pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.23272 · v2 · pith:NMR4XJU3new · submitted 2026-02-26 · 🌊 nlin.CD

Interplay of Nonsmoothness, Time Delay, and Stochasticity in Turning Dynamics

Meiyazhagan Jaganathan , Vikram Pakrashi , Aasifa Rounak This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 12:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.CD
keywords turning dynamicschatter controlnonsmooth frictionregenerative delaystochastic forcesbasin stabilitymetal cuttingnonlinear dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Numerical models of metal cutting that include nonsmooth friction, regenerative delay, and random forces show chatter can be suppressed by limiting initial tool displacement and workpiece roughness.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper numerically investigates the dynamics of orthogonal turning when nonsmooth friction, time-delayed regenerative effects, and stochastic force perturbations are all present together. It shows that omitting any of these features hides key behaviors such as stick-slip motion during chatter and stochastic bifurcations. Entropy-based measures track the transitions between stable and unstable regimes. Basin stability analysis, adjusted for both stochasticity and delays, is then used to map how different initial tool positions and workpiece surface profiles affect the likelihood of chatter. This matters for precision manufacturing because chatter produces poor finishes and tool damage, and the results point to low-cost adjustments in starting conditions that can improve outcomes.

Core claim

The dynamics of the tool exhibit rich nonlinear phenomena such as stick-slip during chatter, with stochastic perturbations in cutting forces adding further complexity and leading to stochastic P and D bifurcations. Measures of entropy quantify the dynamical transitions. Basin stability analyses modified to account for stochasticity and time-delays show that chatter can be controlled by restricting initial tool displacement and controlling initial workpiece surface roughness.

What carries the argument

Basin stability analysis modified for stochasticity and time delays, applied to a numerical model of orthogonal cutting that incorporates a nonsmooth friction law and regenerative effects.

If this is right

  • Stick-slip motion appears during chatter once nonsmooth friction is included.
  • Stochastic force terms produce P and D bifurcations not seen in deterministic models.
  • Entropy measures successfully detect transitions between different dynamical states.
  • Chatter probability decreases when initial tool displacement is kept small and workpiece roughness is controlled.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same control strategy of managing initial conditions might apply to other regenerative machining processes such as milling.
  • In practice, specifying tighter surface finish tolerances on incoming workpieces could serve as a simple stabilization method.
  • Adding measured noise statistics from real cutting forces could refine the stochastic component of the model.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen numerical model with its specific nonsmooth friction law, regenerative delay, and stochastic force terms sufficiently captures the essential physics of real orthogonal turning without major unmodeled effects.

What would settle it

Direct experimental measurements of chatter occurrence in physical turning tests that contradict the stability basins predicted for the same ranges of initial tool displacement and surface roughness profiles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.23272 by Aasifa Rounak, Meiyazhagan Jaganathan, Vikram Pakrashi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the turning process representing the orientation of the tool and workpiece and their relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic of the turning process modeled as a spring-mass-damper system representing various cutting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Stribeck friction coefficient µ(Vγ ) with parameters µd = 0.23, µs = 0.54, Vs = 0.65 ms−1 . The antisymmetric curve shows an exponential transition from static to dynamic friction regimes around the Stribeck velocity. y1(τ) = Y(t) HD , (7c) y2(τ) = y˙1(τ) = Y˙(t) HD r m k , (7d) vγ = Vγ HD r m k = n vs −ν cos(γ)y2(τ). (7e) The non-dimensional equation of the model is obtained as follows: y¨(τ) +ξ y˙(τ) +y(… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The stability lobe diagram shows the numerically computed stable region in green and the chatter region in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the result of the bifurcation analysis where the maximum and minimum values of the instantaneous chip thickness H(t) and the frictional chip velocity relative to the tool Vγ in dimensional form are plotted along the y-axis while the depth of cut ap is in the x-direction. The bifurcation analysis reveals that the system’s stability is divided into three distinct regions, as listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Variation of chip thickness over time for the stable case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of numerical solution obtained with different time steps using the Euler-Maruyama scheme for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Stochastic P-bifurcation of the metal cutting system for the parameter values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Figure (d) representing the area of the contours at j-pdf = 0.5. The shaded region denotes the multi-stable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Estimation of Lyapunov exponent with ap as the bifurcation parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Schematic figure showing initial waviness and height [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Basin stability of chatter cutting is estimated and displayed as functions of the number of basis functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Influence of α and β on basin stability of chatter cutting for various values of the number of basis functions Nbs. The heat-maps in Figs. 13 (b)-(i) reveal that the number of samples transitioning to chatter vibrations MCH begins to rise as the number of basis functions Nbs increases. This rise reflects how enhanced initial surface irregularities (represented by the history function) can affect the stabi… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Various entropy measures. (a) Shannon entropy, (b) Conditional entropy, (c) Permutation entropy, (d) Ap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The stochastic dynamics of orthogonal metal cutting with both regenerative and nonsmooth frictional effects are investigated numerically in this paper. The shortcomings of neglecting nonsmoothness in frictional and stochastic effects in modeling the dynamics of such a machining process are demonstrated. Dynamics of the tool motion is observed to exhibit rich nonlinear phenomena such as stick-slip during chatter, with stochastic perturbations in cutting forces adding further complexity, leading to the occurrence of stochastic P and D bifurcations. Measures of entropy are found to be effective in quantifying the dynamical transitions occurring in the dynamics of the tool. Subsequently, basin stability analyses, modified to account for stochasticity and time-delays, are carried out to systematically investigate the dynamics of the cutting tool across multiple surface roughness profiles of the workpiece. Basin stability analyses indicate that chatter can be controlled by restricting initial tool displacement and controlling initial workpiece surface roughness, suggesting practical strategies to improve machining outcomes for precision manufacturing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper numerically studies the stochastic dynamics of orthogonal metal cutting, incorporating regenerative time delay and nonsmooth frictional effects. It reports rich nonlinear phenomena including stick-slip during chatter and stochastic P and D bifurcations, employs entropy measures to quantify transitions, and performs modified basin-stability analyses (accounting for stochasticity and delays) across varying workpiece surface roughness profiles. The central claim is that chatter can be controlled by restricting initial tool displacement and controlling initial workpiece surface roughness, suggesting practical strategies for precision manufacturing.

Significance. If the chosen constitutive model accurately reproduces the dominant stability boundaries of physical turning, the basin-stability results could offer a useful framework for initial-condition-based chatter mitigation in machining. The combination of nonsmooth friction, delay, and additive noise is a reasonable modeling choice for exploring stochastic bifurcations, and the explicit use of entropy and modified basin stability provides quantitative tools for tracking dynamical transitions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Numerical results and basin stability sections] The manuscript reports numerical observations of bifurcations and basin stability but supplies no information on the integration method, time-stepping scheme, step-size selection, or convergence checks for the stochastic delay differential equations (see the numerical results sections following the model definition). This omission leaves the reported stick-slip, stochastic P/D bifurcations, and basin measures without visible quantitative support.
  2. [Model formulation and basin-stability analysis] No experimental calibration or direct comparison against measured force traces, chatter frequencies, or stability lobes is provided. Consequently, discrepancies in contact mechanics, thermal effects, or multi-tooth dynamics could reshape the stochastic basins and reverse the reported control recommendations (see the model formulation and the basin-stability analysis paragraphs).
  3. [Basin stability analysis] The modification of basin stability to incorporate stochasticity and time delays is described only at a high level; the precise sampling procedure over initial conditions, the treatment of the delay in the stochastic setting, and the specific noise intensities used are not stated, making it impossible to assess robustness of the claim that restricting initial tool displacement controls chatter.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model section] Notation for the nonsmooth friction law and the stochastic force term should be introduced with explicit equations rather than descriptive text only.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the basin-stability plots should specify the exact parameter values (friction discontinuity parameters, noise intensity) and the number of realizations used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will make where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical results and basin stability sections] The manuscript reports numerical observations of bifurcations and basin stability but supplies no information on the integration method, time-stepping scheme, step-size selection, or convergence checks for the stochastic delay differential equations (see the numerical results sections following the model definition). This omission leaves the reported stick-slip, stochastic P/D bifurcations, and basin measures without visible quantitative support.

    Authors: We agree that explicit details on the numerical integration are required for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated paragraph (or subsection) immediately after the model definition that specifies the integration method for the stochastic delay differential equations, the time-stepping scheme, the step-size selection procedure, and the convergence checks performed to support the reported stick-slip, stochastic P/D bifurcations, and basin measures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model formulation and basin-stability analysis] No experimental calibration or direct comparison against measured force traces, chatter frequencies, or stability lobes is provided. Consequently, discrepancies in contact mechanics, thermal effects, or multi-tooth dynamics could reshape the stochastic basins and reverse the reported control recommendations (see the model formulation and the basin-stability analysis paragraphs).

    Authors: The work is a numerical study of the interplay among nonsmooth friction, regenerative delay, and additive noise within a standard constitutive model drawn from the machining literature. We acknowledge that the absence of direct experimental calibration is a genuine limitation that could affect the quantitative transferability of the basin-stability control recommendations. In the revision we will add an explicit limitations paragraph that discusses possible discrepancies arising from contact mechanics, thermal effects, and multi-tooth dynamics, and we will qualify the practical suggestions accordingly. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Basin stability analysis] The modification of basin stability to incorporate stochasticity and time delays is described only at a high level; the precise sampling procedure over initial conditions, the treatment of the delay in the stochastic setting, and the specific noise intensities used are not stated, making it impossible to assess robustness of the claim that restricting initial tool displacement controls chatter.

    Authors: We accept that the current description of the modified basin-stability procedure is insufficiently detailed. The revised manuscript will expand this section to state the precise sampling procedure over initial conditions, the numerical treatment of the regenerative delay within the stochastic simulations, and the specific noise intensities employed, thereby allowing readers to evaluate the robustness of the reported control recommendations. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct experimental calibration or comparison against measured force traces, chatter frequencies, or stability lobes, which would require new experimental work outside the scope of the present numerical investigation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical model exploration shows no circularity

full rationale

The paper conducts direct numerical simulations of a 1-DOF turning model that incorporates a chosen nonsmooth friction law, regenerative delay, and additive stochastic forcing. Basin stability analyses (modified for stochasticity and delay) are performed on this model to map regions of chatter versus stable cutting as functions of initial tool displacement and workpiece surface roughness. No analytic derivation chain exists; reported phenomena such as stick-slip, stochastic P/D bifurcations, and entropy measures are outputs of the simulations rather than quantities redefined from the same fitted inputs. No self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness or to smuggle in ansatzes. The control recommendations are conditional statements about the specific model's basins and do not reduce to tautological re-labeling of simulation parameters. This is a standard numerical exploration whose validity rests on external experimental benchmarks rather than internal definitional closure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents exhaustive enumeration; the model appears to rest on standard domain assumptions of machining dynamics rather than new invented entities or heavily fitted parameters whose values are reported.

free parameters (2)
  • friction discontinuity parameters
    Nonsmooth friction law coefficients are required to produce stick-slip but their specific values are not stated in the abstract.
  • noise intensity
    Amplitude of stochastic perturbations in cutting force is a modeling choice that drives the reported bifurcations.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The regenerative effect in turning can be represented by a constant time delay equal to the spindle period.
    Invoked when the paper includes regenerative effects in the model description.
  • domain assumption Nonsmooth friction can be adequately captured by a piecewise or discontinuous function of relative velocity.
    Required to generate the observed stick-slip behavior.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5697 in / 1490 out tokens · 64277 ms · 2026-05-21T12:25:43.211555+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bernardo, C

    M. Bernardo, C. Budd, A. R. Champneys, P. Kowalczyk, Piecewise-smooth dynamical systems: theory and applications, volume 163, Springer Science & Business Media, 2008

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Popp, Non-smooth mechanical systems, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 64 (2000) 765–772

    K. Popp, Non-smooth mechanical systems, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 64 (2000) 765–772

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    W. Chin, E. Ott, H. E. Nusse, C. Grebogi, Grazing bifurcations in impact oscillators, Physical Review E 50 (1994) 4427

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    Wiercigroch, Applied nonlinear dynamics of non-smooth mechanical systems, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 28 (2006) 519–526

    M. Wiercigroch, Applied nonlinear dynamics of non-smooth mechanical systems, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 28 (2006) 519–526

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Ozturk, Want to save costs and be more sustainable? stop the chatter,https://www.amrc.co.uk/news, 2023

    E. Ozturk, Want to save costs and be more sustainable? stop the chatter,https://www.amrc.co.uk/news, 2023. Accessed: 2025-08-23

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Wiercigroch, A

    M. Wiercigroch, A. M. Krivtsov, Frictional chatter in orthogonal metal cutting, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 359 (2001) 713–738. 22 Interplay of Nonsmoothness, Time Delay, and Stochasticity in Turning Dynamics

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Rusinek, M

    R. Rusinek, M. Wiercigroch, P. Wahi, Modelling of frictional chatter in metal cutting, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 89 (2014) 167–176

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    P. Wahi, A. Chatterjee, Self-interrupted regenerative metal cutting in turning, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 43 (2008) 111–123

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Stépán, Modelling nonlinear regenerative effects in metal cutting, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London

    G. Stépán, Modelling nonlinear regenerative effects in metal cutting, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 359 (2001) 739–757

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    Zhang, L

    X. Zhang, L. Wan, X. Ran, Research progress on the chatter stability in machining systems, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 131 (2024) 29–62

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Wiercigroch, E

    M. Wiercigroch, E. Budak, Sources of nonlinearities, chatter generation and suppression in metal cutting, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 359 (2001) 663–693

    work page 2001

  12. [12]

    Dombovari, D

    Z. Dombovari, D. A. Barton, R. E. Wilson, G. Stepan, On the global dynamics of chatter in the orthogonal cutting model, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 46 (2011) 330–338

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Engelborghs, T

    K. Engelborghs, T. Luzyanina, G. Samaey, DDE-BIFTOOL v. 2.00: a matlab package for bifurcation analysis of delay differential equations (2001)

    work page 2001

  14. [14]

    W. Bai, R. Sun, A. Roy, V . V . Silberschmidt, Improved analytical prediction of chip formation in orthogonal cutting of titanium alloy ti6al4v, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 133 (2017) 357–367

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Gyebrószki, D

    G. Gyebrószki, D. Bachrathy, G. Csernák, G. Stepan, Stability of turning processes for periodic chip formation, Advances in Manufacturing 6 (2018) 345–353

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Ahmadi, Analytical investigation of machining chatter by considering the nonlinearity of process damping, Journal of Sound and Vibration 393 (2017) 252–264

    K. Ahmadi, Analytical investigation of machining chatter by considering the nonlinearity of process damping, Journal of Sound and Vibration 393 (2017) 252–264

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Eynian, Y

    M. Eynian, Y . Altintas, Chatter stability of general turning operations with process damping, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 131 (2009) 041005

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    Yuvaraju, J

    B. Yuvaraju, J. Srinivas, B. Nanda, Nonlinear dynamics of friction-induced regenerative chatter in internal turning with process damping forces, Journal of Sound and Vibration 544 (2023) 117386

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Altintas, M

    Y . Altintas, M. Weck, Chatter stability of metal cutting and grinding, CIRP annals 53 (2004) 619–642

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    H. Li, Y . C. Shin, A study on chatter boundaries of cylindrical plunge grinding with process condition-dependent dynamics, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 47 (2007) 1563–1572

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    Y . Yan, J. Xu, M. Wiercigroch, Chatter in a transverse grinding process, Journal of Sound and Vibration 333 (2014) 937–953

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Y . Yan, J. Xu, M. Wiercigroch, Stability and dynamics of parallel plunge grinding, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 99 (2018) 881–895

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    T. Liu, W. Li, Z. Deng, Q. Yao, J. Tang, J. Yan, H. Kang, Chatter stability analysis for non-circular high-speed grinding process with dynamic force modelling, Journal of Sound and Vibration 595 (2025) 118782

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    J. C. Roukema, Y . Altintas, Generalized modeling of drilling vibrations. part ii: Chatter stability in frequency domain, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 47 (2007) 1474–1485

    work page 2007

  25. [25]

    J. C. Roukema, Y . Altintas, Generalized modeling of drilling vibrations. part i: Time domain model of drilling kinematics, dynamics and hole formation, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 47 (2007) 1455–1473

    work page 2007

  26. [26]

    Stone, S

    E. Stone, S. A. Campbell, Stability and bifurcation analysis of a nonlinear dde model for drilling, Journal of Nonlinear Science 14 (2004) 27–57

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    G. Wang, H. Dong, Y . Guo, Y . Ke, Chatter mechanism and stability analysis of robotic boring, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 91 (2017) 411–421

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Altintas, G

    Y . Altintas, G. Stépán, D. Merdol, Z. Dombóvári, Chatter stability of milling in frequency and discrete time domain, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 1 (2008) 35–44

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    Insperger, G

    T. Insperger, G. Stépán, P. Bayly, B. Mann, Multiple chatter frequencies in milling processes, Journal of sound and vibration 262 (2003) 333–345

    work page 2003

  30. [30]

    L. Zhu, C. Liu, Recent progress of chatter prediction, detection and suppression in milling, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 143 (2020) 106840

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Altintas, G

    Y . Altintas, G. Stepan, E. Budak, T. Schmitz, Z. M. Kilic, Chatter stability of machining operations, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 142 (2020) 110801. 23 Interplay of Nonsmoothness, Time Delay, and Stochasticity in Turning Dynamics

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Quintana, J

    G. Quintana, J. Ciurana, Chatter in machining processes: A review, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 51 (2011) 363–376

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Siddhpura, R

    M. Siddhpura, R. Paurobally, A review of chatter vibration research in turning, International Journal of Machine tools and manufacture 61 (2012) 27–47

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    Sujuan, Z

    W. Sujuan, Z. Tao, D. Wenping, S. Zhanwen, S. To, Analytical modeling and prediction of cutting forces in orthogonal turning: a review, The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology (2021) 1–28

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Fodor, H

    G. Fodor, H. T. Sykora, D. Bachrathy, Stochastic modeling of the cutting force in turning processes, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 111 (2020) 213–226

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Kumar, S

    P. Kumar, S. Narayanan, S. Gupta, Bifurcation analysis of a stochastically excited vibro-impact duffing-van der pol oscillator with bilateral rigid barriers, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 127 (2017) 103–117

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    R. C. Hilborn, Chaos and nonlinear dynamics: an introduction for scientists and engineers, Oxford university press, 2000

    work page 2000

  38. [38]

    Arnold, N

    L. Arnold, N. Sri Namachchivaya, K. R. Schenk-Hoppé, Toward an understanding of stochastic hopf bifurcation: a case study, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 6 (1996) 1947–1975

    work page 1996

  39. [39]

    Buckwar, R

    E. Buckwar, R. Kuske, B. L’esperance, T. Soo, Noise-sensitivity in machine tool vibrations, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 16 (2006) 2407–2416

    work page 2006

  40. [40]

    Gradišek, I

    J. Gradišek, I. Grabec, S. Siegert, R. Friedrich, Stochastic dynamics of metal cutting: bifurcation phenomena in turning, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 16 (2002) 831–840

    work page 2002

  41. [41]

    H. T. Sykora, D. Bachrathy, G. Stepan, A theoretical investigation of the effect of the stochasticity in the material properties on the chatter detection during turning, in: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, volume 58226, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017, p. V008T12A054

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Fodor, D

    G. Fodor, D. Bachrathy, Efficient approximation of stochastic turning process based on power spectral density, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 133 (2024) 5673–5681

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Y . Yan, J. Xu, M. Wiercigroch, Modelling of regenerative and frictional cutting dynamics, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 156 (2019) 86–93

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Y . Yan, G. Liu, M. Wiercigroch, J. Xu, Safety estimation for a new model of regenerative and frictional cutting dynamics, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 201 (2021) 106468

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Kuske, Competition of noise sources in systems with delay: the role of multiple time scales, Journal of Vibration and Control 16 (2010) 983–1003

    R. Kuske, Competition of noise sources in systems with delay: the role of multiple time scales, Journal of Vibration and Control 16 (2010) 983–1003

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    Rounak, S

    A. Rounak, S. Gupta, Stochastic p-bifurcation in a nonlinear impact oscillator with soft barrier under ornstein– uhlenbeck process, Nonlinear Dynamics 99 (2020) 2657–2674

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    D. Liu, M. Li, J. Li, Probabilistic response and analysis for a vibro-impact system driven by real noise, Nonlinear Dynamics 91 (2018) 1261–1273

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Y . Yan, J. Xu, M. Wiercigroch, Basins of attraction of the bistable region of time-delayed cutting dynamics, Physical Review E 96 (2017) 032205

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Altintas, M

    Y . Altintas, M. Eynian, H. Onozuka, Identification of dynamic cutting force coefficients and chatter stability with process damping, CIRP annals 57 (2008) 371–374

    work page 2008

  50. [50]

    L. F. Shampine, S. Thompson, Solving ddes in MATLAB, Applied Numerical Mathematics 37 (2001) 441–458

    work page 2001

  51. [51]

    Higham, P

    D. Higham, P. Kloeden, An introduction to the numerical simulation of stochastic differential equations, SIAM, 2021

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Crauel, A

    H. Crauel, A. Debussche, F. Flandoli, Random attractors, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations 9 (1997) 307–341

    work page 1997

  53. [53]

    Sundqvist, Contour2Area, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/ 26480-contour2area, 2025

    P. Sundqvist, Contour2Area, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/ 26480-contour2area, 2025. MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved July 25, 2025

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Wernecke, B

    H. Wernecke, B. Sándor, C. Gros, Chaos in time delay systems, an educational review, Physics Reports 824 (2019) 1–40

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Benardos, G.-C

    P. Benardos, G.-C. V osniakos, Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review, International journal of machine tools and manufacture 43 (2003) 833–844

    work page 2003

  56. [56]

    Belardinelli, S

    P. Belardinelli, S. Lenci, Improving the global analysis of mechanical systems via parallel computation of basins of attraction, Procedia IUTAM 22 (2017) 192–199. 24 Interplay of Nonsmoothness, Time Delay, and Stochasticity in Turning Dynamics

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    Monge-Álvarez, A set of entropy measures for temporal series (1d signals), MATLAB Central File Exchange, 2014

    J. Monge-Álvarez, A set of entropy measures for temporal series (1d signals), MATLAB Central File Exchange, 2014

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, The Bell system technical journal 27 (1948) 379–423

    work page 1948

  59. [59]

    Porta, G

    A. Porta, G. Baselli, D. Liberati, N. Montano, C. Cogliati, T. Gnecchi-Ruscone, A. Malliani, S. Cerutti, Measuring regularity by means of a corrected conditional entropy in sympathetic outflow, Biological cybernetics 78 (1998) 71–78

    work page 1998

  60. [60]

    Bandt, B

    C. Bandt, B. Pompe, Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series, Physical review letters 88 (2002) 174102

    work page 2002

  61. [61]

    S. M. Pincus, I. M. Gladstone, R. A. Ehrenkranz, A regularity statistic for medical data analysis, Journal of clinical monitoring 7 (1991) 335–345

    work page 1991

  62. [62]

    J. S. Richman, J. R. Moorman, Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy, American journal of physiology-heart and circulatory physiology 278 (2000) H2039–H2049

    work page 2000

  63. [63]

    W. Chen, Z. Wang, H. Xie, W. Yu, Characterization of surface emg signal based on fuzzy entropy, IEEE Transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering 15 (2007) 266–272. 25

    work page 2007