G´ erardin, J

    B. G´ erardin, J. Laurent, P. Ambichl, C. Prada, S. Rot- ter, and A. Aubry, Particlelike wave packets in complex scattering systems, Phys. Rev. B 94, 014209 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    B¨ ohm, A

    J. B¨ ohm, A. Brandst¨ otter, P. Ambichl, S. Rotter, and U. Kuhl, In situ realization of particlelike scattering states in a microwave cavity, Phys. Rev. A 97, 021801 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    F. T. Faul, L. Cronier, A. Alhulaymi, A. D. Stone, and P. del Hougne, Agile free-form signal filtering with a chaotic-cavity-backed non-local programmable metasur- face, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00054 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    C.-Z. Wang, J. Guillamon, W. Tuxbury, U. Kuhl, and T. Kottos, Nonlinearity-induced scattering zero degen- eracies for spectral management of coherent perfect ab- sorption in complex systems, Physical Review Applied 22, 064093 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Go¨ ıcoechea, J

    A. Go¨ ıcoechea, J. H¨ upfl, S. Rotter, F. Sarrazin, and 1 M. Davy, Detecting and Focusing on a Nonlinear Target in a Complex Medium, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07932 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Inverse design of mirror-symmetric disordered systems for broadband perfect transmission

    N. K. Balla, E. Y. Yew, C. J. Sheppard, and P. T. So, Coupled and uncoupled dipole models of nonlinear scat- tering, Optics Express 20, 25834 (2012). Supplemental Material for “Inverse design of mirror-symmetric disordered systems for broadband perfect transmission” I. DEMONST...

    2012

  60. [68]

    We also use the fact that the scattering matrixS1 is unitaryS1†S1 = 1 givingr1tT−1 1 =−t†−1 1 r′† 1 andr′† 1r′ 1 +t† 1t1 = 1

    (S1) Then we use the push-pull relation (A+BC)−1B =A−1B(1+CA−1B)−1 withA = 1,B =tT 1 andC =−tT−1 1 r′ 1r2. We also use the fact that the scattering matrixS1 is unitaryS1†S1 = 1 givingr1tT−1 1 =−t†−1 1 r′† 1 andr′† 1r′ 1 +t† 1t1 = 1. This gives r = [r1−r1tT−1 1 r′ 1r2tT 1 +t1r2...

  61. [69]

    This finally leads to the factorization r =t†−1 1 (r2−r′† 1)(1−r′ 1r2)−1tT−1 1

    (S4) The identity r′† 1r′ 1 +t† 1t1 = 1 leads to X =t†−1 1 [−r′† 1 +r2]tT 1 . This finally leads to the factorization r =t†−1 1 (r2−r′† 1)(1−r′ 1r2)−1tT−1 1 . (S5) Finally, since the matrixr is symmetric, its transpose leads to Eq. 2 of the main text. Note that ift1 is non-inv...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.