Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Steiner Trees for Hereditary Graph Classes: a Treewidth Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.07492 v2 pith:NNU5NU7Y submitted 2020-04-16 cs.DS cs.CCcs.DMmath.CO

classification cs.DScs.CCcs.DMmath.CO
keywords graphsfreesteinertreeclassedgetreewidthbounded
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We consider the classical problems (Edge) Steiner Tree and Vertex Steiner Tree after restricting the input to some class of graphs characterized by a small set of forbidden induced subgraphs. We show a dichotomy for the former problem restricted to $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs and a dichotomy for the latter problem restricted to $H$-free graphs. We find that there exists an infinite family of graphs $H$ such that Vertex Steiner Tree is polynomial-time solvable for $H$-free graphs, whereas there exist only two graphs $H$ for which this holds for Edge Steiner Tree. We also find that Edge Steiner Tree is polynomial-time solvable for $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs if and only if the treewidth of the class of $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs is bounded (subject to P $\neq$ NP). To obtain the latter result, we determine all pairs $(H_1,H_2)$ for which the class of $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs has bounded treewidth.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TriMod Fusion for Multimodal Named Entity Recognition in Social Media

    cs.IR 2025-01 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A text-image-hashtag attention fusion model for Twitter named entity recognition reports a marginal F1 gain over prior work, but the result is not reproducible from the paper.

Pith tools