Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 36 references

On the discrete Kuznetsov-Ma solutions for the defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik equation with large background amplitude

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives explicit parameter conditions under which discrete Kuznetsov-Ma breathers of the defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik lattice remain finite at every lattice site for all times.

desk verdict A clean regularity analysis for AL KM breathers on large backgrounds, plus a new staggered breather family; the main risk is the inherited IST formula from [29] and the thin residual sampling. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00121 v1 pith:NJKNHLEW submitted 2024-12-30 nlin.SI

Evans C. Boadi , Efstathios G. Charalampidis , Panayotis G. Kevrekidis , Nicholas J. Ossi , Barbara Prinari This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SI MSC 37K1535Q5539A14
keywords Kuznetsov-MabreathersAblowitz-LadikequationdefocusingnonlinearSchrödingerinversescatteringtransformDarbouxtransformationmodulationalinstabilitydiscreteroguewaveslargebackground
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks when the discrete Kuznetsov-Ma (KM) breathers of the defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik lattice remain regular—finite at every lattice site for all times—when the background amplitude $Q_o$ is larger than 1. These breathers, discrete analogues of the known Kuznetsov-Ma breathers of the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation, were obtained in 2019 from the inverse scattering transform, but their regularity was left unexamined. The paper derives two explicit conditions on the spectral parameters: a width condition $f(r,\kappa)<0$ in Eq. (27) that makes the interval of possible singularities narrower than one lattice spacing, and an interval condition (30) on the norming constant $c$ that places that interval between two adjacent integers. Under these conditions the previously known KM1 breather is nonsingular, and the paper introduces a second, staggered KM2 breather that is regular under the same conditions. It also constructs multi-KM breathers by Darboux transformations and shows numerically that these states inherit the modulational instability of their background.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the inverse-scattering solution formula (14), restricted to a purely imaginary discrete eigenvalue $\bar\zeta_1=i\kappa$, which reduces each breather to a meromorphic expression whose denominator is $\cosh(n\log\rho-\xi_o)-\alpha\cos(\eta-\eta_o)$ for KM1 and the same with a $(-1)^n$ factor multiplying the cosine for KM2. The quantity $\rho=|\lambda^2|^{-1}>1$ controls the spatial localization width, $\alpha>1$ controls the oscillation depth, and the singularity analysis reduces to whether any integer $n$ satisfies $\cosh(n\log\rho-\xi_o)\le\alpha$. The regularity condition (27), $f(r,\kappa)=\operatorname{arccosh}\alpha-\tfrac12\log\rho<0$, makes the dangerous interval narrower than one lattice spacing, and the norming-constant interval (30) places the interval's center between two adjacent integers. The Darboux transformation supplies the multi-breather generalization in terms of parameters $\rho_j$ and proportionality constants $\gamma_j$, with the analogous regularity conditions (46)-(47).

What would settle it

Pick a pair $(r,\kappa)$ satisfying (27) and a norming constant $c$ inside the interval (30), initialize the lattice with the KM1 or KM2 formula, and integrate Eq. (2) numerically over one breather period: if $|Q_n|$ exceeds the bound implied by the minimum of $\cosh(n\log\rho-\xi_o)-\alpha$ at integers, or if a pole appears, the regularity claim fails. Conversely, a pair with $f(r,\kappa)>0$ and $c$ chosen so that $\cosh(n\log\rho-\xi_o)=\alpha$ at some integer should produce a singularity that is visible as a blow-up at that site and time.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik equation $iQ_{n,\tau}=Q_{n+1}+Q_{n-1}+2r^2Q_n-|Q_n|^2(Q_{n+1}+Q_{n-1})$, with $r^2=Q_o^2-1>0$ and constant boundary conditions of amplitude $Q_o>1$, admits explicit Kuznetsov-Ma breather solutions that are nonsingular on the whole lattice for all real times exactly when the purely imaginary discrete eigenvalue $\bar\zeta_1=i\kappa$ and the norming constant $c=|\bar C_1|$ satisfy the width inequality $f(r,\kappa)<0$ of Eq. (27) together with the centering condition (30). Both the previously known KM1 solution (24) and the newly presented staggered KM2 solution (25) are regular under these same conditions; the KM2 arises when $\lambda^2=\kappa(\kappa-r)/(1+r\kappa)$ is negative, i.e. for $0<\kappa<r$, and carries a factor $(-1)^n$. The paper further claims that, by iterating a Darboux transformation, double KM breathers can be made regular by choosing each constituent parameter set in the appropriate intervals, with concrete examples displayed for both KM1 and KM2 types.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction assumes the inverse-scattering solution formula (14) from Ref. [29], after the Appendix B corrections, is an exact solution of the defocusing AL equation for all parameters used; the breather formulas and their regularity conditions inherit any residual error in that formula.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the two conditions hold, both KM1 and KM2 breathers are exact, globally bounded solutions of the defocusing AL equation for any background $Q_o>1$, not merely for small backgrounds.
  • The inequalities give a concrete recipe for choosing spectral parameters that produce nonsingular discrete breathers, including low-frequency ones that approach rogue waveforms as $\bar\Omega_1\to 0$.
  • The Darboux construction yields double KM breathers that are regular for suitable parameter combinations, so superpositions of discrete breathers on a large background are available in closed form.
  • Floquet and direct numerical simulations show that the single breathers are unstable only through the modulational instability of their background, with no additional instability modes introduced by the breather.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The width condition (27) is essentially a one-dimensional packing statement: the interval in which the denominator can vanish must fit between lattice sites. The same reasoning should extend to other discrete integrable equations whose breather formulas have a $\cosh$ minus $\cos$ denominator, such as focusing AL reductions.
  • Because the KM2 breather is new and carries a $(-1)^n$ staggering, a natural test is whether this staggered form survives as a robust waveform in the non-integrable discrete NLS model; the paper's announced continuation program toward DNLS could settle that question.
  • The numerical observation that conserved quantities stay accurate to $10^{-9}$-$10^{-16}$ even as solutions blow up suggests the blow-up is a genuine feature of the AL lattice dynamics rather than a numerical artifact; analyzing how pairs of sites cross unit modulus could clarify the collapse mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies the defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik (AL) equation on a constant background of amplitude Qo > 1. From the inverse-scattering solution formula (14) taken from Ref. [29] (with the errata in Appendix B), the authors specialise the discrete eigenvalue to ζ = iκ and write down two Kuznetsov-Ma type solutions: KM1 in Eq. (24) for λ^2 > 0 and a new staggered KM2 in Eq. (25) for λ^2 < 0. Section 4 derives conditions on (r, κ) and on the norming constant c that ensure the denominators of these solutions never vanish for n ∈ Z and τ ∈ R: the width condition f(r, κ) < 0 in Eq. (27) and the interval condition (30). Section 5 reconstructs the single KM solutions via Darboux transformations and constructs regular double-KM examples. Section 6 reports Floquet stability and direct numerical evolution, showing that the KM states inherit the modulational instability of the Qo > 1 background and eventually blow up in simulations. The central claim is that the stated parameter conditions guarantee non-singular KM1 and KM2 breathers for all lattice sites and all times.

Significance. Should the claims hold, the paper gives the first systematic, explicit parameter characterisation of regular discrete Kuznetsov-Ma breathers on an arbitrarily large defocusing AL background, and it adds a genuinely new staggered KM2 family. The authors make several verification efforts: residual-error plots in Fig. 2 for five parameter sets, an independent (though partly implicit) Darboux derivation in Section 5, Floquet spectra that are compared with the background modulational-instability prediction, and conservation-law checks in the dynamical runs. These strengths make the paper a useful contribution to integrable discrete nonlinear Schrödinger-type systems and to the discrete rogue-wave literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eq. (26)] The interval in Eq. (26) is written with strict inequalities, while the preceding sentence says it is the set where cosh is less than or equal to α. This distinction matters for the claimed necessity of Eq. (27): for a closed interval, width strictly less than 1 is indeed necessary because any closed interval of length 1 contains an integer, whereas an open interval of length 1 can avoid integers. Please correct Eq. (26) to use non-strict inequalities, or explicitly discuss the endpoint cases, so that the necessary-condition argument for f(r, κ) < 0 is logically sound.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (24)-(25)] The proof that vanishing of the denominator implies a singularity of Qn is not given; the text says only that the denominators 'generically' have zeros. For the theorem's exact wording 'non-singular for all n ∈ Z and all τ ∈ R', the authors must rule out simultaneous vanishing of the numerator in (24) or (25) at the same (n, τ). This is a finite algebraic check using the definitions in Eq. (22), and it should be stated explicitly. Without it, the conditions (27)-(30) are only sufficient up to possible cancellations.
  3. [Sec. 5 and Fig. 2] Because (24)-(25) and conditions (27)-(30) are inherited from Eq. (14) of Ref. [29] via Appendix B's errata, and because the residual checks in Fig. 2 cover only five parameter sets, the paper should make the Darboux route fully explicit: prove that (41)/(43) equal (24)/(25) under the stated coefficient identifications, and show that (46)-(47) is equivalent to (27)-(30). This would close the main independent-verification gap for the exact theorem.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] In the row for r = √5/2 and κ = 0.9, the interval for c is printed as '[80.84]' and should presumably be '[80,84]'.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption contains the typo 'integer vales'; it should read 'integer values'.
  3. [Sec. 6] The period is defined as T_b = π / \tilde Ω_1, but \bar Ω_1 in Eq. (21) can be negative (see Fig. 5); define \tilde Ω_1 = |\bar Ω_1| or state that the period is π / |\bar Ω_1|.
  4. [Appendix B, item 4] In the second residue formula, the norming constant is written as \bar C_k, but from the context it should be C_k, consistent with item 5.
  5. [Sec. 5 and Appendix A] The double-KM solution is only presented through the general J=2 determinant formulas in Appendix A; displaying the explicit resulting expression would improve the reproducibility of Fig. 7.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: the regularity conditions are derived algebraically from the explicit KM solutions, which are independently re-derived via Darboux transformations and verified by direct residual checks.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is non-circular. The regularity conditions (27), (29), and (30) are obtained by elementary analysis of the denominators of the explicit KM1 and KM2 formulas (24) and (25): since alpha > 1, the denominator cosh(n log rho - xi_o) - alpha cos(...) (with the staggered (-1)^n variant for KM2) is bounded away from zero exactly when the width of the interval where cosh <= alpha is less than one lattice spacing and the interval center is placed between consecutive integers. No parameter is fitted to the regularity outcome; c = |C1| is a free norming constant constrained afterward by the interval (30), and the paper even plots the denominator at n = 0, 1 to justify the optimal choice. The explicit KM formulas do originate from Eq. (14) of Ref. [29], co-authored by one of the present authors, and Appendix B lists ten errata items, so this is a load-bearing literature input. However, it is not circular: Section 5 re-derives the single KM breathers, including the staggered KM2 form, from an independent Darboux construction based on the Lax pair and the background solution, and the residual error plots in Fig. 2 verify the explicit formulas directly on five nontrivial parameter sets. The skeptical concern that an unlisted error in the imported IST formula would invalidate the conclusions is a genuine correctness risk, not a circular reduction: the paper's claims do not define their inputs in terms of their outputs, and no fitted or self-cited quantity is renamed as a prediction. The score is 1 rather than 0 only to acknowledge the heavy, though transparent and independently checked, reliance on Ref. [29]; this does not rise to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; KM2 is a new exact solution, not a new mechanism. All free parameters are standard soliton data (background, eigenvalue, norming constant), none fitted to data. The main burden is transferred to the cited IST [29] and Darboux [15] constructions; the paper's own errata corrects ten errors in [29], so the reliability of the central formula depends on the completeness of that correction, mitigated by numerical residual checks shown in Fig. 2.

free parameters (4)
  • r = 0.5, 0.8, 1, sqrt(5)/2, 2, 4 in Table 1 and Fig. 2
    Background amplitude parameter r = sqrt(Qo^2 - 1); freely chosen in the solution family and in the numerical examples.
  • kappa = e.g., -0.13, 0.06, 3, 4.5 in Table 1 and Fig. 2
    Spectral parameter (imaginary part of the discrete eigenvalue); free, but restricted to intervals where the regularity inequality (27) holds.
  • c = |C1| = optimal values in Table 1, e.g., 8.52544, 104.164
    Norming constant controlling the breather center; chosen in the interval (30) to place the center between two lattice sites.
  • rho1, gamma1 (Darboux parametrization) = rho1=6, gamma1=1e-4, rho2=3, gamma2=1e4 in Fig. 7
    Equivalent reparametrization of kappa and c used in the Darboux construction of single and double KM breathers.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The IST for the defocusing AL equation with arbitrarily large background Qo > 1, as developed in Ref. [29], is valid and the general TW solution (14) is correct after the errata corrections in Appendix B.
    The paper builds all its breather formulas (KM1 and KM2) on this solution; it does not re-derive the IST, only corrects typos.
  • domain assumption The Darboux transformation for the AL lattice on a nonzero background, derived in Ref. [15], applies to the large-background defocusing case and the J=2 formula in Appendix A yields genuine solutions.
    Used in Section 5 to construct single KM solutions (41), (43) and the double KM examples (Fig. 7).
  • standard math The uniformization variable zeta and the identities (11) are well-defined on the two-sheeted Riemann surface with the branch structure described in Section 2.
    Algebraic background for converting between z and zeta; no special physical assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the discrete Kuznetsov-Ma solutions for the defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik equation with large background amplitude." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NJKNHLEW

@misc{pith2026250100121,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the discrete Kuznetsov-Ma solutions for the defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik equation with large background amplitude},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NJKNHLEW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00121}
}
read the original abstract

The focus of this work is on a class of solutions of the defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik lattice on an arbitrarily large background which are discrete analogs of the Kuznetsov-Ma (KM) breathers of the focusing nonlinear Schrodinger equation. One such solution was obtained in 2019 as a byproduct of the Inverse Scattering Transform, and it was observed that the solution could be regular for certain choices of the soliton parameters, but its regularity was not analyzed in detail. This work provides a systematic investigation of the conditions on the background and on the spectral parameters that guarantee the KM solution to be non-singular on the lattice for all times. Furthermore, a novel KM-type breather solution is presented which is also regular on the lattice under the same conditions. We also employ Darboux transformations to obtain a multi-KM breather solution, and show that parameters choices exist for which a double KM breather solution is regular on the lattice. We analyze the features of these solutions, including their frequency which, when tending to 0, renders them proximal to rogue waveforms. Finally, numerical results on the stability and spatio-temporal dynamics of the single KM breathers are presented, showcasing the potential destabilization of the obtained states due to the modulational instability of their background.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00121 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: The choice of branch cut in the complex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Regular Kuznetsov-Ma solutions corresponding to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Contour plot of f(r, κ) = arccosh α − log √ρ as a function of r (horizontal axis) and κ (vertical axis) for r − √ r 2 + 1 < κ < r + √ r 2 + 1. The blue shaded regions correspond to f(r, κ) < 0 (where the regularity condition is satisfied) and the red shaded regions correspond to f(r, κ) > 0 (where the regularity condition is not satisfied). The dashed red lines correspond to κ = 0,(Qo − 1)/r, r, where f(r, κ) is… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plots of cosh (n log ρ − ξo) − α at the integer vales n = 0 (blue) and n = 1 (orange) for r = 1 and κ = −0.13 (left), κ = 0.06 (right) as functions of c = |C¯ 1| in the range of allowed values, i.e., 6.1 ≤ c ≤ 11.9 (left) and 70 ≤ c ≤ 156. The optimal choice for c in e…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plots of Ω¯ 1 (left) and log ρ (right) as functions of κ ∈ (− √ r 2 + 1 + r, √ r 2 + 1 + r) for r = 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Sheet I of z-plane, where λ = ξ + p ξ 2 − 1. Center: Sheet II of z-plane, where λ = ξ − p ξ 2 − 1. Right: ζ-plane; the dashed/solid red and blue circle |ζ − ir| = Qo corresponds to the continuous spectrum (where |λ| = 1), and the corresponding oriented contour Σ …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Double KM1 solution with r = 2 and z1 and z2 parametrized by (38), corresponding to ρ1 = 6, γ1 = 10−4 , ρ2 = 3, γ2 = 104 . (b) Double KM2 solution with r = 4 and z1 and z2 parametrized by (37) with the positive sign, corresponding to ρ1 = 8, γ1 = 10−4 , ρ2 = 12, γ2…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Summary of numerical results associated with the KM solutions of Fig. 2(e), (b), (c), and (d) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    Inverse scattering transform for the defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik equation with arbitrarily large background

    AK Ortiz and B Prinari, “Inverse scattering transform for the defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik equation with arbitrarily large background”, Stud. App. Math.143, 337–448 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    Inverse scattering transform for the integrable discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with non-vanishing boundary conditions

    MJ Ablowitz, G Biondini and B Prinari, “Inverse scattering transform for the integrable discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with non-vanishing boundary conditions”,Inv. Probl.23, 1711–1758 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [2]

    Nonlinear differential-difference equations

    MJ Ablowitz and JF Ladik, “Nonlinear differential-difference equations”, J. Math Phys.16, 598– 603 (1975)

    work page 1975

  4. [3]

    Nonlinear differential-difference equations and Fourier analysis

    MJ Ablowitz and JF Ladik, “Nonlinear differential-difference equations and Fourier analysis”, J. Math Phys. 17, 1011–1018 (1976)

    work page 1976

  5. [4]

    MJ Ablowitz, B Prinari and AD Trubatch, Discrete and Continuous Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Systems, LMS Lecture Notes Series 302, Cambridge University Press (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [5]

    Rogue waves and rational solutions of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation

    NN Akhmediev, A Ankiewicz and JM Soto-Crespo, “Rogue waves and rational solutions of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation”,Phys. Rev. E80, 026601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [6]

    Waves that appear from nowhere and disappear without a trace

    NN Akhmediev, A Ankiewicz and M Taki, “Waves that appear from nowhere and disappear without a trace”, Phys. Lett. A373, 675–678 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [7]

    Generation of a periodic sequence of picosecond pulses in an optical fiber. Exact solutions

    NN Akhmediev, VM Eleonskii and NE Kulagin, “Generation of a periodic sequence of picosecond pulses in an optical fiber. Exact solutions.”, Sov Phys JETP.89, 1542–1551 (1985)

    work page 1985

Show all 36 references
  1. [8]

    Modulational instability and periodic solutions of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation

    NN Akhmediev and VI Korneev, “Modulational instability and periodic solutions of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation”,Theor. Math. Phys.69, 1089–1093 (1987)

    1987

  2. [9]

    Discrete rogue waves of the Ablowitz-Ladik and Hirota equations

    A Ankiewicz, AN Akhmediev and JM Soto-Crespo, “Discrete rogue waves of the Ablowitz-Ladik and Hirota equations”, Phys Rev. E.82, 026602 (2010)

    2010

  3. [10]

    Rogue waves and other solutions of single and coupled Ablowitz-Ladik and nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations

    A Ankiewicz, N Devine, M Unal, A Chowdury and N Akhmediev, “Rogue waves and other solutions of single and coupled Ablowitz-Ladik and nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations”, J. Optics 15, 064008 (2013)

    2013

  4. [11]

    D Cai, AR Bishop, and N Grønbech-Jensen, Perturbation theories of a discrete, integrable nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation,Phys. Rev. E53 4131–4136 (1996)

    1996

  5. [12]

    Existence, stability and spatio-temporal dynamics of time-quasiperiodic solutions on a finite back- ground in discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger models

    EG Charalampidis, G James, J Cuevas-Maraver, D Hennig, N Karachalios and PG Kevrekidis, “Existence, stability and spatio-temporal dynamics of time-quasiperiodic solutions on a finite back- ground in discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger models”,Wave Motion 128, 103324 (2024)

    2024

  6. [13]

    Rogue waves arising on the standing periodic waves in the Ablowitz- Ladik equation

    J Chen and DE Pelinovsky, “Rogue waves arising on the standing periodic waves in the Ablowitz- Ladik equation”, Stud. Appl. Math.152, 147–173 (2024)

    2024

  7. [14]

    Some features of the repulsive discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation

    OA Chubykalo, VV Konotop, L Vazquez and VE Vekslerchik, “Some features of the repulsive discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation”,Phys. Lett. A169, 359–363 (1992)

    1992

  8. [15]

    Modulation instability, periodic anomalous wave recurrence, and blow up in the Ablowitz–Ladik lattices

    F Coppini and PM Santini, “Modulation instability, periodic anomalous wave recurrence, and blow up in the Ablowitz–Ladik lattices”, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57, 015202 (2024)

    2024

  9. [16]

    Floquet analysis of Kuznetsov-Ma breathers: A path towards spectral stability of rogue waves

    J Cuevas-Maraver, PG Kevrekidis, DJ Frantzeskakis, N I Karachalios, M Haragus, and G James, “Floquet analysis of Kuznetsov-Ma breathers: A path towards spectral stability of rogue waves”, Phys. Rev. E96, 012202 (2017)

    2017

  10. [17]

    Integrable dynamics of a discrete curve and the Ablowitz-Ladik hier- archy

    A Doliwa and PM Santini, “Integrable dynamics of a discrete curve and the Ablowitz-Ladik hier- archy”, J. Math. Phys.36, 1259–1273 (1995)

    1995

  11. [18]

    Darboux transformation of the discrete Ablowitz-Ladik eigenvalue problem

    X Geng, “Darboux transformation of the discrete Ablowitz-Ladik eigenvalue problem”, Acta Math. Sci. 9, 21–26 (1989)

    1989

  12. [19]

    Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I: Nonstiff Prob- lems

    E Hairer, SP Nørsett and G Wanner, “Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I: Nonstiff Prob- lems”, Springer-Verlag (2008)

    2008

  13. [20]

    An integrable classical spin chain

    Y Ishimori, “An integrable classical spin chain”, J. Phys. Soc. Japan51, 3417–3418 (1982)

    1982

  14. [21]

    Temperature correlations of quantum spins

    AR Its, AG Izergin, VE Korepin and NA Slavnov, “Temperature correlations of quantum spins”, Phys. Rev. Lett.70 1704–1706 (1991)

    1991

  15. [22]

    PG Kevrekidis, The Discrete Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation, Springer (Heidelberg, 2009). 19

    2009

  16. [23]

    Solitons in a parametrically unstable plasma

    EA Kuznetsov, “Solitons in a parametrically unstable plasma”, Sov. Phys. Dokl. (Engl. Transl). 22, 507–508 (1977)

    1977

  17. [24]

    Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain

    E Lieb, T Schultz and D Mattis, “Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain”, Ann. Phys. 16 407–446 (1961)

    1961

  18. [25]

    On the Ablowitz–Ladik equations with self-consistent sources

    X Liu and Y Zeng, “On the Ablowitz–Ladik equations with self-consistent sources”, J. Phys. A: Math. and Theor., 30, 8765–8790 (2007)

    2007

  19. [26]

    The perturbed plane-wave solutions of the cubic Schr¨ odinger equation

    Y-C Ma, “The perturbed plane-wave solutions of the cubic Schr¨ odinger equation”, Stud. Appl. Math. 60, 43–58 (1979)

    1979

  20. [27]

    Observation of nonlinear localized modes in an electrical lattice

    P Marqui´ e, JM Bilbault and M Remoissenet, “Observation of nonlinear localized modes in an electrical lattice”, Phys. Rev. E51, 6127–6133 (1995)

    1995

  21. [28]

    General rogues waves in the focusing and defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik equa- tions

    Y Ohta and J Yang, “General rogues waves in the focusing and defocusing Ablowitz-Ladik equa- tions”, J. Phys. A.47, 255201 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    Water waves, nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations and their solutions

    DH Peregrine, “Water waves, nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations and their solutions”,J. Aust. Math. Soc. Series B25 16–43 (1983)

    1983

  23. [31]

    Discrete solitons of the Ablowitz-Ladik equation with nonzero boundary conditions via inverse scattering

    B Prinari, “Discrete solitons of the Ablowitz-Ladik equation with nonzero boundary conditions via inverse scattering”, J. Math. Phys.57, 083510 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    Inverse scattering transform for the focusing Ablowitz-Ladik system with nonzero boundary conditions

    B Prinari and F Vitale, “Inverse scattering transform for the focusing Ablowitz-Ladik system with nonzero boundary conditions”, Stud. App. Math.137, 28–52 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Kuznetsov–Ma breather-like solutions in the Salerno model

    J Sullivan, EG Charalampidis, J Cuevas-Maraver, PG Kevrekidis and N Karachalios, “Kuznetsov–Ma breather-like solutions in the Salerno model”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus135, 607 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Breather solutions to the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation

    M Tajiri and Y Watanabe, “Breather solutions to the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation”, Phys. Rev. E.57, 3510–3519 (1998)

    1998

  27. [35]

    A propagating self-localized mode in a one-dimensional lattice with quartic anharmonicity

    S Takeno and K Hori, “A propagating self-localized mode in a one-dimensional lattice with quartic anharmonicity”, J. Phys. Soc. Japan59, 3037–3040 (1990)

    1990

  28. [36]

    Discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation under non-vanishing boundary conditions

    VE Vekslerchik and VV Konotop, “Discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation under non-vanishing boundary conditions”, Inv. Probl.8, 889–909 (1992) 20

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.