REVIEW 2 cited by
A confounding bridge approach for double negative control inference on causal effects
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Unmeasured confounding is a key challenge for causal inference. In this paper, we establish a framework for unmeasured confounding adjustment with negative control variables. A negative control outcome is associated with the confounder but not causally affected by the exposure in view, and a negative control exposure is correlated with the primary exposure or the confounder but does not causally affect the outcome of interest. We introduce an outcome confounding bridge function that depicts the relationship between the confounding effects on the primary outcome and the negative control outcome, and we incorporate a negative control exposure to identify the bridge function and the average causal effect. We also consider the extension to the positive control setting by allowing for nonzero causal effect of the primary exposure on the control outcome. We illustrate our approach with simulations and apply it to a study about the short-term effect of air pollution on mortality. Although a standard analysis shows a significant acute effect of PM2.5 on mortality, our analysis indicates that this effect may be confounded, and after double negative control adjustment, the effect is attenuated toward zero.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Sequential Treatment Effect Estimation with Unmeasured Confounders
DSIV-CFR learns instrumental variables from observed covariates and uses a generalized method of moments to estimate sequential treatment effects under unmeasured confounding, but the identification proof is incomplet...
-
Estimating the Causal Effect of Redlining on Present-day Air Pollution
Using a spatial latent factor causal model with 1940 census proxies, redlined neighborhoods show higher NO2 but only weak PM2.5 differences in 2010.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.