Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-06-29T03:03:33.802527Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events
As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 25 of 25 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2606.27971.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: cited_works
Reference resolution
25 of 25 outbound references displayed
- verified exact23
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved2
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
Observation 2c2f05ab-ce19-494e-8e76-b2f519364ccd · outbound
This paper cites A re-analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta-analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events A re-analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta-analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters
Reference 1
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.896847Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation c43a9299-01ae-4e04-b91f-96449cc3a436 · outbound
This paper cites Utilization of the evidence from studies with no events in meta- analyses of adverse events: an empirical investigation.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Utilization of the evidence from studies with no events in meta- analyses of adverse events: an empirical investigation
Reference 2
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.899196Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 33146ad3-af9b-495e-acab-be0e60f7b4fb · outbound
This paper cites The impact of correction methods on rare-event meta- analysis.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events The impact of correction methods on rare-event meta- analysis
Reference 3
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.908776Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 1ed129ea-01cd-4305-9831-40505421b72a · outbound
This paper cites Journal of the American Statistical Association , author =.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Journal of the American Statistical Association , author =
Reference 4
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.906620Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 517b784c-23ae-4d7f-9256-45f40687a1e6 · outbound
This paper cites Random-effects meta-analysis of few studies involving rare events.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Random-effects meta-analysis of few studies involving rare events
Reference 5
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.894293Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 806cdc8e-974d-4325-9391-357f842b650d · outbound
This paper cites Rare events meta-analysis using the Bayesian beta-binomial model.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Rare events meta-analysis using the Bayesian beta-binomial model
Reference 6
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.903461Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation e1e11810-4766-4495-ab97-e738ac5c427f · outbound
This paper cites Statistical methods for meta-analyses including information from studies without any events-add nothing to nothing and succeed nevertheless.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Statistical methods for meta-analyses including information from studies without any events-add nothing to nothing and succeed nevertheless
Reference 7
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.876664Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 0f1e6a2b-d411-44ba-b919-c2175b2f1bc1 · outbound
This paper cites A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis
Reference 8
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.911004Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation d44dac43-d6a8-4082-bb02-dfdf80149243 · outbound
This paper cites Comparison of random-effects meta-analysis models for the relative risk in the case of rare events: A simulation study.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Comparison of random-effects meta-analysis models for the relative risk in the case of rare events: A simulation study
Reference 9
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-06-29T03:03:33.802527Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 193052b0-215b-436f-b458-34fe3859a433 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Unresolved cited work
Reference 10
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.885130Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 8cfc3382-9832-4b0f-a817-cd679221551b · outbound
This paper cites Performance of several types of beta-binomial models in comparison to standard approaches for meta-analyses with very few studies.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Performance of several types of beta-binomial models in comparison to standard approaches for meta-analyses with very few studies
Reference 11
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.873763Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
correction dated 2026-02-17. Source: crossref record 10.1186/s12874-026-02781-9->10.1186/s12874-022-01779-3:correction, observed 2026-07-11T02:56:02.238815+00:00. This notice travels one citation hop only.
Observation 5210b928-6b5d-4f0f-b0be-1bfd577ef82c · outbound
This paper cites Random-effects meta-analysis models for the odds ratio in the case of rare events under different data-generating models: A simulation study.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Random-effects meta-analysis models for the odds ratio in the case of rare events under different data-generating models: A simulation study
Reference 12
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.876986Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 0ebf909e-b923-4b5e-911e-e65cac865780 · outbound
This paper cites A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes
Reference 13
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.901428Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 47ed71c9-650f-4a5f-a393-da1a730ae2a1 · outbound
This paper cites Contrast-Based and Arm-Based Models for Network Meta-Analysis.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Contrast-Based and Arm-Based Models for Network Meta-Analysis
Reference 14
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.871322Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation f9cfcad7-1c22-45bb-8622-34678d96bbb0 · outbound
This paper cites Beta-binomial models for meta-analysis with binary outcomes: Variations, extensions, and additional insights from econometrics.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Beta-binomial models for meta-analysis with binary outcomes: Variations, extensions, and additional insights from econometrics
Reference 15
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.881184Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 854fecd5-ca45-478f-97fe-aed28ba78746 · outbound
This paper cites Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship
Reference 16
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.889710Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 0bc1c05b-ecb7-4816-ab0e-fbed8d87d46b · outbound
This paper cites A Simple Approach to Fit the Beta-binomial Model.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events A Simple Approach to Fit the Beta-binomial Model
Reference 17
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.855983Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 9499bbf0-773a-4e0b-8322-f7cf7fc03687 · outbound
This paper cites Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
Reference 18
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.879209Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 5c263d16-b7b5-4c4d-b205-af8d47e7988b · outbound
This paper cites Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Reference 19
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.858064Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 8834047b-982f-48be-8a23-f37adb9ffe0b · outbound
This paper cites Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses
Reference 20
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-06-29T03:03:33.802527Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ae47f3a2-859f-4ad4-aa5c-4a93966e6786 · outbound
This paper cites Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate
Reference 21
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.891568Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 9bd168ca-6c5b-4ef7-ab35-8b9636f1e41d · outbound
This paper cites Off‐pump versus on‐pump coronary artery bypass grafting for ischaemic heart disease.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Off‐pump versus on‐pump coronary artery bypass grafting for ischaemic heart disease
Reference 22
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.860077Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation d66e55b5-81c2-4865-b27c-55decbdca772 · outbound
This paper cites Simpson's paradox visualized: the example of the rosiglitazone meta-analysis.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events Simpson's paradox visualized: the example of the rosiglitazone meta-analysis
Reference 23
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.887394Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 89ef2558-da02-4ecd-9942-bbbc43a0c57f · outbound
This paper cites How to observe the principle of concurrent control in an arm- based meta-analysis using SAS procedures GLIMMIX and BGLIMM.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events How to observe the principle of concurrent control in an arm- based meta-analysis using SAS procedures GLIMMIX and BGLIMM
Reference 24
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.883044Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 4f73d194-4f7e-4d15-a8fa-d3ae5e403837 · outbound
This paper cites A comparison of seven random-effects models for meta- analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio.
A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events A comparison of seven random-effects models for meta- analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio
Reference 25
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-06-29T03:23:04.874340Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Pith citing papers
No inbound Pith citation observations are available.