pith. sign in

arxiv: 0809.4255 · v1 · pith:NPPMSFIFnew · submitted 2008-09-24 · 🌌 astro-ph · physics.ins-det

Front- vs. back-illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis

classification 🌌 astro-ph physics.ins-det
keywords largernoisepixelsfullhalfmaximumwidthback-illuminated
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Exoplanetary transit and stellar oscillation surveys require a very high precision photometry. The instrumental noise has therefore to be minimized. First, we perform a semi-analytical model of different noise sources. We show that the noise due the CCD electrodes can be overcome using a Gaussian PSF (Point Spread Function) of full width half maximum larger than 1.6 pixels. We also find that for a PSF size of a few pixels, the photometric aperture has to be at least 2.5 times larger than the PSF full width half maximum. Then, we compare a front- with a back-illuminated CCD through a Monte-Carlo simulation. Both cameras give the same results for a PSF full width half maximum larger than 1.5 pixels. All these simulations are applied to the A STEP (Antarctica Search for Transiting Extrasolar Planets) project. As a result, we choose a front-illuminated camera for A STEP because of its better resolution and lower price, and we will use a PSF larger than 1.6 pixels.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.