Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 28 references

Directed Nano-antennas for Laser Fusion

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that embedding resonant gold nanorod antennas in a fusion fuel target lets a laser ignite the entire volume at once, rather than compressing fuel to a single hot spot, and reports directed proton acceleration consistent wit

desk verdict A real but thinly evidenced nanorod proton-acceleration result buried under an unsupported volume-ignition fusion claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.05331 v3 pith:NNJWLMCT submitted 2026-01-08 physics.plasm-ph physics.optics

FUSENOW , NAPLIFE Collaborations: Zsuzsanna Márton , Imene Benabdelghani , Márk Aladi , Judit Budai , Aldo Bonasera , Attila Bonyár , Mária Csete
show 18 more authors
Tibor Gilinger Martin Greve Jan-Petter Hansen Gergely Hegedűs Ádám Inger Miklos Kedves Károly Osvay István Papp Péter Rácz András Szenes Ágnes Szokol Dávid Vass Parvin Varmazyar Miklós Veres Konstantin Zsukovszki Tamás S. Bíró Norbert Kroó Laszlo P. Csernai
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phphysics.optics
keywords laserfusionnano-antennasgoldnanorodsprotonaccelerationvolumeignitiontime-likedetonationplasmonicsp+11B
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that laser fusion's two classic obstacles—hydrodynamic instabilities and burning that spreads more slowly than the fuel expands—can be bypassed by embedding resonant gold nanorod antennas in the fuel. A linearly polarized laser then directly accelerates protons along the antenna direction, producing non-thermal ignition across the whole target at once. The possibility is traced to a 1987 revision of the standard relativistic detonation theory, which allows detonations across time-like fronts, a behavior known from quark-gluon plasma hadronization. The reported experiment shows that targets with nanorods nearly parallel to the laser polarization emit about ten times more protons at 30–40% higher energies than targets with orthogonal nanorods, and particle-in-cell simulations reproduce the directed acceleration. If the volume-ignition premise holds, fusion targets would need less compression and no hot-spot propagation, bringing small laser facilities into play.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the resonant gold nanorod dipole antenna, about 102 x 30 x 30 nm, embedded in a polymer fuel layer and oriented with its long axis near the laser polarization. Its plasmonic near field absorbs the laser light and accelerates protons along the rod. The conceptual machinery is the time-like detonation front: a revision of relativistic detonation theory that allows burning to cover a whole volume simultaneously, imported from quark-gluon plasma hadronization. The simulation machinery is particle-in-cell kinetic modeling, which reproduces the proton angular distribution and reveals the designed directivity that the two fixed ion spectrometers cannot fully capture.

What would settle it

Measure the time of first fusion-product emission from opposite faces of a thick target under two-sided irradiation. Volume ignition predicts simultaneous onset within the laser pulse, while the conventional picture predicts a delay that grows with target thickness; observing that growing delay would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that orienting resonant gold nanorod antennas parallel to the laser polarization converts the laser's energy directly into directed proton acceleration along the rods rather than into heat, and with two-sided irradiation timed to a fraction of an optical cycle this yields simultaneous ignition of the whole fuel volume. The enabling theoretical point is that detonation fronts need not have a vanishing time-like component; a 1987 revision of the 1948 theory permits detonations across time-like fronts, so burning does not have to spread as a shock wave slower than expansion. The experimental evidence compares two nanorod orientations: with rods within 45 degrees of

Load-bearing premise

The scheme presumes that burning can sweep through the entire fuel volume at once—a behavior borrowed from quark-gluon plasma hadronization—and the paper offers no direct evidence that this same behavior occurs in laser-heated fusion fuel.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fusion targets would no longer need the extreme mechanical compression and ablator shells used in hot-spot designs; the laser energy would reach the fuel directly through the antennas.
  • Ignition could occur across the whole target volume in a time shorter than instability growth, removing a central limit of inertial fusion.
  • Target thickness scales roughly linearly with pulse energy—tens of micrometers for millijoule pulses and millimeters for joule-class pulses—which relaxes target fabrication constraints.
  • Protons, heavier ions, and fusion products such as alpha particles are accelerated non-thermally along the rods, so less energy is lost to thermalization before the fusion reaction.
  • The scheme is compatible with proton-boron fuel, offering a route to aneutronic fusion with low activation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the volume-ignition claim holds, the energy economy of inertial fusion changes qualitatively: the need for precise spherical compression to a single hot spot disappears, potentially lowering driver requirements by orders of magnitude—the paper gestures at this but does not quantify it.
  • The same directional nanorod acceleration could serve as a compact, pulsed ion source outside fusion, since the directivity is a target property independent of the fusion argument.
  • A clean test of the time-like front transfer would be to look for a burn onset that does not depend on target thickness: volume ignition should show simultaneous fusion signals across the target, while hot-spot ignition should show a delay that grows with distance from the laser entry face.
  • The planned stretch-aligned nanocomposite targets, if they achieve the same alignment as electron-beam lithography, would make the scheme scalable and inexpensive; that remains an open engineering bet.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a laser-fusion scheme in which resonant gold nanorod antennas embedded in a fuel target accelerate protons along the nanorod direction, enabling two-sided irradiation and simultaneous whole-volume ignition via radiation-dominated, time-like detonation fronts. It reports target fabrication by electron-beam lithography, Thomson-parabola measurements comparing 'horizontal' and 'vertical' nanorod targets, and EPOCH PIC simulations of the angular proton distribution. The central claim, stated in the abstract, is that with nano-antennas, simultaneous ignition of the whole target volume can be achieved, leaving no time for mechanical instabilities.

Significance. If established, the directed proton acceleration from resonant nanorods would be a useful contribution to laser-driven ion acceleration, and the volume-ignition concept would be transformative. The manuscript has genuine strengths: a concrete nanofabrication procedure, experimental Thomson-parabola data, EPOCH simulations, and an explicit statement of the limitation that angular directivity could not be tested in the present setup. However, as presented, the evidence does not support the headline ignition claim: the directionality of proton acceleration is not directly measured, the quantitative comparison lacks error bars, the simulation parameters are poorly matched to the experiment, and the time-like detonation framework is transferred from QGP hadronization to warm dense matter without independent validation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Introduction; Considerations for fusion reactions] The simultaneous-ignition claim rests entirely on the existence of time-like detonation fronts in warm dense matter. The manuscript cites only refs [2]-[4], all Csernai-authored, and transfers QGP hadronization results to a p+11B polymer target at keV temperatures and radiation-dominated pressures without any Rankine-Hugoniot analysis or equation-of-state argument. If Taub's original spacelike-normal restriction applies in this regime, the volume-ignition advantage disappears. This is a prerequisite, not a detail; a concrete relativistic combustion calculation or independent experimental validation is required before the central claim can be accepted.
  2. [Evidence of directed proton acceleration] The experimental evidence for directed acceleration is indirect. The TP detectors were installed only in the forward/backward z-direction, and the text states 'we had no TP detectors at 45° or 225°, we could not test this in the present setup directly.' Thus the statement that 'experimental results as well as the EPOCH simulations confirm that the directed proton acceleration is in the direction of the directed nanorod antennas' is an inference, not a measurement. In addition, the claimed ~10x proton number increase and 30-40% energy increase are not accompanied by error bars, shot counts, or background/subtraction analysis; Fig. 6 shows a single relative spectrum.
  3. [Modeling of Angular Proton Distribution; Fig. 4] The EPOCH simulation is not representative of the experiment. It models a single Au nanorod in pure hydrogen, omitting the C and O in PMMA and the 500-nm array period, and the Fig. 4 caption gives an intensity of 4×10^21 W/cm^2. For the stated 30 mJ, 120.5 fs pulse, any realistic focal spot gives an intensity several orders of magnitude lower. This mismatch weakens the claim that simulations confirm the experimental directionality and prevents quantitative comparison.
  4. [Considerations for fusion reactions] Conditions (ii)-(iii) introduce the key feasibility numbers — one-femtosecond two-sided timing, target-thickness scaling from 20-40 μm at 25 mJ to 2-4 mm at 2.5 J, and the >10^17-10^18 W/cm^2 intensity threshold — without derivation. No calculation of ignition energy, fusion gain, or coupling efficiency is provided. These quantities are essential to the simultaneous-ignition concept and are currently unverifiable from the manuscript.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption refers to the 'BKW TP detector' while the text consistently uses 'BWD'; unify the notation.
  2. [References] Reference [7] has a malformed DOI (https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.2306.13445v2); the correct identifier appears to be arXiv:2306.13445.
  3. [Fig. 5 discussion] The text states 'the accelerated proton numbers and energies are not visible' but then says 'we see that protons are accelerated in both the Horizontal and Vertical cases.' Please clarify what Fig. 5 is expected to show.
  4. [Introduction] The phrase 'a decade later [2] in 1987' is inaccurate for a paper published 39 years after Taub (1948); correct the wording.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Volume-ignition claim rests on self-cited time-like detonation chain (refs [2]–[4]); proton acceleration data are independent but not the central fusion claim.

  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction (refs [2]–[4]); Abstract]
    "This arises from a mistaken assumption, [1] that the detonation normal 4-vector should have vanishing time-like component... However, a decade later [2] in 1987 it turned out that Taub's original derivation was incomplete and simultaneous detonations (or detonations across a time-like hypersurface) are possible. ... For laser induced fusion to achieve this type of detonation was not simple or easy [3]. The possibility opened by using nanotechnology, which allowed the regulation of confinement and amplification of laser light in the fusion fuel target [4]."

    The abstract's central claim — 'simultaneous ignition can be achieved in the whole target volume' — is not derived or independently validated in this paper. It is imported from refs [2] (Csernai 1987), [3] (Csernai & Strottman 2015), and [4] (Csernai, Kroo & Papp 2018), all co-authored by the present corresponding author. The only non-self-cited element, Taub (1948), is used as the position the authors reject; the rejection and the nano-plasmonic transfer are supplied by their own prior papers. No independent EOS/detonation analysis is given for warm dense p-11B/UDMA targets at keV temperatures, as opposed to QGP hadronization. The proton-acceleration data are independent, but the volume-ignition claim is forced by this self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper contains two distinct claims. (1) Directed nanorod antennas enhance and direct proton acceleration. This is supported by EPOCH simulations and by a Thomson-parabola comparison of horizontal vs vertical nanorods, though the paper itself concedes: 'we had no TP detectors at 45⁰ or 225⁰ degrees, we could not test this in the present setup directly.' That directional confirmation therefore rests on simulation rather than direct measurement, but it is an evidentiary gap, not a constructional circularity, because the EPOCH model is a separate kinetic simulation and the measured z-direction yield/energy difference is an external observation. (2) The abstract's volume-ignition claim is not derived in the paper; it depends on time-like detonation fronts in warm dense fusion fuel, introduced via 'a mistaken assumption, [1]' and corrected by '[2] in 1987', then transferred to laser fusion by [3] and to nano-plasmonics by [4]. Refs [2]–[4] are all Csernai co-authored. The QGP hadronization observation is a different physical regime, and the paper provides no independent validation that time-like detonation fronts exist in solid hydrogen-boron targets at keV temperatures. Thus the load-bearing fusion claim reduces to a self-citation chain. I also flag the paper's own admission of the unmeasured 45°/225° directions as an explicit limitation; it weakens the experimental confirmation of the directional claim but does not by itself constitute circularity. Overall: the central fusion claim is partially circular (score 6), while the proton-acceleration measurement has independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fully new physical entities are postulated; the scheme rests on existing nanoplasmonic structures. The main ledger load is the self-cited detonation theory and the pure-hydrogen simulation assumption.

free parameters (4)
  • EPOCH laser intensity = 4e21 W/cm2
    Simulation input for Fig. 4; the experimental laser spot intensity is not directly measured, so the simulation intensity is a chosen parameter.
  • Ignition threshold intensity = 1e17-1e18 W/cm2
    Stated in Considerations (iii) as a required design target without derivation; central to the ignition claim.
  • Target thickness scaling = 20-40 um (25 mJ); 2-4 mm (2.5 J)
    Hand-estimated design rule in Considerations (iii); no formula or simulation backing provided.
  • Two-sided timing precision = ~1 fs (quarter wave period)
    Design requirement in Considerations (ii) asserted without analysis of achievable synchronization.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Time-like detonation fronts are physically realizable and can lead to simultaneous deflagration/detonation (Csernai 1987 revision of Taub 1948).
    Invoked in Introduction to justify radiation-dominated volume ignition; not tested in laser fusion; cited only to authors' own works.
  • domain assumption QGP hadronization at constant proper time is a valid analog for laser-fusion fuel burning.
    Used to translate heavy-ion phenomenology into a fusion ignition mechanism; no scaling law or experimental bridge provided.
  • domain assumption Enhanced near-field of resonant nanorods accelerates protons non-thermally along the rod axis without significant thermalization losses.
    Central mechanism; partially supported by TP spectra and EPOCH, but energy balance and non-thermal character not fully demonstrated.
  • ad hoc to paper EPOCH simulation with pure hydrogen plasma and single gold nanorod is representative of the real PMMA/quartz target with C,O atoms and a 500-nm array.
    Simulation simplifies target chemistry; the paper states C and O 'neglected for simplicity', which may affect ion acceleration dynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Directed Nano-antennas for Laser Fusion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NNJWLMCT

@misc{pith2026260105331,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Directed Nano-antennas for Laser Fusion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NNJWLMCT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.05331}
}
read the original abstract

Why do we use nano-antennas for fusion? In three sentences: The present laser induced fusion plans use extreme mechanical shock compression to get one hotspot and then ignition. Still fusion burning spreads slower than expansion, and mechanical instabilities may also develop. With nano-antennas in radiation dominated systems, simultaneous ignition can be achieved in the whole target volume and there is no time left for mechanical instabilities. Ignition is achieved with protons accelerated in the direction of the nanoantennas that are orthogonal to the direction of laser irradiation. Present laser fusion methods are based on extreme and slow mechanical compression with an ablator surface on the fuel target pellet to increase compression and eliminate penetration of laser electromagnetic energy into the target. This arises from a mistaken assumption, [1] that the detonation normal 4-vector should have vanishing time-like component, and this assumption eliminates the possibility to rapid or even simultaneous, radiation dominated detonations, (which are well known in the burning (or hadronization) of Quark Gluon Plasma).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.05331 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Resonance analysis of a 102 x 30 x 30 nm Gold nanorod antenna in PMMA resists under 45⁰ laser irradiation, relative to the situation without nanorod antenna (rel. u.). In this configuration the vacuum resonance length is 821 nm, calculated in the COMSOL Multiphysics Simulation Software. In our experiment the laser irradiation has a vacuum wavelength of 795 nm, and as we see the presently used antenna under the 45⁰ l… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The calculated angular energy distribution of accelerated protons in the experimental configuration shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    Csernai, Detonation on a time-like front for relativistic systems, Zh

    L.P. Csernai, Detonation on a time-like front for relativistic systems, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 92, 379- 386 (1987)

    1987

  2. [4]

    Csernai, N

    L.P. Csernai, N. Kroo, and I. Papp, Radiation dominated implosion with nano-plasmonics, Laser and Particle Beams, 36 (2), 171-178 (2018)

    2018

  3. [1]

    A. H. Taub, Relativistic Rankine-Hugoniot Equations, Phys, Rev. 74, 328 (1948)

    1948

  4. [3]

    Csernai and D.D

    L.P. Csernai and D.D. Strottman, Volume ignition via time-like detonation in pellet fusion, Laser and Particle Beams, 33, 279-282 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    A hybridization model for the plasmon response of complex nanostructures,

    E. Prodan, C. Radloff, N. J. Halas, and P. Nordlander, “A hybridization model for the plasmon response of complex nanostructures,” Science. 302 (5644), 419–422 (2003)

    2003

  6. [6]

    Papp and K

    I. Papp and K. Zsukovszki, Particle simulation of various gold nanoantennas in laser-irradiated matter for fusion production (part of NAPLIFE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. Jul. 2 (2025),

    2025

  7. [7]

    PIC simulations of laser-induced proton acceleration by resonant nanoantennas for fusion

    István Papp, Larissa Bravina, Mária Csete, Archana Kumari, Igor N. Mishustin, Anton Motornenko, Péter Rácz, Leonid M. Satarov, Horst Stöcker, András Szenes, Dávid Vass, Tamás S. Biró, László P. Csernai, Norbert Kroó, on behalf of NAPLIFE Collaboration, PIC simulations of laser-induced proton acceleration by resonant nanoantennas for fusion, arXiv:2306.134...

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.2306.13445v2

  8. [8]

    [Online]

    https://www.allresist.com/portfolio-item/e-beam-resist-ar-p-672-series/, Allresist. [Online]. [Accessed 20 08 2025]

    2025

Show all 28 references
  1. [9]

    Sanjay Kumar, Sanju Tanwar, Sumit Kumar Sharma, Nanoantenna – A Review on Present and Future Perspective, International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(1), 2395- 4752 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0365

    Tae-In Jeong, Dong Kyo Oh, San Kim, Jongkyoon Park, Yeseul Kim, Jungho Mun, Kyujung Kim, Soo Hoon Chew, Junsuk Rho, and Seungchul Kim, Deterministic nanoantenna array design for stable plasmon-enhanced harmonic generation, Nanophotonics; 12(3): 619–629 (2023). https://doi.org/...

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/729138

    Aftab Ahmed, Yuanjie Pang, Ghazal Hajisalem, Reuven Gordon, Antenna Design for Directivity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy, International Journal of Optics, Volume 2012, 729138, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/729138

    2012 doi

  4. [12]

    Alshebeili; Thermoelectric Sensor Coupled Yagi–Uda Nanoantenna for Infrared Detection, Electronics, 10, 527, (2021),

    Waleed Tariq Sethi, Olivier De Sagazan, Mohamed Himdi, Hamsakutty Vettikalladi and Saleh A. Alshebeili; Thermoelectric Sensor Coupled Yagi–Uda Nanoantenna for Infrared Detection, Electronics, 10, 527, (2021),

    2021

  5. [13]

    Moshik Cohen, Reuven Shavit & Zeev Zalevsky, Observing Optical Plasmons on a Single Nanometer Scale; Scientific Reports 4, 4096, (2014), https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04096 [[(21 February 2014); 1) Faculty of Engineering, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel, 2) Departme...

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    Large- Area Nanoimprinted colloidal Au Nanocrystal Based Nanoantenna for Ultrathin Polarizing Plasmonic metasurface

    Wenxing Chen, Mykhailo Tymchenko, Prashanth, Gopalan, Xingchen Ye, Yaoting Wu, Mingliang Zhang, Christopher B Murray, Andrea Alu, Cherier R Kagan, “Large- Area Nanoimprinted colloidal Au Nanocrystal Based Nanoantenna for Ultrathin Polarizing Plasmonic metasurface”, Nanoletter:...

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    Kasani, K

    S. Kasani, K. Curtin, and N. Wu, A review of 2D and 3D plasmonic nanostructure array patterns: fabrication, light management and sensing applications, Nanophotonics, 8(12), 2065−2089, (2019)

  8. [16]

    Min Q., Pang Y., Collins D.J., Kuklev N.A., Gottselig K., Steuerman D.W., and Gordon R., Substrate-based platform for boosting the surface enhanced Raman of plasmonic nanoparticles, Optics Express, 19(2), 1648-1655 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Extremes 7, 064403 (2022)

    Defeng Kong, Guoqiang Zhang, Yinren Shou, Shirui Xu, Zhusong Me, Zhengxuan Cao, Zhuo Pan, Pengjie Wang, Guijun Qi, Yao Lou, Zhiguo Ma, Haoyang Lan, Wenzhao Wang, Yunhui Li, Peter Rubovic, Martin Veselsky, Aldo Bonasera, Jiarui Zhao, Yixing Geng, Yanying Zhao, Changbo Fu, Wen L...

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Optical Control and Patterning of Gold-Nanorod–Poly(vinyl alcohol) Nanocomposite Films,

    J. Pérez-Juste, B. Rodríguez-González, P. Mulvaney, and L. M. Liz-Marzán, “Optical Control and Patterning of Gold-Nanorod–Poly(vinyl alcohol) Nanocomposite Films,” Adv Funct Mater, 15, no. 7, pp. 1065–1071, Jul. 2005, https://doi.org/10.1002/ADFM.200400591

    2005 doi

  11. [19]

    Optical Properties of Aligned Rod-Shaped Gold Particles Dispersed in Poly(vinyl alcohol) Films,

    B. M. I. Van Der Zande, L. Pagès, R. A. M. Hikmet, and A. Van Blaaderen, “Optical Properties of Aligned Rod-Shaped Gold Particles Dispersed in Poly(vinyl alcohol) Films,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 103, no. 28, pp. 5761–5767, Jul. 1999, https://doi.org/10.1021/JP9847383

    1999 doi

  12. [20]

    Laser writing in polarized silver nanorod films,

    O. Wilson, G. Wilson, and P. Mulvaney, “Laser writing in polarized silver nanorod films,” Advanced Materials, 14, no. 13–14, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(20020705)14:13/14<1000::AID-ADMA1000>3.0.CO;2-E

    2002 doi

  13. [21]

    Polyvinyl Alcohol: A Comprehensive Overview,

    S. Asano, “Polyvinyl Alcohol: A Comprehensive Overview,” Advanced Materials Science Research, 7, no. 5, pp. 199–200, Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.37532/aaasmr.2024.7(5).199-200

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    A linear dichroism study of colloidal silver in stretched polymer films,

    D. Fornasiero and F. Grieser, “A linear dichroism study of colloidal silver in stretched polymer films,” Chem Phys Lett, 139, no. 1, pp. 103–108, Aug. 1987, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009- 2614(87)80159-8

    1987 doi

  15. [23]

    Michl, E

    J. Michl, E. W. Thulstrup, and J. H. Eggers, “Polarization spectra in stretched polymer sheets. III.1 Physical significance of the orientation factors and determination of π-π* transition moment directions in molecules of low symmetry,” J Phys Chem, 74(22) 3878–3884, 1970, htt...

    1970 doi

  16. [24]

    Fabrication of plasmonic structures with well-controlled nanometric features: a comparison between lift-off and ion beam etching,

    B. Abasahl, C. Santschi, T. V. Raziman, and O. J. F. Martin, “Fabrication of plasmonic structures with well-controlled nanometric features: a comparison between lift-off and ion beam etching,” Nanotechnology, vol. 32, no. 47, p. 475202, Aug. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-...

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    Imene Benabdelghani, Márk Aladi, Péter Rácz, Gergő Hegedüs, Ádám Inger, László P. Csernai, Tamás Sándor Biró, Norbert Kroó, Miklós Ákos Kedves, Károly Osvay, Parvin Varmazyar, Tibor Gilinger, Attila Bonyár, Nóra Tarpataki, Zsuzsanna Márton (NAPLIFE collaboration), Experimental...

    2025

  18. [26]

    Laszlo P. Csernai (for the NAPLIFE & FUSENOW Collaborations), Laser Induced p+11B Fusion by Resonant Nanoplasmonic Antennas, invited talk, XIV International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics, 17-31 July 2025, OAC, Kolymbari, Crete, Greece

    2025

  19. [27]

    Kroó, L.P

    N. Kroó, L.P . Csernai, I. Papp, M.A. Kedves, M. Aladi, A. Bonyár, M. Szalóki, K. Osvay, P . Varmazyar, T.S. Biró (for the NAPLIFE Collaboration), Indication of p + 11B Reaction in Laser Induced Nanofusion Experiment, Scientific Reports (Nature) 14, 30087 (2024).,

    2024

  20. [28]

    Csernai, T

    L.P . Csernai, T. Csörgő, I. Papp, M. Csete, J.P . Hansen, A. Szenes, K. Tamosiunas, D. Vass, T.S. Bíró, M. Veres and N. Kroó (part of NAPLIFE and FUSENOW Collaborations), Radiation pattern and source size of particles in nanoplasmonic fusion, International Journal of Modern P...

    2026 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.