Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Equilibrium in Production Chains with Multiple Upstream Partners

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A production chain in which every firm may hire many upstream partners has a unique equilibrium price schedule, reached by iteration and computable by a fast grid algorithm.

desk verdict A solid extension of Kikuchi et al. with a genuinely useful algorithm; the main proof has a fixable gap and the stochastic part is under-proved. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08208 v1 pith:NN4BJCV3 submitted 2019-08-22 econ.TH

Meng Yu , Junnan Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification econ.TH
keywords productionnetworksfirmboundariesmonotoneconcaveoperatorsequilibriumuniquenesstransactioncostsmultipleupstreampartnersstochasticchainsfixedpointcomputation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Firms in a production chain choose how much to produce in house and how many upstream partners to hire, and competition forces the price schedule to satisfy a Bellman-like equation $p(s)=\min_{t\le s, k\in\mathbb{N}}\{c(s-t)+g(k)+\delta^k p(t/k)\}$. This paper proves that for convex in-house costs $c$ and increasing partnership costs $g$, this equation has exactly one continuous solution $p^*$, that repeatedly applying the operator from any price in $[u_0,v_0]$ converges to $p^*$, and that the same is true when the number of partners is random and Poisson-distributed. It also provides a grid-based algorithm that converges to $p^*$ and is much faster in practice than iteration. The payoff is a theory of firm boundaries and network shape in which transaction costs alone determine a unique price path and hence a unique allocation, including richer, asymmetric production networks in the stochastic version.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is a fixed-point theorem for monotone concave operators (stated as Theorem 3.1): if $A$ is increasing and concave on an order interval, with $Au_0\ge u_0+\epsilon(v_0-u_0)$ and $Av_0\le v_0$, then $A$ has a unique fixed point and iteration converges globally. The paper checks these hypotheses for $T$: Lemma A.2 shows $T$ is increasing and concave (the minimum of affine expressions in $p$ is concave), Lemma A.3 shows $Tu_0$ lies strictly above $u_0$, and Lemma A.4 shows $Tv_0\le v_0$ by choosing one partner and no subcontracting. This theory replaces the contraction-mapping argument, which fails here because $\delta>1$ can amplify differences.

What would settle it

Take the constant price function $p(s)=-1$ on $[0,1]$. For any $t>0$, the term $\delta^k p(t/k)=-\delta^k$ tends to $-\infty$ as $k\to\infty$, so $Tp(s)$ has no finite minimum. This shows Lemma A.1 cannot hold for all continuous $p$; Theorem 3.2 escapes because its order interval $[u_0,v_0]$ contains only nonnegative functions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is Theorem 3.2: under Assumptions 2.1 and 2.2, the operator $T$ defined by $Tp(s)=\min_{t\le s, k\in\mathbb{N}}\{c(s-t)+g(k)+\delta^k p(t/k)\}$ has a unique fixed point $p^*$ in the order interval $[u_0,v_0]$, where $u_0(s)=c'(0)s$ and $v_0(s)=c(s)$, and $T^n p\to p^*$ uniformly for every starting point $p$ in that interval. This extends the earlier single-upstream-partner result to the multiple-partner case, which the earlier analysis left open. The paper further proves that the equilibrium price is strictly increasing, that raising either transaction cost raises the whole price schedule, that the non-iterative grid algorithm of Section 4 converges uniformly to $p^*$, and that the stochastic Poisson version satisfies the same existence, uniqueness, and convergence statements.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of Lemma A.1 assumes that the search over the number of partners can be bounded by one finite cutoff uniformly for every continuous price function, which is only guaranteed if prices stay nonnegative; the main theorem works on nonnegative prices, but the lemma as stated does not restrict them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With multiple upstream partners allowed, equilibrium prices are still determinate: every stage of the chain has a single price consistent with zero profits, so the allocation is not arbitrary.
  • Because $p^*$ is strictly increasing and the comparative-statics result holds, a rise in either transaction cost raises the entire price schedule, shifting the boundary between in-house production and subcontracting.
  • The Section 4 algorithm converges uniformly to $p^*$ with a fixed number of minimization steps per grid, and in the paper's simulations it is up to around forty times faster than successive iteration, especially when $\delta$ is close to one.
  • In the stochastic Poisson model, uniqueness and convergence still hold, and simulated networks are asymmetric even across firms at the same layer; higher $\delta$ or lower $g$ shortens the network, while lower curvature of $c$ also reduces layers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension the paper does not spell out: the same argument should work for stage spaces that are multidimensional or discrete, as long as the operator remains increasing and concave and the tangent lower bound holds.
  • The stochastic model implies a testable prediction about firm-size dispersion: if the number of partners is Poisson with mean and variance increasing in search effort $\lambda$, a policy that lowers additive partnership costs should raise the variance of firm sizes across the network; the paper notes the mechanism is unclear, so this is an inference.
  • The dyadic-grid algorithm suggests a rate-of-convergence question the paper leaves open: bounding the sup-norm distance between $p_n$ and $p^*$ by the modulus of continuity of $c$ and $p^*$ would convert the numerical method into a certified approximation scheme.
  • A practical consequence for modelers is that the equilibrium price can be computed reliably by the grid algorithm even when successive approximation converges slowly, so computational cost no longer restricts the choice of $\delta$ near one.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a production-chain model in which each firm may choose multiple upstream partners, extending Kikuchi et al. (2018). The equilibrium price function is characterized as the unique fixed point of the operator Tp(s) = min_{t≤s, k∈N} {c(s−t)+g(k)+δkp(t/k)}. The authors prove existence, uniqueness, and global stability on an order interval [u0,v0] using Du's theorem for monotone concave operators, propose a non-iterative grid algorithm with a uniform convergence result, and extend the model to a stochastic version in which the number of upstream partners is Poisson-distributed with an endogenously chosen parameter. The paper also reports numerical simulations on computation time and on network shapes.

Significance. If the results are made fully rigorous, the paper is a useful contribution: it replaces the ad hoc arguments of Kikuchi et al. with a unified monotone-concave-operator proof, handles multiple upstream partners, gives a fast and provably convergent algorithm, and adds a stochastic heterogeneity channel. The Du-theorem approach is well matched to the problem, and the algorithmic convergence proof is a concrete, checkable contribution. The main economic conclusions are plausible and the proof gaps identified below appear repairable without changing the model or the central claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Lemma A.1] The statement that Tp∈C([0,1]) for all p∈C([0,1]) is false. For example, with g(k)=k−1 and p≡−1, the expression c(s−t)+g(k)+δkp(t/k)=c(s−t)+k−1−δk is unbounded below as k→∞, so Tp is not real-valued on (0,1]. The proof's restriction of Θ(s) to {1,...,k̄}×[0,s] is valid only when p is bounded below (and bounded above, so that k̄ can be chosen uniformly). This matters because Theorem 3.2 applies Du's theorem to T on [u0,v0], and the proof relies on Lemma A.1 to conclude that T maps that interval into C(X). The fix is straightforward: restate Lemma A.1 for nonnegative continuous functions, or directly for the order interval [u0,v0], and invoke it only there. As written, however, the proof of the main theorem is not valid.
  2. [Section 3.2, Proposition 3.3] The proof of strict monotonicity of p* is incomplete. The argument shows that if p is strictly increasing and p∈[u0,v0], then Tp is strictly increasing. The proof then invokes T^n c→p* and concludes that p* is strictly increasing. But a uniform limit of strictly increasing functions need only be nondecreasing; the argument does not rule out flat segments in p*. Since strict monotonicity is an explicitly stated property of the equilibrium price function, either a direct argument from the fixed-point equation p*=Tp* (using p*≥u0 and strict convexity of c) or a weakening of the proposition is needed.
  3. [Appendix C, Theorem 5.1] The stochastic extension is a main contribution, but its proof is largely omitted. The text says the lemmas 'still hold' and 'to avoid redundancy, we omit the proofs', yet additional nontrivial verification is required: one must show that the objective (λ,t) ↦ c(s−t)+E^λ_k[g(k)+δkp(t/k)] is jointly continuous in λ on the compact set [0,¯λ], and that the restriction of λ to [0,¯λ] does not change the minimum, using dominance arguments for the Poisson expectation. These steps are not immediate from the deterministic case because the expectation involves an infinite sum of g(k) terms. Please supply the missing details or state precisely which standard lemma covers them.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A, Lemma A.3] The claim that pointwise strict inequality Tu0(s)>u0(s) for s>0 implies the existence of a uniform ε with Tu0≥u0+ε(v0−u0) is not fully justified; one should argue by compactness that the ratio (Tu0−u0)/(v0−u0) is bounded away from zero on neighborhoods away from s=0.
  2. [Appendix A, Lemma A.2] The concavity proof is written for arbitrary p,q∈C([0,1]), but the operator T is not well-defined on all of C([0,1]) because of the issue raised in the first major comment. Restricting the domain to [u0,v0] (or to nonnegative continuous functions) makes the proof correct.
  3. [Introduction, footnote 5] There is a typographical error: 'Knaester–Tarski' should be 'Knaster–Tarski'.
  4. [Section 5, after (5)] The discussion of the shifted Poisson distribution should state explicitly that k has support {1,2,...}; the current text says 'k starts from 1', which is understandable but could be made precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: uniqueness and stability follow from an external fixed-point theorem applied to verified hypotheses.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Theorem 3.2, is not equivalent to its inputs. The equilibrium price is defined as a fixed point of the operator T in (3), and the uniqueness/global-stability conclusion is obtained by verifying the hypotheses of Du's (1989) monotone concave operator theorem (Theorem 3.1): Lemma A.2 proves monotonicity and concavity, Lemma A.3 proves Au0 >= u0 + eps(v0-u0), and Lemma A.4 proves Av0 <= v0. The order interval [u0,v0] is not assumed to contain the fixed point; it is shown to be mapped appropriately. No parameter is fitted to the target quantity, and no result is imported from the authors' own prior work: the model is attributed to Kikuchi et al. (2018), and the uniqueness theorem used is external (Du 1989; Guo et al. 2004). Algorithm convergence in Theorem 4.1 is proved separately via compactness and the already-established uniqueness, not derived from the theorem being proved. The stochastic extension (Theorem 5.1) is supported by the same external operator theory plus a cited median bound (Choi 1994). The noted weakness of Lemma A.1 for arbitrary continuous p taking negative values is a domain/regularity gap, not a circularity: Theorem 3.2 only needs the lemma on [u0,v0], where p>=0, so the derivation does not presuppose its conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorems rely on the stated functional form assumptions on c and g, on the zero-profit equilibrium concept, and on externally cited mathematical tools (Du's theorem, Berge's theorem, Arzela-Ascoli). The simulation parameters are illustrative and do not enter the proofs.

free parameters (3)
  • delta (transaction cost coefficient) in simulations = 1.01, 1.1, 10, 15
    Chosen for illustrative simulations in Figures 2, 3, and 4; not fitted to data and not load-bearing for the theorems.
  • beta (additive transaction cost slope) in simulations = 0.0001, 0.0005, 50, 100
    Chosen for illustrative simulations; not fitted to data and not load-bearing for the theorems.
  • theta (cost curvature) in stochastic simulations = 1.15, 1.2
    Chosen for the production network plots in Figure 4; not fitted to data and not load-bearing for the theorems.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.1: cost function c is differentiable, strictly increasing, strictly convex, with c(0)=0 and c'(0)>0.
    Ensures the firm's in-house production cost is convex, so subcontracting can be optimal; underpins the operator's concavity and the order interval bounds.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.2: additive transaction cost g is strictly increasing, g(1)=0, and g(k)→∞ as k→∞.
    Ensures finite optimal partner counts and that one partner is always available at zero additive cost; used to restrict the choice set to a compact set.
  • standard math Du's monotone concave operator fixed point theorem (Theorem 3.1).
    Cited as the core tool; used to obtain existence, uniqueness, and global stability of the fixed point.
  • domain assumption Equilibrium zero-profit condition, Equation (2): p(s)=min_{t≤s,k∈N}{c(s-t)+g(k)+δkp(t/k)}.
    Defines the equilibrium price as the fixed point of T; if firms did not earn zero profit, the equation would not hold.
  • domain assumption Poisson distribution of partner counts in Section 5, with shift so k starts at 1.
    Specific parametric model of uncertainty in partner search; not derived from primitives.
  • standard math Normality of the positive cone in C(X) under the sup norm.
    Required to apply Du's theorem; standard for the space of continuous functions with the usual partial order.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Equilibrium in Production Chains with Multiple Upstream Partners." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NN4BJCV3

@misc{pith2026190808208,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Equilibrium in Production Chains with Multiple Upstream Partners},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NN4BJCV3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08208}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we extend and improve the production chain model introduced by Kikuchi et al. (2018). Utilizing the theory of monotone concave operators, we prove the existence, uniqueness, and global stability of equilibrium price, hence improving their results on production networks with multiple upstream partners. We propose an algorithm for computing the equilibrium price function that is more than ten times faster than successive evaluations of the operator. The model is then generalized to a stochastic setting that offers richer implications for the distribution of firms in a production network.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08208 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An example of equilibrium price function. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Equilibrium price function when c(s) = e 10s − 1 and g(k) = β(k − 1). evaluation of p(s) is by setting p(s) = min t≤s−h k∈N {c(s − t) + g(k) + δkp(t/k)} . (4) In line five, the linear interpolation is piecewise linear interpolation of grid points 0, h, 2h, . . . , s and values p(0), p(h), p(2h), . . . , p(s). The procedure can be implemented because the minimization step on the right-hand side of (4), which is used … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Computation time comparison for the two methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Production networks with stochastic choices of upstream partners [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , author Carvalho, V.M

    author Acemoglu, D. , author Carvalho, V.M. , author Ozdaglar, A. , author Tahbaz-Salehi, A. , year 2012 . title The network origins of aggregate fluctuations . journal Econometrica volume 80 , pages 1977--2016

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    , author Ozdaglar, A

    author Acemoglu, D. , author Ozdaglar, A. , author Tahbaz-Salehi, A. , year 2015 a. title Networks, shocks, and systemic risk . type Technical Report . National Bureau of Economic Research

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    , author Ozdaglar, A

    author Acemoglu, D. , author Ozdaglar, A. , author Tahbaz-Salehi, A. , year 2015 b. title Systemic risk and stability in financial networks . journal American Economic Review volume 105 , pages 564--608

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    , author Border, K.C

    author Aliprantis, C.D. , author Border, K.C. , year 2006 . title Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker's Guide . publisher Springer

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    , year 2016

    author Balbus, L. , year 2016 . title On non-negative recursive utilities in dynamic programming with nonlinear aggregator and ces . journal University of Zielora G \'o ra Working Paper

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    , author Reffett, K

    author Balbus, . , author Reffett, K. , author Wo \'z ny, . , year 2013 . title A constructive geometrical approach to the uniqueness of markov stationary equilibrium in stochastic games of intergenerational altruism . journal Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control volume 37 , pages 1019--1039

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    , author Venables, A.J

    author Baldwin, R. , author Venables, A.J. , year 2013 . title Spiders and snakes: offshoring and agglomeration in the global economy . journal Journal of International Economics volume 90 , pages 245--254

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    , author Murphy, K.M

    author Becker, G.S. , author Murphy, K.M. , year 1992 . title The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge . journal The Quarterly Journal of Economics volume 107 , pages 1137--1160

    work page 1992

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    , author Rinc \'o n-Zapatero, J.P

    author Becker, R.A. , author Rinc \'o n-Zapatero, J.P. , year 2017 . title Recursive utiity and thompson aggregators

    2017

  2. [10]

    , year 1957

    author Bellman, R.E. , year 1957 . title Dynamic Programming . publisher Princeton University Press

    1957

  3. [11]

    fixed-point principle

    author Bessaga, C. , year 1959 . title On the converse of banach “fixed-point principle” . journal Colloquium Mathematicum volume 7 , pages 41–43 . http://dx.doi.org/10.4064/cm-7-1-41-43, :10.4064/cm-7-1-41-43

    1959 doi

  4. [12]

    , author La’O, J

    author Bigio, S. , author La’O, J. , year 2016 . title Financial frictions in production networks . type Technical Report . National Bureau of Economic Research

    2016

  5. [13]

    , author Vailakis, Y

    author Bloise, G. , author Vailakis, Y. , year 2018 . title Convex dynamic programming with (bounded) recursive utility . journal Journal of Economic Theory volume 173 , pages 118--141

    2018

  6. [14]

    , author Stachurski, J

    author Borovi c ka, J. , author Stachurski, J. , year 2017 . title Necessary and sufficient conditions for existence and uniqueness of recursive utilities . type Technical Report . National Bureau of Economic Research

    2017

  7. [15]

    , author Stachurski, J

    author Borovi c ka, J. , author Stachurski, J. , year 2018 . title Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium asset prices over infinite horizons . type Technical Report

    2018

  8. [16]

    , year 2007

    author Carvalho, V. , year 2007 . title Aggregate fluctuations and the network structure of intersectoral trade

    2007

  9. [17]

    , year 2013

    author Cheney, W. , year 2013 . title Analysis for applied mathematics . volume volume 208 . publisher Springer Science & Business Media

    2013

  10. [18]

    , year 1994

    author Choi, K.P. , year 1994 . title On the medians of gamma distributions and an equation of ramanujan . journal Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society volume 121 , pages 245--251

    1994

  11. [19]

    , year 2002

    author Ciccone, A. , year 2002 . title Input chains and industrialization . journal The Review of Economic Studies volume 69 , pages 565--587

    2002

  12. [20]

    , year 1937

    author Coase, R.H. , year 1937 . title The nature of the firm . journal Economica volume 4 , pages 386--405

    1937

  13. [21]

    , year 1991

    author Coleman, W.J. , year 1991 . title Equilibrium in a production economy with an income tax . journal Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages 1091--1104

    1991

  14. [22]

    , year 2000

    author Coleman, W.J. , year 2000 . title Uniqueness of an equilibrium in infinite-horizon economies subject to taxes and externalities . journal Journal of Economic Theory volume 95 , pages 71--78

    2000

  15. [23]

    , author Mirman, L.J

    author Datta, M. , author Mirman, L.J. , author Morand, O.F. , author Reffett, K.L. , year 2002 a. title Monotone methods for markovian equilibrium in dynamic economies . journal Annals of Operations Research volume 114 , pages 117--144

    2002

  16. [24]

    , author Mirman, L.J

    author Datta, M. , author Mirman, L.J. , author Reffett, K.L. , year 2002 b. title Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium in distorted dynamic economies with capital and labor . journal Journal of Economic Theory volume 103 , pages 377--410

    2002

  17. [25]

    , author Kraemer, K.L

    author Dedrick, J. , author Kraemer, K.L. , author Linden, G. , year 2011 . title The distribution of value in the mobile phone supply chain . journal Telecommunications Policy volume 35 , pages 505--521

    2011

  18. [26]

    , year 1989

    author Du, Y. , year 1989 . title Fixed points of a class of non-compact operators and applications . journal Acta Mathematica Sinica volume 32 , pages 618--627

    1989

  19. [27]

    , author Cho, Y.J

    author Guo, D. , author Cho, Y.J. , author Zhu, J. , year 2004 . title Partial ordering methods in nonlinear problems . publisher Nova Publishers

    2004

  20. [28]

    , author Lakshmikantham, V

    author Guo, D. , author Lakshmikantham, V. , year 1988 . title Nonlinear problems in abstract cones . publisher Academic Press . :https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-10750-7

    1988 doi

  21. [29]

    , year 1967

    author Janos, L. , year 1967 . title A converse of banach's contraction theorem . journal Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society volume 18 , pages 287--289

    1967

  22. [30]

    , year 2011

    author Jones, C.I. , year 2011 . title Intermediate goods and weak links in the theory of economic development . journal American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics volume 3 , pages 1--28

    2011

  23. [31]

    , author Nishimura, K

    author Kikuchi, T. , author Nishimura, K. , author Stachurski, J. , year 2018 . title Span of control, transaction costs, and the structure of production chains . journal Theoretical Economics volume 13 , pages 729--760

    2018

  24. [32]

    , author Linden, G

    author Kraemer, K.L. , author Linden, G. , author Dedrick, J. , year 2011 . title Capturing value in global networks: Apple’s ipad and iphone . journal University of California, Irvine, University of California, Berkeley, y Syracuse University, NY. http://pcic. merage. uci. ed...

    2011

  25. [33]

    title Positive Solutions of Operator Equations

    author Krasnosel'skii , year 1964 . title Positive Solutions of Operator Equations

    1964

  26. [34]

    , author Zabre i ko, P

    author Krasnosel'skii, M. , author Zabre i ko, P. , year 1984 . title Geometrical methods of nonlinear analysis . Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, publisher Springer-Verlag . https://books.google.com.au/books?id=8Q2oAAAAIAAJ

    1984

  27. [35]

    , author Vainikko, G.M

    author Krasnosel’skii, M.A. , author Vainikko, G.M. , author Zabreiko, P.P. , author Rutitskii, Y.B. , author Stetsenko, V.Y. , year 1972 . title Approximate Solution of Operator Equations . publisher Springer Netherlands . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2715-1, :10.1007...

    1972 doi

  28. [36]

    , author Schreft, S

    author Lacker, J.M. , author Schreft, S. , year 1991 . title Money, trade credit and asset prices

    1991

  29. [37]

    , year 1982

    author Leader, S. , year 1982 . title Uniformly contractive fixed points in compact metric spaces . journal Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society volume 86 , pages 153--158

    1982

  30. [38]

    , year 2012

    author Levine, D.K. , year 2012 . title Production chains . journal Review of Economic Dynamics volume 15 , pages 271--282

    2012

  31. [39]

    , year 1978

    author Lucas, R.E. , year 1978 . title On the size distribution of business firms . journal The Bell Journal of Economics , pages 508--523

    1978

  32. [40]

    , author Montrucchio, L

    author Marinacci, M. , author Montrucchio, L. , year 2010 . title Unique solutions for stochastic recursive utilities . journal Journal of Economic Theory volume 145 , pages 1776--1804

    2010

  33. [41]

    , author Montrucchio, L

    author Marinacci, M. , author Montrucchio, L. , year 2017 . title Unique Tarski fixed points . type Technical Report

    2017

  34. [42]

    , author Reffett, K.L

    author Morand, O.F. , author Reffett, K.L. , year 2003 . title Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium in nonoptimal unbounded infinite horizon economies . journal Journal of Monetary Economics volume 50 , pages 1351--1373

    2003

  35. [43]

    , author Sleet, C

    author Pavoni, N. , author Sleet, C. , author Messner, M. , year 2018 . title The dual approach to recursive optimization: theory and examples . journal Econometrica volume 86 , pages 133--172

    2018

  36. [44]

    , author Stachurski, J

    author Ren, G. , author Stachurski, J. , year 2018 . title Dynamic programming with recursive preferences: Optimality and applications . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.05748

    2018 arXiv

  37. [45]

    , author Rodr \'i guez-Palmero, C

    author Rinc \'o n-Zapatero, J.P. , author Rodr \'i guez-Palmero, C. , year 2003 . title Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the bellman equation in the unbounded case . journal Econometrica volume 71 , pages 1519--1555

    2003

  38. [46]

    , year 1963

    author Thompson, A.C. , year 1963 . title On certain contraction mappings in a partially ordered vector space . journal Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society volume 14 , pages 438--443

    1963

  39. [47]

    , author Janos, L

    author Williamson, R. , author Janos, L. , year 1987 . title Constructing metrics with the heine-borel property . journal Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society volume 100 , pages 567--573

    1987

  40. [48]

    , year 2013

    author Zhang, Z. , year 2013 . title Variational, Topological, and Partial Order Methods with Their Applications . volume volume 29 of series Developments in Mathematics . publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg . :10.1007/978-3-642-30709-6

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.