Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Toward satisfactory public accessibility: A crowdsourcing approach through online reviews to inclusive urban design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.08459 v1 pith:NUOSGPGE submitted 2024-09-13 cs.SI

classification cs.SI
keywords publicaccessibilityurbancrowdsourcingreviewssentimentareasdesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As urban populations grow, the need for accessible urban design has become urgent. Traditional survey methods for assessing public perceptions of accessibility are often limited in scope. Crowdsourcing via online reviews offers a valuable alternative to understanding public perceptions, and advancements in large language models can facilitate their use. This study uses Google Maps reviews across the United States and fine-tunes Llama 3 model with the Low-Rank Adaptation technique to analyze public sentiment on accessibility. At the POI level, most categories -- restaurants, retail, hotels, and healthcare -- show negative sentiments. Socio-spatial analysis reveals that areas with higher proportions of white residents and greater socioeconomic status report more positive sentiment, while areas with more elderly, highly-educated residents exhibit more negative sentiment. Interestingly, no clear link is found between the presence of disabilities and public sentiments. Overall, this study highlights the potential of crowdsourcing for identifying accessibility challenges and providing insights for urban planners.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. More Parameters Than Populations: A Systematic Literature Review of Large Language Models within Survey Research

    cs.DL 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A work-in-progress systematic review finds LLM use in survey research clusters in instrument development, synthetic respondent modeling, and automated text classification, leaving interviewing and cross-lingual work thin.

Pith tools