Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Collinear Laser Spectroscopy on a Fast Atomic Beam of Boron Generated by Photodetachment of Accelerated B- Ions

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Photodetaching negative ions in flight can produce atomic beams for collinear laser spectroscopy.

desk verdict Genuine first demonstration of CLS on a photodetached neutral atomic beam; the proof-of-principle is solid, but the route to high precision leans on an untested linewidth attribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16048 v1 pith:NKPYIGAY submitted 2026-07-17 physics.atom-ph

L. Renth , P. Imgram , B. Maass , D. Hanstorp , J. Krämer , D. Koestel , D. Lu , W. Nörtershäuser
show 1 more author
T. Walther
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph PACS 32.80.Fb32.30.-r
keywords collinearlaserspectroscopyphotodetachmentnegativeionbeamsatomicbeampreparationboronisotopesisotopeshiftchargeexchangetime-gatedfluorescence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates an alternative way to prepare atomic beams for collinear laser spectroscopy: instead of neutralizing an ion beam by collisions in a vapor cell, the ions are photodetached by a laser pulse, leaving neutral atoms exclusively in the ground-state fine-structure levels. Because no collisional charge exchange occurs, there is no long-lived excited-state population to cascade and create fluorescence background, and no collision-induced velocity shift to distort line shapes. As a proof of principle, the authors record resonances in 11B and 10B and an isotope shift consistent with the much more precise literature value, despite a total neutral-beam efficiency around 10^-4. The significance is that the method, if combined with beam cooling and bunching plus higher-repetition-rate detachment lasers, could deliver the MHz-level accuracy needed for cases like the proton-halo candidate 8B.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is photodetachment neutralization: a negative ion absorbs a photon and ejects its extra electron, leaving a neutral atom. In boron, the 0.28 eV detachment threshold means a 1.14 eV infrared photon liberates the electron while the atom stays in its 2p ^2P ground-state fine-structure doublet, with the statistical 2:1 population ratio between ^2P_{3/2} and ^2P_{1/2}. The detached neutral atoms are then Doppler-tuned and excited by the spectroscopy laser. The key property is that photodetachment, unlike collisional charge exchange, cannot populate long-lived excited states, so the detected fluorescence comes only from atoms that are already in the state of interest.

What would settle it

Measure the longitudinal energy spread of the B− beam with an electrostatic analyzer while recording the resonance linewidth; if the observed width is fully accounted for by that energy spread and the known time-of-flight kinematics, then acceleration-voltage instability is not the dominant broadening source and the proposed voltage stabilization alone would not recover MHz accuracy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in-flight photodetachment of a negative ion beam is a viable beam-preparation step for collinear laser spectroscopy, producing neutral atoms with population confined to the ground state, in contrast to charge-exchange cells. Using a cesium sputter source to make B−, a pulsed 1086.6 nm laser to detach the extra electron, and a continuous-wave 250 nm laser to excite the 2s^2 2p ^2P → 2s^2 3s ^2S transitions, the authors observe time-gated fluorescence from both boron isotopes. The measured isotope shift, −4.8(14) GHz, agrees with the high-precision value of −5.0313(20) GHz. The result is a proof of principle rather than a precision measurement: the resonances are ~1.0

Load-bearing premise

The route to high precision rests on the assumption that the 1–1.5 GHz linewidth is dominated by acceleration-voltage instability rather than by the ion source's energy spread or by velocity spread introduced in the photodetachment process itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Isotope-shift and hyperfine measurements on boron can be made without a charge-exchange cell, eliminating cascade background and collisional line-shift systematics.
  • The same preparation should work for any element or negative molecular ion with a laser-accessible photodetachment threshold, not just boron.
  • Combining the negative-ion source with an RFQ cooler/buncher and synchronizing detachment-laser pulses with ion bunches would raise temporal overlap to near 100%, increasing neutral-beam flux by orders of magnitude at the same ion current.
  • Time-gating on the arrival of photodetached atoms suppresses both detachment-laser scatter and out-of-gate cw-laser background by about 99.8%, a noise reduction that directly improves signal-to-background.
  • A simple Gaussian fit with known hyperfine parameters recovers the center of gravity only after a ~1.4 GHz shift correction, so precision spectra will require resolving or modeling the hyperfine structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to run the same scheme with the acceleration voltage actively stabilized and monitored; if the linewidth collapses toward the ~100 MHz scale expected from residual Doppler broadening, the voltage-instability attribution is confirmed, and if not, the ion source's energy spread or the detachment step itself must be investigated.
  • The method could be paired with resonance ionization rather than fluorescence detection, making it a ground-state-only variant of collinear resonance ionization spectroscopy, potentially useful for rare isotopes where background counts dominate.
  • For molecular ions, photodetachment may produce neutral molecules in a single well-defined vibrational state more often than charge exchange, which would open a route to state-selective molecular spectroscopy on fast beams.
  • Because the detachment laser can be pulsed and synchronized with ion bunches, the technique is naturally compatible with next-generation radioactive-beam facilities where beam intensities are low and background suppression is critical.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a proof-of-principle experiment of collinear laser spectroscopy on a neutral boron atomic beam produced by in-flight photodetachment of accelerated B− ions. The authors describe the production of B− from a cesium sputter source, mass purification with a Wien filter, a time-of-flight diagnostic for continuous beams, and neutralization with a pulsed infrared laser. They record fluorescence resonances on the 2s²2p ²P₁/₂,₃/₂ → 2s²3s ²S₁/₂ transitions in ¹⁰,¹¹B and obtain an isotope shift of −4.8(14) GHz, which they compare with the precise literature value of −5.0313(20) GHz. The paper identifies the main efficiency limitations (low laser repetition rate, beam overlap) and proposes a roadmap to high-precision measurements via voltage stabilization and an RFQ cooler-buncher.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper demonstrates a new beam-preparation method for collinear laser spectroscopy that produces neutral atoms only in the electronic ground state (with the two fine-structure levels populated), avoiding the excited-state cascades and collisional line shifts of conventional charge-exchange cells. The boron proof-of-principle is supported by clear resonances in both isotopes and a first isotope-shift value consistent with literature. The method is extendable to other elements and negative molecular ions, and the paper provides a concrete improvement path. The strengths are the honest reporting of efficiencies, the detailed description of the ToF and Wien-filter developments, and the clear identification of the remaining challenges. The main weaknesses are the unverified linewidth diagnosis and an incomplete treatment of the hyperfine-structure offset in the isotope-shift comparison.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3, linewidth paragraph] The attribution of the 1.0–1.5 GHz Gaussian width to acceleration-voltage instability is presented as 'probably the dominant contribution' but is not supported by a direct measurement of voltage fluctuations or source energy spread. The proposed route to MHz-level accuracy in Sec. 4 depends in part on this diagnosis, since improved voltage stabilization is listed as a key improvement. If a significant fraction of the broadening instead originates from the sputter source's energy spread, voltage stabilization alone will not recover the projected resolution. The authors should either provide a direct test (e.g., linewidth vs. acceleration voltage, or a measurement of the source's energy spread) or explicitly frame the diagnosis as an unverified assumption and temper the improvement roadmap accordingly.
  2. [Sec. 3, isotope shift] The paper does not state whether the measured transition frequencies used for the isotope shift were corrected for the estimated 1.4 GHz offset between the simple Gaussian center and the hyperfine center-of-gravity, which was estimated only for the ¹¹B D₁ line. Since the hyperfine patterns of ¹¹B (I=3/2) and ¹⁰B (I=3) and of the D₁ and D₂ transitions differ, the difference of uncorrected Gaussian centers can be biased by ~1 GHz, comparable to the stated 1.4 GHz uncertainty. The 'good agreement' with the −5.0313(20) GHz value of Ref. [26] is therefore not fully quantified. The authors should apply the hyperfine correction using known A factors and Racah intensities for both isotopes and both measured transitions, or explicitly state that no correction was applied and the agreement is only indicative within the large uncertainty.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.1 heading] Typo: 'Negtive Ion Production' should be 'Negative Ion Production'.
  2. [Sec. 2.1] Duplicate word: 'higher higher kinetic energy'.
  3. [Sec. 4] Typo: 'combing' should be 'combining'.
  4. [Table 1] The efficiencies are point estimates without uncertainties. Please state explicitly that they are order-of-magnitude estimates; the inferred neutral flux (e.g., ~1200 atoms per pulse) inherits this uncertainty.
  5. [Sec. 3, hyperfine fit] The statement that the hyperfine-sum fit is 'practically indistinguishable' from the simple Gaussian fit would be more convincing with a residual plot or a quantitative comparison (e.g., Δχ²) to support the robustness of the 1.4 GHz offset estimate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; minor shared-author benchmark only

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, no target quantity is defined in terms of a fitted parameter or a prior result from the same group. The central efficiency estimate (Eq. 1) is a direct product of an independently measured photodetachment cross section [48], the laser pulse energy, beam radius, and photon energy; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The proof-of-principle resonances in Figs. 6a-c are raw spectra, and the measured isotope shift (-4.8(14) GHz) is compared with the externally published value from [26] after the fact, not used as an input to extract it. The hyperfine-structure fit fixes A factors to published values [49,50] and Racah intensities, leaving only Gaussian width, intensity, and center of gravity free; this is a standard line-shape correction, not a self-definitional fit. The [26] benchmark shares several authors with the present work and [50] is a same-group thesis, so the external check is not fully independent, but the citation is real existing experimental data and the central method demonstration stands on the direct spectra and independent cross-section/energy-level inputs. The Sec. 3 attribution of the 1.0-1.5 GHz width to acceleration-voltage instability is untested (the paper says 'probably'), but an untested linewidth diagnosis is a correctness/risk issue, not circularity: it is not used to define any fitted target and no subsequent result is forced by it.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to produce the central result; the only numbers are literature cross sections and statistical fit parameters. The central physical claims rest on three domain assumptions about B− photodetachment and boron hyperfine structure.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Photodetachment cross section of B− at 1086.6 nm is σ≈3×10^-17 cm2
    Used in Eq. (1) to estimate 29% neutralization efficiency; value taken from [48], not measured here.
  • domain assumption Photodetachment of B− at 1.14 eV populates only the 2P1/2 and 2P3/2 fine-structure components of the ground term
    Underpins the 'ground-state-only beam' motivation; from energy thresholds and [46] branching ratios.
  • domain assumption Hyperfine A factors and Racah intensities for 11B are known from [49,50,26]
    Used to estimate the 1.4 GHz center-of-gravity correction between the simple Gaussian fit and the hyperfine-weighted center.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Collinear Laser Spectroscopy on a Fast Atomic Beam of Boron Generated by Photodetachment of Accelerated B- Ions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NKPYIGAY

@misc{pith2026260716048,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Collinear Laser Spectroscopy on a Fast Atomic Beam of Boron Generated by Photodetachment of Accelerated B- Ions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NKPYIGAY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16048}
}
abstract

Atomic beams for collinear laser spectroscopy are typically produced via charge exchange reactions in an in-beam vapor cell. This process is accompanied by the formation of a considerable amount of longer-lived excited state population, which is not accessible for spectroscopy and also induces fluorescence background to photon detectors. We present an alternative method to produce an atomic beam, consisting exclusively of ground-state atoms. Negative ions are neutralized in-flight by photodetachment and are subsequently used for fluorescence spectroscopy. As a test candidate, a negative boron ion beam was produced in a cesium sputtering source and superimposed with a co-propagating high-power pulsed infrared laser. The neutral atoms were subsequently excited along the $2s^2 2p\,{}^{2\!}P_{1/2,3/2} \rightarrow 2s^2 3s\,{}^{2\!}S_{1/2}$ transitions by a continuous-wave laser at about 250 nm. The statistics and efficiency were limited by the combination of a continuous ion beam with a low-repetition-rate laser, but a clear route for the improvement combining existing techniques is presented, which can then be applied to other elements as well as negative molecular ions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16048 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: The Collinear Apparatus for Laser Spectrcoscopy and Applied Physics (COALA). Ions are accelerated with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Time-of-flight spectra of the negative ion beam from the sputter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Energy level scheme (not to scale) of B− (left) and neutral B (right). The solid arrows indicate the possible optical transitions by photodetachement in negative boron and the resonant optical transitions in neutral boron. The dashed arrows indicate decays through electron emission. The detachment laser was overlapped with the copropagat￾ing ion beam in order to achieve a large interaction volume and best neutraliza… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The observed ToFs of the different components in the negative ion beam are plotted against the square root of their atomic masses. Error bars represent the FWHM of the observed ToF peaks. The solid line is the expected ToF-mass relation. The uncertainties of the expect…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time resolved spectrum of 11B. The horizontal axis represents the ion beam energy in keV and the vertical axis the time in µs between the trigger sig￾nal and the detection signal. The detected photon counts are color-coded. Ions of different initial velocities require …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Measured spectra in neutral boron. a) Resonance of the 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    B. Maaß, T. Hüther, K. König, J. Krämer, J. Krause, A. Lovato, P. Müller, K. Pachucki, M. Puchalski, R. Roth, R. Sánchez, F. Sommer, R. B. Wiringa, W. Nörter- shäuser, Nuclear Charge Radii of 10,11B, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 182501.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122. 182501

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122 2019

  2. [1]

    S. L. Kaufman, High-resolution laser spectroscopy in fast beams, Optics Communications 17 (1976) 309–312.doi: 10.1016/0030-4018(76)90267-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0030-4018(76)90267-4 1976

  3. [2]

    W. H. Wing, G. A. Ruff, W. E. Lamb, J. J. Spezeski, Observation of the Infrared Spectrum of the Hydrogen Molecular Ion HD +, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 1488. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.1488

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.36.1488 1976

  4. [3]

    Meier, H

    Th. Meier, H. Hühnermann, H. Wagner, High-resolution spectroscopy on a fast beam of metastable xenon ions, Opt. Comm. 20 (1977) 397–400.doi:10.1016/ 0030-4018(77)90213-9

    1977

  5. [4]

    R. E. Silverans, G. Borghs, G. Dumont, J. M. Van den Cruyce, Collinear fast beam-laser spectroscopy on 5d 2D3/2,5/2 barium ions, Zeitschr. f. Phys. A 295 (1980) 311

    1980

  6. [5]

    A. C. Mueller, F. Buchinger, W. Klempt, E. W. Ot- ten, R. Neugart, C. Ekstrom, J. Heinemeier, Spins, mo- ments and charge radii of barium isotopes in the range 122−146Ba determined by collinear fast-beam laser spec- troscopy, Nucl. Phys. A 403 (1983) 234–262.doi:10. 1016/0375-9474(83)90226-9

    1983

  7. [6]

    Anton, S

    K.-R. Anton, S. L. Kaufman, W. Klempt, G. Moruzzi, R. Neugart, E.-W. Otten, B. Schinzler, Collinear Laser Spectroscopy on Fast Atomic Beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 642.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.642

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.642 1978

  8. [7]

    Schinzler, W

    B. Schinzler, W. Klempt, S. L. Kaufman, H. Lochmann, G. Moruzzi, R. Neugart, E. W. Otten, J. Bonn, L. Reisky, K. P. C. Spath, Collinear laser spectroscopy of neutron- rich Cs isotopes at an on-line mass separator, Phys. Lett. B 79 (1978) 209–212.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78) 90224-1

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78 1978

Show all 56 references
  1. [8]

    Carrington, P

    A. Carrington, P. J. Sarre, Sub-Doppler Laser Spec- troscopy of Molecular Ions in Ion Beams, Le Journal de Physique Colloques 40 (C1) (1979) C1–54–C1–56. doi:10.1051/jphyscol:1979113

    1979 doi

  2. [9]

    Hechtfischer, Z

    U. Hechtfischer, Z. Amitay, P. Forck, M. Lange, J. Linke- mann, M. Schmitt, U. Schramm, D. Schwalm, R. Wester, D. Zajfman, A. Wolf, Near-Threshold Photodissociation of Cold CH+ in a Storage Ring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 2809–2812.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2809

    1998 doi

  3. [10]

    R. F. Garcia Ruiz, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. L. Binnersley, M. L. Bissell, A. A. Breier, A. J. Brinson, K. Chrysalidis, T. E. Cocolios, B. S. Cooper, K. T. Flanagan, T. F. Giesen, R. P. Groote, S. Franchoo, F. P. Gustafsson, T. A. Isaev, A. Koszorús, G. Neyens, H. A. Perrett,...

    2020 doi

  4. [11]

    Cheal, K

    B. Cheal, K. T. Flanagan, Progress in laser spectroscopy at radioactive ion beam facilities, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 113101.doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/11/113101

    2010 doi

  5. [12]

    Blaum, J

    K. Blaum, J. Dilling, W. Nörtershäuser, Precision atomic physics techniques for nuclear physics with radioactive beams, Phys. Scripta T152 (2013) 014017.doi:10. 1088/0031-8949/2013/T152/014017

    2013

  6. [13]

    Campbell, I

    P. Campbell, I. D. Moore, M. R. Pearson, Laser spec- troscopy for nuclear structure physics, Progress in Par- ticle and Nuclear Physics 86 (2016) 127–180.doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.09.003

    2016 doi

  7. [14]

    Neugart, J

    R. Neugart, J. Billowes, M. L. Bissell, K. Blaum, B. Cheal, K. T. Flanagan, G. Neyens, W. Nörtershäuser, D. T. Yordanov, Collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE: new methods and highlights, J. Phys. G 44 (2017) 064002. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/aa6642

    2017 doi

  8. [15]

    X. F. Yang, S. J. Wang, S. G. Wilkins, R. G. Ruiz, Laser spectroscopy for the study of exotic nuclei, Progr. Part. Nucl. Phys. 129 (2023) 104005.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp. 2022.104005

    2023

  9. [16]

    Klose, K

    A. Klose, K. Minamisono, C. Geppert, N. Frömmgen, M. Hammen, J. Krämer, A. Krieger, C. D. P. Levy, P. F. 7 Mantica, W. Nörtershäuser, S. Vinnikova, Tests of atomic charge-exchange cells for collinear laser spectroscopy, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. Sect. A 678 (2012) 114. d...

    2012 doi

  10. [17]

    A. R. Vernon, J. Billowes, C. L. Binnersley, M. L. Bis- sell, T. E. Cocolios, G. J. Farooq-Smith, K. T. Flanagan, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, W. Gins, R. P. de Groote, Á. Koszorús, K. M. Lynch, G. Neyens, C. M. Ricketts, K. Wendt, S. G. Wilkins, X. F. Yang, Simulation of the relative a...

    2019 doi

  11. [18]

    Bendali, H

    N. Bendali, H. T. Duong, P. Juncar, J. M. S. Jalm, J. L. Vialle, Na +-Na charge exchange processes studied by collinear laser spectroscopy, J. Phys. B 19 (1986) 233. doi:10.1088/0022-3700/19/2/012

    1986 doi

  12. [19]

    Neugart, S

    R. Neugart, S. L. Kaufman, W. Klempt, G. Moruzzi, E.- W. Otten, B. Schinzler, High-Resolution Spectroscopy in Fast Atomic Beams, in: J. L. Hall, J. L. Carlsten (Eds.), Laser Spectroscopy III, Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1977, p. 446.doi:10.1007/ 978-3-540...

    1977

  13. [20]

    Imgram, K

    P. Imgram, K. König, J. Krämer, T. Ratajczyk, R. A. Müller, A. Surzhykov, W. Nörtershäuser, Collinear laser spectroscopy at ion-trap accuracy: Transition frequencies and isotope shifts in the 6s 2S1/2 →6p 2P1/2,3/2 transi- tions in Ba +, Phys. Rev. A 99 (2019).doi:10.1103/ Phy...

    2019

  14. [21]

    Müller, K

    P. Müller, K. König, P. Imgram, J. Krämer, W. Nörter- shäuser, Collinear laser spectroscopy of Ca+: Solving the field-shift puzzle of the 4s 2S1/2 →4p 2P1/2,3/2 transi- tions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 043351.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.2.043351

    2020

  15. [23]

    Marinova, W

    K. Marinova, W. Geithner, M. Kowalska, K. Blaum, S. Kappertz, M. Keim, S. Kloos, G. Kotrotsios, P. Lievens, R. Neugart, H. Simon, S. Wilbert, Charge radii of neon isotopes across thesdneutron shell, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 034313.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.84.034313

    2011 doi

  16. [24]

    Carlson, S

    J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, F. Pederiva, S. C. Pieper, R. Schi- avilla, K. E. Schmidt, R. B. Wiringa, Quantum Monte Carlo methods for nuclear physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 (2015) 1067.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1067

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    B. Maaß, P. Müller, W. Nörtershäuser, J. Clark, C. Gorges, S. Kaufmann, K. König, J. Krämer, A. Levand, R. Orford, R. Sánchez, G. Savard, F. Sommer, Towards laser spec- troscopy of the proton-halo candidate 8B, Hyperf. Inter- act. 238 (2017).doi:10.1007/s10751-017-1399-5

    2017 doi

  18. [27]

    Kristensen, U

    P. Kristensen, U. Pedersen, V . Petrunin, T. Andersen, K. Chung, Binding energy of the metastable He-ion, Phys. Rev. A 55 (1997) 978–983.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA. 55.978

    1997 doi

  19. [28]

    Bresteau, C

    D. Bresteau, C. Drag, C. Blondel, Isotope shift of the electron affinity of carbon measured by photodetachment microscopy, Phys. Rev. A 93 (2016) 013414.doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.93.013414

    2016

  20. [29]

    Rothe, J

    S. Rothe, J. Sundberg, J. Welander, K. Chrysalidis, T. Day Goodacre, V . Fedosseev, S. Fiotakis, O. Forstner, R. Heinke, K. Johnston, T. Kron, U. Köster, Y . Liu, B. Marsh, A. Ringvall-Moberg, R. Rossel, C. Seiffert, D. Studer, K. Wendt, D. Hanstorp, Laser photodetach- ment of...

    2017 doi

  21. [30]

    Leimbach, J

    D. Leimbach, J. Karls, Y . Guo, R. Ahmed, J. Ballof, L. Bengtsson, F. Boix Pamies, A. Borschevsky, K. Chrysalidis, E. Eliav, D. Fedorov, V . Fedosseev, O. Forstner, N. Galland, R. Garcia Ruiz, C. Granados, R. Heinke, K. Johnston, A. Koszorus, U. Köster, M. Kris- tiansson, Y . ...

    2020

  22. [31]

    Welander, J

    J. Welander, J. E. Navarro Navarrete, J. Rohlén, T. Leopold, R. D. Thomas, D. J. Pegg, D. Hanstorp, A field ionizer for photodetachment studies of negative ions, Rev. Scient. Instrum. 93 (2022) 065004.doi:10.1063/ 5.0061736

    2022

  23. [32]

    F. M. Maier, E. Leistenschneider, M. Au, U. B¯erzin, š, Y . N. Vila Gracia, D. Hanstorp, C. Kanitz, V . Lagaki, S. Lech- ner, D. Leimbach, P. Plattner, M. Reponen, L. V . Ro- driguez, S. Rothe, L. Schweikhard, M. Vilen, J. Warbinek, S. Malbrunot-Ettenauer, Enhanced sensitivity...

    2025 doi

  24. [33]

    Blondel, D

    C. Blondel, D. Bresteau, C. Drag, Cavity-enhanced pho- todetachment of H− as a means to produce energetic neu- tral beams for plasma heating, Atoms 7 (2019) 32.doi: 10.3390/atoms7010032. 8

    2019 doi

  25. [34]

    Simonin, et al., R&D around a photoneutralizer- based NBI system (Siphore) in view of a DEMO toka- mak steady-state fusion reactor, Nucl

    A. Simonin, et al., R&D around a photoneutralizer- based NBI system (Siphore) in view of a DEMO toka- mak steady-state fusion reactor, Nucl. Fusion 55 (2015) 123020.doi:10.1088/0029-5515/55/12/123020

    2015 doi

  26. [35]

    Simonin, C

    A. Simonin, C. Blondel, W. Chaibi, C. Dechelle, C. Drag, E. Villedieu, Towards a maintainable and high efficiency neutral beam system for future fusion reactors, Nucl. Fusion 61 (2021) 046003. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abdac2. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ abdac2

    2021 doi

  27. [37]

    A. P. O’Connor, F. Grussie, H. Bruhns, N. de Ruette, T. P. Koenning, K. A. Miller, D. W. Savin, J. Stützel, X. Ur- bain, H. Kreckel, Generation of neutral atomic beams uti- lizing photodetachment by high power diode laser stacks, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 (2015) 113306.doi:10.1063...

    2015 doi

  28. [38]

    Becker, M

    Á. Becker, M. Grieser, R. von Hahn, C. Krantz, O. Novotný, D. Rimmler, A. Wolf, H. Kreckel, An ion- atom merged beams setup at the Cryogenic Storage Ring, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93 (2022) 053305.doi:10.1063/5. 0086391

    2022 doi

  29. [39]

    Debu, Status report on the GBAR CERN experiment, J

    P. Debu, Status report on the GBAR CERN experiment, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 460 (2013) 012008.doi:10.1088/ 1742-6596/460/1/012008

    2013

  30. [40]

    Pérez, et al., The GBAR antimatter gravity experi- ment, Hyperf

    P. Pérez, et al., The GBAR antimatter gravity experi- ment, Hyperf. Interact. 233 (2015) 21–27.doi:10. 1007/s10751-015-1154-8

    2015

  31. [41]

    Bruhns, H

    H. Bruhns, H. Kreckel, D. W. Savin, D. G. Seely, C. C. Havener, Low-energy charge transfer for collisions of Si3+ with atomic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 064702. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.77.064702

    2008 doi

  32. [42]

    B. Maaß, K. König, J. Krämer, A. J. Miller, K. Mi- namisono, W. Nörtershäuser, F. Sommer, A 4πFluores- cence Detection Region for Collinear Laser Spectroscopy (2020).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2007.02658

    2020 doi arXiv

  33. [43]

    Middleton, A versatile high intensity negative ion source, Nucl

    R. Middleton, A versatile high intensity negative ion source, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. 214 (1983) 139. doi:10.1016/0167-5087(83)90580-X

    1983 doi

  34. [44]

    Middleton, A negative-ion cookbook (1989)

    R. Middleton, A negative-ion cookbook (1989). URLhttps://www.pelletron.com/cookbook.pdf

    1989

  35. [45]

    Blahins, T

    J. Blahins, T. Leopold, A. Apsitis, U. Berzins, A. Ubelis, J. Rohlén, D. Lu, D. Hanstorp, Operating a cesium sput- ter source in a pulsed mode, Rev. Sci. Instr. 91 (2020) 023322.doi:10.1063/1.5130519

    2020 doi

  36. [46]

    Scheer, R

    M. Scheer, R. C. Bilodeau, H. K. Haugen, Negative Ion of Boron: An Experimental Study of the 3P Ground State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 2562.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.80.2562

    1998

  37. [47]

    Rupp, Brillouin-LIDAR: Erprobung und Erweiterung, Doctoral Thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt (2018).doi:10.26083/tuprints-00007697

    D. Rupp, Brillouin-LIDAR: Erprobung und Erweiterung, Doctoral Thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt (2018).doi:10.26083/tuprints-00007697

    2018 doi

  38. [48]

    J. Liu, Y . Li, J. Wu, J. Yuan, Near-threshold photode- tachment cross section of negative atomic boron ions, Phys. Rev. A 87 (2013).doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.87. 065402

    2013 doi

  39. [49]

    H. Lew, R. S. Title, Note on the hyperfine structure of the 2s2 2pstate of boron-10 and 11, Canad. J. Phys. 38 (1960) 868–871.doi:10.1139/p60-091

    1960 doi

  40. [50]

    Maaß, Laser Spectroscopy of the Boron Isotopic Chain, Doctoral thesis, TU Darmstadt (2020).doi:10.25534/ TUPRINTS-00011484

    B. Maaß, Laser Spectroscopy of the Boron Isotopic Chain, Doctoral thesis, TU Darmstadt (2020).doi:10.25534/ TUPRINTS-00011484

    2020

  41. [51]

    Drake, W

    G. Drake, W. Nörtershäuser, Z.-C. Yan, Isotope shifts and nuclear radius measurements for helium and lithium, Can. J. Phys. 83 (2005) 311–325.doi:10.1139/P05-020

    2005 doi

  42. [52]

    Nörtershäuser, C

    W. Nörtershäuser, C. Geppert, A. Krieger, K. Pachucki, M. Puchalski, K. Blaum, M. L. Bissell, N. Frömmgen, M. Hammen, M. Kowalska, J. Krämer, K. Kreim, R. Neu- gart, G. Neyens, R. Sánchez, D. T. Yordanov, Preci- sion Test of Many-Body QED in the Be + 2pFine Struc- ture Doublet...

    2015 doi

  43. [53]

    L. M. Wang, C. Li, Z.-C. Yan, G. W. F. Drake, Iso- tope shifts and transition frequencies for theSandP states of lithium: Bethe logarithms and second-order rel- ativistic recoil, Phys. Rev. A 95 (2017) 032504.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.032504

    2017 doi

  44. [54]

    Müller, K

    P. Müller, K. König, E. Burbach, G. W. F. Drake, P. Imgram, B. Maass, T. M. Maggio, W. Nörtershäuser, J. Spahn, Splitting isotope shift in the 1s2p 3P0,1,2 fine- structure triplet in 12,13,14C4+: Experiment and theory, Phys. Rev. A 113 (2026) 012806.doi:10.1103/ 24k3-r2gp

    2026

  45. [55]

    Nieminen, P

    A. Nieminen, P. Campbell, J. Billowes, D. H. Forest, J. A. R. Griffith, J. Huikari, A. Jokinen, I. D. Moore, R. Moore, G. Tungate, J. Äystö, On-Line Ion Cooling and Bunching for Collinear Laser Spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 094801.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 88.094801

    2002 doi

  46. [56]

    K. T. Flanagan, K. M. Lynch, J. Billowes, M. L. Bissell, I. Budincevic, T. E. Cocolios, R. P. Groote, S. Schepper, V . N. Fedosseev, S. Franchoo, R. F. G. Ruiz, H. Heylen, B. A. Marsh, G. Neyens, T. J. Procter, R. E. Rossel, S. Rothe, I. Strashnov, H. H. Stroke, K. D. A. Wendt...

    2013 doi

  47. [57]

    K. M. Lynch, J. Billowes, M. L. Bissell, I. Budince- vic, T. E. Cocolios, R. P. Groote, S. Schepper, V . N. Fedosseev, K. T. Flanagan, S. Franchoo, R. F. G. Ruiz, H. Heylen, B. A. Marsh, G. Neyens, T. J. Procter, R. E. Rossel, S. Rothe, I. Strashnov, H. H. Stroke, K. D. A. Wen...

    2014

  48. [58]

    V oss, M

    A. V oss, M. R. Pearson, J. Billowes, F. Buchinger, B. Cheal, J. E. Crawford, A. A. Kwiatkowski, C. D. P. Levy, O. Shelbaya, First use of high-frequency intensity modulation of narrow-linewidth laser light and its applica- tion in determination of 206,205,204Fr ground-state pr...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.