Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 42 references

Enhanced fidelity in nonlinear structured light by virtual light-based apertures

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Structured one input mode can serve as a virtual aperture for the other, raising DFG output fidelity to just over 0.9.

desk verdict A practical new alignment trick for nonlinear structured light that largely works, but the fidelity numbers are model-dependent and the phase-matching filter is ignored for sharp-edged modes. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18290 v1 pith:NS6KBPE7 submitted 2025-01-30 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Sachleen Singh , Isaac Nape , Andrew Forbes This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords structuredlightdifferencefrequencygenerationorbitalangularmomentumbeamalignmentmodalfidelitynonlinearconversionvirtualaperturespatialoverlap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the structure of one laser mode can be used as a virtual, light-based aperture for the other in nonlinear difference frequency generation, giving a practical way to align the two beams inside a crystal. The authors argue that because the DFG output field is proportional to the product of the two input fields, $E_3 \propto E_1 E_2^*$, one input plays the role of an optical transmission function for the other. They demonstrate that iterating on the near-field and far-field structure of the output, for example merging split optical vortices, raises the output mode fidelity from about 0.7 to just over 0.9. If correct, this offers a path to high-fidelity nonlinear frequency conversion of structured light that does not rely on power optimization alone.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the product amplitude relationship $E_3 \approx \eta E_1 E_2^*$ at the crystal plane (Appendix Eq.~1), which makes one input mode act as a virtual aperture with amplitude and phase. This relationship turns the output beam's near-field and far-field structure into diagnostics of transverse and longitudinal overlap: vortex splitting in the near field and asymmetric far-field rings flag lateral misalignment, while the sharpness of dark features of an aperture mode flags longitudinal waist displacement. The supporting machinery includes 4f telescopes that image both input source planes to $z=0$ at the crystal center and input Rayleigh ranges much larger than the crystal length, so the product rule stays valid.

What would settle it

Repeat the alignment procedure with input beams focused so tightly that their Rayleigh range is shorter than the crystal length; if the sharpness-based metric no longer tracks the predicted product output or the fidelity gain from 0.7 to 0.9 disappears, the near-field product assumption underpinning the virtual aperture fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a collinear type-0 difference-frequency-generation experiment, the output field at the crystal plane follows $E_3 \approx \eta E_1 E_2^*$, so one of the input beams acts as a complex transmission function, a virtual structured light-based aperture, for the other. This product relationship lets the structure of the output reveal misalignment: transverse misalignment splits a vortex into two singularities in the near field and breaks the symmetry of the far field, while longitudinal displacement blurs sharp dark features of an aperture mode. Using these structural signatures as alignment metrics, the authors recover output fidelities just over 0.9, an improvement from about 0.7 under coarse alignment, and verify the alignment by swapping which input carries the aperture. The authors claim the procedure generalizes to other structured-light fields and to sum- and second-harmonic generation because the product relation is a generic property of three-wave mixing near the crystal center.

Load-bearing premise

The method depends on the crystal being short enough and the input beams broad enough that both beams stay essentially undiffracted through the crystal and are imaged to the same central plane, so the output really is the product of the two inputs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, the same structural-alignment routine can be applied to OAM modes of arbitrary topological charge and to Hermite-Gaussian aperture modes without changing the product-rule logic.
  • Because the product relationship holds for sum-frequency and second-harmonic generation near the crystal center, the virtual-aperture approach should transfer to those processes.
  • The OAM selection rule $l_3 = l_1 - l_2$ gives an independent confirmation channel: a clean DFG vortex at the expected charge signals good overlap.
  • Longitudinal alignment sensitivity is highest at small waist displacements, so the sharpness metric is naturally suited to fine-tuning rather than coarse positioning.
  • The sharpness-based longitudinal technique is stated to work for non-collinear configurations as well.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the authors leave implicit is closed-loop alignment: the near-field and far-field structural error signals are quantitative, so a feedback loop could replace manual mirror adjustments.
  • The product-rule argument invites testing in nonlinear waveguides and metasurfaces, where longitudinal overlap is harder to access and the near-field assumption would need to be checked rather than assumed.
  • A conservative expectation is that the fidelity gain will shrink when the two input beams have very different Rayleigh ranges or sizes, because the simple product model and the sharpness calibration are tied to the near-field condition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes and demonstrates a method for improving the fidelity of structured light generated by difference frequency generation (DFG). The key idea is to exploit the product relationship E_DFG ∝ E_1 E_2^* so that one input mode acts as a virtual amplitude-and-phase aperture for the other. Using OAM modes as an example, the authors show that the near-field and far-field structures of the DFG output can diagnose transverse misalignment, and that sharp-edged dark modes can diagnose longitudinal displacement. They report that an iterative alignment procedure raises the output fidelity from about 0.7 to just over 0.9, confirm the alignment by swapping which input carries the OAM structure, and argue that the method extends to other nonlinear processes such as SHG and SFG.

Significance. If substantiated, the proposed method would be a practical and broadly applicable alignment tool for nonlinear structured-light conversion, where conventional power optimization is often insufficient. The central physics—the product relationship for near-field DFG—is standard and derived in the appendix, and the confirmation step of swapping which beam carries the structure is a genuine, non-fitted test. The paper also defines its fidelity metric explicitly and provides a concrete quantitative target (fidelity >0.9). However, the current support is incomplete in two ways that affect the headline claims: the validity of the product rule for the sharp-edged apertures used in the longitudinal demonstration is not checked against the spatial-frequency filtering of a finite crystal, and the reported fidelities and sharpness values lack uncertainty estimates. These issues are fixable with additional measurements and simulations, so the manuscript is a worthwhile contribution if revised accordingly.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix, Eq. (1); Sec. 5, Figs. 5-6] The derivation of E3 ∝ E1 E2* is performed in the z→0 limit and then applied over the full 5 mm crystal using only the condition z_R >> L for the input beams. That condition is necessary for the overall beam envelope not to diffract over L, but it is not sufficient for the sharp-edged dark apertures used in the longitudinal-overlap demonstration (Fig. 5). Such features carry high transverse spatial frequencies, and in paraxial DFG the phase mismatch Δk_z is quadratic in the transverse wavevectors, so the crystal acts as a spatial-frequency filter whose acceptance narrows with L. The paper provides no measured beam waists, angular spectra, or phase-matching acceptance checks for these modes. Without them, the sharpness-versus-Δz calibration in Fig. 6 may be influenced by spatial filtering rather than purely by longitudinal overlap. I ask the authors to add either (i) a propagation simulation that includes the crystal phase-matching filter for the sharp-edged apertures, or (ii) direct measurement of the angular spectrum at the crystal and a demonstration that the relevant spatial frequencies fall within the acceptance bandwidth.
  2. [Section 4, Fig. 4] The central quantitative claim—an increase in output fidelity from approximately 0.7 to just over 0.9—is reported as single numbers without error bars, number of independent trials, or a description of how the 'average fidelity' was computed. Since these numbers are used to support a near-40% improvement, the paper should report mean ± standard deviation over repeated independent alignment runs, or at least give the distribution of measured values. Without uncertainty estimates, the reported improvement cannot be distinguished from run-to-run variation.
  3. [Section 5, Fig. 6] The sensitivity analysis is a first-order Taylor approximation ΔS = (∂S/∂z)Δz, with no second-order term and no uncertainty on S or on the simulated ∂S/∂z. The inset plots the derivative against displacement, but no error bars are shown and no resolution limit is stated. Because the longitudinal-overlap method is justified by its ability to 'fine tune' alignment, the paper should provide a quantitative resolution limit—for example, the smallest Δz that produces a sharpness change larger than the measurement noise—and should check that the first-order approximation is adequate at the reported working point.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Fig. 2] The text says the far-field camera is placed one focal length away from lens L5, while later in the same setup the camera is described as being one focal length away from lens L9; the lens labels should be made consistent.
  2. [Section 4, Fig. 3] The horizontal axis of Fig. 3 is described as a 'hologram shift' on the SLM, but the text discusses displacement at the crystal in micrometres; the calibration between SLM pixels and crystal-plane displacement should be stated explicitly.
  3. [Appendix, Eq. (1)] The constant η in Eq. (1) has dimensions that are not discussed, and the symbol z is used both as the crystal coordinate and implicitly as a fixed parameter; a sentence defining η and the precise meaning of z would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: simulations are forward-model predictions from Eq. (1) with no fitted parameters, and experimental validation is independent.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The Appendix obtains E3≈ηE1E2* from Boyd's coupled-wave equations in the z→0 limit, and all simulations of near-field/far-field patterns, fidelity, and sharpness-vs-Δz curves are forward calculations from that product relation; no parameter is fitted to the experimental data it is later compared with. The experimental fidelity comparison is therefore a genuine test, not a tautology, and the confirmation step of swapping which input carries the Gaussian/OAM structure is an independent, non-fitted consistency check. The 'virtual aperture' language is an interpretation of the standard product relationship rather than a separate load-bearing assumption. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. 13, 18, 33) are contextual and do not replace the textbook derivation. The Appendix's stated assumptions (z=0 plane at crystal center, z_R >> L) are explicit limitations that affect the regime of validity; they are correctness risks, not circular steps. No equation is defined in terms of the result it is used to prove, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities and fits no free parameters to data. The central derivation relies on standard nonlinear optics assumptions, with the near-field and z=0 source plane assumptions being the most significant and load-bearing ones.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Paraxial approximation and undepleted pump for coupled wave equations.
    Used in the appendix to derive the simplified DFG equations and the product relationship.
  • domain assumption Optimum phase matching and type-0 DFG with temperature tuning.
    Required for the near-field product relationship and for the experiment to work as described in Section 3.
  • domain assumption Rayleigh ranges of input beams are much larger than the crystal length, so the crystal is in the near field.
    Explicitly stated in the appendix: 'To avoid unwanted diffraction effects the Rayleigh ranges are kept much larger than the length of the NLC making the whole crystal fall in the NF region.' This is load-bearing for the product relationship.
  • domain assumption The 4f telescopes place the source planes of both input beams at the center of the crystal (z=0).
    The appendix assumes both source planes fall at the center of the NLC, and this is essential for the longitudinal overlap correction to make sense.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced fidelity in nonlinear structured light by virtual light-based apertures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NS6KBPE7

@misc{pith2026250118290,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced fidelity in nonlinear structured light by virtual light-based apertures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NS6KBPE7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18290}
}
read the original abstract

Tailoring the degrees of freedom (DoF) of light for a desired purpose, so-called structured light, has delivered numerous advances over the past decade, ranging from communications and quantum cryptography to optical trapping, and microscopy. The shaping toolkit has traditionally been linear in nature, only recently extended to the nonlinear regime, where input beams overlap in a nonlinear crystal to generate a structured output beam. Here we show how to enhance the fidelity of the structured output by aligning light with light. Using orbital angular momentum modes and difference frequency generation as an example, we demonstrate precise control of the spatial overlap in both the transverse and longitudinal directions using the structure of one mode as a virtual structured (in amplitude and phase) light-based aperture for the other. Our technique can easily be translated to other structured light fields as well as alternative nonlinear processes such as second harmonic generation and sum frequency generation, enabling advancements in communication, imaging, and spectroscopy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18290 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) The diffraction pattern from a light-based virtual optic is the same as that of a physical optic, but [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The VIS input beam with wavelength 532 nm and IR beam 1550 nm is imaged using two 4f-telescopes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Output DFG power with change in the VIS beam position with hologram shift in x-direction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The alignment procedure with simulated and experimental results (insets) at both near-field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) The longitudinal overlap is reduced if the desired waist positions are displaced by some amount, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) The simulated DFG profiles for longitudinal displacements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Structured light,

    A. Forbes, M. de Oliveira, and M. R. Dennis, “Structured light,” Nat. Photonics15, 253–262 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Towards higher-dimensional structured light,

    C. He, Y. Shen, and A. Forbes, “Towards higher-dimensional structured light,” Light. Sci. & Appl.11, 205 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    M. D. Al-Amri, D. L. Andrews, and M. Babiker,Structured Light for Optical Communication (Elsevier, 2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Generation and detection of structured light: a review,

    J. Wang and Y. Liang, “Generation and detection of structured light: a review,” Front. Phys.9, 688284 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    High-dimensional cryptography with spatial modes of light: tutorial,

    E. Otte, I. Nape, C. Rosales-Guzmán,et al., “High-dimensional cryptography with spatial modes of light: tutorial,” JOSA B37, A309–A323 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Optical trapping with structured light: a review,

    Y. Yang, Y.-X. Ren, M. Chen,et al., “Optical trapping with structured light: a review,” Adv. Photonics3, 034001–034001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Whatspatiallightmodulatorscandoforopticalmicroscopy,

    C.Maurer,A.Jesacher,S.Bernet,andM.Ritsch-Marte,“Whatspatiallightmodulatorscandoforopticalmicroscopy,” Laser & Photonics Rev.5, 81–101 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    A review of liquid crystal spatial light modulators: devices and applications,

    Y. Yang, A. Forbes, and L. Cao, “A review of liquid crystal spatial light modulators: devices and applications,” Opto-Electronic Sci.2, 230026–1 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Structured light with spatial light modulators,

    C. Rosales-Guzmán and A. Forbes, “Structured light with spatial light modulators,” (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Structured light with digital micromirror devices: a guide to best practice,

    S. Scholes, R. Kara, J. Pinnell,et al., “Structured light with digital micromirror devices: a guide to best practice,” Opt. Eng.59, 041202–041202 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Broadband structured light using digital micro-mirror devices (dmds): a tutorial,

    L. Perumal and A. Forbes, “Broadband structured light using digital micro-mirror devices (dmds): a tutorial,” J. Opt. 25, 074003 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Tunable structured light with flat optics,

    A. H. Dorrah and F. Capasso, “Tunable structured light with flat optics,” Science376, eabi6860 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Nonlinear optics with structured light,

    W. T. Buono and A. Forbes, “Nonlinear optics with structured light,” Opto-Electronic Adv.5, 210174–1 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Nonlinear photonic metasurfaces,

    G. Li, S. Zhang, and T. Zentgraf, “Nonlinear photonic metasurfaces,” Nat. Rev. Mater.2, 1–14 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Second-harmonicgenerationandtheorbitalangularmomentum of light,

    K.Dholakia, N.Simpson, M.Padgett, andL.Allen, “Second-harmonicgenerationandtheorbitalangularmomentum of light,” Phys. Rev. A54, R3742 (1996)

    1996

  8. [16]

    Quantum transport of high-dimensional spatial information with a nonlinear detector,

    B. Sephton, A. Vallés, I. Nape,et al., “Quantum transport of high-dimensional spatial information with a nonlinear detector,” Nat. communications14, 8243 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Remote transport of high-dimensional orbital angular momentum states and ghost images via spatial-mode-engineered frequency conversion,

    X. Qiu, H. Guo, and L. Chen, “Remote transport of high-dimensional orbital angular momentum states and ghost images via spatial-mode-engineered frequency conversion,” Nat. Commun.14, 8244 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Light correcting light with nonlinear optics,

    S. Singh, B. Sephton, W. Tavares Buono,et al., “Light correcting light with nonlinear optics,” Adv. Photonics6, 026003–026003 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Observation of a triangular-lattice pattern in nonlinear wave mixing with optical vortices,

    B. P. da Silva, G. dos Santos, A. de Oliveira,et al., “Observation of a triangular-lattice pattern in nonlinear wave mixing with optical vortices,” Optica9, 908–912 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Orthogonal spatial coding with stimulated parametric down-conversion,

    Y. Xu, S. Tang, A. Nicholas Black, and R. W. Boyd, “Orthogonal spatial coding with stimulated parametric down-conversion,” Opt. Express31, 42723–42729 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Polarization-controlled nonlinear computer-generated holography,

    L. Ackermann, C. Roider, K. Cvecek,et al., “Polarization-controlled nonlinear computer-generated holography,” Sci. Reports 13, 10338 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Nonlinearvolumeholographyin3dnonlinearphotoniccrystals,

    S.Liu,L.M.Mazur,W.Krolikowski,andY.Sheng,“Nonlinearvolumeholographyin3dnonlinearphotoniccrystals,” Laser & Photonics Rev.14, 2000224 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Spiral phase contrast imaging in nonlinear optics: seeing phase objects using invisible illumination,

    X. Qiu, F. Li, W. Zhang,et al., “Spiral phase contrast imaging in nonlinear optics: seeing phase objects using invisible illumination,” Optica5, 208–212 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Second harmonic generation based joint transform correlator for human face and qr code recognitions,

    L. Hong, F. Lin, X. Qiu, and L. Chen, “Second harmonic generation based joint transform correlator for human face and qr code recognitions,” Appl. Phys. Lett.116(2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Mid-infrared single-photon edge enhanced imaging based on nonlinear vortex filtering,

    Y. Wang, J. Fang, T. Zheng,et al., “Mid-infrared single-photon edge enhanced imaging based on nonlinear vortex filtering,” Laser & Photonics Rev.15, 2100189 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Spatial mode detection by frequency upconversion,

    B. Sephton, A. Vallés, F. Steinlechner,et al., “Spatial mode detection by frequency upconversion,” Opt. letters44, 586–589 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Vectorial nonlinear optics: Type-ii second-harmonic generation driven by spin-orbit-coupled fields,

    H.-J. Wu, H.-R. Yang, C. Rosales-Guzmán,et al., “Vectorial nonlinear optics: Type-ii second-harmonic generation driven by spin-orbit-coupled fields,” Phys. Rev. A100, 053840 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Conformal frequency conversion for arbitrary vectorial structured light,

    H.-J. Wu, B.-S. Yu, Z.-H. Zhu,et al., “Conformal frequency conversion for arbitrary vectorial structured light,” Optica 9, 187–196 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Shadow of a laser beam,

    R. A. Abrahao, H. P. Morin, J. T. Pagé,et al., “Shadow of a laser beam,” Optica11, 1549–1555 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Frequency conversion of structured light,

    F. Steinlechner, N. Hermosa, V. Pruneri, and J. P. Torres, “Frequency conversion of structured light,” Sci. reports6, 21390 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Two-dimensionalnonlinearbeamshaping,

    A.Shapira,R.Shiloh,I.Juwiler,andA.Arie,“Two-dimensionalnonlinearbeamshaping,”Opt.letters 37,2136–2138 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    Efficient nonlinear beam shaping in three-dimensional lithium niobate nonlinear photonic crystals,

    D. Wei, C. Wang, X. Xu,et al., “Efficient nonlinear beam shaping in three-dimensional lithium niobate nonlinear photonic crystals,” Nat. communications10, 4193 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Frequency conversion of orbital angular momentum with optimized efficiency and modal purity,

    S. Singh, B. Sephton, I. Morland,et al., “Frequency conversion of orbital angular momentum with optimized efficiency and modal purity,” JOSA B40, 3128–3136 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Spin to orbital angular momentum transfer in frequency up-conversion,

    B. Pinheiro da Silva, W. T. Buono, L. J. Pereira,et al., “Spin to orbital angular momentum transfer in frequency up-conversion,” Nanophotonics11, 771–778 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Orbital-angular-momentum mixing in type-ii second-harmonic generation,

    L. J. Pereira, W. T. Buono, D. S. Tasca,et al., “Orbital-angular-momentum mixing in type-ii second-harmonic generation,” Phys. Rev. A96, 053856 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Spatial filtering of structured light,

    J. Pinnell, A. Klug, and A. Forbes, “Spatial filtering of structured light,” Am. J. Phys.88, 1123–1131 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Modal description of paraxial structured light propagation: tutorial,

    H. Sroor, C. Moodley, V. Rodríguez-Fajardo,et al., “Modal description of paraxial structured light propagation: tutorial,” JOSA A38, 1443–1449 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Observation of anomalous orbital angular momentum transfer in parametric nonlinearity,

    H.-J. Wu, B.-S. Yu, J.-Q. Jiang,et al., “Observation of anomalous orbital angular momentum transfer in parametric nonlinearity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 153803 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Rosales-Guzmán and A

    C. Rosales-Guzmán and A. Forbes,How to shape light with spatial light modulators (Bellingham: SPIE Press, 2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Metrology with a twist: probing and sensing with vortex light,

    M. Cheng, W. Jiang, L. Guo,et al., “Metrology with a twist: probing and sensing with vortex light,” Light. Sci. & Appl. 14, 4 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    R. W. Boyd,Nonlinear Optics (Third Edition) (Academic Press, Burlington, 2008), third edition ed

    2008

  34. [42]

    Beyond conservation of orbital angular momentum in stimulated parametric down-conversion,

    A. de Oliveira, G. Santos, N. R. da Silva,et al., “Beyond conservation of orbital angular momentum in stimulated parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 044019 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.