Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 47 references

A phase-modulation interferometer for intense, ultrashort, near infrared laser pulses

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A phase-modulation interferometer for intense, ultrashort, near-infrared laser pulses: the paper claims a design that overcomes the distortions acousto-optical modulators impose on such pulses, and demonstrates its viability.

desk verdict Solid engineering paper that solves AOM dispersion and efficiency issues for NIR PM interferometry, but the intense-pulse claim is partly extrapolated; worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16299 v2 pith:NUHCLM7L submitted 2025-07-22 physics.optics physics.atom-ph

classification physics.opticsphysics.atom-ph PACS 42.79.Jq42.65.Re42.25.Hz
keywords acousto-opticalphasemodulationstrong-fieldphysicsultrashortlaserpulsesnear-infraredinterferometryangulardispersioncompensationself-phasepulsedradio-frequencyoperationFourier-transformspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Phase-modulation interferometry uses acousto-optical modulators driven at distinct radio frequencies and lock-in detection to achieve high dynamic range and selective detection of weak coherent signals. Applied to strong-field physics, however, the modulators distort intense, ultrashort, near-infrared pulses through temporal and angular dispersion, self-phase modulation, and poor diffraction efficiency at NIR wavelengths. The paper claims a design that overcomes all four problems: large-aperture quartz AOMs with pulsed, laser-synchronized radio-frequency drive reach 84% diffraction efficiency; a fused-silica prism compensating the AOM's angular chirp restores recompression of the output to the input pulse duration; and stretched-pulse operation with post-compression permits 1.7-mJ pulses. If correct, the design makes phase-modulated interferometry practical for strong-field experiments driven by multi-mJ NIR lasers.

What carries the argument

The central object is the acousto-optical phase-modulation (PM) interferometer: a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with an AOM in each arm driven at radio frequencies $\Omega_1$ and $\Omega_2$, producing a low-frequency beat note $\Omega_{21}$ for lock-in detection. The enabling design elements are: (i) large-aperture (12 mm × 6 mm) quartz AOMs with an array of piezo transducers, which keep intensity low and dispersion minimal; (ii) pulsed RF driving synchronized to the laser pulses, raising the acousto-optic efficiency to 84% without overheating transducers; (iii) a 45° fused-silica prism inserted at ~−49° tilt that compensates the angular dispersion $\theta = \Omega/v$ introduced by diffraction; and (iv) water cooling with a vibration-damping unit. The diffraction-efficiency formula $\eta \simeq \frac{\pi^2}{2\lambda_0^2 \cos^2\theta_0} M_2 \frac{P_a L}{H}$ guides the design trade-offs among wavelength, acoustic power, aperture, and interaction length.

What would settle it

Measure the interference contrast at the interferometer output while operating at 1.7 mJ stretched pulses (or at input peak intensities exceeding $3.5\times10^{10}$ W/cm²) and check whether the >90% contrast and 22-fs recompression hold; if the transducer-array interference pattern reappears in the beam or the contrast drops, the claim that the design solves the intense-pulse problem fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a phase-modulation interferometer can be built for intense, ultrashort, near-infrared pulses without sacrificing efficiency or pulse quality. The key results are an 84% diffraction efficiency from large-aperture quartz AOMs operated with pulsed radio-frequency power synchronized to the laser, a prism-based compensation of the ~19 µrad/nm angular dispersion that leaves a symmetric focus and recompressed 22-fs output pulses identical to the input, and transmission of nearly the full spectral bandwidth needed for 12-fs Fourier-limited pulses. The authors also show that stretching the input pulses by a factor of 15 and recompressing them after the interferometer allows operation at 1.7 mJ without discernible nonlinear effects, and they demonstrate the instrument's readiness by resolving the Rb D1 and D2 lines in fluorescence-detected Fourier-transform spectroscopy.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the diffracted beam's wavefront quality, measured as better-than-90% interference contrast with moderate 120-fs pulses, survives unchanged at the maximum pulse energy of 1.7 mJ and at input intensities above the self-phase-modulation onset.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Strong-field experiments such as above-threshold ionization and high-harmonic generation in complex systems become accessible to phase-modulated interferometry with multi-mJ NIR drivers.
  • The design principles—quartz AOMs, pulsed RF drive, and prism compensation—can be transferred to other phase-modulation interferometers to raise their efficiency and pulse fidelity.
  • The energy ceiling extends beyond 1.7 mJ, since the authors state that even higher pulse energies should be possible with the stretched-pulse approach.
  • The near-full transmission of 12-fs Fourier-limited bandwidth makes the interferometer compatible with few-cycle NIR pulses.
  • The demonstrated Fourier-transform spectroscopy of dilute Rb vapor shows the instrument works for linear and, by extension, nonlinear coherent spectroscopy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension would be to test single-transducer or phased-array AOM designs that produce a more homogeneous acoustic field, since the transducer-array interference pattern, minimized by placing the beam near the transducers, could become the limiting factor at larger apertures or higher intensities.
  • The residual phase-front tilt of $0.09^\circ$ across 100 nm bandwidth suggests that a two-prism or grism compensator could cancel the remaining spatial chirp, potentially pushing recompression from the 22-fs input duration toward the 12-fs Fourier limit.
  • The measured SPM onset at $3.5\times10^{10}$ W/cm² sets an intensity ceiling that the stretched-pulse strategy bypasses only by added complexity; using crystals with even lower nonlinear refractive index (e.g., CaF$_2$) or cryogenic cooling could raise the ceiling directly.
  • The phase-synchronous undersampling variant of PM interferometry could be combined with the high-energy capability to isolate multiphoton coherences in strong-field spectra at harmonics of the beat frequency $\Omega_{21}$, a route the paper notes but does not demonstrate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a phase-modulation (PM) interferometer design intended for intense, ultrashort, near-infrared laser pulses. The authors address four known limitations of acousto-optical modulators (AOMs) in this regime: temporal dispersion, angular dispersion, self-phase modulation, and low diffraction efficiency at NIR wavelengths. They use large-aperture quartz AOMs with pulsed RF driving to reach 84% diffraction efficiency, insert a prism to compensate angular chirp, and demonstrate recompression of the interferometer output to the input pulse duration. They also operate the interferometer with 1.7 mJ pulses stretched by a factor of 15 and demonstrate linear Fourier-transform spectroscopy of a dilute Rb vapor using the PM technique.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a useful technical advance for extending acousto-optical phase-modulation interferometry into the multi-mJ, NIR pulse regime, which is relevant for strong-field spectroscopy. The paper's strengths include multiple independent cross-checks of the central design claims (focus quality, spatio-spectral profiles, second-harmonic autocorrelation, spectral transmission, Rb vapor spectroscopy), the use of external NIST calibration for the frequency axis, and a design that does not rely on fitted free parameters. The main weakness is that the interference contrast—the key resource of the PM technique—is validated only in a low-intensity, narrow-bandwidth regime, while the high-energy and broad-bandwidth operating conditions are not accompanied by contrast or wavefront measurements.

major comments (3)
  1. [IV.C] The central claim of operation with intense pulses is supported only by recompression of 1.7 mJ stretched pulses to 30 fs; no measurement of the two-arm interference contrast, beat-note visibility, or diffracted-beam wavefront is reported for these conditions. The manuscript itself states that above roughly 3.5e10 W/cm^2 a reduction of interference contrast is observed, and that a detailed characterization is deferred to another publication. Because the selective-detection and dynamic-range advantages of phase-modulation interferometry depend directly on maintaining interference contrast, this is a load-bearing gap; please provide a contrast or visibility measurement under the stretched-pulse high-energy operating conditions, or explicitly qualify the intense-pulse claim to the regimes in which contrast is verified.
  2. [IV.A] The >90% two-arm interference contrast was measured only with 800 nm, 11 nm FWHM, 120 fs pulses at moderate intensity (Section IV.A), while the broad-bandwidth NOPA tests (60-80 nm) and the high-energy stretched-pulse tests are not accompanied by contrast or wavefront measurements. The transducer-array-induced spatial interference and its minimization by beam position could depend on wavelength and acoustic power, so the bandwidth and energy axes of the claimed solution remain unverified. Please add contrast measurements for the broad-bandwidth and high-energy cases, or state explicitly that the contrast validation is limited to the conditions of Fig. 4.
  3. [IV.A-IV.C] Key quantitative claims are reported without uncertainties or measurement details: 84% diffraction efficiency (Fig. 3), 42% optical losses, 22 fs recompressed pulse duration, 30 fs after 1.7 mJ operation, and the spectral transmission in Fig. 10. Since these numbers constitute the headline performance of the design, please provide estimates of uncertainty, the number of repeated measurements, and the analysis protocol (e.g., autocorrelation deconvolution factor and how the efficiency was calibrated).
minor comments (5)
  1. [III.B, Eq. (6)] Equation (6) writes θ/λ = Ω/v, but if Ω denotes an angular frequency, a factor 2π is missing; the numerical value in the following sentence (19.3 µrad/nm) is consistent with using the linear acoustic frequency, so please clarify the notation.
  2. [IV.B, Fig. 9] The second-harmonic autocorrelation traces are not shown, and the deconvolution factor used to convert the autocorrelation width to pulse duration is not stated; please include representative traces and the assumed pulse shape.
  3. [IV.C] The definition of the reported 42% optical losses is ambiguous: please clarify whether both exit ports of BS2 were collected and how this compares to the stated 'minimum loss of 50% common to Mach-Zehnder and Michelson interferometers.'
  4. [IV.C, Fig. 10] The spectral transmission is described only as 'minor narrowing'; please quantify the input and output spectral FWHM and relate the transmitted bandwidth to the 12 fs Fourier-limit claim.
  5. [IV.A, Fig. 3] The diffraction efficiency curve in Fig. 3 appears to show a single measurement series; please indicate whether error bars are smaller than the symbol size and how many independent measurements were averaged.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the experimental validations are independent of the claims.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a custom acousto-optical phase-modulation interferometer solves the dispersion, self-phase-modulation, and efficiency problems encountered with intense NIR pulses. The supporting evidence is direct measurement: diffraction efficiency versus RF power in Fig. 3, beam-profile and interference-contrast characterization in Fig. 4, focal-spot measurements in Fig. 7, spatio-spectral pinhole scans in Fig. 8, second-harmonic autocorrelation compression results in Fig. 9, input/output spectral transmission in Fig. 10, and Rb vapor Fourier-transform spectroscopy calibrated against the NIST D-line frequencies in Fig. 11. The prism parameters were chosen from ray-tracing simulations and then validated experimentally; the ray-tracing angular dispersion of 19.2 urad/nm is compared with the analytic estimate of 19.3 urad/nm from Eq. 6, which is a cross-check between two independent estimates rather than a fit of the target result to itself. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then presented as a prediction of a closely related quantity. Self-citations, such as Refs. 10 and 30, describe previously established PM technique components and are not used as the justification for the new design's performance. The explicit limitation that interference contrast is reduced above roughly 3.5e10 W/cm^2 and that a detailed high-energy characterization is deferred to another publication is an acknowledged validation gap, not a circular step. Likewise, the 1.7-mJ stretched-pulse test validates recompression but does not directly measure interferometric contrast under those conditions; this affects the strength of the extrapolation to intense-pulse operation, but it does not make the derivation circular. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and supported by direct experimental evidence against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities; the contributions are engineering choices (crystal material, aperture, pulsing scheme, prism compensation) using existing components and standard physics formulas.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Acousto-optic diffraction efficiency follows Eq. 4 with material parameters from literature.
    Used to motivate the material choice; values for M2, n2, GVD are taken from references 35-38.
  • standard math The angular dispersion of the AOM diffracted beam is given by theta/lambda = Omega/v (Eq. 6).
    Used to predict 19.3 urad/nm and to design the compensating prism; verified by ray tracing at 19.2 urad/nm.
  • domain assumption The transducer array interference pattern can be minimized by placing the laser beam close to the transducers and remains acceptable at high pulse energies.
    Beam profile optimization is shown at moderate intensity; not re-measured at the highest pulse energy (1.7 mJ) or at the SPM onset intensity.
  • domain assumption Stretching input pulses by 15x keeps the peak intensity inside the AOMs below the SPM threshold (about 3.5e10 W/cm^2).
    The 1.7 mJ test uses stretched pulses, and the authors infer no discernible nonlinear effects; the intensity limit is only stated for un-stretched operation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A phase-modulation interferometer for intense, ultrashort, near infrared laser pulses." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NUHCLM7L

@misc{pith2026250716299,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A phase-modulation interferometer for intense, ultrashort, near infrared laser pulses},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NUHCLM7L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16299}
}
read the original abstract

The investigation of coherent phenomena in strong-field processes requires interferometric measurement schemes with high selectivity to disentangle the complex nonlinear response of the system. Interferometers combining acousto-optical phase modulation with lock-in detection feature excellent dynamic range and highly selective detection, thus providing a promising solution. However, acousto-optical modulators (AOMs) cause several issues when operated with intense, ultrashort, near infrared (NIR) laser pulses. The AOMs introduce temporal and angular dispersion, self-phase modulation and reduced acousto-optic efficiency at NIR wavelengths. Here, we present an acousto-optical phase modulation interferometer design that solves these issues. The presented solutions pave the way for the investigation of strong-field processes with phasemodulated interferometry and are also useful to improve the performance of phase-modulation interferometers in other applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16299 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Experimental setup consisting of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Schematic of custom-built RF driver used for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: Beam profile distortion observed in the large [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Schematic illustration of the angular dispersion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Ray tracing simulations of the diffraction in the AOM with and without including a compensation prism [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Comparison of the focal beam profiles when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Investigation of the spatio-spectral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Second-harmonic autocorrelation measurements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Spectral bandwidth acceptance of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

  4. [4]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

  5. [5]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

  6. [6]

    Brabec \ and\ author F

    author author T. Brabec \ and\ author F. Krausz ,\ title title Intense few-cycle laser fields: Frontiers of nonlinear optics , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.72.545 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 72 ,\ pages 545--591 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

  7. [7]

    Wolter , author M

    author author B. Wolter , author M. G. \ Pullen , author M. Baudisch , author M. Sclafani , author M. Hemmer , author A. Senftleben , author C. D. \ Schröter , author J. Ullrich , author R. Moshammer , \ and\ author J. Biegert ,\ title title Strong- Field Physics with Mid - IR Fields , \ 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.021034 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 5 ,\...

  8. [8]

    author author I. I. \ Rabi ,\ title title Space Quantization in a Gyrating Magnetic Field , \ 10.1103/PhysRev.51.652 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 51 ,\ pages 652--654 ( year 1937 ) NoStop

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    author author S. H. \ Autler \ and\ author C. H. \ Townes ,\ title title Stark Effect in Rapidly Varying Fields , \ 10.1103/PhysRev.100.703 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 703--722 ( year 1955 ) NoStop

  2. [10]

    author author N. F. \ Scherer , author R. J. \ Carlson , author A. Matro , author M. Du , author A. J. \ Ruggiero , author V. Romero‐Rochin , author J. A. \ Cina , author G. R. \ Fleming , \ and\ author S. A. \ Rice ,\ title title Fluorescence‐detected wave packet interferomet...

  3. [11]

    author author M. L. \ Cowan , author J. P. \ Ogilvie , \ and\ author R. J. D. \ Miller ,\ title title Two-dimensional spectroscopy using diffractive optics based phased-locked photon echoes , \ 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.01.027 journal journal Chemical Physics Letters \ volume 386 ...

  4. [12]

    Brixner , author T

    author author T. Brixner , author T. Mančal , author I. V. \ Stiopkin , \ and\ author G. R. \ Fleming ,\ title title Phase-stabilized two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy , \ 10.1063/1.1776112 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 121 ,\ pages 4221--4236 ...

  5. [13]

    Tian , author D

    author author P. Tian , author D. Keusters , author Y. Suzaki , \ and\ author W. S. \ Warren ,\ title title Femtosecond Phase - Coherent Two - Dimensional Spectroscopy , \ 10.1126/science.1083433 journal journal Science \ volume 300 ,\ pages 1553--1555 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

  6. [14]

    Réhault , author M

    author author J. Réhault , author M. Maiuri , author A. Oriana , \ and\ author G. Cerullo ,\ title title Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy with birefringent wedges , \ 10.1063/1.4902938 journal journal Review of Scientific Instruments \ volume 85 ,\ pages 123107 ( year 2...

  7. [15]

    author author P. F. \ Tekavec , author T. R. \ Dyke , \ and\ author A. H. \ Marcus ,\ title title Wave packet interferometry and quantum state reconstruction by acousto-optic phase modulation , \ 10.1063/1.2386159 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 125 ,\...

  8. [16]

    author author J. C. \ Vaughan , author T. Hornung , author K. W. \ Stone , \ and\ author K. A. \ Nelson ,\ title title Coherently Controlled Ultrafast Four - Wave Mixing Spectroscopy , \ 10.1021/jp0662911 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 111 ,\ pages 4873--4883 ( year...

  9. [17]

    Wituschek , author L

    author author A. Wituschek , author L. Bruder , author E. Allaria , author U. Bangert , author M. Binz , author R. Borghes , author C. Callegari , author G. Cerullo , author P. Cinquegrana , author L. Giannessi , author M. Danailov , author A. Demidovich , author M. Di Fraia ,...

  10. [18]

    Uhl , author A

    author author D. Uhl , author A. Wituschek , author U. Bangert , author M. Binz , author C. Callegari , author M. D. \ Fraia , author O. Plekan , author K. C. \ Prince , author G. Cerullo , author L. Giannessi , author M. Danailov , author G. Sansone , author T. Laarmann , aut...

  11. [19]

    Wituschek , author O

    author author A. Wituschek , author O. Kornilov , author T. Witting , author L. Maikowski , author F. Stienkemeier , author M. J. J. \ Vrakking , \ and\ author L. Bruder ,\ title title Phase cycling of extreme ultraviolet pulse sequences generated in rare gases , \ 10.1088/136...

  12. [20]

    Bruder , author M

    author author L. Bruder , author M. Binz , \ and\ author F. Stienkemeier ,\ title title Efficient isolation of multiphoton processes and detection of collective resonances in dilute samples , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.053412 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 92 ,\ pages 053412...

  13. [21]

    Bruder , author U

    author author L. Bruder , author U. Bangert , \ and\ author F. Stienkemeier ,\ title title Phase-modulated harmonic light spectroscopy , \ 10.1364/OE.25.005302 journal journal Opt. Express \ volume 25 ,\ pages 5302--5315 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  14. [22]

    Bruder , author A

    author author L. Bruder , author A. Eisfeld , author U. Bangert , author M. Binz , author M. Jakob , author D. Uhl , author M. Schulz-Weiling , author E. R. \ Grant , \ and\ author F. Stienkemeier ,\ title title Delocalized excitons and interaction effects in extremely dilute ...

  15. [23]

    Yu , author M

    author author S. Yu , author M. Titze , author Y. Zhu , author X. Liu , \ and\ author H. Li ,\ title title Observation of scalable and deterministic multi-atom Dicke states in an atomic vapor , \ 10.1364/OL.44.002795 journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 44 ,\ pages 2795 ( year ...

  16. [24]

    author author T. M. \ Autry , author G. Nardin , author C. L. \ Smallwood , author K. Silverman , author D. Bajoni , author A. Lemaître , author S. Bouchoule , author J. Bloch , \ and\ author S. Cundiff ,\ title title Excitation Ladder of Cavity Polaritons , \ 10.1103/PhysRevL...

  17. [25]

    author author P. F. \ Tekavec , author G. A. \ Lott , \ and\ author A. H. \ Marcus ,\ title title Fluorescence-detected two-dimensional electronic coherence spectroscopy by acousto-optic phase modulation , \ doi:10.1063/1.2800560 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 127 ,\ ...

  18. [26]

    Bruder , author U

    author author L. Bruder , author U. Bangert , author M. Binz , author D. Uhl , author R. Vexiau , author N. Bouloufa-Maafa , author O. Dulieu , \ and\ author F. Stienkemeier ,\ title title Coherent multidimensional spectroscopy of dilute gas-phase nanosystems , \ 10.1038/s4146...

  19. [27]

    Tiwari , author Y

    author author V. Tiwari , author Y. A. \ Matutes , author A. T. \ Gardiner , author T. L. C. \ Jansen , author R. J. \ Cogdell , \ and\ author J. P. \ Ogilvie ,\ title title Spatially-resolved fluorescence-detected two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy probes varying exciton...

  20. [28]

    Bangert , author F

    author author U. Bangert , author F. Stienkemeier , \ and\ author L. Bruder ,\ title title High-resolution two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy reveals the homogeneous line profile of chromophores solvated in nanoclusters , \ 10.1038/s41467-022-31021-z journal journal Nat C...

  21. [29]

    Granados , author C.-L

    author author C. Granados , author C.-L. \ Hsiao , author M. F. \ Ciappina , \ and\ author K. J. \ Karki ,\ title title Decoding Phase and Time - Dependent Interferograms of High - Order Harmonics , \ 10.34133/ultrafastscience.0077 journal journal Ultrafast sci. \ volume 4 ,\ ...

  22. [30]

    Flögel , author J

    author author M. Flögel , author J. Durá , author B. Schütte , author M. Ivanov , author A. Rouzée , \ and\ author M. J. J. \ Vrakking ,\ title title Rabi oscillations in extreme ultraviolet ionization of atomic argon , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.021401 journal journal Phys. Rev. A...

  23. [31]

    Nandi , author E

    author author S. Nandi , author E. Olofsson , author M. Bertolino , author S. Carlström , author F. Zapata , author D. Busto , author C. Callegari , author M. Di Fraia , author P. Eng-Johnsson , author R. Feifel , author G. Gallician , author M. Gisselbrecht , author S. Maclot...

  24. [32]

    Nandi , author A

    author author S. Nandi , author A. Stenquist , author A. Papoulia , author E. Olofsson , author L. Badano , author M. Bertolino , author D. Busto , author C. Callegari , author S. Carlström , author M. B. \ Danailov , author P. V. \ Demekhin , author M. Di Fraia , author P. En...

  25. [33]

    Richter , author U

    author author F. Richter , author U. Saalmann , author E. Allaria , author M. Wollenhaupt , author B. Ardini , author A. Brynes , author C. Callegari , author G. Cerullo , author M. Danailov , author A. Demidovich , author K. Dulitz , author R. Feifel , author M. D. \ Fraia , ...

  26. [34]

    author author J. R. \ Widom , author N. P. \ Johnson , author P. H. v. \ Hippel , \ and\ author A. H. \ Marcus ,\ title title Solution conformation of 2-aminopurine dinucleotide determined by ultraviolet two-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy , \ 10.1088/1367-2630/15/2/0250...

  27. [35]

    Wituschek , author L

    author author A. Wituschek , author L. Bruder , author L.-S. \ Klein , author J. Strucka , author A. Demidovich , author M. B. \ Danailov , \ and\ author F. Stienkemeier ,\ title title Stable interferometric platform for phase modulation of seeded free-electron lasers , \ 10.1...

  28. [36]

    Javed , author J

    author author A. Javed , author J. Lüttig , author S. E. \ Sanders , author F. Sessa , author A. T. \ Gardiner , author M. Joffre , \ and\ author J. P. \ Ogilvie ,\ title title Broadband rapid-scanning phase-modulated Fourier transform electronic spectroscopy , \ 10.1364/OE.53...

  29. [37]

    Jana , author S

    author author S. Jana , author S. Durst , author L. Ludwig , \ and\ author M. Lippitz ,\ title title Overcoming experimental obstacles in two-dimensional spectroscopy of a single molecule , \ 10.1063/5.0261813 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 162 ,\ pag...

  30. [38]

    Bruder , author M

    author author L. Bruder , author M. Binz , \ and\ author F. Stienkemeier ,\ title title Phase-synchronous undersampling in nonlinear spectroscopy , \ 10.1364/OL.43.000875 journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 43 ,\ pages 875--878 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  31. [39]

    Tian \ and\ author W

    author author P. Tian \ and\ author W. S. \ Warren ,\ title title Ultrafast measurement of two-photon absorption by loss modulation , \ 10.1364/OL.27.001634 journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 27 ,\ pages 1634--1636 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

  32. [40]

    Tiwari , author Y

    author author V. Tiwari , author Y. A. \ Matutes , author A. Konar , author Z. Yu , author M. Ptaszek , author D. F. \ Bocian , author D. Holten , author C. Kirmaier , \ and\ author J. P. \ Ogilvie ,\ title title Strongly coupled bacteriochlorin dyad studied using phase-modula...

  33. [41]

    author author A. K. \ Ghatak \ and\ author K. Thyagarajan ,\ 10.1017/CBO9781139167857 title Optical Electronics \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address Cambridge ,\ year 1989 )\ pp.\ pages 501--507 NoStop

  34. [42]

    Souilhac , author D

    author author D. Souilhac , author D. Billeret , \ and\ author A. Gundjian ,\ title title Photoelastic tensor of tellurium , \ 10.1364/AO.28.003993 journal journal Appl. Opt. \ volume 28 ,\ pages 3993--3996 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

  35. [43]

    Cimek , author N

    author author J. Cimek , author N. Liaros , author S. Couris , author R. Stępień , author M. Klimczak , \ and\ author R. Buczyński ,\ title title Experimental investigation of the nonlinear refractive index of various soft glasses dedicated for development of nonlinear photoni...

  36. [44]

    author author A. P. \ Goutzoulis \ and\ author V. V. \ Kludzin ,\ title title Principles of Acousto - Optics , \ in\ @noop booktitle Design and Fabrication of Acousto - Optic Devices \ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ year 1994 )\ pp.\ pages 1--68 NoStop

  37. [45]

    Sahu , author V

    author author A. Sahu , author V. N. \ Bhat , author S. Patra , \ and\ author V. Tiwari ,\ title title High-sensitivity fluorescence-detected multidimensional electronic spectroscopy through continuous pump–probe delay scan , \ 10.1063/5.0130887 journal journal The Journal of ...

  38. [46]

    Lücking , author A

    author author F. Lücking , author A. Assion , author A. Apolonski , author F. Krausz , \ and\ author G. Steinmeyer ,\ title title Long-term carrier-envelope-phase-stable few-cycle pulses by use of the feed-forward method , \ 10.1364/OL.37.002076 journal journal Opt. Lett. \ vo...

  39. [47]

    , author Ralchenko, Yu

    author author Kramida, A. , author Ralchenko, Yu. , author Reader, J. , \ and\ author NIST ASD Team ,\ http://physics.nist.gov/asd title NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.3) , \ ( year 2015 ) NoStop

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.